Advertisement

Journal of Plant Growth Regulation

, Volume 38, Issue 2, pp 438–448 | Cite as

Plant Biostimulant Regulatory Framework: Prospects in Europe and Current Situation at International Level

  • Federica Caradonia
  • Valerio Battaglia
  • Lorenzo Righi
  • Giacomo Pascali
  • Anna La TorreEmail author
Article

Abstract

This review analyses the current regulatory procedures for plant biostimulants, both at an EU level and beyond the EU, and explores the future regulation of these substances in the EU. Plant biostimulants are defined as products that stimulate plant nutritional processes regardless of the product’s nutrient content, with the sole aim of improving one or more of the following characteristics of the plant and the plant rhizosphere or phyllosphere: the efficiency of nutrient use, tolerance to abiotic stresses, crop quality traits, availability of confined nutrients in the soil and rhizosphere, humification and degradation of organic compounds in the soil. This definition is reported in the proposals for new rules to regulate making CE-marked fertiliser products available on the market. This regulation, which includes a plant biostimulants category, will repeal the existing Fertilisers Regulation (EC) No. 2003/2003. This category of compounds is also used in non-European countries. Currently, as there are different market conditions and different national regulation requirements for plant biostimulants in different countries, the non-harmonised regulatory processes can lead to unfair competition between operators. The assessment of plant biostimulants should be harmonised as far as possible, to avoid fragmentation and ensure a level, reliable playing field. It is essential that a common market is created for these substances.

Keywords

European legislation Non-European countries Definition Innovative fertilisers Plant growth Integrated and organic farming 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank the PQAI I “Organic Farming and National Food Quality Systems and General Affairs” Office of the Italian Ministry of Agriculture, for funding the project: “Strategies and possible alternatives to reduce copper use in organic farming—ALT.RAMEinBIO”, in which this study was conducted.

