Advertisement

World Journal of Urology

, Volume 37, Issue 9, pp 1867–1877 | Cite as

Novel nomograms to predict recurrence and progression in primary non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer: validation of predictive efficacy in comparison with European Organization of Research and Treatment of Cancer scoring system

  • Hyung Suk Kim
  • Chang Wook Jeong
  • Cheol Kwak
  • Hyeon Hoe Kim
  • Ja Hyeon KuEmail author
Original Article

Abstract

Purpose

To develop and validate novel nomograms to predict recurrence and progression after transurethral resection of bladder tumor (TURBT) in Korean patients with non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC).

Methods

We retrospectively analyzed the clinical data on 970 newly diagnosed NMIBC patients after TURBT between 2000 and 2013 in a single institution. We used multivariate Cox proportional hazard models to identify the significant predictors of recurrence and progression, which resulted in the construction of the nomograms predicting the 5-year probability of recurrence and progression. We internally validated the nomograms using the area under the receiver-operating characteristics’ curves and calibration plots. In addition, the clinical usefulness of each nomogram was assessed and compared with that of the European Organization of Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC)-scoring system using decision curve analysis (DCA).

Results

The significant factors related to recurrence were gross hematuria at diagnosis, previous or concomitant upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC), pT1 tumor, high tumor grade, multiple tumors, and intravesical therapy. The significant predictors of progression were previous or concomitant UTUC, pT1 tumor, high tumor grade, carcinoma in situ, and lymphovascular invasion. The 5-year predictive accuracy of each nomogram was 65% for recurrence and 70% for progression, respectively. Compared with the EORTC-scoring system, the nomograms were generally well calibrated. On DCA, each nomogram presented better net benefit gains than did the EORTC-scoring system across a wide range of threshold probabilities.

Conclusions

Our novel nomograms are not completely accurate, but they show a reasonable level of discriminative ability, adequate calibration, and meaningful net benefit gain for the prediction of recurrence and progression after TURBT in Korean NMIBC patients. Additional external validation will be required to generalize the nomograms which we developed.

Keywords

Urinary bladder neoplasms Recurrence Disease progression Nomograms 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This study was supported by the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) Grant funded by the Korea government (MSIP) (Grant number: 2018R1C1B5086339).

Author contributions

Conception and design: HSK, JHK, CWJ, CK, and HHK. Data acquisition: HSK and JHK. Data analysis and interpretation: JHK and HSK. Manuscript drafting: HSK and JHK. Critical revision of the manuscript for scientific and factual content: JHK and HSK. Statistical analysis: HSK and JHK. Supervision: HSK, JHK, CWJ, CK, and HHK.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

There is no any conflict of interest to disclose among all authors.

Research involving human participants and/or animals

Prior to the initiation of the study, the use of patients’ data in this study was approved from institutional review board (IRB) of Seoul National University Hospital (IRB number: H-1506-063-679).

Informed consent

Owing to the retrospective feature of this study, the requirement for obtaining written informed consent from each patient was waived by the IRB of Seoul National University Hospital.

