Optimal beam quality for chest flat panel detector system: realistic phantom study
- 9 Downloads
To investigate optimal beam quality for chest flat panel detector (FPD) system by semi-quantitatively assessment using a realistic lung phantom.
Materials and methods
Chest FPD radiographs were obtained on a realistic lung phantom with simulated lung opacities using various X-ray tube voltage levels (90–140 kV) with/without copper filter. Entrance skin dose was set to maintain identical for all images (0.1 mGy). Three chest radiologists unaware of the exposure settings independently evaluated the image quality of each simulated opacity and normal structure using a 5-point scale (+ 2: clearly superior to the standard; + 1: slightly superior to the standard; 0: equal to the standard; − 1: slightly inferior to the standard; − 2: clearly inferior to the standard). The traditional FPD image obtained at a tube voltage of 120 kV was used as the standard. The scores of image quality were statistically compared using the Wilcoxon rank test with Bonferroni correction.
FPD images using 90-kV shot with copper filter were superior to the traditional 120-kV shot without filter with respect to the visibility of vertebra, pulmonary vessels, and nodules overlapping diaphragm and heart (p < 0.05). There was no significant difference with respect to the visibility of all other simulated lung opacities (lung nodules except for overlying diaphragm/heart and honeycomb opacity) between each tube voltage level with/without copper filter and the traditional 120-kV shot without filter.
Image quality of FPD images using 90 kV with copper filtration is superior to that using standard tube voltage when dose is identical.
• FPD image quality using 90 kV with filter is superior to that using traditional beam.
• Ninety-kilovolt shot with copper filter may be suitable for chest FPD image.
• Clinical study dealing with chest FPD beam optimization would be warranted.
KeywordsDigital radiography Chest radiography Physics Dose Image quality
Entrance skin dose
Flat panel detector
Intraclass correlation coefficients
The authors state that this work has not received any funding.
Compliance with ethical standards
The scientific guarantor of this publication is Takatoshi Aoki.
Conflict of interest
The authors of this manuscript declare no relationships with any companies whose products or services may be related to the subject matter of the article.
Statistics and biometry
No complex statistical methods were necessary for this paper.
Informed consent was waived because of phantom study.
Institutional Review Board approval was not required because of phantom study.
• performed at one institution
- 3.American College of Radiology (2014) ACR–SPR–STR practice parameter for the performance of chest radiography. Available via https://www.acr.org/-/media/ACR/Files/Practice-Parameters/ChestRad.pdf. Accessed 12 Oct 2017
- 13.Hashemi S, Mehrez H, Cobbold RS, Paul NS (2014) Optimal image reconstruction for detection and characterization of small pulmonary nodules during low-dose CT. Eur Radiol 24:1239–1250Google Scholar
- 15.Hubbell JH, Seltzer SM (1995) “Tables of X-ray mass attenuation coefficients and mass energy-absorption coefficients 1 keV to 20 MeV for elements Z=1 to 92 and 48 additional substances of dosimetric interest,” NISTIR 5632 National Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersdurg, MDGoogle Scholar
- 18.ICRP (1991) 1990 Recommendations of the International Commission on Radiological Protection. ICRP Publication 60. Ann ICRP 21 1–3Google Scholar