Advertisement

Influence of Clonal Variation on the Efficiency of Arundo donax Propagation Methods

  • Tommaso Danelli
  • Enrico Cantaluppi
  • Alberto Tosca
  • Elena Cassani
  • Michela Landoni
  • Stefano Bosio
  • Fabrizio Adani
  • Roberto PiluEmail author
Article
  • 33 Downloads

Abstract

The recent growth of interest in Arundo donax L. (Giant reed) as an energy crop is due to its great vegetative vigor and high biomass productivity. This perennial rhizomatous plant is able to grow in a wide range of pedo-climatic conditions and it has been employed by man for a great number of purposes. This has promoted its worldwide diffusion, despite its sexual sterility. Field establishment represents the most expensive phase of the whole cultivation cycle, because of the high cost of the propagules. In this work three agamic propagation methods, rhizome transplantation, hydroponic cultivation, and in vitro propagation, were compared with the aim of improving their efficiency, and reducing costs and time required. We focused our attention on in vitro and hydroponic cultivation, finding clones characterized by a high response to these propagation methods. In vitro propagation is the most widespread technique adopted in the large-scale production of propagules; according to our results hydroponic cultivation also appears to be a valid and cheap propagation method, making it possible to obtain in about 2 months, vigorous plants ready to be transplanted into the field. We found a strong effect of the clone used on the success rate of the specific propagation method, suggesting that clonal selection could be particularly useful in improving the efficiency of propagation techniques, contributing to cost reduction. Evaluation of field performance of plants propagated by tissue culture is an important matter, considering the possible residual effects of hormones on plants’ growth, and the importance of first year growth for field establishment. These experiments highlighted the lower biomass production from plants obtained by tissue culture. A novel cytokinin-like hormone, meta-topolin, was tested in vitro, in a preliminary study to evaluate its possible use for A. donax L. propagation.

Keywords

Arundo donax Energy crop Hydroponic culture In vitro culture Hormones 

Notes

Acknowledgements

We wish to thank Dr. Davide Reginelli for his hard work in the field and Dr. Lesley Currah for her editing and suggestions.

Funding

This study was partly supported by Regione Lombardia and Fondazione Minoprio (d.g.r. 16/03/2011 n. IX/1435) by the project “Coltivazione di Arundo donax L. quale biomassa no-food ad elevata resa e basso impatto ambientale per produrre biogas: prove su cloni selezionati, prove agronomiche, produzione di biogas, multifunzionalità”.

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Supplementary material

344_2019_9947_MOESM1_ESM.pdf (191 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (PDF 190 KB)

