Follow-up MRI in multiple sclerosis patients: automated co-registration and lesion color-coding improves diagnostic accuracy and reduces reading time
In multiple sclerosis (MS), the heterogeneous and numerous appearances of lesions may impair diagnostic accuracy. This study investigates if a combined automated co-registration and lesion color-coding method (AC) improves assessment of MS follow-up MRI compared with conventional reading (CR).
We retrospectively assessed 70 follow-up MRI of 53 patients. Heterogeneous datasets of diverse scanners and institutions were used. Two readers determined presence of (a) progression, (b) regression, (c) mixed change, or (d) stable disease between the two examinations using corresponding FLAIR sequences in CR and AC-assisted reading. Consensus reference reading was provided by two blinded radiologists. Kappa statistics tested interrater agreement, McNemar’s test dichotomous variables, and Wilcoxon’s test continuous variables (statistical significance p ≤ 0.05).
The cohort comprised 41 female and 12 male patients with a mean age of 40 (± 14) years. Average rating time was reduced from 78 (± 36) to 44 (±22) s with the AC approach (p < 0.001). The time needed to start and match datasets with AC was 14 (± 1) s. Compared with CR, AC improved interrater agreement, both between raters (0.52 vs. 0.67) and between raters and consensus reference reading (0.47/0.5 vs. 0.83/0.78). Compared with CR, the diagnostic accuracy increased from 67 to 90% (reader 1, p < 0.01) and from 70 to 87% (reader 2, p < 0.05) in the AC-assisted reading.
Compared with CR, automated co-registration and lesion color-coding of MS-associated FLAIR-lesions in follow-up MRI increased diagnostic accuracy and reduced the time required for follow-up evaluation significantly. The AC algorithm therefore appears to be helpful to improve MS follow-up assessments in clinical routine.
• Automated co-registration and lesion color-coding increases diagnostic accuracy in the assessment of MRI follow-up examinations in patients with multiple sclerosis.
• Automated co-registration and lesion color-coding reduces reading time of MRI follow-up examinations in patients with multiple sclerosis.
• Automated co-registration and lesion color-coding improved interrater agreement in the assessment of MRI follow-up examinations in patients with multiple sclerosis.
KeywordsMultiple sclerosis Magnetic resonance imaging Disease progression Brain Image processing, computer-assisted
Automated co-registration and lesion color-coding image reading approach
Fluid-attenuated inversion recovery
Magnetic resonance imaging
Picture archiving and communication system
Radiological information system
The authors state that this work has not received any funding.
Compliance with ethical standards
The scientific guarantor of this publication is Jan Borggrefe.
Conflict of interest
The authors of this manuscript declare relationships with the following companies:
Jan Borggrefe received speaker honoraria from Philips.
Statistics and biometry
No complex statistical methods were necessary for this paper.
Written informed consent was waived by the Institutional Review Board.
Institutional Review Board approval was obtained.
• Diagnostic or prognostic study
• Performed at one institution
- 4.Simpson S Jr, Blizzard L, Otahal P, van der Mei I, Taylor B (2011) Latitude is significantly associated with the prevalence of multiple sclerosis: a meta-analysis. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 82(10):1132–1141Google Scholar
- 8.Katz Sand IB, Lublin FD (2013) Diagnosis and differential diagnosis of multiple sclerosis. Continuum (Minneap Minn) 19(4 Multiple Sclerosis):922–943Google Scholar
- 16.Cabezas M, Corral JF, Oliver A et al (2016) Improved automatic detection of new T2 lesions in multiple sclerosis using deformation fields. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A4829
- 20.Laukamp KR, Thiele F, Shakirin G et al (2018) Fully automated detection and segmentation of meningiomas using deep learning on routine multiparametric MRI. Eur Radiol. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-018-5595-8
- 28.Chokshi FH, Hughes DR, Wang JM, Mullins ME, Hawkins CM, Duszak R Jr (2015) Diagnostic radiology resident and fellow workloads: a 12-year longitudinal trend analysis using national Medicare aggregate claims data. J Am Coll Radiol 12(7):664–669Google Scholar