The emulsification of crude oil is caused by the oil flowing into the water, resulting in the increase of oil film tension, viscosity, water content, and volume, which brings great harm to the marine ecological environment and difficulties for the cleanup of marine emergency equipment. The realization observation of emulsification crude oil will increase the response speed of marine emergency response. Therefore, we set up crude oil emulsification samples to study the physical property in laboratory and conducted radar measurements at different incidence angles in outdoor. The radar is C band in resolution of 0.7 m by 0.7 m. A fully polarimetric scatterometer (HH, VV, and VH/HV) is mounted at 1.66 m (minimum altitude) height at an incidence angle between 35° and 60°. An asphalt content of less than 3% crude oil and the filtered seawater were used to the outdoor emulsification scattering experiment. The measurement results are as follows. The water content can be used to describe the process of emulsification and it is easy to measure. Wind speed, asphalt content, seawater temperature, and photo-oxidation affect the emulsifying process of crude oil, and affects the normalized radar cross section (NRCS) of oil film but wind is not the dominant factor. It is the first time to find that the emulsification of crude oil results in an increase of NRCS.
emulsification of crude oil normalized radar cross section (NRCS) water content wind speed temperature
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.
We thank Muping Coastal Environment Research Station of the Chinese Academy of Sciences for field support and for using the weather station observation data.
Ariffin T S T, Yahya E, Husin H. 2016. The rheology of light crude oil and water-in-oil-emulsion. Procedia Engineering, 148: 1149–1155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berridge S A, Dean R A, Fallows R G, Fish A. 1986. The properties of persistent oils at sea. Journal of the Institute of Petroleum, 54: 300–309.Google Scholar
Bora MA. 1991. Water-in-oil emulsification: a physicochemical study. In: International Oil Spill Conference. American Petroleum Institute, Washington, DC. p.483–488.Google Scholar
Brekke C, Solberg A. 2005. Oil spill detection by satellite remote sensing. Remote sensing of Environment, 95(1): 1–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Daling S, Brandvik J. 1988. A study of the formation and stability of water-in-oil emulsions. In: Proceedings of the 11th Arctic Marine Oilspill Program Technical Seminar. Environment Canada, Ottawa. p.153–170.Google Scholar
De Loor G P, Van Hulten H W B. 1998. Microwave measurements over the North Sea. Boundary-Layer Meteorology, 13(1–4): 119–131.Google Scholar
Garcia-Pineda O, Zimmer B, Howard M, Pichel W, Li X F, MacDonald I R. 2009. Using SAR images to delineate ocean oil slicks with a texture-classifying neural network algorithm (TCNNA). Canadian Journal of Remote Sensing, 35(5): 411–421.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guo J, Meng J M, He Y J. 2016. Scattering model research based on two-dimensional laser observation of spilled oil and emulsification processes. Marine Sciences, 40(2): 159–164. (in Chinese with English abstract)Google Scholar
Johansen E J, Skjärvö M, Lund T, Sjöblom J, Söderlund H, Boström G. 1988. Water-in-crude oil emulsions from the Norwegian continental shelf Part I. Formation, characterization and stability correlations. Colloids and Surfaces, 34(4): 353–370.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Khan B A, Akhtar N, Khan H M S, Waseem K, Mahmood T, Rasul A, Iqbal M, Khan H. 2011. Basics of pharmaceutical emulsions: a review. African Journal of Pharmacy and Pharmacology, 5(25): 2715–2725, https://doi.org/10.5897/AJPP11.698.Google Scholar
Li Y. 2014. Research on Microwave Scattering Properties of Oil Spill Based on Experimental method. University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu. p.1–85. (in Chinese with English abstract)Google Scholar
Mackay D, Zagorski W. 1982. Water-in-oil emulsions: a stability hypothesis. In: Proceedings of the Fifth Annual Arctic Marine Oilspill Program Technical Seminar. Environment Canada, Ottawa. p.61–74.Google Scholar
Neuman H J, Paczyńska-Lahme B. 1988. Petroleum emulsions, micro-emulsions, and micellar solutions. In: Hummel K, Schurz J eds. Dispersed Systems. Steinkopff Verlag, Darmstadt. p.123–126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sjoblom J, Urdahl O, Borve K G N. 1990. Stabilization and destabilization of water-in-oil emulsions from the Norwegian continental shelf: correlation with model systems. Advances in Colloids and Polymer Science, 41(1992): 241–271.Google Scholar
Solberg A H S, Brekke C, Husoy P O. 2007. Oil spill detection in radarsat and envisat SAR images. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 45(3): 746–755.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thingstad T, Pengerud B. 1983. The formation of ‘chocolate mousse’ from Stafjord crude off and seawater. Marine Pollution Bulletin, 14(6): 214–216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Topouzelis K N. 2008. Oil Spill Detection by SAR images: dark formation detection, feature extraction and classification algorithms. Sensors, 8(10): 6642–6659.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wong S F, Lim J S, Dol S S. 2015. Crude oil emulsion: A review on formation, classification and stability of water-in-oil emulsions. Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering, 135: 498–504.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yan Z Y, Xu H L. 2002. Review of the studies on emulsification of spilled oil. Environmental Protection in Transportation, 23(2): 1–6, 26. (in Chinese with English abstract)Google Scholar
Yang Y Z, Lu G X, Zhong Q Y, Huang Y L, Zhou Z Z. 1998. A study on measuring the thickness of oil film on the sea by airborne remote sensing. Remote Sensing of Environment China, 8(3): 222–231. (in Chinese with English abstract)Google Scholar