References

  1. Angelini LG, Ceccarini L, Bonari E (2005) Biomass yield and energy balance of giant reed (Arundo donax L.) cropped in central Italy as related to different management practices. Eur J Agron 22:375–389CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Angelini LG, Ceccarini L, Nassi N o Di Nasso, Bonari E (2009) Comparison of Arundo donax L. and Miscanthus x giganteus in a long-term field experiment in Central Italy: Analysis of productive characteristics and energy balance. Biomass Bioenergy 33:635–643CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Boersma NN, Heaton EA (2014) Propagation method affects Miscanthus × giganteus developmental morphology. Ind Crop Prod 57:59–68CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Boland JM (2006) The importance of layering in the rapid spread of Arundo donax (giant reed). Madroño 53:303–312CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bucci A, Cassani E, Landoni M, Cantaluppi E, Pilu R (2013) Analysis of chromosome number and speculations on the origin of Arundo donax L. (giant reed). Cytol Genet 47:237–241CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Cantaluppi E, Cassani E, Puglisi D, Corno L, Munaro M, Landoni M, Adani F, Pilu R (2015) Study on the inflorescences of Arundo donax L. clones sampled in Italy. Braz J Bot 39(1):275–285CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Cavallaro V, Patanè C, Cosentino SL, Di Silvestro I, Copani V (2014) Optimizing in vitro large scale production of giant reed (Arundo donax L.) by liquid medium culture. Biomass Bioenergy 69:21–27CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Ceotto E, Di M, Candilo (2010) Shoot cuttings propagation of giant reed (Arundo donax L) in water and moist soil: The path forward? Biomass Bioenergy 34:1614–1623CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Copani V, Cosentino SL, Testa G, Scordia D (2013) Agamic propagation of giant reed (Arundo donax L.) in semi-arid Mediterranean environment. Ital J Agron 8(s1):e4Google Scholar
  10. Corno L, Pilu R, Adani F (2014) Arundo donax L.: A non-food crop for bioenergy and bio-compound production. Biotechnol Adv 32:1535–1549CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Corno L, Pilu R, Tambone F, Scaglia B, Adani F (2015) New energy crop Giant Cane (Arundo donax L.) can substitute traditional energy crops increasing biogas yield and reducing costs. Bioresour Technol 191:197–204CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Cosentino SL, Copani V, D’Agosta GM, Sanzone E, Mantineo M (2005) First results on evaluation of Arundo donax L. clones collected in Southern Italy. Ind Crop Prod 23:212–222CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Decruyenaere JG, Holt JS (2001) Seasonality of clonal propagation in giant reed. Weed Sci 49:760–767CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Gherbin P, Milan S, Mercurio G, Scopa A (2016) Shooting of giant reed (Arundo donax L.) stem cuttings in cold greenhouse. Int J Plant Biol.  https://doi.org/10.4081/pb.2016.6294 Google Scholar
  15. Gubišová M, Gubiš J, Žofajová A (2016a) Biomass production of gigantic grasses arundo donax and miscanthus × giganteus in the dependence on plant multiplication method. Agriculture (Polnohospodárstvo) 62(2):43–51CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Gubišová M, Čičková M, Klčová L, Gubiš J (2016b) In vitro tillering—an effective way to multiply high-biomass plant Arundo donax. Ind Crop Prod 81:123–128CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Lewandowski I, Scurlock JM, Lindvall E, Christou M (2003) The development and current status of perennial rhizomatous grasses as energy crops in the US and Europe. Biomass Bioenergy 25:335–361CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Mariani C, Cabrini R, Danin A, Piffanelli P, Fricano A, Gomarasca S, Dicandilo M, Grassi F, Soave C (2010) Origin, diffusion and reproduction of the giant reed (Arundo donax L.): a promising weedy energy crop. Ann Appl Biol 157:191–202CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Onofry A (1940) La canna comune (Arundo donax L.). Cremonese libraio Editore, RomaGoogle Scholar
  20. Perdue RE (1958) Arundo donax—source of musical reeds and industrial cellulose. Econ Bot 12:368–404CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Petersen KK, Hagberg P, Kristiansen K (2003) Colchicine andoryzalin mediated chromosome doubling in different geno-types of Miscanthus sinensis. Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult 73:137–146CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Pilu R, Bucci A, Cerino Badone F, Landoni M (2012) Giant Reed (Arundo donax L.): a weed plant or a promising energy crop? Afr. J Biotechnol 11:9163–9174Google Scholar
  23. Pilu R, Manca A, Landoni M (2013) Arundo donax as an energy crop: pros and cons of the utilization of this perennial plant. Maydica 58:54–59Google Scholar
  24. Pilu R, Cassani E, Landoni M, Badone FC, Passera A, Cantaluppi E, Corno L, Adani F (2014) Genetic characterization of an Italian Giant Reed (Arundo donax L.) clones collection: exploiting clonal selection. Euphytica 196:169–181CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Płażek A, Dubert F, Kopeć P, Krępski T, Kacorzyk P, Micek P, Kurowska M, I., and Żurek G (2015) In vitro-propagated Miscanthus × giganteus plants can be a source of diversity in terms of their chemical composition. Biomass Bioenergy 75:142–149CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Poaceae (2012) Defective development of male and female gametophytes in Arundo donax L. Biomass Bioenergy 45:265–269CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Podlešáková K, Zalabák D, Čudejková M, Plíhal O, Szüčová L, Doležal K, Spíchal L, Strnad M, Galuszka P (2012) Novel cytokinin derivatives do not show negative effects on root growth and proliferation in submicromolar range. PLoS ONE 7(6):e39293CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  28. Read PE, Bavougian CM (2013) In vitro rejuvenation of woody species. Methods Mol Biol 11013:383–395PubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Scordia D, Cosentino SL, Lee JW, Jeffries TW (2012) Bioconversion of giant reed (Arundo donax L.) hemicellulose hydrolysate to ethanol by Scheffersomyces stipitis CBS6054. Biomass Bioenergy 39:296–305CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Takahashi W, Takamizo T, Kobayashi M, Ebina M (2010) Plant regeneration from calli in giant reed (Arundo donax L.). Grassl Sci 56:224–229CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Testa R, Foderà M, Di Trapani AM, Tudisca S, and F.Sgroi (2016) Giant reed as energy crop for Southern Italy: an economic feasibility study. Renew Sustain Energ Rev 58:558–564CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Touchell DH, Ranney TG, Panthee DR, Gehl RJ, Krings A (2016) Genetic diversity, cytogenetics, and biomass yields among taxa of Giant Reeds (Arundo species). J Am Soc Hortic Sci 141(3):256–263CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Virtue JG, Reynolds T, Malone J, Preston C, Williams C (2010) Managing the weed risk of cultivated Arundo donax L. In: Proceedings of 17th Australasian weeds conference, new frontiers in New Zealand: together we can beat the weeds. Christchurch, New Zealand, 2010, pp 176–179Google Scholar
  34. Westhuizen A (2014) Use of meta-topolin as an alternative cytokinin in the tissue culture of Eucalyptus species. Acta Hort 1055:25–28CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Agricultural and Environmental Sciences – Production, Landscape, AgroenergyUniversità Degli Studi di MilanoMilanItaly
  2. 2.Centro di Ricerca Orticoltura e FlorovivaismoCREASanremoItaly
  3. 3.MiRT Centre, Minoprio FoundationVertemate Con MinoprioItaly
  4. 4.Department of BiosciencesUniversità Degli Studi di MilanoMilanItaly
  5. 5.Gruppo Ricicla − DiSAA − Università Degli Studi di MilanoMilanItaly

Personalised recommendations