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Agriculture, forestry & fisheries Department of Republic of South Africa, “Guidelines For registration of Group 3 Fertilizers” http://www.nda.agric.za/doaDev/sideMenu/ActNo36_1947/AIC/DAFF%20GROUP%203%20FERTILISER%20GUIDELINE%20Final%2011%20february%202016%20(2).pdf. Accessed 3 Nov 2016
  2. Alam G (2000) A study of biopesticides and biofertilisers in Haryana, India. In: IIED’s Sustainable Agriculture and Rural Livelihoods Programme (ed) Gatekeeper Series 93, LondonGoogle Scholar
  3. Aliferis KA, Jabaji S (2011) Metabolomics–a robust bioanalytical approach for the discovery of the modes-of-action of pesticides: a review. Pestic Biochem Phys 100:105–117.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pestbp.2011.03.004 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Arcadia International (2014) A legal framework for plant biostimulants and agronomic fertiliser additives. http://ec.europa.eu/DocsRoom/documents/5403/attachments/1/translations/en/renditions/nativen. Accessed 20 June 2017
  5. Association of American Plant Food Control Officials (2017) AAPFCO product label guide. http://www.aapfco.org/pdf/product_label_guide.pdf. Accessed 14 Dec 2017
  6. Bundesministerium für Ernährung, Landwirtschaft und Verbraucherschutz (2012) Verordnung über das Inverkehrbringen von Düngemitteln, Bodenhilfsstoffen, Kultursubstraten und Pflanzenhilfsmitteln-Düngemittelverordnung—DüMV. Bundesgesetzblatt Teil I 58:2482–2544Google Scholar
  7. Bundesministers für Land-und Forstwirtschaft, Umwelt und Wasserwirtschaft (2004) Verordnung des Bundesministeri für Land- und Forstwirtschaft, Umwelt und Wasserwirtschaft—Düngemittelverordnung. Bundesgesetzblatt für die Republik Österreich Teil II 100:1–5Google Scholar
  8. Bundestag (2009) Düngegesetz. Bundesgesetzblatt Teil I 4:54–60Google Scholar
  9. Calvo P, Nelson L, Kloepper JW (2014) Agricultural uses of plant biostimulants. Plant Soil 383:3–41CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Chehade LA, Al Chami Z, De Pascali SA, Cavoski, Fanizzi FP (2017) Biostimulants from food processing by-products: agronomic, quality and metabolic impacts on organic tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.). J Sci Food Agric.  https://doi.org/10.1002/jsfa.8610 Google Scholar
  11. Department of agriculture, forestry and fisheries (2012) Regulations regarding fertilizers. Staatskoerant 35666:3–67Google Scholar
  12. du Jardin P (2015) Plant biostimulants: definition, concept, main categories and regulation. Sci Hort 195:3–14CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Ertani A, Sambo P, Nicoletto C, Santagata S, Schiavon M, Nardi S (2015) The use of organic biostimulants in hot pepper plants to help low input sustainable agriculture. Chem Biol Technol Agric 2:11.  https://doi.org/10.1186/s40538-015-0039-z CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. European Biostimulant Industry Council (2013) Economic overview of the biostimulants sector in Europe, 17 April 2013. http://www.biostimulants.eu/wp-content/uploads/2013/04/Biostimulant_economics_17April2013.pdf. Accessed 23 June 2017
  15. European Biostimulants Industry Council (2011) The Unique Properties of Biostimulants Require an Appropriate Regulatory Framework so the Biostimulants Sector can to Make its Full Contribution to Smart, Sustainable and Inclusive Growth in Europe http://www.biostimulants.eu/wp-content/uploads/2011/12/EBIC_Position_7Options_29Nov2011.pdf. Accessed 23 June 2017
  16. European Commission (2016) Proposal for a regulation laying down rules on the making available on the market of CE marked fertilising products and amending Regulations (EC)1069/2009 and (EC)1107/2009.COM(2016) 157Google Scholar
  17. Ghannam A, Abbas A, Alek H, Al-Waari Z, Al-Ktaifani M (2013) Enhancement of local plant immunity against tobacco mosaic virus infection after treatment with sulphated-carrageenan from red alga (Hypnea musciformis). Physiol Mol Plant 84:19–27.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pmpp.2013.07.001 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Government of India (1985) Fertilizer (control) order. Gaz India 72:1–108Google Scholar
  19. Governor General (1947) Fertilizers, farm feeds, agricultural remedies and stock remedies act. Staatskoerant 14:1009–1025Google Scholar
  20. Governor General (1979) Fertilizers regulations (C.R.C., c. 666). Can Gaz Part II 113(9):1959–1970Google Scholar
  21. Governor General (1985) Fertilizers Act (R.S.C., 1985, c. F-10). http://laws-lois.justice.gc.ca/eng/acts/F-10/. Accessed 3 Nov 2016
  22. Iriti M, Picchi V, Rossoni M, Gomarasca S, Ludwig N, Gargano M, Faoro F (2009) Chitosan antitranspirant activity is due to abscisic acid-dependent stomatal closure. Environ Exp Bot 66:493–500CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Jannin L, Arkoun M, Ourry A, Laîné P, Goux D, Garnica M. Fuentes M, San Francisco S, Baigorri R, Cruz F, Houdusse F, Garcia-Mina J-M, Yvin J-C, Etienne P (2012) Microarray analysis of humic acid effects on Brassica napus growth: involvementof N, C and S metabolisms. Plant Soil 359:297–319.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-012-1191-x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Khan W, Rayirath UP, Subramanian S, Jithesh MN, Rayorath P, Hodges DM, Critchley A, Craigie J, Norrie J, Prithiviraj B (2009) Seaweed extracts as biostimulants of plant growth and development. J Plant Growth Regul 28:386–399.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00344-009-9103-x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. La Torre A, Battaglia V, Caradonia F (2016) An overview of the current plant biostimulant legislations in different European Member States. J Sci Food Agric 96:727–734CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Maini P (2006) The experience of the first biostimulant, based on amino acids and peptides: a short retrospective review on laboratory researches and practical results. Fertilitas Agrorum 1:29–43Google Scholar
  27. Marketsandmarkets.com (2017) Biostimulants market by active ingredient (humic substances, seaweed, microbials, trace minerals, vitamins & amino acids), crop type (row crops, fruits & vegetables, turf & ornamentals), formulation, application method, and region—global forecast to 2022.USA MarketsandMarkets™ INC. http://www.marketsandmarkets.com. Accessed 16 July 2018
