Advertisement

Applied Physics B

, 124:128 | Cite as

Phase-stabilized 100 mW frequency comb near 10 μm

  • Kana Iwakuni
  • Gil Porat
  • Thinh Q. Bui
  • Bryce J. Bjork
  • Stephen B. Schoun
  • Oliver H. Heckl
  • Martin E. Fermann
  • Jun Ye
Open Access
Article
  • 356 Downloads
Part of the following topical collections:
  1. Mid-infrared and THz Laser Sources and Applications

Abstract

Long-wavelength mid-infrared (MIR) frequency combs with high power and flexible tunability are highly desired for molecular spectroscopy, including investigation of large molecules such as C60. We present a high power, phase-stabilized frequency comb near 10 μm, generated by a synchronously pumped, singly resonant optical parametric oscillator (OPO) based on AgGaSe2. The OPO can be continuously tuned from 8.4 to 9.5 μm, with a maximum average idler power of 100 mW at the center wavelength of 8.5 μm. Both the repetition rate (frep) and the carrier-envelope offset frequency (fceo) of the idler wave are phase-locked to microwave signals referenced to a Cs clock. We describe the detailed design and construction of the frequency comb, and discuss potential applications for precise and sensitive direct frequency comb spectroscopy.

1 Introduction

High-power frequency comb sources at infrared wavelengths have become increasingly desirable for a wide range of applications in spectroscopy. While originally developed for metrology, comb lasers found immediate applications in high-resolution spectroscopy [1, 2]. In direct frequency comb spectroscopy, frequency combs are used as light sources, enabling efficient and multiplexed, high-resolution spectroscopy over a broad spectral bandwidth [3]. Direct frequency comb spectroscopy based on a variety of broadband detection schemes including Fourier-transform spectrometry (FTIR) [4], grating spectrography [5], virtually imaged phased array (VIPA) spectrometry [6], and dual-comb spectrometer [7, 8] have been developed mainly for applications of trace gas sensing [9, 10]. Recently, the versatility of direct comb spectroscopy was extended to probe large, complex molecules cooled by buffer gas [11] and chemical reaction kinetics involving transient intermediates such as DOCO molecules produced from the OD + CO reaction [12, 13]. These studies were carried out in the MIR wavelength (3–5 µm), and the next advance for comb-based high-resolution molecular spectroscopy lies at longer MIR wavelengths of 5–10 µm, where the fundamental molecular vibration bands display even stronger intensities. In the case of large molecules, probing at longer wavelengths provides an additional advantage of reducing the impact of intermolecular vibrational redistribution, which causes spectral congestion and dilution of absorption intensity [14]. For detection of transient molecules like DOCO, a strong band intensity is also necessary, since the probing time must be very short, on the order of microseconds, to follow kinetics.

Recently, frequency comb lasers in the MIR wavelength region have been reported using a variety of architectures: difference frequency generation (DFG), optical parametric oscillators (OPO), quantum cascade lasers (QCL), microresonator, and supercontinuum using waveguide dispersion.

DFG-based MIR frequency comb sources (based on periodically polled lithium niobate, PPLN) are known for their relative simplicity (single-pass configuration, passive cancelation of the fceo) at the expense of relatively low power (100 μW–20 mW at 2.6–5.2 μm) [15, 16, 17]. More recently, a higher power (~ 240 mW) DFG comb has been reported at 2.7–4.2 μm based on Raman-induced soliton self-frequency shift in a nonlinear fiber [18]. Longer MIR wavelengths which are comparable to those in the present work have been achieved with a GaSe crystal at 7.5–12.5 μm (~ 15 μW) [19] and 8–14 μm (~ 4 mW) [20], with a AgGaS2 crystal at 7.5–11.6 μm (~ 1.55 mW) [21], and with an orientation-patterned (OP) GaP at 6–11 μm (~ 60 mW) [22].

