Advertisement

Impact of emulsification of crude oil on normalized radar cross section

  • Jie GuoEmail author
  • Tianlong Zhang
  • Xi ZhangEmail author
  • Genwang Liu
Article

Abstract

The emulsification of crude oil is caused by the oil flowing into the water, resulting in the increase of oil film tension, viscosity, water content, and volume, which brings great harm to the marine ecological environment and difficulties for the cleanup of marine emergency equipment. The realization observation of emulsification crude oil will increase the response speed of marine emergency response. Therefore, we set up crude oil emulsification samples to study the physical property in laboratory and conducted radar measurements at different incidence angles in outdoor. The radar is C band in resolution of 0.7 m by 0.7 m. A fully polarimetric scatterometer (HH, VV, and VH/HV) is mounted at 1.66 m (minimum altitude) height at an incidence angle between 35° and 60°. An asphalt content of less than 3% crude oil and the filtered seawater were used to the outdoor emulsification scattering experiment. The measurement results are as follows. The water content can be used to describe the process of emulsification and it is easy to measure. Wind speed, asphalt content, seawater temperature, and photo-oxidation affect the emulsifying process of crude oil, and affects the normalized radar cross section (NRCS) of oil film but wind is not the dominant factor. It is the first time to find that the emulsification of crude oil results in an increase of NRCS.

Keyword

emulsification of crude oil normalized radar cross section (NRCS) water content wind speed temperature 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

Acknowledgment

We thank Muping Coastal Environment Research Station of the Chinese Academy of Sciences for field support and for using the weather station observation data.

