Advertisement

“Three horse shoe-like incision” holmium laser enucleation of the prostate: first experience with a novel en bloc technique for anatomic transurethral prostatectomy

  • Arkadiusz Miernik
  • Dominik S. Schoeb
Original Article

Abstract

Objective

To demonstrate the performance of a novel holmium laser enucleation technique in patients with lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS).

Materials and methods

Between September 2015 and August 2017, 114 consecutive patients underwent modified HoLEP [3 horse shoe-like incision HoLEP (3 HSI HoLEP)] for LUTS performed by an experienced urologist (A.M.). The surgical intervention and short postoperative course were analyzed. International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS), quality of life score, maximum urinary flow rate (Q max), postvoid residual urine (PVR), and clinical and sociodemographic data were assessed preoperatively. The patient cohort was compared with existing data regarding clinical outcome parameters after surgical LUTS therapy.

Results

The mean size of the prostatic gland was 86.3 ± 46.5 mL. The mean total operative time was 49.6 min (15–280 min). IPSS, Q max, and PVR were 20.7, 10.8, and 112.7 mL, respectively, prior to the intervention in the 3 HSI HoLEP group. The complication rate for Clavien category-III complications was 4.4%; no category IV complications were recorded. Seven of 114 patients experienced urinary retention after catheter removal during the hospital stay.

Conclusions

The presented procedure provides several improvements over the standard modality. The prostatic gland is enucleated en bloc in an anatomical manner without longitudinal incisions of the urethra. This method is fast, safe, and may be easier to learn. However, this is the first description recorded. Future multicenter, controlled studies should clarify the long-term outcomes and surgical performance of 3 HSI HoLEP.

Keywords

Benign prostatic obstruction, BPO Holmium Laser therapy/methods Lower urinary tract symptoms, LUTS Prostatic hyperplasia/surgery Minimally invasive surgical procedures/methods 

Notes

Authors’ contribution

DSS: Protocol/project development, data analysis, manuscript, figure writing/editing. AM: Protocol/project development, performance of operations, data analysis, manuscript and figure writing/editing, supervision

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

None of the other authors has any conflict of interest or financial ties relevant to this work to disclose. No external funding was received for this study.

Ethics approval

The study was approved by our local ethics committee and was performed in accordance with the ethical standards laid down in the 1964 Declaration of Helsinki and its later amendments (number 178/17, Ethics Committee of the University Medical Center Freiburg). For this type of study formal consent was not required. This article does not contain any studies with animals performed by any of the authors.

German Clinical Trial Register ID

DRKS00013024 (approved WHO primary register).

Supplementary material

Supplementary file 1: “Three horse shoe-like incision” technique for holmium laser enucleation of the prostate (3 HSI HoLEP) (MP4 12864 kb)

345_2018_2418_MOESM2_ESM.png (24 kb)
Supplementary Figure 1: Plot of surgery time in relation to prostate size for conventional holmium laser enucleation of the prostate (HoLEP) and 3 horse shoe-like incision HoLEP Pearson’s correlation coefficient (R) is shown for both procedures. Median is given in green (PNG 23 kb)
345_2018_2418_MOESM3_ESM.png (36 kb)
Supplementary Figure 2: Plot of surgery time per mL of prostate volume for the different procedures. Blue depicts regular holmium laser enucleation of the prostate (HoLEP), while red dots depict 3 horse shoe-like incision (HSI) HoLEP procedures. The mean is shown in light green. 3 HSI HoLEP was associated with a significant lower surgery time per mL (p = 0.0001). (PNG 36 kb)