In contrast to DFG-based sources, OPO-based frequency combs exhibit higher power while maintaining a wide wavelength tuning range. MIR sources below 6 μm have been reported using MgO-PPLN at 2.8–4.8 μm (~ 1.5 W) [23] and at 2.2–3.7 μm (~ 33 mW) [24], using OP-GaAs at 2.6–7.5 μm (~ 73 mW) [25] and at 5.2–6.2 μm (~ 10 mW) [26], using AgGaSe2 at 4.8–6.0 μm (~ 17.5 mW) [27], and using OP-GaP at 2.3–4.8 μm (~ 30 mW) [28]. There have been several reported implementations of longer wavelength infrared OPOs at 5–12 μm (~ 15 mW at 8.5 μm) [29], and 2.85–8.4 μm [30], but the idler powers in these studies drop off significantly at wavelengths longer than 8 μm. Finally, the widest wavelength tuning (1.33–20 μm, ~ 40 mW at 9 μm) has been recently reported by combining OPO and DFG techniques [31].

Additional infrared frequency comb sources include QCL, microresonators, and supercontinuum architectures. A QCL-based frequency comb has a high repetition rate (around 10 GHz) and high power (~ 3 mW per comb mode) for both 7 [32] and 8 μm [33] center wavelengths, though it is difficult to tune its wavelength continuously. On the other hand, microresonator [34, 35, 36] and supercontinuum frequency combs [37, 38, 39] have been limited to wavelengths no longer than 3 µm. Access to longer infrared wavelengths is mainly hindered by the difficulty of finding suitable materials.

As described above, ideal light sources for molecular spectroscopy in the long infrared wavelengths, i.e., frequency comb sources providing a combination of high power, frequency stability, and broad wavelength tunability, are highly desired for molecular spectroscopy. In this work, we have developed a singly resonant AgGaSe2-based OPO synchronously pumped with a Tm-fiber comb. We achieved more than 100 mW average power near the 10 μm region, for the first time to the best of our knowledge. In addition, we experimentally demonstrate phase stabilization of the frequency comb. This long-wavelength infrared laser will enable the study of fundamental vibration bands of large molecules and molecular clusters, which are important for investigating structure and dynamics of complex molecules.

2 Apparatus and results

2.1 Optical parametric oscillator

Figure 1 depicts the experimental setup. The pump laser is a mode-locked Tm:fiber laser at 1.95 µm, with a spectral bandwidth of 50 nm, repetition rate of 110 MHz, and a maximum output power of 2.5 W. This Tm-fiber laser synchronously pumps a 5-mirror linear OPO cavity, where all mirrors have high reflectivity (HR > 99.5%) at the signal wavelength for singly resonant operation. Mirror M4 out-couples the generated idler wave with a transmittance of about 92%, while M1 functions as an input mirror with about 99% transmittance for the pump wave. M5 is attached to a fast piezo (PZT) actuator for fceo control. The PZT is a commercial 5 × 5 × 2 stack PZT (Phsik Instrumente, PL055.3x), attached to a 6 mm diameter and 2 mm-thick mirror. We mount the PZT and mirror on a homemade bullet-shaped base, which supports an actuation bandwidth of 100 kHz [40].

Fig. 1

Schematic of the OPO. Output from a 110 MHz Tm-fiber comb is mode-matched into linear cavity consisting of the M1, M2, M3, M4, and M5 mirrors. M2 and M3 are concave mirrors with an ROC of either 50 or 110 mm (see text). The rest are flat mirrors. All mirrors have HR for the signal wave. M1 has high transmittance (HT) for the pump wave and M4 has HT for the idler wave. A part of Tm-fiber comb light enters highly nonlinear fiber after pulse compression by the fused silica rod, and it is spectrally broadened. P + I and spectrally broadened P interfere to obtain fceo,I. LPF long pass filter

The OPO is based on a AgGaSe2 nonlinear optical crystal with an aperture of 5 × 5 mm and length of 3.6 mm. The crystal is centered at the focal plane of the concave mirrors, M2 and M3, and mounted on a rotation stage for angle tuning. Both faces of the crystal are anti-reflection (AR) coated for the pump, signal, and idler waves. The AgGaSe2 crystal has a relatively large second-order nonlinear optical coefficient of 32 pm/V, and it is transparent at 0.76–17 µm (absorption coefficient < 1 cm−1) [41]. These characteristics make AgGaSe2 highly suitable for MIR generation using a 1.95 µm pump wave while avoiding large nonlinear absorption. This is in contrast to GaAs, where the idler power was significantly limited due to nonlinear absorption of the pump and signal [26]. The AgGaSe2 crystal is cut at an angle of 57° to achieve type II phase matching with pump wave (1.95 µm, extraordinary wave), signal wave (2.53 µm, ordinary wave), and idler wave (8.5 µm, extraordinary wave).

