Advertisement

Coral Reefs

, Volume 38, Issue 1, pp 103–108 | Cite as

Enhanced fast-start performance and anti-predator behaviour in a coral reef fish in response to suspended sediment exposure

  • Sybille HessEmail author
  • Bridie J. M. Allan
  • Andrew S. Hoey
  • Michael D. Jarrold
  • Amelia S. Wenger
  • Jodie L. Rummer
Note

Abstract

Declining water quality, in particular elevated suspended sediments, poses a significant threat to coastal coral reefs. We exposed juvenile anemonefish (Amphiprion melanopus) to two suspended sediment concentrations (0 or 180 mg L−1) for 7 d and examined their predator escape performance and anti-predator behaviour in both clear water and suspended sediments (0 and 180 mg L−1, i.e. acute exposure). After 7-d exposure to suspended sediments, fish responded faster to a mechanical stimulus and exhibited enhanced fast starts compared to individuals reared in clear water, regardless of acute exposure. Fish were also less active and avoided open areas when exposed to elevated suspended sediments in the test arena when compared to clear water, irrespective of prior 7-d exposure. While these changes are likely strategies to compensate for an increased perceived predation risk in suspended sediments, they may also be associated with non-consumptive costs for juveniles living on turbid reefs.

Keywords

Suspended solids Sub-lethal effects Predator–prey interactions Turbidity Fish health 

Notes

Acknowledgements

We thank the team at MARFU, Ross Barrett and Sue Reilly for their technical support.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

All authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

This research has been conducted according to the Australian code for the care and use of animals for scientific purposes and has been approved by the Animal Ethics Committee at James Cook University (animal ethics approval number A2218).

Supplementary material

338_2018_1757_MOESM1_ESM.docx (398 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 399 kb)

References

  1. Allan BJ, Miller GM, McCormick MI, Domenici P, Munday PL (2014) Parental effects improve escape performance of juvenile reef fish in a high-CO2 world. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 281:20132179CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bates D, Maechler M, Bolker B, Walker S (2015) Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. J Stat Softw 67:1–48CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Brown NR, Leighton TG, Richards SD, Heathershaw AD (1998) Measurement of viscous sound absorption at 50–150 kHz in a model turbid environment. J Acoust Soc Am 104:2114–2120CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Brown CJ, Jupiter SD, Lin H-Y, Albert S, Klein C, Maina JM, Tulloch VJ, Wenger AS, Mumby PJ (2017) Habitat change mediates the response of coral reef fish populations to terrestrial run-off. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 576:55–68CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Domenici P (2010) Context-dependent variability in the components of fish escape response: integrating locomotor performance and behavior. J Exp Zool 313:59–79CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Domenici P, Blake R (1997) The kinematics and performance of fish fast-start swimming. J Exp Biol 200:1165–1178Google Scholar
  7. Fabricius KE (2005) Effects of terrestrial runoff on the ecology of corals and coral reefs:review and synthesis. Mar Poll Bull 50:125–146CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Fautin DC, Allen GR (1992) Field guide to anemonefishes and their host sea anemones. Western Australian Museum, PerthGoogle Scholar
  9. Godin JGJ, Smith SA (1988) A fitness cost of foraging in the guppy. Nature 333:69–71CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Hamilton RJ, Almany GR, Brown CJ, Pita J, Peterson NA, Choat JH (2017) Logging degrades nursery habitat for an iconic coral reef fish. Biol Cons 210:273–280CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Higham TE, Stewart WJ, Wainwright PC (2015) Turbulence, temperature, and turbidity: The ecomechanics of predator-prey interactions in fishes. Integr Comp Biol 55:6–20CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Hess S, Prescott LJ, Hoey ASH, McMahon SA, Wenger ASW, Rummer JLR (2017) Species-specific effects of suspended sediments on gill structure and function in coral reef fishes. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 284Google Scholar
  13. Hawlena D, Schmitz OJ (2010) Physiological stress as a fundamental mechanism linking predation to ecosystem functioning. Am Nat 176:537–556CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Hoey AS, McCormick MI (2004) Selective predation for low body condition at the larval-juvenile transition of a coral reef fish. Oecologica 139(1):23–29CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Killen SS, Reid D, Marras S, Domenici P (2015) The interplay between aerobic metabolism and antipredator performance: vigilance is related to recovery rate after exercise. Front Physiol 6:111CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Larcombe P, Costen A, Woolfe KJ (2001) The hydrodynamic and sedimentary setting of nearshore coral reefs, central Great Barrier Reef shelf, Australia: Paluma Shoals, a case study. Sedimentology 48:811–835CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Leahy SM, McCormick MI, Mitchell MD, Ferrari MC (2011) To fear or to feed: the effects of turbidity on perception of risk by a marine fish. Biol Lett:rsbl20110645Google Scholar
  18. Lima SL (1998) Stress and decision making under the risk of predation: recent developments from behavioral, reproductive, and ecological perspectives. Adv Study Behav 27:215–290CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Meager JJ, Domenici P, Shingles A, Utne-Palm AC (2006) Escape responses in juvenile Atlantic cod Gadus morhua L.: the effects of turbidity and predator speed. J Exp Biol 209:4174–4184CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. McCormick MI, Fakan E, Allan BJM (2018) Behavioural measures determine survivorship within the hierarchy of whole-organism phenotypic traits. Fun Ecol 32:958–969CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Preisser EL, Bolnick DI, Benard MF (2005) Scared to death? The effects of intimidation and consumption in predator–prey interactions. Ecology 86:501–509CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Ramasamy RA, Allan BJ, McCormick MI (2015) Plasticity of escape responses: prior predator experience enhances escape performance in a coral reef fish. Plos One 10:e0132790CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Ross RM (1978) Territorial behaviour and ecology of the anemonefish Amphiprion melanopus on Guam. Ethology 36:71–83Google Scholar
  24. Schnörr S, Steenbergen P, Richardson M, Champagne D (2012) Measuring thigmotaxis in larval zebrafish. Behav Brain Res 228:367–374CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Syvitski JPM, Vorosmarty CJ, Kettner AJ, Green P (2005) Impact of humans on the flux of terrestrial sediment to the global coastal ocean. Science 308:376–380CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Walker J, Ghalambor C, Griset O, McKenney D, Reznick D (2005) Do faster starts increase the probability of evading predators? Fun Ecol 19:808–815CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Wenger AS, McCormick MI (2013) Determining trigger values of suspended sediment for behavioral changes in a coral reef fish. Mar Pol Bul 70:73–80CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Wenger AS, McCormick MI, McLeod I, Jones G (2013) Suspended sediment alters predator–prey interactions between two coral reef fishes. Coral Reefs 32:369–374CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Wenger AS, Williamson DH, da Silva ET, Ceccarelli DM, Browne NK, Petus C, Devlin MJ (2016) Effects of reduced water quality on coral reefs in and out of no-take marine reserves. Cons Biol 30:142–153CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Wenger AS, Harvey E, Wilson S, Rawson C, Newman SJ, Clarke D, Saunders BJ, Browne N, Travers MJ, Mcilwain JL (2017) A critical analysis of the direct effects of dredging on fish. Fish Fish 18:967–985CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.ARC Centre of Excellence for Coral Reef StudiesTownsvilleAustralia
  2. 2.College of Science and EngineeringJames Cook UniversityTownsvilleAustralia
  3. 3.Department of Marine ScienceUniversity of OtagoDunedinNew Zealand
  4. 4.School of Earth and Environmental SciencesUniversity of QueenslandBrisbaneAustralia

Personalised recommendations