References

  1. 1.
    Speakman M, Kirby R, Doyle S, Ioannou C (2015) Burden of male lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) suggestive of benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH)—focus on the UK. BJU Int 115(4):508–519.  https://doi.org/10.1111/bju.12745 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Reich O, Gratzke C, Bachmann A, Seitz M, Schlenker B, Hermanek P, Lack N, Stief CG, Urology Section of the Bavarian Working Group for Quality A (2008) Morbidity, mortality and early outcome of transurethral resection of the prostate: a prospective multicenter evaluation of 10,654 patients. J Urol 180(1):246–249.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2008.03.058 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Gratzke C, Schlenker B, Seitz M, Karl A, Hermanek P, Lack N, Stief CG, Reich O (2007) Complications and early postoperative outcome after open prostatectomy in patients with benign prostatic enlargement: results of a prospective multicenter study. J Urol 177(4):1419–1422.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2006.11.062 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Gilling PJ, Cass CB, Cresswell MD, Fraundorfer MR (1996) Holmium laser resection of the prostate: preliminary results of a new method for the treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia. Urology 47(1):48–51CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Jones P, Alzweri L, Rai BP, Somani BK, Bates C, Aboumarzouk OM (2016) Holmium laser enucleation versus simple prostatectomy for treating large prostates: results of a systematic review and meta-analysis. Arab J Urol 14(1):50–58.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aju.2015.10.001 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Ahyai SA, Gilling P, Kaplan SA, Kuntz RM, Madersbacher S, Montorsi F, Speakman MJ, Stief CG (2010) Meta-analysis of functional outcomes and complications following transurethral procedures for lower urinary tract symptoms resulting from benign prostatic enlargement. Eur Urol 58(3):384–397.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2010.06.005 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Cornu JN, Ahyai S, Bachmann A, de la Rosette J, Gilling P, Gratzke C, McVary K, Novara G, Woo H, Madersbacher S (2015) A systematic review and meta-analysis of functional outcomes and complications following transurethral procedures for lower urinary tract symptoms resulting from benign prostatic obstruction: an update. Eur Urol 67(6):1066–1096.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2014.06.017 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Humphreys MR, Miller NL, Handa SE, Terry C, Munch LC, Lingeman JE (2008) Holmium laser enucleation of the prostate—outcomes independent of prostate size? J Urol 180(6):2431–2435.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2008.08.019 (discussion 2435) CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Gilling PJ, Fraundorfer MR (1998) Holmium laser prostatectomy: a technique in evolution. Curr Opin Urol 8(1):11–15CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Scoffone CM, Cracco CM (2016) The en-bloc no-touch holmium laser enucleation of the prostate (HoLEP) technique. World J Urol 34(8):1175–1181.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-015-1741-y CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Endo F, Shiga Y, Minagawa S, Iwabuchi T, Fujisaki A, Yashi M, Hattori K, Muraishi O (2010) Anteroposterior dissection HoLEP: a modification to prevent transient stress urinary incontinence. Urology 76(6):1451–1455.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urology.2010.03.071 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Kuo RL, Paterson RF, Kim SC, Siqueira TM Jr, Elhilali MM, Lingeman JE (2003) Holmium laser enucleation of the prostate (HoLEP): a technical update. World J Surg Oncol 1(1):6.  https://doi.org/10.1186/1477-7819-1-6 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Baazeem AS, Elmansy HM, Elhilali MM (2010) Holmium laser enucleation of the prostate: modified technical aspects. BJU Int 105(5):584–585.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1464-410X.2009.09111.x CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Gong YG, He DL, Wang MZ, Li XD, Zhu GD, Zheng ZH, Du YF, Chang LS, Nan XY (2012) Holmium laser enucleation of the prostate: a modified enucleation technique and initial results. J Urol 187(4):1336–1340.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2011.11.093 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Kim M, Lee HE, Oh SJ (2013) Technical aspects of holmium laser enucleation of the prostate for benign prostatic hyperplasia. Korean J Urol 54(9):570–579.  https://doi.org/10.4111/kju.2013.54.9.570 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Brunckhorst O, Ahmed K, Nehikhare O, Marra G, Challacombe B, Popert R (2015) Evaluation of the learning curve for holmium laser enucleation of the prostate using multiple outcome measures. Urology 86(4):824–829.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urology.2015.07.021 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Elzayat EA, Habib EI, Elhilali MM (2005) Holmium laser enucleation of the prostate: a size-independent new “gold standard”. Urology 66(5 Suppl):108–113.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urology.2005.06.006 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Kuo RL, Paterson RF, Kim SC, Siqueira TM Jr, Elhilali MM, Lingeman JE (2003) Holmium laser enucleation of the prostate (HoLEP): a technical update. World J Surg Oncol 1(1):6CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Minagawa S, Okada S, Sakamoto H, Toyofuku K, Morikawa H (2015) En-Bloc technique with anteroposterior dissection holmium laser enucleation of the prostate allows a short operative time and acceptable outcomes. Urology 86(3):628–633.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urology.2015.06.009 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Saredi G, Pacchetti A, Pirola GM, Berti L, Ambrosini F, Martorana E, Marconi AM (2017) En-bloc thulium laser enucleation of the prostate: surgical technique and advantages compared with the classical technique. Urology.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urology.2017.07.011 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Saredi G, Pacchetti A, Pirola GM, Berti L, Ambrosini F, Martorana E, Marconi AM (2017) En bloc thulium laser enucleation of the prostate: surgical technique and advantages compared with the classical technique. Urology 108:207–211.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urology.2017.07.011 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Kuntz RM, Lehrich K, Ahyai SA (2008) Holmium laser enucleation of the prostate versus open prostatectomy for prostates greater than 100 grams: 5-year follow-up results of a randomised clinical trial. Eur Urol 53(1):160–166.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2007.08.036 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Ahyai SA, Chun FK, Lehrich K, Dahlem R, Zacharias MS, Fisch MM, Kuntz RM (2012) Transurethral holmium laser enucleation versus transurethral resection of the prostate and simple open prostatectomy–which procedure is faster? J Urol 187(5):1608–1613.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2011.12.107 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Cynk M (2014) Holmium laser enucleation of the prostate: a review of the clinical trial evidence. Ther Adv Urol 6(2):62–73.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1756287213511509 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Krambeck AE, Handa SE, Lingeman JE (2010) Holmium laser enucleation of the prostate for prostates larger than 175 grams. J Endourol 24(3):433–437.  https://doi.org/10.1089/end.2009.0147 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Urology, Faculty of Medicine and Medical Center - University of FreiburgUniversity of FreiburgFreiburgGermany

Personalised recommendations