The generated idler power is determined by a compromise between the nonlinear interaction strength, effective crystal length, and thermal lensing, under the limitation imposed by the crystal’s optical damage threshold. The nonlinear interaction strength increases with peak pump intensity, which in turn is greater for shorter pulsewidth and smaller beam size. However, as the pulse gets shorter and the spot size smaller, other detrimental effects limit the OPO performance. First, a shorter pulsewidth reduces the effective interaction length due to temporal walk-off [42] in the crystal. Second, a smaller spot size exacerbates thermal gradients across the crystal, resulting in a thermal lensing effect. The latter effect is more severe in AgGaSe2 relative to most common nonlinear crystals as it is difficult to cool AgGaSe2 due to its low thermal conductivity [1 W/(m K)] and large size. The large crystal size is a result of its softness (Mohs hardness of 3), making it challenging for further machining process to yield small pieces. The combination of a large size and low thermal conductivity makes it challenging to remove optically deposited heat from the crystal. In addition to these trade-offs, the peak intensity is limited by the crystal’s damage threshold, which we observed to be about 3 GW/cm2 for ~ 100 fs pulses. In the following, we will discuss our comprehensive experimental investigations of these competing effects and present a final design that yields an optimal idler power of more than 100 mW.

2.2 Idler power optimization

The line plot in Fig. 2a shows the calculated average pump power at the oscillation threshold of the OPO as a function of the pump pulsewidth [43]. This calculation makes the assumption that both the pump and signal waves have 30 µm (1/e2 intensity radius) beam sizes and the same pulsewidth. The estimated round-trip loss of the OPO cavity is 14.7%, calculated from mirror reflectivities and crystal linear absorption. The calculation shows that there is a trade-off between pump pulsewidth and effective crystal length (shown in the inset of Fig. 2a) due to temporal walk-off. The experimental OPO threshold under three different pulsewidths are measured and plotted in Fig. 2a with the same plot markers of Fig. 2b. The measurements basically follow the theory prediction and show that the lowest threshold is achieved at 700 fs. The small discrepancy at the pulsewidth of 700 fs can arise from by considering astigmatism due to finite incident angle to the concave mirrors.

Fig. 2

OPO oscillation threshold and idler power. a Calculated average pump power at the oscillation threshold of the OPO as a function of pump pulsewidth (FWHM), with a beam size of 30 µm (1/e2 intensity radius, solid line). The data points show the measured threshold for each pulsewidth, as shown in Fig. 2b. Inset shows the effective crystal length (Leff) as a function of the pump pulsewidth (FWHM). Leff is limited by spatial transverse walk-off at long pulsewidths. b Idler average power as a function of pump average power at different pulsewidths. The dashed lines indicate trends before saturation starts. c Idler average power as a function of pump average power at different beam sizes (1/e2 intensity radius), with a pulsewidth of 200 fs (FWHM)

Figure 2b shows the measured average idler power as a function of input pump power at three different pump pulsewidths. At the crystal, the pump and signal beam radii are set to ~ 30 µm using 100 mm radius of curvature (ROC) concave mirrors (M2 and M3). With this beam size, the maximum input pump power is limited to 1.2 W due to the low damage threshold of the crystal AR coating. The 200 fs pulsewidth, obtained by pulse compression with a fused silica rod, is the shortest studied here. This short pulse has a reduced effective interaction length due to temporal walk-off, as shown in Fig. 2a, thus limiting the generated idler power. We also stretch the pulse by inserting ZnSe plates or a fused silica rod to the pump beam’s path (see Fig. 1). When using a 5 mm thickness ZnSe plate, a stretched pulse of 700 fs yields the maximum observed idler power of 105 mW. The photon conversion efficiency is about 60% at the conditions that produces the maximum idler power.