References

  1. Ariffin T S T, Yahya E, Husin H. 2016. The rheology of light crude oil and water-in-oil-emulsion. Procedia Engineering, 148: 1149–1155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Berridge S A, Dean R A, Fallows R G, Fish A. 1986. The properties of persistent oils at sea. Journal of the Institute of Petroleum, 54: 300–309.Google Scholar
  3. Bora MA. 1991. Water-in-oil emulsification: a physicochemical study. In: International Oil Spill Conference. American Petroleum Institute, Washington, DC. p.483–488.Google Scholar
  4. Brekke C, Solberg A. 2005. Oil spill detection by satellite remote sensing. Remote sensing of Environment, 95(1): 1–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Daling S, Brandvik J. 1988. A study of the formation and stability of water-in-oil emulsions. In: Proceedings of the 11th Arctic Marine Oilspill Program Technical Seminar. Environment Canada, Ottawa. p.153–170.Google Scholar
  6. De Loor G P, Van Hulten H W B. 1998. Microwave measurements over the North Sea. Boundary-Layer Meteorology, 13(1–4): 119–131.Google Scholar
  7. Del Frate F, Petrocchi A, Lichtenegger J, Calabresi G. 2000. Neural networks for oil spill detection using ERS-SAR data. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 38(5): 2282–2287,  https://doi.org/10.1109/36.868885.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Fingas M F, Brown C E. 1997. Review of oil spill remote sensing. Spill Science & Technology Bulletin, 4(4): 199–208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Fingas M F, Fieldhouse B. 1999. Water-in-oil emulsions results of formation studies and applicability to oil spill modelling. Spill Science & Technology Bulletin, 5(1): 81–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Fingas M, Fieldhouse B. 2003. Studies of the formation process of water-in-oil emulsions. Marine Pollution Bulletin, 47(9–12): 369–396,  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0025-326X(03)00212-1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Fingas M, Fieldhouse B. 2004. Formation of water-in-oil emulsions and application to oil spill modelling. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 107(1–2): 37–50,  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2003.11.008.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Fingas M. 1995. Water-in-oil emulsion formation: a review of physics and mathematical modelling. Spill Science & Technology Bulletin, 2(1): 55–59,  https://doi.org/10.1016/1353-2561(95)94483-Z.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Garcia-Pineda O, Zimmer B, Howard M, Pichel W, Li X F, MacDonald I R. 2009. Using SAR images to delineate ocean oil slicks with a texture-classifying neural network algorithm (TCNNA). Canadian Journal of Remote Sensing, 35(5): 411–421.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Guo J, Meng J M, He Y J. 2016. Scattering model research based on two-dimensional laser observation of spilled oil and emulsification processes. Marine Sciences, 40(2): 159–164. (in Chinese with English abstract)Google Scholar
  15. Johansen E J, Skjärvö M, Lund T, Sjöblom J, Söderlund H, Boström G. 1988. Water-in-crude oil emulsions from the Norwegian continental shelf Part I. Formation, characterization and stability correlations. Colloids and Surfaces, 34(4): 353–370.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Karantzalos K, Argialas D. 2008. Automatic detection and tracking of oil spills in SAR imagery with level set segmentation. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 29(21): 6281–6296,  https://doi.org/10.1080/01431160802175488.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Khan B A, Akhtar N, Khan H M S, Waseem K, Mahmood T, Rasul A, Iqbal M, Khan H. 2011. Basics of pharmaceutical emulsions: a review. African Journal of Pharmacy and Pharmacology, 5(25): 2715–2725,  https://doi.org/10.5897/AJPP11.698.Google Scholar
  18. Li Y. 2014. Research on Microwave Scattering Properties of Oil Spill Based on Experimental method. University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu. p.1–85. (in Chinese with English abstract)Google Scholar
  19. Liu P, Zhao C F, Li X F, He M X, Pichel W. 2010. Identification of ocean oil spills in SAR imagery based on fuzzy logic algorithm. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 31(17–18): 4819–4833,  https://doi.org/10.1080/01431161.2010.485147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Mackay D, Zagorski W. 1982. Water-in-oil emulsions: a stability hypothesis. In: Proceedings of the Fifth Annual Arctic Marine Oilspill Program Technical Seminar. Environment Canada, Ottawa. p.61–74.Google Scholar
  21. Neuman H J, Paczyńska-Lahme B. 1988. Petroleum emulsions, micro-emulsions, and micellar solutions. In: Hummel K, Schurz J eds. Dispersed Systems. Steinkopff Verlag, Darmstadt. p.123–126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Sjoblom J, Urdahl O, Borve K G N. 1990. Stabilization and destabilization of water-in-oil emulsions from the Norwegian continental shelf: correlation with model systems. Advances in Colloids and Polymer Science, 41(1992): 241–271.Google Scholar
  23. Solberg A H S, Brekke C, Husoy P O. 2007. Oil spill detection in radarsat and envisat SAR images. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 45(3): 746–755.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Thingstad T, Pengerud B. 1983. The formation of ‘chocolate mousse’ from Stafjord crude off and seawater. Marine Pollution Bulletin, 14(6): 214–216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Topouzelis K N. 2008. Oil Spill Detection by SAR images: dark formation detection, feature extraction and classification algorithms. Sensors, 8(10): 6642–6659.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Wong S F, Lim J S, Dol S S. 2015. Crude oil emulsion: A review on formation, classification and stability of water-in-oil emulsions. Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering, 135: 498–504.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Wu J. 1986. Research on microwave backscattering of sea-surface with oil slick. Chinese Journal of Radio Science, 3(1): 32–44.  https://doi.org/10.13443/j.cjors.1986.03.003. (in Chinese with English abstract)Google Scholar
  28. Yan Z Y, Xu H L. 2002. Review of the studies on emulsification of spilled oil. Environmental Protection in Transportation, 23(2): 1–6, 26. (in Chinese with English abstract)Google Scholar
  29. Yang Y Z, Lu G X, Zhong Q Y, Huang Y L, Zhou Z Z. 1998. A study on measuring the thickness of oil film on the sea by airborne remote sensing. Remote Sensing of Environment China, 8(3): 222–231. (in Chinese with English abstract)Google Scholar
  30. Yue H S, Guo J, Mu Y K, Zhang T L. 2017. Detection of oil film roughness of 3D laser scanner. Journal of Guangxi Academy of Sciences, 33(4): 298–302,  https://doi.org/10.13657/j.cnki.gxkxyxb.20171127.002. (in Chinese with English abstract)Google Scholar
  31. Zhang B, Perrie W, Li X F, Pichel W G. 2011. Mapping sea surface oil slicks using RADARSAT-2 quad-polarization SAR image. Geophysical Research Letters, 38(10): L10602,  https://doi.org/10.1029/2011GL047013.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Chinese Society for Oceanology and Limnology, Science Press and Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.CAS Key Laboratory of Coastal Environmental Processes and Ecological Remediation, Yantai Institute of Coastal Zone Research (YIC)Chinese Academy of Sciences (CAS)YantaiChina
  2. 2.Shandong Key Laboratory of Coastal Environmental ProcessesYICCASYantaiChina
  3. 3.Center for Ocean Mega-ScienceCASQingdaoChina
  4. 4.University of Chinese Academy of SciencesBeijingChina
  5. 5.First Institute of Oceanography (FIO)Ministry of Natural Resources (MNR)QingdaoChina

Personalised recommendations