Advertisement

Journal of Plant Growth Regulation

, Volume 38, Issue 2, pp 619–630 | Cite as

Action of N-Succinyl and N,O-Dicarboxymethyl Chitosan Derivatives on Chlorophyll Photosynthesis and Fluorescence in Drought-Sensitive Maize

  • Caroline Oliveira dos Reis
  • Paulo César Magalhães
  • Roniel Geraldo Avila
  • Lorena Gabriela Almeida
  • Valquíria Mikaela Rabelo
  • Diogo Teixeira Carvalho
  • Daniela Ferreira Cabral
  • Décio Karam
  • Thiago Correa de SouzaEmail author
Article

Abstract

Chitosan induces plant tolerance to various abiotic stresses, including water deficit. However, its use may be limited, due to its constitution and low solubility in water. Thus, chemical modifications were proposed in this study with the objective of potentializing its biological effects in maize plants. The derivatives were semi-synthesized (N-succinyl and N,O-dicarboxymethyl) and, together with chitosan, they were applied, via the leaf, in a drought-sensitive maize hybrid (BRS1030) under pre-flowering water deficit. The water deficit was maintained for 15 days and the analyses were performed at the beginning and end of stress, and also in rehydration. Leaf water potential, gas exchange, chlorophyll fluorescence, and content of chloroplastidic pigments were evaluated. The use of the derivatives modulated photosynthesis parameters, affecting the involved mechanisms, such as stomatal activity, water use efficiency and photosystem II activity. Chlorophyll fluorescence indicated that the antenna complex was damaged by the water deficit condition, with a decrease in the energy flux in the electron transport chain and in the photochemical phase of photosynthesis. However, the spraying of chitosan derivatives induced tolerance to water deficit, suggesting that chitosan derivatives are more bioavailable to plants. Water stress decreases pigment content, but both the application of chitosan and derivatives increased these contents. It is concluded that chitosan derivatives improved the photosynthetic parameters in maize susceptible to drought, inducing tolerance to this stress, and the possible reasons and consequences are discussed.

Keywords

Water deficit Zea mays L. Gas exchange Biostimulant Quenching Leaf water potential 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de Minas Gerais (FAPEMIG) and Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq), for the master’s degree scholarship (C. O. Reis) and project financing (APQ-00651-14).

Funding

This study was funded by Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de Minas Gerais (FAPEMIG) and Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico. Project financing: APQ-00651-14.

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Research Involving Human and Animal Participants

This article does not contain any studies with human participants (or animals) performed by any of the authors.