We observe saturation of the output idler power at increasing average pump power. This saturation behavior is evident for all three traces in Fig. 2b when the average pump power exceeds 800 mW. A likely explanation is thermal lensing, where the thermal lens focal length is inversely proportional to average intensity. The latter increases for higher average power and smaller beam size. Figure 2c shows the average idler power as a function of pump power for two different beam sizes of 20 and 30 μm, both using a pulsewidth of 200 fs. For a beam size of 20 μm (obtained from using concave mirrors with ROC of 50 mm), there is strong saturation of the idler power above 350 mW pump power, as shown in Fig. 2c, which corresponds to the same average intensity for 800 mW at 30 μm beam size. Thermal lensing could be mitigated by cooling of the crystal. However, this strategy is not effective due to the crystal’s large thermal mass and low thermal conductivity. These results suggest that larger ROC mirrors could further relax this thermal effect and increase idler power, especially in combination with a more powerful pump laser.

2.3 Wavelength tuning

The OPO’s wavelength can be tuned by changing the crystal temperature and phase-matching angle. We first studied temperature tuning. The crystal refractive index has a small temperature dependence of dn/dT = 8 × 10−5 K−1 [41]. We observed a very limited idler wavelength tuning range of about 1 nm by temperature tuning from 20 to 60 °C due to the narrow safe operating temperature range for the crystal’s AR coating.

The phase-matching angle provided a significantly larger wavelength tuning capability. Figure 3 shows the output idler spectrum recorded with an FTIR [44] for different phase-matching angles from 54.2° to 57.2° (solid lines). This corresponds to center idler wavelengths of 8.4–9.5 µm with a spectral bandwidth of 200 nm (FWHM). The average idler power corresponding to each spectrum’s center wavelength is overlaid on the same plot depicted by black square points. The strong absorption lines present in the spectra are from the ν2 fundamental vibrational band of atmospheric water. Fringes on the spectra are due to etalon effects from optics outside of the OPO cavity. Access to longer idler wavelength is limited by the HR coating of the M1 mirror for the signal, while the shorter idler wavelength is limited by absorption of atmospheric water at the signal wavelength, which increases the loss of the OPO cavity and hence degrades the idler power (Fig. 3b).

Fig. 3

OPO wavelength tuning. a Idler spectrum and corresponding idler average power. b Reflectivity of input mirror M1 (left) and the line strength of water rovibrational features (right) as a function of signal wavelength

2.4 f rep and f ceo phase stabilization

The idler frequency comb can be completely stabilized by phase locking frep and fceo to a radio frequency (RF) reference signal. To lock frep, a small fraction of the output light from the Tm comb oscillator is detected by a fast photodiode. The 9th harmonic of frep (990 MHz) is mixed with a 1 GHz reference frequency from a Cs-stabilized quartz oscillator. The resulting 10 MHz beat signal is measured by a phase detector, where it is mixed with a reference RF signal generated by a DDS slaved to a 10 MHz quartz oscillator stabilized to a Cs clock. The phase error signal from the mixer is low-pass filtered and fed back to a PZT in the Tm comb oscillator to lock frep (Fig. 1). The fractional frequency instability is measured by a frequency counter to be 1.6 × 10−13 at 1 s.

Stabilization of the carrier-envelope offset frequency of the idler wave, fceo,I, is achieved by the heterodyne optical beat of (1) the sum frequency of the pump and idler wave (P + I) generated in the OPO cavity and (2) spectrally broadened pump wave (P) by a highly nonlinear fiber [23]. The P + I wave at 1.6 μm, along with many other parasitic waves, are generated in the crystal by nonphase-matched nonlinear processes. An optical band pass filter (1550–1600 nm) is used to make sure only the P + I wave reaches the detector. The bottom insets of Fig. 1 show the broadened pump spectrum from a 24 cm long, 4 μm core diameter nonlinear fiber and the P + I spectrum from the OPO. To broaden the pump spectrum efficiently, the pulsewidth is narrowed to 200 fs with a 30 cm fused silica rod. The pump spectrum broadens to 1.6 µm at 300 mW input power into the nonlinear fiber.

