Representing surface wind stress response to mesoscale SST perturbations in western coast of South America using Tikhonov regularization method
- 4 Downloads
Interaction between mesoscale perturbations of sea surface temperature (SSTmeso) and wind stress (WSmeso) has great influences on the ocean upwelling system and turbulent mixing in the atmospheric boundary layer. Using daily Quik-SCAT wind speed data and AMSR-E SST data, SSTmeso and WSmeso fields in the western coast of South America are extracted by using a locally weighted regression method (LOESS). The spatial patterns of SSTmeso and WSmeso indicate strong mesoscale SST-wind stress coupling in the region. The coupling coefficient between SSTmeso and WSmeso is about 0.009 5 N/(m2.°C) in winter and 0.008 2 N/(m2.°C) in summer. Based on mesoscale coupling relationships, the mesoscale perturbations of wind stress divergence (Div(WSmeso)) and curl (Curl (WSmeso)) can be obtained from the SST gradient perturbations, which can be further used to derive wind stress vector perturbations using the Tikhonov regularization method. The computational examples are presented in the western coast of South America and the patterns of the reconstructed WSmeso are highly consistent with SSTmeso, but the amplitude can be underestimated significantly. By matching the spatially averaged maximum standard deviations of reconstructed WSmeso magnitude and observations, a reasonable magnitude of WSmeso can be obtained when a rescaling factor of 2.2 is used. As current ocean models forced by prescribed wind cannot adequately capture the mesoscale wind stress response, the empirical wind stress perturbation model developed in this study can be used to take into account the feedback effects of the mesoscale wind stress-SST coupling in ocean modeling. Further applications are discussed for taking into account the feedback effects of the mesoscale coupling in large-scale climate models and the uncoupled ocean models.
Keywordmesoscale air-sea coupling Tikhonov’s regularization method western coast of South America
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
The authors wish to thank the anonymous reviewers for their numerous comments that helped to improve the original manuscript.
- Capet X, Colas F, McWilliams J C, Penven P, Marchesiello P. 2008. Eddies in eastern boundary subtropical upwelling systems. In: Hecht M W, Hasumi H eds. Ocean Modeling in an Eddying Regime, Volume 177. American Geophysical Union, Washington. 350p, https://doi.org/10.1029/177GM10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Chelton D B, Esbensen S K, Schlax M G, Thum N, Freilich M H, Wentz F J, Gentemann C L, McPhaden M J, Schopf P S. 2001. Observations of coupling between surface wind stress and sea surface temperature in the eastern tropical pacific. J. Climate, 14(7): 1 479–1 498, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0442(2001)014<1479:OOCBSW>2.0.CO;2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Davey M, Huddleston M, Sperber K, Braconnot P, Bryan F, Chen D, Colman R, Cooper C, Cubasch U, Delecluse P, DeWitt D, Fairhead L, Flato G, Gordon C, Hogan T, Ji M, Kimoto M, Kitoh A, Knutson T, Latif M, Treut Le H, Li T, Manabe S, Mechoso C, Power S, Roeckner E, Terray L, Vintzileos A, Voss R, Wang B, Washington W, Yoshikawa I, Yu J, Yukimoto S, Zebiak S, Meehl G. 2002. STOIC: a study of coupled model climatology and variability in tropical ocean regions. Climate Dyn., 18(5): 403–420, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-001-0188-6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Lynch P. 1989. Partitioning the wind in a limited domain. Mon. Wea.Rev., 117(7): 1 492–1 500, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0493(1989)117<1492PTWIAL>2.0.CO;2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Ma X H, Jing Z, Chang P, Liu X, Montuoro R, Small R J, Bryan F O, Greatbatch R J, Brandt P, Wu D X, Lin X P, Wu L X. 2016. Western boundary currents regulated by interaction between ocean eddies and the atmosphere. Nature, 535(7613): 533–537, https://doi.org/10.1038/nature18640.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Oerder V, Colas F, Echevin V, Masson S, Hourdin C, Jullien S, Madec G, Lemarié F. 2016. Mesoscale SST-wind stress coupling in the Peru-Chile current system: which mechanisms drive its seasonal variability? Climate Dyn., 47(7-8): 2 309–2 330, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-015-2965-7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Piazza M, Terray L, Boé J, Maisonnave E, Sanchez-Gomez E. 2016. Influence of small-scale North Atlantic sea surface temperature patterns on the marine boundary layer and free troposphere: a study using the atmospheric ARPEGE model. Climate Dyn., 46(5-6): 1 699–1 717, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-015-2669-z.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Strub P T, Mesias J M, Montecino V, Rutilant J, Salinas S. 1998. Coastal ocean circulation off western South America. In: Robinson A, Brink K eds. The Sea. Wiley, New York. p.29–67.Google Scholar
- Sweet W, Fett R, Kerling J, La Violette P. 1981. Air-sea interaction effects in the lower troposphere across the north wall of the Gulf-stream. Mon. Wea. Rev., 109(5): 1 042–1 052, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0493(1981)109<1042ASIEIT>2.0.CO;2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Tikhonov A N, Arsenin V Y. 1977. Solution of Ill-Posed Problems. Winston and Sons, Washington.Google Scholar
- Zuidema P, Chang P, Medeiros B, Kirtman B P, Mechoso R, Schneider E K, Toniazzo T, Richter I, Small R J, Bellomo K, Brandt P, de Szoeke S, Farrar J T, Jung E, Kato S, Li M K, Patricola C, Wang Z Y, Wood R, Xu Z. 2016. Challenges and prospects for reducing coupled climate model SST biases in the eastern tropical Atlantic and Pacific oceans. Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc., 97(12): 2 305–2 327, https://doi.org/10.1175/BAMS-D-15-00274.1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar