Applied Physics A

, 125:680 | Cite as

Mechanical properties and microstructure of reaction sintering SiC ceramics reinforced with graphene-based fillers

  • Fu Liu
  • Mingjie Wang
  • Yao ChenEmail author
  • Jianmin GaoEmail author
  • Tian Ma


To improve the fracture toughness and bending strength of reaction sintering SiC ceramics, graphene oxide (GO) and reduced graphene oxide (rGO) were selected as fillers to develop reinforced SiC ceramic composites by reactive sintering in the current work. Different amounts (0.5, 1.0, 1.5, or 3.0 wt.%) of graphene-reinforced reaction-bonded silicon carbide (RBSC) composites were fabricated. The mechanical behaviors of the materials were evaluated as a function of the type of graphene source and graphene content. X-ray diffraction (XRD) and scanning electron microscopy (SEM) analysis showed that graphene was maintained after reactive sintering by liquid infiltration of molten silicon. Both the fracture toughness and bending strength of the RBSC increased with employing graphene-based additives. GO showed the most significant positive effects on improving mechanical performance of RBSC ceramics. The highest fracture toughness of 3.6 MPa m1/2 was obtained at 1.5 wt.% of GO addition. It was 33% higher than that of RBSC without graphene. The highest bending strength corresponded to the composite reinforced with GO content of 1.0 wt.%. It was about 58% higher than that of RBSC ceramic. The relation between phase content and mechanical properties was discussed. The main toughening mechanism was sheet pullout/debonding and the distribution of graphene along grain boundaries.



This paper was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (contract no. 51572028), and Beijing Natural Science Foundation (6192020).


  1. 1.
    S.H. Lee, Y.I. Lee, Y.W. Kim, R.J. Xie, M. Mitomo, G.D. Zhan, Mechanical properties of hot-forged silicon carbide ceramics. Scr. Mater. 52, 153–156 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Y. Zhou, K. Hirao, Y. Yamauchi, S. Kanzaki, Tailoring the mechanical properties of silicon carbide ceramics by modification of the intergranular phase chemistry and microstructure. J. Eur. Ceram. Soc. 22, 2689–2696 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    S. Baud, F. Thévenot, Microstructures and mechanical properties of liquid-phase sintered seeded silicon carbide. Mater. Chem. Phys. 67, 165–174 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    X.F. Zhang, Q. Yang, L.C. De Jonghe, Microstructure development in hot-pressed silicon carbide: effects of aluminum, boron, and carbon additives. Acta. Mater. 51, 3849–38602003 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    J.K. Lee, J.G. Park, E.G. Lee, D.S. Seo, Y. Hwang, Effect of starting phase on microstructure and fracture toughness of hot-pressed silicon carbide. Mater. Lett. 57, 203–208 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    S.C. Zhang, G.E. Hilmas, W.G. Fahrenholtz, Pressureless sintering of ZrB2–SiC ceramics. J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 91, 26–32 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    C. Lee, X. Wei, J.W. Kysar, J. Hone, Measurement of the elastic properties and intrinsic strength of monolayer graphene. Science 321, 385–388 (2008)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    A.K. Geim, K.S. Novoselov, The rise of graphene. Nat. Mater. 6, 183–191 (2007)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    R. Barabas, D. Deemter, G. Katona, G. Batin, L. Barabas, L. Bizo, O. Cadar, Comparative study on physicochemical and mechanical characterization of new nanocarbon-based hydroxyapatite nanocomposites. Turk. J. Chem. 43, 809–824 (2019)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    J. Liu, H. Yan, M.J. Reece, K. Jiang, Toughening of zirconia/alumina composites by the addition of graphene platelets. J. Eur. Ceram. Soc. 32, 4185–4193 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    A.K. Geim, Graphene: status and prospects. Science 324, 1530–1534 (2009)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    P. Miranzo, C. Ramírez, B. Román-Manso, L. Garzón, H.R. Gutiérrez, M. Terrones, M. Belmonte, In situ processing of electrically conducting graphene/SiC nanocomposites. J. Eur. Ceram. Soc. 33, 1665–1674 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    M. Belmonte, A. Nistal, P. Boutbien, B. Román-Manso, M.I. Osendi, P. Miranzo, Toughened and strengthened silicon carbide ceramics by adding graphene-based fillers. Scr. Mater. 113, 127–130 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    K.P. dos Santos Tonello, E. Padovano, C. Badini, S. Biamino, M. Pavese, P. Fino, Fabrication and characterization of laminated sic composites reinforced with graphene nanoplatelets. Mat. Sci. Eng. A Struct. 659, 158–164 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Q. Li, Y. Zhang, H. Gong, H. Sun, W. Li, L. Ma, Y. Zhang, Enhanced fracture toughness of pressureless-sintered SiC ceramics by addition of graphene. J. Mater. Sci. Technol. 32, 633–638 (2016)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    S. Li, Y. Zhang, J. Han, Y. Zhou, Fabrication and characterization of SiC whisker reinforced reaction bonded SiC composite. Ceram. Int. 39, 449–455 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    N. Song, H. Liu, Y. Yuan, X. Li, J. Fang, Fabrication and corrosion resistance of sic-coated multi-walled carbon nanotubes. J. Mater. Sci. Technol. 29, 1146–1150 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    S. Gilje, M. Wang, S. Han, R.B. Kaner, S. Wang, A chemical route to graphene for device applications. Nano Lett. 7, 3394–3398 (2007)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    H. Saleem, M. Haneef, H.Y. Abbasi, Synthesis route of reduced graphene oxide via thermal reduction of chemically exfoliated graphene oxide. Mater. Chem. Phys. 204, 1–7 (2018)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    ASTM Standard C373-88. Standard test method for water absorption, bulk density, apparent density and the apparent specific gravity of fired whiteware products, American Society for Testing Materials, West Conshohocken, PA (1999)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    D.D. Nesmelov, S.N. Perevislov, Reaction sintered materials based on boron carbide and silicon carbide. Glass Ceram 71, 313–319 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Y. Zhang, S. Li, J. Han, Y. Zhou, Fabrication and characterization of random chopped fiber reinforced reaction bonded silicon carbide composite. Ceram. Int. 38, 1261–1266 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    G. Qiao, R. Ma, N. Cai, C. Zhang, Z. Jin, Mechanical properties and microstructure of Si/SiC materials derived from native wood. Mat. Sci. Eng. A 323, 301–305 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    B. Heidenreich, M. Gahr, E. Straßburger, E. Lutz, Biomorphic Sisic-materials for lightweight armour, Advances in Ceramic Armor II, p. 21-31 (2006)Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    X. Zhou, D. Liu, H. Bu, L. Deng, H. Liu, Y. Peng, XRD-based quantitative analysis of clay minerals using reference intensity ratios, mineral intensity factors Rietveld, and full pattern summation methods: a critical review. Solid Earth Sci. 3, 16–29 (2018)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Y. Huang, D. Jiang, X. Zhang, Z. Liao, Z. Huang, Enhancing toughness and strength of SiC ceramics with reduced graphene oxide by HP sintering. J. Eur. Ceram. Soc. 38, 4329–4337 (2018)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    L.S. Walker, V.R. Marotto, M.A. Rafiee, N. Koratkar, E.L. Corral, Toughening in graphene ceramic composites. ACS Nano 5, 3182–3190 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.MOE Key Laboratory of Wooden Materials Science and ApplicationBeijing Forestry UniversityBeijingChina
  2. 2.The Research Center of China-Hemp Materials, The Quartermaster Research Institute of the General Logistics Department of the PLABeijingChina

Personalised recommendations