The fceo,I beat signal is detected with a single photodetector with an input power of approximately 50 μW. The signal-to-noise ratio of the beat signal is limited by the amplitude noise from the spectrally broadened pump wave [45], which was suppressed by 5 dB using balanced detection. We achieved a final signal-to-noise ratio of 35 dB at 100 kHz resolution bandwidth. Figure 4a shows the observed free-running fceo,I beat signal. fceo,I is phase-stabilized to the same Wenzel quartz oscillator used for frep locking. The error signal from the phase detector is fed back to both a fast PZT (M5) and slow PZT (M4) in the OPO cavity (Fig. 1). In the synchronously pumped OPO cavity, the signal carrier-envelope offset frequency can be controlled by adjusting the cavity length [46]. Figure 4b shows the in-loop beat signal of fceo, I with frep phase-locked. The servo bandwidth is about 40 kHz based on Fourier analysis of the error signal. The coherent peak is about 30 dB with a spectral width limited by the instrumental resolution bandwidth of 1 kHz and averaging time of 85 ms. The estimated modified Allan deviation of the idler wave is about the same as that of the quartz oscillator (5 × 10−13 at 1 s) according to the stability measurement of the repetition rate [47].

Fig. 4

fceo phase locking. a Free-running fceo,I beat signal at a resolution band width (RBW) of 100 kHz and sweep time of 5 ms. Inset shows a magnified view of the free-running beat signal at a RBW of 100 kHz and sweep time of 30 ms. b Phase-locked in-loop beat signal at a RBW of 1 kHz. The linewidth is limited by the RBW and the servo bump is at 40 kHz

3 Conclusions

We have developed a phase-stabilized frequency comb generated from an OPO in the wavelength range of 8.4–9.5 μm. We obtain a maximal idler power of more than 100 mW at maximum (10 µW per comb mode) by optimizing the pulsewidth and beam size, which is the highest reported power in this wavelength region. In addition, we find that the thermal lensing effect becomes significant at an average intensity of about 28 kW/cm2. Currently, the idler power is limited by the thermal effects and damage threshold of the crystal. These limits can be further relaxed by using mirrors with a larger ROC. In wavelength tuning, we expect that a 10 μm idler wave can be obtained with the current crystal by only extending the mirror HR coating up to 2.4 μm. Shorter idler wavelengths (< 8.4 µm) can be obtained by properly purging the OPO cavity with dry air. Finally, we demonstrate that the idlers frep and fceo are phase-locked to a stable microwave reference. In the future, we plan to couple the idler into an enhancement cavity and perform multiplexed readout of the output spectrum with highly dispersive optics, such as a VIPA. These combined techniques will be a significant upgrade for our goals of performing high-resolution spectroscopy of large molecules such as C60 and time-resolved detection of transient molecules.

Notes

Acknowledgements

This research was funded by AFOSR, DARPA SCOUT, NIST, and NSF-JILA PFC. K.I. is supported by the JSPS Overseas Research Fellowships. T.Q.B. is supported through an NRC Postdoctoral Fellowship. We would like to thank P. Bryan Changala for helpful discussions.

References

  1. 1.
    A. Marian, M.C. Stowe, J.R. Lawall, D. Felinto, J. Ye, United time-frequency spectroscopy for dynamics and global structure. Science 306, 2063 (2004)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    M.J. Thorpe, K.D. Moll, R.J. Jones, B. Safdi, J. Ye, Broadband cavity ringdown spectroscopy for sensitive and rapid molecular detection. Science, 311, 1595 (2006)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    M.C. Stowe, M.J. Thorpe, A. Pe’er, J. Ye, J.E. Stalnaker, V. Gerginov, S.A. Diddams, Direct frequency comb spectroscopy. Adv. At. Mol. Opt. Phys. 55, 1 (2008)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    J. Mandon, G. Guelachvili, N. Picqué, Fourier transform spectroscopy with a laser frequency comb. Nat. Photonics 3, 99 (2009)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    R. Grilli, G. Méjean, C. Abd Alrahman, I. Ventrillard, S. Kassi, D. Romanini, Cavity-enhanced multiplexed comb spectroscopy down to the photon shot noise. Phys. Rev. A 85, 051804 (2012)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    L. Nugent-Glandorf, T. Neely, F. Adler, A.J. Fleisher, K.C. Cossel, B. Bjork, T. Dinneen, J. Ye, S.A. Diddams, Mid-infrared virtually imaged phased array spectrometer for rapid and broadband trace gas detection. Opt. Lett. 37, 3285 (2012)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    I. Coddington, N. Newbury, W. Swann, Dual-comb spectroscopy, Optica, 3, 414 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    A.V. Muraviev, V.O. Smolski, Z.E. Loparo, K.L. Vodopyanov, Nat. Photonics 12, 209 (2018)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    K.C. Cossel, E.M. Waxman, I.A. Finneran, G.A. Blake, J. Ye, N.R. Newbury, Gas-phase broadband spectroscopy using active sources: progress, status, and applications. J. Opt. Soc. Am. B 34, 104 (2016)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    A. Schliesser, N. Picqué, T.W. Hänsch, Mid-infrared frequency combs. Nat. Photonics 6, 440 (2012)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    B. Spaun, P.B. Changala, D. Patterson, B.J. Bjork, O.H. Heckl, J.M. Doyle, J. Ye, Continuous probing of cold complex molecules with infrared frequency comb spectroscopy. Nature 533, 517 (2016)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    B.J. Bjork, T.Q. Bui, O.H. Heckl, P.B. Changala, B. Spaun, P. Heu, D. Follman, C. Deutsch, G.D. Cole, M. Aspelmeyer, M. Okumura, J. Ye, Direct frequency comb measurement of OD mathplus CO-greater DOCO kinetics. Science, 354, 444 (2016)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    T.Q. Bui, B.J. Bjork, P.B. Changala, T.L. Nguyen, J.F. Stanton, M. Okumura, J. Ye, Direct measurements of DOCO isomers in the kinetics of OD + CO. Sci. Adv. 4, eaao4777 (2018)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    P.B. Changala, B. Spaun, D. Patterson, J.M. Doyle, J. Ye, Sensitivity and resolution in frequency comb spectroscopy of buffer gas cooled polyatomic molecules. Appl. Phys. B 122, 292 (2016)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    I. Galli, F. Cappelli, P. Cancio, G. Giusfredi, D. Mazzotti, S. Bartalini, P. De Natale, Opt. Express 21, 28877 (2013)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    I. Galli, S. Bartalini, P. Cancio, F. Cappelli, G. Giusfredi, D. Mazzotti, N. Akikusa, M. Yamanishi, P. De Natale, Opt. Lett. 39, 5050 (2014)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    D.L. Maser, G. Ycas, W.I. Depetri, F.C. Cruz, S.A. Diddams, Coherent frequency combs for spectroscopy across the 3–5 µm region. Appl. Phys. B 123, 142 (2017)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    G. Soboń, T. Martynkien, P. Mergo, L. Rutkowski, A. Foltynowicz, High-power frequency comb source tunable from 2.7 to 4.2 µm based on difference frequency generation pumped by an Yb-doped fiber laser. Opt. Lett. 42, 1748 (2017)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    S.M. Foreman, D.J. Jones, J. Ye, Flexible and rapidly configurable femtosecond pulse generation in the mid-IR. Opt. Lett. 28, 370 (2003)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    A. Gambetta, N. Coluccelli, M. Cassinerio, D. Gatti, P. Laporta, G. Galzerano, M. Marangoni, Milliwatt-level frequency combs in the 8–14 µm range via difference frequency generation from an Er:fiber oscillator. Opt. Lett. 38, 1155 (2013)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    D. Churin, K. Kieu, R.A. Norwood, N. Peyghambarian, Efficient frequency comb generation in the 9 µm region using compact fiber sources. IEEE Photonics Technol. Lett. 22, 2271 (2014)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    K.F. Lee, C.J. Hensley, P.G. Schunemann, M.E. Fermann, Midinfrared frequency comb by difference frequency of erbium and thulium fiber lasers in orientation-patterned gallium phosphide. Opt. Express 25, 17411 (2017)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    F. Adler, K.C. Cossel, M.J. Thorpe, I. Hartl, M.E. Fermann, J. Ye, Phase-stabilized, 1.5 W frequency comb at 2.8–4.8 µm. Opt. Lett. 34, 1330 (2009)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    S.C. Kumar, A. Esteban-Martin, T. Ideguchi, M. Yan, S. Holzner, T.W. Hänsch, N. Picqué, M. Ebrahim-Zadeh, Few-cycle, broadband, mid-infrared optical parametric oscillator pumped by a 20-fs Ti:sapphire laser. Laser Photonics Rev. 8, L86–L91 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    V.O. Smolski, H. Yang, S.D. Gorelov, P.G. Schunemann, K.L. Vodopyanov, Coherence properties of a 2.6–7.5 µm frequency comb produced as a subharmonic of a Tm-fiber laser. Opt. Lett. 41, 1388 (2016)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    O.H. Heckl, B.J. Bjork, G. Winkler, P.B. Changala, B. Spaun, G. Porat, T.Q. Bui, K.F. Lee, J. Jiang, M.E. Fermann, P.G. Schunemann, J. Ye, Three-photon absorption in optical parametric oscillators based on OP-GaAs. Opt. Lett. 41, 5405 (2016)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    B. Metzger, B. Pollard, I. Rimke, E. Büttner, M.B. Raschke, Single-step sub-200 fs mid-infrared generation from an optical parametric oscillator synchronously pumped by an erbium fiber laser. Opt. Lett. 41, 4383 (2016)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Q. Ru, Z.E. Loparo, X.S. Zhang, S. Crystal, S. Vasu, P.G. Schunemann, K.L. Vodopyanov, Self-referenced octave-wide subharmonic GaP optical parametric oscillator centered at 3 µm and pumped by an Er-fiber laser. Opt. Lett. 42, 4756 (2017)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    L. Maidment, P.G. Schunemann, D.T. Reid, Molecular fingerprint-region spectroscopy from 5 to 12 µm using an orientation-patterned gallium phosphide optical parametric oscillator. Opt. Lett. 41, 4261 (2016)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Q. Ru, K. Zhong, N.P. Lee, Z.E. Loparo, P.G. Schunemann, S. Vasilyev, S.B. Mirov, K.L. Vodopyanov, Instantaneous spectral span of 2.85–8.40 µm achieved in a Cr:ZnS laser pumped subharmonic GaAs OPO. In Conf. Lasers and Electro-Optics, OSA, SM4M.3 (2017)Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    T. Steinle, F. Mörz, A. Steinmann, H. Giessen, Ultra-stable high average power femtosecond laser system tunable from 133 to 20 µm. Opt. Lett. 41, 4863 (2016)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    A. Hugi, G. Villares, S. Blaser, H.C. Liu, J. Faist, Mid-infrared frequency comb based on a quantum cascade laser. Nature 492, 229 (2012)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Q. Lu, D. Wu, S. Slivken, M. Razeghi, High efficiency quantum cascade laser frequency comb. Sci. Rep. 7, 43806 (2017)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    C.Y. Wang, T. Herr, P. Del’Haye, A. Schliesser, J. Hofer, R. Holzwarth, T.W. Hänsch, N. Picqué, T.J. Kippenberg, Mid-infrared optical frequency combs at 2.5 µm based on crystalline microresonators. Nat. Commun. 