References

  1. Ahmad B, Masroor M, Khan A, Jaleel H, Sadiq Y, Shabbir A, Uddin M (2017) Exogenously sourced γ-irradiated chitosan-mediated regulation of growth, physiology, quality attributes, and yield in Mentha piperita L. Turk J Biol 41:388–401.  https://doi.org/10.3906/biy-1608-64 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Anjum SA, Farooq M, Wang LC, Xue LL, Wang SG, Wang L, Zhang S, Chen M (2011) Gas exchange and chlorophyll synthesis of maize cultivars are enhanced by exogenously-applied glycinebetaine under drought conditions. Plant Soil Environ 57:326–331CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Araus JL, Sanchez C, Cabrera-Bosquet L (2010) Is heterosis in maize mediated through better water use? New Phytol 187:392–406.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8137.2010.03276.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Arnon DI (1949) Copper enzymes in isolated chloroplasts polyphenoloxidase in Beta vulgaris. Plant Physiol 24:1–15.  https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.24.1.1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Badawy MEI, Rabea EI (2011) A biopolymer chitosan and its derivatives as promising antimicrobial agents against plant pathogens and their applications in crop protection. Int J Carbohydr Chem 2011:1–29.  https://doi.org/10.1155/2011/460381 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Boonlertnirun S, Sarobol ED, Meechoui S, Sooksathan I (2007) Drought recovery and grain yield potential of rice after chitosan application. Kasetsart J Nat Sci 41:1–6Google Scholar
  7. Boyer JS (1970) Leaf enlargement and metabolic rates in corn, soybean and sunflower at various leaf water potentials. Plant Physiol 46(2):233–235.  https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.17.01677 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Calvo P, Nelson L, Kloepper JW (2014) Agricultural uses of plant biostimulants. Plant Soil 383:3–41.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-014-2131-8 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Carvalho RC, Cunha A, Silva JM (2011) Photosynthesis by six Portuguese maize during drought stress and recovery. Acta Physiol Plant 33:359–374.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11738-010-0555-1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Chamnanmanoontham N, Pongprayoon W, Pichayangkura R, Roytrakul S, Chadchawan S (2015) Chitosan enhances rice seedling growth via gene expression network between nucleus and chloroplast. Plant Growth Regul 75:101–114.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10725-014-9935-7 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Choudhary RC, Kumaraswamy RV, Kumari S, Sharma SS, Pal A, Raliya R, Biswas P, Saharan V (2017) Cu-chitosan nanoparticle boost defense responses and plant growth in maize (Zea mays L.). Sci Rep 7:9754.  https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-08571-0 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Ding L, Wang KJ, Joang GM, Liu MZ, Niu SL, Gao LM (2005) Postanthesis changes in photosynthetic traits of maize hybrids released in different years. Field Crop Res 93:108–115.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fre.2004.09.008 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Dzung NA, Khanh VTP, Dzung TT (2011) Research on impact of chitosan oligomers on biophysical characteristics, growth, development and drought resistance of coffee. Carbohydr Polym 84:751–755.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2010.07.066 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Efeoglu B, Ekmekci Y, Cicek N (2009) Physiological responses of three maize cultivars to drought stress and recovery. S Afr J Bot 75:31–42.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sajb.2008.06.005 Google Scholar
  15. FAO (2002) Deficit irrigation practices. Water reports, n. 22. RomeGoogle Scholar
  16. Farouk S, Amany AR (2012) Improving growth and yield of cowpea by foliar application of chitosan under water stress. Egypt J Biol 14:14–26.  https://doi.org/10.4314/ejb.v14i1.2 Google Scholar
  17. Genty B, Harbinson J, Cailly AL, Rizza F (1996) Fate of excitation at PS II in leaves: the non- photochemical side. Presented at: The Third BBSRC Robert Hill Symposium on Photosynthesis, March 31 to April 3, University of Sheffield, Department of Molecular Biology and Biotechnology, Western Bank, Sheffield, UK, pp 28Google Scholar