References

  1. 1.
    Clark PE, Agarwal N, Biagioli MC et al (2013) Bladder cancer. J Natl Compr Canc Netw 11:446–475CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Babjuk M, Böhle A, Burger M et al (2017) EAU guidelines on non-muscle-invasive urothelial carcinoma of the bladder: update 2016. Eur Urol 71:447–461CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Chang SS, Boorjian SA, Chou R et al (2016) Diagnosis and treatment of non-muscle invasive bladder cancer: AUA/SUO Guideline. J Urol 22:1086–1094Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Mansoor M, Ali S, Fasihuddin Q, Baloch MU (2011) Superficial bladder tumours: recurrence and progression. J Coll Physicians Surg Pak 21:157–160PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Kiemeney LA, Witjes JA, Heijbroek RP, Verbeek AL, Debruyne FM (1993) Predictability of recurrent and progressive disease in individual patients with primary superficial bladder cancer. J Urol 150:60–64CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Millan-Rodriguez F, Chechile-Toniolo G, Salvador-Bayarri J et al (2000) Primary superficial bladder cancer risk groups according to progression, mortality and recurrence. J Urol 164:680–684CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Nguyen CT, Stephenson AJ, Kattan MW (2010) Are nomograms needed in the management of bladder cancer? Urol Oncol 28:102–107CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Sylvester RJ, van der Meijden AP, Oosterlinck W et al (2006) Predicting recurrence and progression in individual patients with stage Ta T1 bladder cancer using EORTC risk tables: a combined analysis of 2596 patients from seven EORTC trials. Eur Urol 49:466–477CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Hong SJ, Cho KS, Han M et al (2008) Nomograms for prediction of disease recurrence in patients with primary Ta, T1 transitional cell carcinoma of the bladder. J Korean Med Sci 23:428–433CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Fernandez-Gomez J, Madero R, Solsona E et al (2009) Predicting nonmuscle invasive bladder cancer recurrence and progression in patients treated with bacillus Calmette–Guerin: the CUETO scoring model. J Urol 182:2195–2203CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Pan CC, Chang YH, Chen KK et al (2010) Constructing prognostic model incorporating the 2004 WHO/ISUP classification for patients with non-muscle-invasive urothelial tumours of the urinary bladder. J Clin Pathol 63:910–915CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Ali-El-Dein B, Sooriakumaran P, Trinh QD et al (2013) Construction of predictive models for recurrence and progression in > 1000 patients with non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC) from a single centre. BJU Int 111:E331–E341CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Ieda T, Muto S, Shimizu F et al (2016) Development and validation of a novel recurrence risk stratification for initial non-muscle invasive bladder cancer in Asia. EBioMedicine 12:98–104CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Lammers RJ, Hendriks JC, Rodriguez Faba OR et al (2016) Prediction model for recurrence probabilities after intravesical chemotherapy in patients with intermediate-risk non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer, including external validation. World J Urol 34:173–180CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Seo KW, Kim BH, Park CH, Kim CI, Chang HS (2010) The efficacy of the EORTC scoring system and risk tables for the prediction of recurrence and progression of non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer after intravesical bacillus Calmette–Guerin instillation. Korean J Urol 51:165–170CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Ding W, Chen Z, Gou Y et al (2014) Are EORTC risk tables suitable for Chinese patients with non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer? Cancer Epidemiol 38:157–161CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Kohjimoto Y, Kusumoto H, Nishizawa S et al (2014) External validation of European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer and Spanish Urological Club for Oncological Treatment scoring models to predict recurrence and progression in Japanese patients with non-muscle invasive bladder cancer treated with bacillus Calmette–Guerin. Int J Urol 21:1201–1207CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Heagerty PJ, Lumley T, Pepe MS (2000) Time-dependent ROC curves for censored survival data and a diagnostic marker. Biometrics 56:337–344CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    DeLong ER, DeLong DM, Clarke-Pearson DL (1988) Comparing the areas under two or more correlated receiver operating characteristic curves: a nonparametric approach. Biometrics 44:837–845CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Miller ME, Langefeld CD, Tierney WM, Hui SL, McDonald CJ (1993) Validation of probabilistic predictions. Med Decis Mak 13:49–58CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Vickers AJ, Elkin EB (2006) Decision curve analysis: a novel method for evaluating prediction models. Med Decis Mak 26:565–574CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Vickers AJ, Cronin AM, Elkin EB, Gonen M (2008) Extensions to decision curve analysis, a novel method for evaluating diagnostic tests, prediction models and molecular markers. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak 8:53CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Kim HS, Kim M, Jeong CW et al (2014) Presence of lymphovascular invasion in urothelial bladder cancer specimens after transurethral resections correlates with risk of upstaging and survival: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Urol Oncol 32:1191–1199CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Kim HS, Ku JH, Kim SJ et al (2016) Prognostic factors for recurrence and progression in Korean non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer patients: a retrospective, multi-institutional study. Yonsei Med J 57:855–864CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Sfakianos JP, Kim PH, Hakimi AA, Herr HW (2014) The effect of restaging transurethral resection on recurrence and progression rates in patients with nonmuscle invasive bladder cancer treated with intravesical bacillus Calmette–Guérin. J Urol 191:341–345CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Shindo T, Masumori N, Kitamura H et al (2014) Clinical significance of definite muscle layer in TUR specimen for evaluating progression rate in T1G3 bladder cancer: multicenter retrospective study by the Sapporo Medical University Urologic Oncology Consortium (SUOC). World J Urol 32:1281–1285CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Fang D, Zhang L, Li X et al (2015) Presence of concomitant non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer in Chinese patients with upper tract urothelial carcinoma: risk factors, characteristics, and predictive Value. Ann Surg Oncol 22:2789–2798CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Kim BW, Ha YS, Lee JN et al (2015) Effects of previous or synchronous non-muscle invasive bladder cancer on clinical results after radical nephroureterectomy for upper tract urothelial carcinoma: a multi-institutional study. Urol J 12:2233–2239PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Hyung Suk Kim
    • 1
  • Chang Wook Jeong
    • 2
  • Cheol Kwak
    • 2
  • Hyeon Hoe Kim
    • 2
  • Ja Hyeon Ku
    • 2
    Email author
  1. 1.Department of UrologyDongguk University Ilsan Medical Center, Dongguk University College of MedicineGoyangKorea
  2. 2.Department of Urology, Seoul National University HospitalSeoul National University College of MedicineSeoulKorea

Personalised recommendations