4, 1345 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    A.G. Griffith, R.K.W. Lau, J. Cardenas, Y. Okawachi, A. Mohanty, R. Fain, Y.H.D. Lee, M. Yu, C.T. Phare, C.B. Poitras, A.L. Gaeta, M. Lipson, Silicon-chip mid-infrared frequency comb generation. Nat. Commun. 6, 6299 (2015)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    C. Lecaplain, C. Javerzac-Galy, M.L. Gorodetsky, T.J. Kippenberg, Mid-infrared ultra-high-Q resonators based on fluoride crystalline materials. Nat. Commun. 7, 13383 (2016)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    A. Marandi, C.W. Rudy, V.G. Plotnichenko, E.M. Dianov, K.L. Vodopyanov, R.L. Byer, Mid-infrared supercontinuum generation in tapered chalcogenide fiber for producing octave-spanning frequency comb around 3 µm. Opt. Express 20, 24218 (2012)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    B. Kuyken, T. Ideguchi, S. Holzner, M. Yan, T.W. Hänsch, J.V. Campenhout, P. Verheyen, S. Coen, F. Leo, R. Baets, G. Roelkens, N. Picqué, An octave-spanning mid-infrared frequency comb generated in a silicon nanophotonic wire waveguide. Nat. Commun. 6, 6310 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    C. Herkommer, A. Billat, H. Guo, D. Grassani, C. Zhang, M.H.P. Pfeiffer, C.-S. Bres, T.J. Kippenberg, Mid-infrared frequency comb generation with silicon nitride nano-photonic waveguides (2017), arXiv:1704.02478Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    T.C. Briles, D.C. Yost, A. Cingöz, J. Ye, T.R. Schibli, Simple piezoelectric-actuated mirror with 180 kHz servo bandwidth. Opt. Express 18, 9739 (2010)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    D.N. Nikogosyan, Nonlinear optical crystals: a complete survey (Springer Science + Business Media, Inc., New York, 2005)Google Scholar
  42. 42.
    R.W. Boyd, Nonlinear optics (Academic, Cambridge, 1992)Google Scholar
  43. 43.
    M.J. McCarthy, D.C. Hanna, All-solid-state synchronously pumped optical parametric oscillator. J. Opt. Soc. Am. B 10, 2180 (1993)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    P. Maslowski, K.F. Lee, A.C. Johansson, A. Khodabakhsh, G. Kowzan, L. Rutkowski, A.A. Mills, C. Mohr, J. Jiang, M.E. Fermann, A. Foltynowicz, Surpassing the path-limited resolution of Fourier-transform spectrometry with frequency combs. Phys. Rev. A 93, 021802 (2016)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    A. Ruehl, M.J. Martin, K.C. Cossel, L. Chen, H. McKay, B. Thomas, C. Benko, L. Dong, J.M. Dudley, M.E. Fermann, I. Hartl, J. Ye, Ultrabroadband coherent supercontinuum frequency comb. Phys. Rev. A 84, 011806 (2011)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Y. Kobayashi, K. Torizuka, Measurement of the optical phase relation among subharmonic pulses in a femtosecond optical parametric oscillator. Opt. Lett. 25, 856 (2000)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    J. Ye, J.L. Hall, S.A. Diddams, Precision phase control of an ultrawide-bandwidth femtosecond laser: a network of ultrastable frequency marks across the visible spectrum. Opt. Lett. 25, 1675 (2000)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.

Authors and Affiliations

  • Kana Iwakuni
    • 1
  • Gil Porat
    • 1
  • Thinh Q. Bui
    • 1
  • Bryce J. Bjork
    • 1
    • 3
  • Stephen B. Schoun
    • 1
  • Oliver H. Heckl
    • 1
    • 4
  • Martin E. Fermann
    • 2
  • Jun Ye
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Physics, JILA, National Institute of Standards and Technology and University of ColoradoUniversity of ColoradoBoulderUSA
  2. 2.IMRA America, Inc.Ann ArborUSA
  3. 3.Honeywell InternationalBroomfieldUSA
  4. 4.Christian Doppler Laboratory for Mid-IR Spectroscopy and Semiconductor OpticsUniversity of ViennaViennaAustria

Personalised recommendations