  18. Ghahfarokhi MG, Mansurifar S, Taghizadeh-Mehrjardi R, Saeidi M, Jamshidi AM, Ghasemi E (2015) Effects of drought stress and rewatering on antioxidant systems and relative water content in different growth stages of maize (Zea mays L.) hybrids. Arch Agron Soil Sci 61(4):493–506.  https://doi.org/10.1080/03650340.2014.943198 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Guan YJ, Hu J, Wang XJ, Shao CX (2009) Seed priming with chitosan improves maize germination and seedling growth in relation to physiological changes under low temperature stress. J Zhejiang Univ Sci 10:427–433.  https://doi.org/10.1631/jzus.B0820373 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Hadwiger LA (2013) Multiple effects of chitosan on plant systems: solid science or hype. Plant Sci 208:42–49.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.plantsci.2013.03.007 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Hadwiger LA (2015) Anatomy of a nonhost disease resistance response of pea to Fusarium solani: PR gene elicitation via DNase, chitosan and chromatin alterations. Front Plant Sci 6:373.  https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2015.00373 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Hasan SA, Rabei SH, Nada RM, Abogadallah GM (2017) Water use efficiency in the drought-stressed sorghum and maize in relation to expression of aquaporin genes. Biol Plantarum 61(1):127–137.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10535-016-0656-9 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Ibrahim EA, Ramadan WA (2015) Effect of zinc foliar spray alone and combined with humic acid or/and chitosan on growth, nutrient elements content and yield of dry bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) plants sown at different dates. Sci Hort 184: 101–105.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scienta.2014.11.010 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Iriti M, Picchi V, Rossonia M, Gomarasca S, Ludwig N, Gargano M, Faoro F (2009) Chitosan antitranspirant activity is due to abscisic acid-dependent stomatal closure. Environ Exp Bot 66:493–500.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envexpbot.2009.01.004 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Jayakumar R, Selvamurugan N, Nair SV, Tokura S, Tamura H (2008) Preparative methods of phosphorylated chitin and chitosan—an overview. Int J Biol Macromol 43: 221–225.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2008.07.004 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Kalaji MH, Guo P (2008) Chlorophyll fluorescence: a useful tool in barley plant breeding programs. In: Sanchez A, Gutierrez SJ (eds) Photochemistry research progress. Nova Publishers, New York, pp 439–463Google Scholar
  27. Karimi LN, Khanahmadi M, Moradi B (2012) Accumulation and phytotoxicity of lead in Cynara scolymus. Indian J Sci Technol 5:3634–3641Google Scholar
  28. Katiyar D, Hemantaranjan A, Singh B (2015) Chitosan as a promising natural compound to enhance potential physiological responses in plant: a review. Indian J Plant Physi 20(1):1–9.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s40502-015-0139-6 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Khan WM, Prithiviraj B, Smiyh DL (2002) Effect of foliar application of chitin oligosaccharides on photosynthesis of maize and soybean. Photosynthetica 40(4):621–624.  https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1024320606812 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Khokon AR, Uraji M, Munemasa S, Okuma E, Nakamura Y, Mori IC, Murata Y (2010) Chitosan induced stomatal closure accompanied by peroxidase-mediated reactive oxygen species production in Arabidopsis. Biosci Biotechnol Biochem 74(11):2313–2315.  https://doi.org/10.1271/bbb.100340 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Laranjeira MCM, Fávere VT (2009) Quitosana: biopolímero funcional com potencial industrial biomédico. Quim Nova 32:672–678.  https://doi.org/10.1590/S0100-40422009000300011 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Lee SH, Chung GC (2005) Sensitivity of root system to low temperature appers to be associated with the hydraulic properties trough aquaporin activity. Sci Hortic 105:1–11.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scienta.2005.01.013 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Lee SH, Choi S, Suh JS, Doo IS, Oh KY (1999) Oligogalacturonic acid and chitosan reduced stomatal aperture by inducing the evolution of reactive oxygen species from guard cell of tomato and Commelina communis. Plant Physiol 121(1):147–152.  https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.121.1.147 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Li F, Ding C (2014) Optimization of ultrasonic synthesis of N-succinyl-chitosan and adsorption of Zn2+ from aqueous solutions. Desalin Water Treat 52(40–42):7856–7865.  https://doi.org/10.1080/19443994.2013.833867 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Li Z, Zhang Y, Zhang X, Merewitz E, Peng Y, Ma X, Huang L, Yan Y (2017) Metabolic pathways regulated by chitosan contributing to drought resistance in White Clover. J Proteome Res 16:3039–3052.  https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jproteome.7b00334 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Limpanavech P, Chaiyasuta S, Vongpromek R, Pichyangkura R, Khunwasi C, Chadchawan S, Lotrakul P, Bunjongrat R, Chaidee A, Bangyeekhun T (2008) Chitosan effects on floral production, gene expression, and anatomical changes in the Dendrobium orchid. Sci Hortic 116: 65–72.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scienta.2007.10.034 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Liu XF, Guan YL, Yang DZ, Li Z, Yao KD (2001) Antibacterial action of chitosan and carboxymethylated chitosan. J Appl Polym Sci 79:1324–1335CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Lizarraga-Pauli EG, Torres-Pacheco I, Moreno-Martinez E, Miranda-Castro SP (2011) Chitosan application in maize (Zea mays) to counteract the effects of abiotic stress at seedling level. Afr J Biotechnol 10(34):6439–6446Google Scholar
  39. Lopes MS, Araus JL, Van Heerden PDR, Foyer CH (2011) Enhancing drought tolerance in C4 crops. J Exp Bot 62:3135–3153.  https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/err105 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Malerba M, Cerana R (2016) Chitosan effects on plant systems. Int J Mol Sci 17(7):996.  https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms17070996 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Martins M, Carvalho M, Carvalho DT, Barbosa S, Doriguetto AC, Magalhaes PC, Ribeiro C (2018) Physicochemical characterization of chitosan and its effects on early growth, cell cycle and root anatomy of transgenic and non-transgenic maize hybrids. Aust J Crop Sci 12:56.  https://doi.org/10.21475/ajcs.18.12.01.pne649 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Mondal MMA, Malek MA, Puteh AB, Ismail MR, Ashrafuzzaman M, Naher L (2012) Effect of foliar application of chitosan on growth and yield in okra. Aust J Crop Sci 6:918–921Google Scholar
  43. Mondal MMA, Puteh AB, Dafader NC, Rafii MY, Malek MA (2013) Foliar application of chitosan improves growth and yield in maize. J Food Agric Environ 11:520–523Google Scholar
  44. O’ Neill PM, Shanahan JF, Schepers JS (2006) Use of chlorophyll fluorescence assessments to differentiate corn hybrid response to variable water conditions. Crop Sci 46:681–687.  https://doi.org/10.2135/cropsci2005.06-0170 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Patrick DJ (2015) Plant biostimulants: definition, concept, main categories and regulation. Sci Hortic 196:3–14.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scienta.2015.09.021 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Peltier G, Cournac L (2002) Chlororespiration. Annu Rev Plant Biol 53:523–550.  https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.arplant.53.100301.135242 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Perdomo JA, Capó-Bauçà S, Carmo-Silva E, Galmés J (2017) Rubisco and rubisco activase play an important role in the biochemical limitations of photosynthesis in rice, wheat, and maize under high temperature and water deficit. Front Plant Sci 8:490.  https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2017.00490 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Pichyangkura R, Chadchawan S (2015) Biostimulant activity of chitosan in horticulture. Sci Hortic 196:49–65.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scienta.2015.09.031 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Pirbalouti AG, Malekpoor F, Salimi A, Golparvar A (2017) Exogenous application of chitosan on biochemical and physiological characteristics, phenolic content and antioxidant activity of two species of basil (Ocimum ciliatum and Ocimum basilicum) under reduced irrigation. Sci Hortic 217:114–122.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scienta.2017.01.031 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Pongprayoon W, Roytrakul S, Pichayangkura R, Chadchawan S (2013) The role of hydrogen peroxide in chitosan-induced resistance to osmotic stress in rice (Oryza sativa L.). Plant Growth Regul 70:159–173.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10725-013-9789-4 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Pospisilova J (2003) Participation of phytohormones in the stomatal regulation of gas exchange during water stress. Biol Plant 46:491–506.  https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1024894923865 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Povero G, Loreti E, Pucciariello C, Santaniello A, Di-Tommaso D, Di-Tommaso G, Kapetis D, Zolezzi F, Piaggesi A, Perata A (2011) Transcript profiling of chitosan-treated Arabidopsis seedlings. J Plant Res 124:619–629.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10265-010-0399-1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Ramírez M, Rodriguez AT, Alfonso L, Peniche C (2010) Chitin and its derivatives as biopolymers with potential agricultural applications. Biotechnol Appl 27:270–276Google Scholar
  54. Rinderle U, Lichtenthaler KK (eds) (1988) Applications of chlorophyll fluorescence. Kluwer Academic Publishers, DordrechtGoogle Scholar
  55. Saglam A, Kadioglu A, Demiralay M, Terzi R (2014) Leaf rolling reduces photosynthetic loss in maize under severe drought. Acta Bot Croat 73(2):315–332.  https://doi.org/10.2478/botcro-2014-0012 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Sharathchandra RG, Niranjan S, Shetty NP, Amruthesh KN, Shekar H (2004) A chitosan formulation Elexa induces downy mildew disease resistance and growth promotion in pearl millet. Crop Protect 23:881–888.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cropro.2003.12.008 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Sharp RG (2013) A review of the applications of chitin and its derivatives in agriculture to modify plant-microbial interactions and improve crop yields. Agronomy 3:757–793.  https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy3040757 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Signini S, Campana-Filho SP (2001) Characteristics and properties of purified chitosan in the neutral, acetate and hydrochloride forms. Polímeros 11:58–64.  