  28. Ministère de l’agriculture, de l’agroalimentaire et de la forêt (2016a) Décret No 2016—532 du 27 avril 2016 relatif à la procédure d’autorisation des substances naturelles à usage biostimulant. J Officiel de la République Française 102:22Google Scholar
  29. Ministère de l’agriculture, de l’agroalimentaire et de la forêt (2016b) Arrêté du 27 avril 2016 établissant la liste des substances naturelles à usage biostimulant. J Officiel de la République Française 102:23Google Scholar
  30. Ministerio de Agricultura, Pesca y Alimentaciòn (2007) ORDEN APA/1470/2007 de 24 de mayo, por la que se regula la comunicación de comercialización de determinados medios de defensa fitosanitaria. Boletín Oficial del Estado 128:23296–23297Google Scholar
  31. Ministerio de Agricultura, Pesca y Alimentaciòn (2014) Real Decreto 951/2014, de 14 de noviembre, por el que se regula la comercialización de determinados medios de defensa fitosanitaria. Boletín Oficial del Estado 303:101959–101973Google Scholar
  32. Ministerio de Agricultura, Pesca y Alimentaciòn (2015) Orden AAA/2564/2015 por la que se modifican los anexos I, II, III, IV y VI del Real Decreto 506/2013, de 28 de junio, sobre productos fertilizantes. Boletín Oficial del Estado 289:114186–114248Google Scholar
  33. Ministerio de la Presidencia (2013) Real Decreto 506/2013, de 28 de junio, sobre productos fertilizantes. Boletín Oficial del Estado 164:51119–51207Google Scholar
  34. Ministero delle politiche agricole alimentari e forestali (2009) Decreto Ministeriale No 18354/2009 Disposizioni per l’attuazione dei regolamenti (CE) n. 834/2007, n. 889/2008 e n. 1235/2008 e successive modifiche riguardanti la produzione biologica e l’etichettatura dei prodotti biologici. Gazzetta Ufficiale della Repubblica Italiana 31:1–56Google Scholar
  35. Mladenova YI, Maini P, Mallegni C, Goltsev V, Vladova R, Vinarova K, Rocheva S (1998) Siapton—an amino-acid-based biostimulant reducing osmostress metabolic changes in maize. Agro Food Ind Hi-Tech 9:18–22Google Scholar
  36. Nardi S, Pizzeghello D, Muscolo A, Vianello A (2002) Review: physiological effects of humic substances on higher plants. Soil Biol Biochem 34:1527–1536CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Nardi S, Muscolo A, Vaccaro S, Baiano S, Spaccini R, Piccolo A (2007) Relationship between molecular characteristics of soil humic fractions and glycolytic pathway and Krebs cycle inmaize seedlings. Soil Biol Biochem 39:3138–3146CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Nationalrat (1994) Düngemittelgesetz. Bundesgesetzblatt für die Republik Österreich Teil I 513:4155–4167Google Scholar
  39. Parađiković N, Vinković T, Vinković Vrček I, Žuntar I, Bojić M, Medić-Šarić M (2011) Effect of natural biostimulants on yield and nutritional quality: an example of sweet yellow pepper (Capsicum annuum L.) plants. J Sci Food Agric 91:2146–2152Google Scholar
  40. Pichyangkura R, Chadchawan S (2015) Biostimulant activity of chitosan in horticulture. Sci Hortic 196:49–65.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scienta.2015.09.031 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Presidente da República (2004) Decreto No-4.954, de 14 De Janeiro de 2004 Aprova o Regulamento da Lei no-6.894, de 16 de dezembro de 1980, que dispõe sobre a inspeção e fiscalização da produção e do comércio de fertilizantes, corretivos, inoculantes ou biofertilizantes destinados à agricultura, e dá outras providências. Diário Oficial da União 10:2–11Google Scholar
  42. Presidente da República (2013) Decreto Nº 8.059, DE 26 DE, JULHO DE 2013 Altera o Anexo ao Decreto nº 4.954, de 14 de janeiro de 2004, que aprova o Regulamento da Lei nº 6.894, de 16 de dezembro de 1980, que dispõe sobre a inspeção e fiscalização da produção e do comércio de fertilizantes, corretivos, inoculantes ou biofertilizantes destinados à agricultura. Diário Oficial da União 144:37–41Google Scholar
  43. Rafiee H, Naghdi Badi H, Mehrafarin A, Qaderi A, Zarinpanjeh N, Sekara A, Zand E (2016) Application of plant biostimulants as new approach to improve the biological responses of medicinal plants—a critical review. J Med Plant 15:6–39Google Scholar
  44. Russo RO, Berlyn GP (1991) The use of organic biostimulants to help low input sustainable agriculture. J Sustain Agric 1:19–42.  https://doi.org/10.1300/J064v01n02_04 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Sahain MFM, Abd El Motty EZ, El-Shiekh MH, Hagagg LF (2007) Effect of some biostimulant on growth and fruiting of Anna apple trees in newly reclaimed areas. Res J Agric Biol Sci 5:422–429Google Scholar
  46. Sharma SHS, Lyons G, McRoberts C, McCall D, Carmichael E, Andrews F et al (2012) Brown seaweed species from Strangford Lough: compositional analyses of seaweed species and biostimulant formulations by rapid instrumental methods. J Appl Phycol 24:1141–1157.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10811-011-9744-6 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Thomas M, Chauhan D, Patel J, Panchal T (2013) Analysis of biostimulants made by fermentation of Sargassum tenerimum seaweed. Int J Curr Trop Res 2:405–407Google Scholar
  48. Vijayanand N, Ramya SS, Rathinavel S (2014) Potential of liquid extracts of Sargassum wightii on growth, biochemical and yield parameters of cluster bean plant. Asian Pac J Reprod 3:150–155.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S2305-0500(14)60019-1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Vranova V, Rejsek K, Skene KR, Formanek P (2011) Non-protein amino acids: plant, soil and ecosystem interactions. Plant Soil 342:31–48CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Yakhin OI, Lubyanov AA, Yakhin IA, Brown PH (2017) Biostimulants in plant science: a global perspective. Front Plant Sci 7:2049.  https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2016.02049 CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Consiglio per la ricerca in agricoltura e l’analisi dell’economia agraria - Centro di ricerca Difesa e Certificazione (CREA-DC)RomeItaly

Personalised recommendations