Thermal stability and optical properties of single-layer nano-composite TiN/TiC-Ni/Mo solar-selective-absorbing coatings by laser cladding
Abstract
Currently, the most important challenge for solar energy photo-thermal utilization is the thermal stability of solar absorber coatings at high temperature. The new one-layer nano-composite TiN/TiC-based cermet coatings were designed and fabricated with laser-cladding method in the air. The result indicated the laser cladding could be used to obtain 30 wt.%, TiN-30 wt.%, TiC-20 wt.%, and Ni-20 wt.% Mo cermet coatings with the desired optical properties. In particular, an absorptance (α) of ~ 80.1% and a thermal emissivity (ε) of ~ 2% at 300 K were calculated when the weight rate of nano-particles/micro-particles is 1:1. In addition, the thermal stability of the coating was outstanding after heat treatment at 650 °C for 6 h. The absorptance and emissivity of cermet coating were, respectively, 80.8% and 1.9% at 650 °C. The results indicated that nano-composite TiN/TiC-Ni/Mo cermets are suitable for spectrally selective materials. Moreover, the laser cladding was found to be an improved and novel preparation method in the field of solar-selective-absorbing coatings.
Notes
Acknowledgements
This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (51502133).
References
- 1.H.C. Barshilia, N. Selvakumar, K.S. Rajam, Appl. Phys. Lett. 89, 191909 (2006)CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
- 2.J. Moon, D. Lu, B. VanSaders, T.K. Kim, S.D. Kong, S. Jin, R. Chen, Z. Liu, Nano Energy 8, 238–246 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 3.X. Wang, T.Y. Ouyang, X. Duan, C. Ke, X. Zhang, J. Min, A. Li, W. Guo, X. Cheng, Metals 7, 137 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 4.X. Wang, J. Gao, H. Hu, H. Zhang, L. Liang, K. Javaid, F. Zhuge, H. Cao, L. Wang, Nano Energy 37, 232–241 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 5.X.M. Pang, Q. Wei, J.X. Zhou, H.Y. Ma, Materials 11, 1037 (2018)CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
- 6.T.S. Sathiaraj, R. Thangaraj, O.P. Agnihotri, Sol. Energy Mater. 18, 343–356 (1989)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 7.X.H. Gao, W. Theiss, Y.Q. Shen, P.J. Ma, G. Liu, Sol. Energy. Mater. Sol. Cells. 167, 150–156 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 8.J.A. Ramírez-Rincón, O. Ares-Muzio, J.D. Macias, M.A. Estrella-Gutiérrez, F.I. Lizama-Tzec, G. Oskam, Appl. Phys. A Mater. 124, 252 (2018)CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
- 9.X. He, D.J. Kong, R.G. Song, Materials 11, 198 (2018)CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
- 10.Q.C. Zhang, J. Phys. D Appl. Phys. 34, 3113 (2001)CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
- 11.J.P. Meng, R.R. Guo, H. Li, L.M. Zhao, X.P. Liu, Z. Li, Appl. Surf. Sci. 440, 932–938 (2018)CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
- 12.Q. Wei, X.M. Pang, J.X. Zhou, C. Chen, Sol. Energy 171, 247–257 (2018)CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
- 13.X.M. Pang, Mater. Res. Express. 4, 095503 (2017)CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
- 14.A.A. Shah, C. Ungaro, C.M. Gupta, Sol. Energy. Mater. Sol. Cells. 134, 209–214 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 15.Y. Zheng, W.J. Liu, S.X. Wang, W.H. Xiong, Ceram. Int. 30, 2111–2115 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar