SIU–ICUD on bladder cancer: pathology
Many changes have been made during these last years and concepts for understanding bladder cancer have evolved. We make an update with the latest findings of the WHO (World Health Organistaion) 2016, ICCR (International Collaboration on Cancer Reporting) and other official organisms and try to show the latest developments. In this document we provide new consensus guidelines and insights. We kept this document short and concise providing consensus guidelines to clinicians for the best patient care, it should be easy to understand for a non pathologists. We focussed on several burning issues, such as the anatomical and histological understanding of the bladder wall, the prognostic significance of grading and the most challenging problems in staging, we underline our needs from the clinicians such as clinical information, we further discuss the histological subtypes of bladder cancer, which is an extremely important issue in the light of molecular classifications and give prognostic insights. Furthermore, we discuss the ICCR worldwide consensus reporting, urinary cytology with the Paris system and several issues such as frozen section specimen.
KeywordsPathology Stage Grade Histology
Protocol/project development: EC. Data collection or management: EC, MB, FA, MA, FB, DG, DH, OH, BM, VR, TK. Data analysis EC, MB, FA, MA, FB, DG, DH, OH, BM, VR, TK. Manuscript writing/editing EC, MB, FA, MA, FB, DG, DH, OH, BM, VR, TK/editing EC, MB, TK.
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
The authors declare no conflicts of interest.
Research involving human participants and/or animals
All co-authors have had and read the last version of the paper and agreed on it.
- 5.Frozen section library: genitourinary tract internet. Enea Brivio. Disponible sur. http://www.eneabrivio.com/product/frozen-section-library-genitourinary-tract/. Accessed 4 Dec 2017
- 8.Moch H, Humphrey P, Ulbright T, Reuter V (eds) (2016) WHO Classification of Tumours of the Urinary System and Male Genital Organs. International Agency for Research on CancerGoogle Scholar
- 14.Amin MB, Trpkov K, Lopez-Beltran A, Grignon D, Members of the ISUP Immunohistochemistry in Diagnostic Urologic Pathology Group (2014) Best practices recommendations in the application of immunohistochemistry in the bladder lesions: report from the International Society of Urologic Pathology consensus conference. Am J Surg Pathol 38(8):e20–34CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 18.Soukup V, Čapoun O, Cohen D, Hernández V, Babjuk M, Burger M et al (2017) Prognostic performance and reproducibility of the 1973 and 2004/2016 World Health Organization grading classification systems in non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer: a European Association of Urology Non-muscle Invasive Bladder Cancer Guidelines Panel Systematic Review. Eur Urol 72(5):801–813CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 22.Cao D, Vollmer RT, Luly J, Jain S, Roytman TM, Ferris CW et al (2010) Comparison of 2004 and 1973 World Health Organization grading systems and their relationship to pathologic staging for predicting long-term prognosis in patients with urothelial carcinoma. Urology 76(3):593–599CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 23.May M, Brookman-Amissah S, Roigas J, Hartmann A, Störkel S, Kristiansen G et al (2010) Prognostic accuracy of individual uropathologists in noninvasive urinary bladder carcinoma: a multicentre study comparing the 1973 and 2004 World Health Organisation classifications. Eur Urol 57(5):850–858CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 29.Epstein JI, Amin MB, Reuter VR, Mostofi FK (1998) The World Health Organization/International Society of Urological Pathology consensus classification of urothelial (transitional cell) neoplasms of the urinary bladder. Bladder Consensus Conference Committee. Am J Surg Pathol 22(12):1435–1448CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 32.Rouprêt M, Seisen T, Compérat E, Larré S, Mazerolles C, Gobet F et al (2013) Prognostic interest in discriminating muscularis mucosa invasion (T1a vs T1b) in nonmuscle invasive bladder carcinoma: French national multicenter study with central pathology review. J Urol 189(6):2069–2076CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 52.Dorothy L. Rosenthal (2017) The Paris system for reporting urinary cytology Springer Internet. Disponible sur. www.springer.com/us/book/9783319228631. Accessed 24 Oct 2017
- 53.Wang Y, Auger M, Kanber Y, Caglar D, Brimo F (2018) Implementing The Paris System for reporting urinary cytology results in a decrease in the rate of the atypical category and an increase in its prediction of subsequent high-grade urothelial carcinoma. Cancer Cytopathol 126(3):207–214CrossRefGoogle Scholar