https://doi.org/10.1590/S0104-14282001000200007 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Souza TC, Castro EM, Magalhaes PC, Lino LO, Alves ET, Albuquerque PEP (2013a) Morphophysiology, morphoanatomy, and grain yield under field conditions for two maize hybrids with contrasting response to drought stress. Acta Physiol Plant 35:3201–3321.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11738-013-1355-1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Souza TC, Castro EM, Magalhães PC, Castro EM, Albuquerque PEP, Marabesi MA (2013b) The influence of ABA on water relation, photosynthesis parameters, and chlorophyll fluorescence under drought conditions in two maize hybrids with contrasting drought resistance. Acta Physiol Plant 35:515–527.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11738-012-1093-9 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Souza TC, Magalhães PC, Castro EM, Carneiro NP, Padilha FA, Gomes Júnior CC (2014) ABA application to maize hybrids contrasting for drought tolerance: changes in water parameters and in antioxidant enzyme activity. Plant Growth Regul 73:205–2017.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10725-013-9881-9 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. van Kooten O, Snel J (1990) The use of chlorophyll fluorescence nomenclature in plant stress physiology. Photosynth Res 25:147–150.  https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00033156 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Wang X, Vigjevic M, Liu F, Jacobsen S, Jiang D, Wollenweber B (2015) Drought priming at vegetative growth stages improves tolerance to drought and heat stresses during grain fi lling in spring wheat (Triticum aestivum L. cv. Vinjett). Plant Growth Regul 75:677–687.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10725-014-9969-x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Yan H, Wu L, Filardo F, Yang X, Zhao X (2017) Chemical and hydraulic signals regulate stomatal behavior and photosynthetic activity in maize during progressive drought. Acta Physiol Plant 39:125.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11738-017-2418-5 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Yang F, Hu J, Li J, Wu X, Qian Y (2009) Chitosan enhances leaf membrane stability and antioxidant enzyme activities in apple seedlings under drought stress. Plant Growth Regul 58:131–136.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10725-009-9361-4 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Yao Y, Liu X, Li Z, Ma X, Rennenberg H, Wang X, Li H (2013) Drought-induced H2O2 accumulation in subsidiary cells is involved in regulatory signaling of stomatal closure in maize leaves. Planta 238:217–227.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00425-013-1886-0 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Zeng D, Luo X (2012) Physiological effects of chitosan coating on wheat growth and activities of protective enzyme with drought tolerance. Open J Soil Sci 2:282–288.  https://doi.org/10.4236/ojss.2012.23034 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Zeng K, Deng Y, Ming J, Deng L (2010) Induction of disease resistance and ROS metabolism in navel oranges by chitosan. Sci Hortic 126:223–228.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scienta.2010.07.017 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Zhang H, Zhao X, Yang J, Yin H, Wang W, Lu H, Du Y (2011) Nitric oxide production and its functional link with OIPK in tobacco defense response elicited by chitooligosaccharide. Plant Cell Rep 30:1153–1162.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00299-011-1024-z CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Zhang X, Li K, Liu S, Xing R, Yu H, Chen X, Li P (2016) Size effects of chitooligomers on the growth and photosynthetic characteristics of wheat seedlings. Carbohydr Polym 138:27–33.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2015.11.050 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Zou P, Li K, Liu S, Xing R, Qin Y, Yua H, Zhou M, Li P (2015) Effect of chitooligosaccharides with different degrees of acetylationon wheat seedlings under salt stressing. Carbohydr Polym 126:62–69.  https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules22111903 CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Caroline Oliveira dos Reis
    • 1
  • Paulo César Magalhães
    • 2
  • Roniel Geraldo Avila
    • 3
  • Lorena Gabriela Almeida
    • 3
  • Valquíria Mikaela Rabelo
    • 1
  • Diogo Teixeira Carvalho
    • 4
  • Daniela Ferreira Cabral
    • 5
  • Décio Karam
    • 2
  • Thiago Correa de Souza
    • 1
    Email author
  1. 1.Institute of Natural Sciences-ICNFederal University of Alfenas - UNIFAL-MGAlfenasBrazil
  2. 2.Maize and Sorghum National Research CenterSete LagoasBrazil
  3. 3.Section of Plant Physiology, Department of BiologyFederal University of LavrasLavrasBrazil
  4. 4.Faculty of Pharmaceutical SciencesFederal University of Alfenas - UNIFAL-MGAlfenasBrazil
  5. 5.Chemistry InstituteFederal University of Alfenas - UNIFAL-MGAlfenasBrazil

Personalised recommendations