Abdominal compartment syndrome and intra-abdominal hypertension in critically ill patients: diagnostic value of computed tomography
- 24 Downloads
The aims of the present work were to reevaluate, prospectively, the diagnostic value of already-described computed tomography (CT) landmarks of intra-abdominal hypertension (IAH) and abdominal compartment syndrome (ACS) and to study the diagnostic value of some undescribed CT signs for the diagnosis of IAH and ACS.
Materials and methods
Consecutive patients admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) in shock for whom an abdominal CT was clinically indicated were included. CT examinations were reviewed and scored by two reviewers for the 12 proposed CT features of IAH and ACS. Intravesical pressure (IVP) was measured for each patient. Imaging features and clinical data of patients with IAH (IVP ≥ 12 mmHg) were compared to those of patients with normal intra-abdominal pressure (IVP < 12 mmHg).
Forty-one patients were included. Twenty-one patients (51%) presented IAH with an IVP value ≥ 12 mmHg. Four patients (10%) were considered to have ACS (10%). Only an increased peritoneal-to-abdominal height ratio (PAR) was associated with the presence of IAH (PAR = 0.45 [0.40–0.49] in patients with IVP < 12 mmHg and PAR = 0.52 [0.48–0.53] in patients with IVP ≥ 12 mmHg; p < 0.001). Increased PAR ≥ 0.52 had a specificity of 85% for IAH diagnosis.
The present study suggests that a PAR ≥ 0.52 could help radiologists to identify IAH on abdominal CT scan and could lead to adequate identification and/or treatment, even at early stages of IAH.
• CT is an efficient first-intention procedure to evaluate and follow up underlying conditions in critically ill patients at risk of IAH and ACS overcome.
• Raising the possibility of an IAH on a CT examination is relevant information for the clinician.
• The only factors associated with intra-abdominal hypertension were the peritoneal-to-abdominal height ratio (PAR) and the ratio of maximal anteroposterior to transverse abdominal diameter (which define the round belly sign when > 0.8).
KeywordsIntra-abdominal hypertension Sagittal abdominal diameter Intensive care units X-ray computed tomography Prospective studies
Abdominal compartment syndrome
Intensive care unit
Peritoneal-to-abdominal height ratio
Round belly sign
World Society of the Abdominal Compartment Syndrome
Compliance with ethical standards
The scientific guarantor of this publication is Prof. Eric Delabrousse.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Statistics and biometry
One of the authors has significant statistical expertise.
Written informed consent was obtained from some subjects in this study.
Written informed consent was not required for all the patients of this study because the subjects were critically patients.
Institutional review board approval was obtained.
• performed at one institution
- 5.Kim IB, Prowle J, Baldwin I, Bellomo R (2012) Incidence, risk factors and outcome associations of intra-abdominal hypertension in critically ill patients. Anaesth Intensive Care 40(79)Google Scholar
- 6.Strang SG, Van Lieshout EM, Verhoeven RA, Van Waes OJ, Verhofstad MH (2016) Recognition and management of intra-abdominal hypertension and abdominal compartment syndrome; a survey among Dutch surgeons. Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg 43:85–98Google Scholar
- 9.Arabadzhiev GM, Tzaneva VG, Peeva KG (2015) Intra-abdominal hypertension in the ICU—a prospective epidemiological study. Clujul Med 1957 88:188–195Google Scholar
- 10.Dalfino L, Tullo L, Donadio I, Malcangi V, Brienza N (2008) Intra-abdominal hypertension and acute renal failure in critically ill patients. Intensive Care Med 34:707–713. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00134-007-0969-4
- 11.Kyoung KH, Hong SK (2015) The duration of intra-abdominal hypertension strongly predicts outcomes for the critically ill surgical patients: a prospective observational study. World J Emerg Surg 10Google Scholar
- 12.Malbrain MLNG, Chiumello D, Cesana BM et al (2014) A systematic review and individual patient data meta-analysis on intra-abdominal hypertension in critically ill patients: the wake-up project. World initiative on Abdominal Hypertension Epidemiology, a Unifying Project (WAKE-Up!). Minerva Anestesiol 80:293–306PubMedGoogle Scholar
- 16.Desie N, Willems A, De Laet I et al (2012) Intra-abdominal pressure measurement using the FoleyManometer does not increase the risk for urinary tract infection in critically ill patients. Ann Intensive Care 2(1)Google Scholar
- 18.Kirkpatrick AW, Brenneman FD, McLean RF, Rapanos T, Boulanger BR (2000) Is clinical examination an accurate indicator of raised intra-abdominal pressure in critically injured patients? Can J Surg 43:207Google Scholar
- 21.Epelman M, Soudack M, Engel A, Halberthal M, Beck R (2002) Abdominal compartment syndrome in children: CT findings. Pediatr Radiol 32:319–322Google Scholar
- 22.Al-Bahrani AZ, Abid GH, Sahgal E, O'shea S, Lee S, Ammori BJ (2007) A prospective evaluation of CT features predictive of intra-abdominal hypertension and abdominal compartment syndrome in critically ill surgical patients. Clin Radiol 62:676–682Google Scholar
- 23.Wu J, Zhu Q, Zhu W, Chen W, Wang S (2014) Computed tomographic features of abdominal compartment syndrome complicated by severe acute pancreatitis. Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi 94:3378–3381Google Scholar
- 24.Laffargue G, Taourel P, Saguintaah M, Lesnik A (2012) CT diagnosis of abdominal compartment syndrome. AJR Am J Roentgenol 178:771–772Google Scholar
- 26.Moreno FL, Hagan AD, Holmen JR, Pryor TA, Strickland RD, Castle CH (1984) Evaluation of size and dynamics of the inferior vena cava as an index of right-sided cardiac function. Am J Cardiol 53:579–585Google Scholar
- 27.Pickhardt PJ, Shimony JS, Heiken JP, Buchman TG, Fisher AJ (1999) The abdominal compartment syndrome: CT findings. AJR Am J Roentgenol 173:575–579Google Scholar
- 30.De Waele JJ, Malbrain ML, Kirkpatrick AW (2015) The abdominal compartment syndrome: evolving concepts and future directions. Crit Care 19. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13054-015-0879-8
- 31.Smit M, Werner MJM, Lansink-Hartgring AO, Dieperink W, Zijlstra JG, van Meurs M (2016) How central obesity influences intra-abdominal pressure: a prospective, observational study in cardiothoracic surgical patients. Ann Intensive Care 6:99Google Scholar
- 32.Maddison L, Starkopf J, Reintam Blaser A (2016) Mild to moderate intra-abdominal hypertension: does it matter? World J Crit Care Med 5:96–102Google Scholar