Advertisement

Intrauterine fetal MR versus postmortem MR imaging after therapeutic termination of pregnancy: evaluation of the concordance in the detection of brain abnormalities at early gestational stage

  • Giana IzzoEmail author
  • Giacomo Talenti
  • Giorgia Falanga
  • Marco Moscatelli
  • Giorgio Conte
  • Elisa Scola
  • Chiara Doneda
  • Cecilia Parazzini
  • Mariangela Rustico
  • Fabio Triulzi
  • Andrea Righini
Neuro
  • 41 Downloads

Abstract

Background and purpose

Fetal postmortem MR Imaging (pmMRI) has been recently used as an adjuvant tool to conventional brain autopsy after termination of pregnancy (TOP). Our purpose was to compare the diagnostic performance of intrauterine MRI (iuMRI) and pmMRI in the detection of brain anomalies in fetuses at early gestational age (GA).

Material and methods

We retrospectively collected 53 fetuses who had undergone iuMRI and pmMRI for suspected brain anomalies. Two pediatric neuroradiologists reviewed iuMRI and pmMRI examinations separately and then together. We used Cohen’s K to assess the agreement between pmMRI and iuMRI. Using the combined evaluation iuMRI+pMRI as the reference standard, we calculated the “correctness ratio.” We used Somers’ D to assess the cograduation between postmortem image quality and time elapsed after fetus expulsion.

Results

Our data showed high agreement between iuMRI and pmMRI considering all the categories together, for both observers (K1 0.84; K2 0.86). The correctness ratio of iuMRI and pmMRI was 79% and 45% respectively. The major disagreements between iuMRI and pmMRI were related to postmortem changes as the collapse of liquoral structures and distorting phenomena. We also found a significant cograduation between the time elapsed from expulsion and pmMRI contrast resolution and distortive phenomena (both p < 0.001).

Conclusions

Our study demonstrates an overall high concordance between iuMRI and pmMRI in detecting fetal brain abnormalities at early GA. Nevertheless, for the correct interpretation of pmMRI, the revision of fetal examination seems to be crucial, in particular when time elapsed from expulsion is longer than 24 h.

Key Points

• IuMRI and pmMRI showed overall high concordance in detecting fetal brain abnormalities at early GA.

• PmMRI corroborated the antemortem diagnosis and it could be a valid alternative to conventional brain autopsy, only when the latter cannot be performed.

• Some caution should be taken in interpreting pmMR images when performed after 24 h from fetal death.

Keywords

Fetuses Magnetic resonance imaging Brain Termination of pregnancy Counseling 

Abbreviations

CNS

Central nervous system

CSF

Cerebrospinal fluid

GA

Gestational age

iuMRI

Intrauterine magnetic resonance imaging

PCF

Posterior cranial fossa

pmMRI

Postmortem magnetic resonance imaging

TOP

Termination of pregnancy

Notes

Acknowledgments

We are grateful to Professor Paul D. Griffiths for his advice in preparing the manuscript.

Funding

The authors state that this work has not received any funding.

Compliance with ethical standards

Guarantor

The scientific guarantor of this publication is Andrea Righini, chief of the Neuroradiology Department.

Conflict of interest

The authors of this manuscript declare no relationships with any companies, whose products or services may be related to the subject matter of the article.

Statistics and biometry

No complex statistical methods were necessary for this paper. One of the authors has statistical expertise.

Informed consent

Written informed consent was obtained from all subjects in this study.

Ethical approval

Institutional review board approval was obtained.

Study subjects or cohorts overlap

One study case has been previously reported in Prenatal Magnetic Resonance Imaging of Atypical Partial Rhombencephalosynapsis with involvement of the Anterior Vermis: Two Case Reports. Izzo G, Conte G, Cesaretti C, Parazzini C, Bulfamante G, Righini A. Neuropediatrics. 2015 Dec;46(6):416–9.

