Advertisement

Timing of Waterlogging Is Crucial for the Development of Micronutrient Deficiencies or Toxicities in Winter Wheat and Rapeseed

  • Anna-Catharina Wollmer
  • Britta Pitann
  • Karl-Hermann Mühling
Article
  • 3 Downloads

Abstract

Waterlogging events affect soil properties, which alter plant nutrient availability and result in an increased solubility of micronutrients. Until now, it has not been conclusively determined whether plants take up increased concentrations of plant-available Mn, Fe, Cu, or Zn during a period of waterlogging. The aim of this study was to analyze (1) if the micronutrient concentrations increase in plant tissues after waterlogging or (2) rather lead to micronutrient deficiencies, and (3) if this process depends on the developmental stage in which the plant was flooded. Winter wheat and rapeseed were cultivated in large containers and water-logged at two developmental stages: DC 31 (first node visible) and DC 51 (beginning of ear emergence/floral bud appearance). Early waterlogging did not result in microelement toxicities neither in winter wheat nor in rapeseed, although the Mn concentration in rapeseed shoots was significantly increased. On the contrary, in rapeseed, early waterlogging resulted in significantly decreased Cu and Zn concentrations. After late waterlogging, plants accumulated high amounts of Mn and Fe (wheat) or Mn, Cu, and Zn (rapeseed), leading to toxic levels. We conclude that the occurrence of micronutrient deficiencies or toxicities depends on the developmental stage in which the plant was flooded.

Keywords

Waterlogging Winter wheat Rapeseed Micronutrients Large-scale containers 

Notes

Acknowledgements

Anna-Catharina Wollmer gratefully acknowledges the financial support provided by the Vereinigte Hagelversicherung VVaG, Gießen.

References

  1. Armstrong W (1979) Aeration in higher plants. Adv Bot Res 7:225–332CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Ashraf M, Mehmood S (1990) Effects of waterlogging on growth and some physiological parameters of four Brassica species. Plant Soil 121:203–209CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Ashraf M, Rehman H (1999) Mineral nutrient status of corn in relation to nitrate and long-term waterlogging. J Plant Nutr 22:1253–1268CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bailey-Serres J, Voesenek LACJ (2008) Flooding stress: acclimations and genetic diversity. Annu Rev Plant Biol 59:313–339CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bradford KJ, Hsiao TC (1982) Stomatal behavior and water relations of waterlogged tomato plants. Plant Physiol 70:1508–1513CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Colmer TD, Greenway H (2011) Ion transport in seminal and adventitious roots of cereals during O2 deficiency. J Exp Bot 62:39–57CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Colmer TD, Voesenek LACJ (2009) Flooding tolerance: suites of plant traits in variable environments. Funct Plant Biol 36:665–681CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Elzenga JTM, van Veen H (2010) Waterlogging and plant nutrient uptake. In: Mancuso S, Shabala S (eds) Waterlogging signalling and tolerance in plants. Springer, Berlin, pp 23–35CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Hohmann M, Stahl A, Rudloff J, Wittkop B, Snowdon RJ (2016) Not a load of rubbish: simulated field trials in large-scale containers. Plant Cell Environ 39(9):2064–2073CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Holbrook NM, Zwieniecki MA (2003) Plant biology—water gate. Nature 425:361CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Huang B, Johnson JW, Nesmith S, Bridges DC (1995) Growth, physiological and anatomical responses of two wheat genotypes to waterlogging and nutrient supply. J Exp Bot 45:193–202CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Husson O (2013) Redox potential (Eh) and pH as drivers of soil/plant/microorganism systems: a transdisciplinary overview pointing to integrative opportunities for agronomy. Plant Soil 362:389–417CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Jezek M, Geilfus CM, Bayer A, Mühling KH (2015) Photosynthetic capacity, nutrient status, and growth of maize (Zea mays L.) upon MgSO4 leaf-application. Front Plant Sci 5:781.  https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2014.00781 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Khabaz-Saberi H, Setter TL, Waters I (2006) Waterlogging induces high to toxic concentrations of iron, aluminum, and manganese in wheat varieties on acidic soil. J Plant Nutr 29:899–911CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Khabaz-Saberi H, Barker SJ, Rengel Z (2012) Tolerance to ion toxicities enhances wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) grain yield in waterlogged acidic soils. Plant Soil 354:371–381CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Malik AI, Colmer TD, Lambers H, Setter TL, Schortemeyer M (2002) Short-term waterlogging has long-term effects on the growth and physiology of wheat. New Phytol 153:225–236CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Mielke MS, de Alemeida AAF, Gomes FP, Aguilar MAG, Mangabeira PAO (2003) Leaf gas exchange, chlorophyll fluorescence and growth responses of Genipa americana seedlings to soil flooding. Environ Exp Bot 50:221–231CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Ponnamperuma FN (1972) The chemistry of submerged soil. Adv Agron 24:29–96CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Ponnamperuma FN (1984) Effects of flooding on soils. In: Flooding and plant growth, pp 9–45Google Scholar
  20. Sajwan KS, Lindsay WL (1986) Effects of redox on zinc deficiency in paddy rice. Soil Sci Soc Am J 50:1264–1269CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Setter TL, Waters I, Sharma KS, Singh KN, Kulshreshtha N, Yaduvanshi NPS, Ram PC, Singh BN, Rane J, McDonald G, Khabaz-Saberi H, Biddulph TB, Wilson R, Barclay I, McLean R, Cakir M (2009) Review of wheat improvement for waterlogging tolerance in Australia and India: the importance of anaerobiosis and element toxicities associated with different soils. Ann Bot 103:221–235CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Shao GC, Lan JJ, Yu SE, Liu N, Guo RQ, She DL (2013) Photosynthesis and growth of winter wheat in response to waterlogging at different growth stages. Photosynthetica 51:429–437CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Steffens D, Hütsch BW, Eschholz T, Lošák T, Schubert S (2005) Waterlogging may inhibit plant growth primarily by nutrient deficiency rather than nutrient toxicity. Plant Soil Environ 51:545–552CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Stieger PA, Feller U (1994) Nutrient accumulation and translocation in maturing wheat plants grown on waterlogged soil. Plant Soil 160:87–95CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Wollmer AC, Pitann B, Mühling KH (2018) Waterlogging events during stem elongation or flowering affect yield of oilseed rape (Brassica napus L.) but not seed quality. J Agro Crop Sci 204:165–174CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Yordanova RY, Uzunova AN, Popova LP (2005) Effects of short-term soil flooding on stomata behavior and leaf gas exchange in barley plants. Biol Plant 49:317–319CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Zhang Y, Song X, Yang G, Li Z, Lu H, Kong X, Eneji AE, Dong H (2015) Physiological and molecular adjustment of cotton to waterlogging at peak-flowering in relation to growth and yield. Field Crop Res 179:164–172CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Zhang Y, Chen Y, Lu H, Kong X, Dai J, Li Z, Dong H (2016) Growth, lint yield and changes in physiological attributes of cottonunder temporal waterlogging. Field Crop Res 194:83–93CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Zhang Y, Kong X, Dai J, Luo Z, Li Z, Lu H, Xu S, Tang W, Li W, Xin C, Dong H (2017) Global gene expression in cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) leaves to waterlogging stress. PLoS ONE 12:e0185075CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institute of Plant Nutrition and Soil ScienceKiel UniversityKielGermany

Personalised recommendations