Advertisement

Applied Physics B

, 125:57 | Cite as

Study on image transmission mechanism of ghost imaging based on joint source and channel coding

  • Zhang Leihong
  • Ye HualongEmail author
  • Zhang Dawei
  • Chen Jian
Article
  • 89 Downloads

Abstract

In this paper, through the detailed analysis of ghost imaging algorithm and joint source–channel coding transmission, it not only combines the efficient compression function of source code, and the error detection and error correction function of channel code, but also combines the accurate transmission function of ghost imaging, which finally completes the coding transmission of the image. In this paper, the image transmission mechanism of ghost imaging based on joint source–channel coding is studied, and the feasibility, bit error rate and robustness are analyzed respectively. The transmission mechanism of the image coding can improve the compressibility of the coded image and the difficulty of being deciphered by the attacker, reduce the bit error rate in the process of the transmission of the image coding, enhance the ability of anti-interference and anti-interception, realize the accurate image coding transmission, and it also solves the problems such as lack of feasibility, low reduction degree and poor imaging quality of current imaging algorithms.

Notes

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the Natural Science Foundation of Shanghai (Grant nos. 14ZR1428400, 18ZR1425800), and Open Project of Anhui Province Key Laboratory of Nondestructive Evaluation (Grant no. CGHBMWSJC03).

References

  1. 1.
    X. Chen (2017) A quality-of-content-based joint source and channel coding for human detections in a mobile surveillance cloud. IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems for Video Technology, 99, 1–1Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    P. A. M. Oliveira (2017) Low-complexity image and video coding based on an approximate discrete tchebichef transform. IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems for Video Technology, 27(5), 1066–1076CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    F. Zhou (2016) Joint source–channel coding for band-limited backhauls in coordinated multi-point systems. IET Communications, 10(13), 1562–1570CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    S. Sarreshtedari, A. Abbasfar, M. A. Akhaee (2017) A joint source–channel coding approach to digital image self-recovery. Signal Image and Video Processing 11(7), 1–8(CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    D. Dong (2017) Joint source–channel rate allocation with unequal error protection for space image transmission. International Journal of Distributed Sensor Networks, 13(7), 155014771772114CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    A. Hagag, X. Fan, F.E.A. El-Samie, Hyperspectral image coding and transmission scheme based on wavelet transform and distributed source coding. Multimedia Tools & Applications 76(22), 23757–23776 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    I. E. Aguerri, D. Gündüz (2016) Joint source-channel coding with time-varying channel and side-information. IEEE Transactions on Information Theory 62(2), 736–753MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    S. Xiao, C. Wu (2002) Joint source channel coding of progressive image over wireless channel. Journal of Electronics and Information Technology 24(12), 1835–1841Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Z. Shi, Y. J. R. Ping, L. Feng-Cheng (2017) Research on secure and reliable communications method based on LDPC codes. Journal of University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, 46(5), 641–647Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    H. Yuan (2016) Compressive sensing measurement matrix generator based on improved SC-array LDPC code. Circuits Systems and Signal Processing 35(3), 977–992MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    B. Jiang (2013) Shape adaptive all phase biorthogonal transform and its application in image coding. Journal of Communications, 8(5):330–336CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    P. Gong, M. C. Kolios, Y. Xu (2015) Delay-encoded transmission and image reconstruction method in synthetic transmit aperture imaging. IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control, 62(10):1745CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    T. Y. Mao (2016) Optical communication in turbid and turbulent atmosphere. Acta Physica Sinica, 65(8), 084207Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    V. Katkovnik, J. Astola (2012) Compressive sensing computational ghost imaging. Journal of the Optical Society of America A Optics Image Science and Vision 29(8), 1556ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    D. B. Phillips (2016) Non-diffractive computational ghost imaging. Optics Express 24(13), 14172ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    N. D. Hardy, J. H. Shapiro (2013) Computational ghost imaging versus imaging laser radar for three-dimensional imaging. Physical Review A 87(2), 023820ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Z. Liu (2016) Spectral camera based on ghost imaging via sparsity constraints. Scientific Reports 6, 25718ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    J. H. Shapiro, R. W. Boyd (2012) The physics of ghost imaging. Quantum Information Processing 11(4), 949–993CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    L. Jin, P. Yang, H. Yang, Distributed joint source-channel decoding using systematic polar codes. IEEE Communications Letters 22(1), 49–52 (2018)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    L. Zhang, H. Ye, D. Zhang (2018) Study on the key technology of image transmission mechanism based on channel coding ghost imaging. IEEE Photonics Journal 10(4), 6500913Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Y. U. Qingping, S. Zhiping (2018) Research of channel coding techniques in 5G communications. Radio Communications TechnologyGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.College of Communication and Art DesignUniversity of Shanghai for Science and TechnologyShanghaiChina
  2. 2.School of Optical Electrical and Computer EngineeringUniversity of Shanghai for Science and TechnologyShanghaiChina
  3. 3.Anhui Province Key Laboratory of Nondestructive EvaluationAnhuiChina

Personalised recommendations