Methodology

• retrospective

• diagnostic or prognostic study

• performed at one institution

References

  1. 1.
    Glenn OA (2006) Fetal central nervous system MR imaging. Neuroimaging Clin N Am 16(1):1–17CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Jarvis D, Mooney C, Cohen J et al (2017) A systematic review and meta-analysis to determine the contribution of mr imaging to the diagnosis of foetal brain abnormalities in utero. Eur Radiol 27(6):2367–2380CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Huisman TA, Wisser J, Stallmach T, Krestin GP, Huch R, Kubik-Huch RA (2002) MR conventional brain autopsy in fetuses. Fetal Diagn Ther 17:58–64CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Griffiths PD, Paley MN, Whitby EH (2005) Post-mortem MRI as an adjunct to fetal or neonatal conventional brain autopsy. Lancet 365:1271–1273CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Addison S, Arthurs OJ, Thayyil S (2014) Post-mortem MRI as an alternative to non forensic conventional brain autopsy in fetuses and children: from research into clinical practice. Br J Radiol.  https://doi.org/10.1259/bjr.20130621
  6. 6.
    Brookes JS, Hagmann C (2006) MRI in fetal necroscopy. J Magn Reson Imaging 24:1221–1228CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Pfefferbaum A, Sullivan EV, Adalsteinsson E, Garrick T, Harper C (2004) Postmortem MR imaging of formalin-fixed human brain. Neuroimage 21:1585–1595CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Thayyil S, Sebire NJ, Chitty LS et al (2011) Post mortem magnetic resonance imaging in the fetuses, infant and child : a comparative study with conventional conventional brain autopsy (MaRIAS protocol). BMC Pediatr.  https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2431-11-120
  9. 9.
    Lequin MH, Huisman TA (2012) Postmortem MR imaging in the fetal and neonatal period. Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am 20:129–143Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Whitby EH, Paley MN, Cohen M, Griffiths PD (2005) Postmortem MR imaging of the fetus: an adjunct or a replacement for conventional conventional brain autopsy? Semin Fetal Neonatal Med 10:475–483Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Breeze AC, Cross JJ, Hackett GA et al (2006) Use of a confidence scale in reporting postmortem fetal magnetic resonance imaging. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 28:918–924Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Scola E, Conte G, Palumbo G et al (2018) High resolution post-mortem MRI of non fixed in situ foetal brain in the second trimester of gestation : normal foetal brain development. Eur Radiol 28(1):363–371CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Whitby EH, Variend S, Rutter S et al (2004) Corroboration of in utero MRI using post-mortem MRI and conventional brain autopsy in foetuses with CNS abnormalities. Clin Radiol 59:1114–1120CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Griffiths PD, Bradburn M, Campbell MJ et al (2017) Use of MRI in the diagnosis of fetal brain abnormalities in utero (MERIDIAN): a multicentre, prospective cohort study. Lancet 389(10068):538–546CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Arthurs OJ, Thayyil S, Pauliah SS et al (2015) Diagnostic accuracy and limitations of post-mortem MRI for neurological abnormalities in fetuses and children. Clin Radiol 70:872–800CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Griffiths PD, Varient D, Evans M et al (2003) Postmortem MR imaging of the fetal and stillborn central nervous system. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 24:22–27Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Whitby EH, Paley MN, Cohen M, Griffiths PD (2006) Post-mortem fetal MRI: what do we learn from it? Eur J Radiol 57:250–255CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Thayyil S, Sebire N, Chitty LS et al (2013) Post-mortem MRI versus conventional conventional brain autopsy in fetuses and children: a prospective validation study. Lancet 382:223–233CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Sebire NJ, Miller S, Jacques TS et al (2013) Post-mortem apparent resolution of fetal ventriculomegaly : evidence from magnetic resonance imaging. Prenat Diagn 33:360–364PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Garel C, Fallet-Bianco C, Guibaud L (2011) The fetal cerebellum: development and common malformations. J Child Neurol 26(12):1483–1492CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Conte G, Parazzini C, Falanga G et al (2016) Diagnostic value of prenatal MR imaging in the detection of brain malformations in fetuses before the 26th week of gestational age. AJNR 37(5):946–951CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Thayyil S, De Vita E, Sebire NJ et al (2012) Post-mortem cerebral magnetic resonance imaging T1 and T2 in fetuses, newborns and infants. Eur J Radiol 81:232–238CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Montaldo P, Addison S, Oliveira V et al (2016) Quantification of maceration changes using post mortem MRI in fetuses. BMC Med Imaging.  https://doi.org/10.1186/s12880-016-0137-9
  24. 24.
    Verhoye M, Votino C, Cannie MM et al (2013) Post-mortem high-field magnetic resonance imaging: effect of various factors. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 26(11):1060–1065CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Kostovic I, Judas M, Rados M, Hrabac P (2002) Laminar organization of the human fetal cerebrum revealed by histochemical markers and magnetic resonance imaging. Cereb Cortex 12:536–544CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Zhang Z, Liu S, Lin X et al (2011) Development of fetal brain of 20 weeks gestational age: assessment with post-mortem magnetic resonance imaging. Eur J Radiol 80(3):e432–e439CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Widjaja E, Geibprasert S, Blaser S, Rayner T, Shannon P (2009) Abnormal fetal cerebral lamination in cobbleston complex seen on post-mortem MRI and DTI. Pediatr Radiol 38:860–864CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Widjaja E, Geibprasert S, Mahmoodabadi SZ, Brown NE, Shannon P (2010) Corroboration of normal and abnormal fetal cerebral lamination on post mortem MR imaging with postmortem examination. AJNR 31:1987–1993CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Sebire NJ (2006) Towards the minimally invasive conventional brain autopsy? Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 28:865–867Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Breeze AC, Jessop FA, Set PA et al (2011) Minimally-invasive fetal autopsy using magnetic resonance imaging and percutaneus organ biopsies: clinical value and comparison to conventional autopsy. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 37:317–323Google Scholar

Copyright information

© European Society of Radiology 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Giana Izzo
    • 1
    Email author return OK on get
  • Giacomo Talenti
    • 2
  • Giorgia Falanga
    • 3
  • Marco Moscatelli
    • 4
  • Giorgio Conte
    • 5
  • Elisa Scola
    • 5
  • Chiara Doneda
    • 1
  • Cecilia Parazzini
    • 1
  • Mariangela Rustico
    • 6
  • Fabio Triulzi
    • 5
  • Andrea Righini
    • 1
  1. 1.Pediatric Radiology and Neuroradiology DepartmentChildren’s Hospital V. Buzzi – ASST Fatebenefratelli-SaccoMilanItaly
  2. 2.Neuroradiology UnitVerona University HospitalVeronaItaly
  3. 3.Department of NeuroradiologyCivico-Di Cristina-Benfratelli HospitalPalermoItaly
  4. 4.Postgraduate School in RadiodiagnosticsUniversity of MilanMilanItaly
  5. 5.Neuroradiology UnitFondazione IRCCS Ca’ Granda Ospedale Maggiore PoliclinicoMilanItaly
  6. 6.Obstetrics and Gynecology DepartmentChildren’s Hospital V. Buzzi – ASST Fatebenefratelli-SaccoMilanItaly

Personalised recommendations