Transhepatic forceps biopsy combined with biliary drainage in obstructive jaundice: safety and accuracy
- 73 Downloads
This study was conducted in order to investigate the safety and accuracy of percutaneous transluminal forceps biopsy (PTFB) during percutaneous biliary drainage (PTBD) in patients with a suspicion of malignant biliary stricture.
Material and methods
Fifty consecutive patients with obstructive jaundice underwent PTFB during PTBD. Biopsy specimens were obtained using 5.2-F flexible biopsy forceps and these specimens were independently analysed by two pathologists. Consensus was obtained in case of discrepancy. Biopsy was considered as a true positive when tumour cells were retrieved. In the absence of tumour cells, comparison with available surgical findings and/or endoscopic ultrasound fine-needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) and/or percutaneous liver biopsy and/or imaging or clinical follow-up was made to distinguish true and false negatives. Specificity, sensitivity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value and accuracy were calculated. Influence of tumour location and pre-operative imaging findings was evaluated. Adverse events were reported.
Biliary drainage and tissue sampling were achieved in 100% of patients. Sensitivity and specificity were 70 and 100%, respectively, while overall accuracy was 72%. After excluding the first 25 patients, accuracy and sensitivity for tissue sampling reached 80 and 78%, respectively. Sensitivity was better (87%) if stenosis was located at the upper part of the biliary tree, compared to the lower part (55%). In case of cholangiocarcinoma or intraductal invasion suspected on imaging, biopsy was contributive in 84 and 81% of patients, respectively. Four complications occurred consisting of one bile leak, two haemobilia and one pneumoperitoneum.
PTFB combined with PTBD is a safe and effective technique for both histopathological diagnosis and biliary decompression of biliary strictures.
Implications for patient care:
• Percutaneous transbiliary forceps biopsy is technically feasible (100% of tissue sampling in our study) and is a safe technique.
• Radiological management combining PTFB plus PTBD may allow diagnosis and treatment of the biliary stricture at the same time.
• Sensitivity and accuracy for PTFB reached 78 and 80%, respectively, with a 100% specificity.
KeywordsBile Obstructive jaundice Drainage Biopsy Bile duct neoplasms
Cystic dystrophy in heterotopic pancreas
Contrast-enhanced computed tomography
Dose area product
Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography
Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration
Haematoxylin and eosin
Indeterminate biliary stricture
Magnetic resonance imaging
Negative predictive value
Positive predictive value
Percutaneous biliary drainage
Percutaneous transhepatic forceps biopsy
Society of Interventional Radiology
The authors state that this work has not received any funding.
Compliance with ethical standards
The scientific guarantor of this publication is Prof. Jean Pierre Pelage.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Statistics and biometry
One of the authors has significant statistical expertise.
No complex statistical methods were necessary for this paper.
Written informed consent was not required for this study because it was a retrospective study, based on acquired data.
Institutional Review Board approval was obtained.
CPP Nord Ouest-France, reference: CPP A15-D30-VOL.26.
• Performed at one institution
- 2.Arrivé L, Hodoul M, Arbache A, Slavikova-Boucher L, Menu Y, El Mouhadi S (2015) Magnetic resonance cholangiography: current and future perspectives. Clin Res Hepatol Gastroenterol 39:659–664Google Scholar
- 3.Singh A, Gelrud A, Agarwal B (2014) Biliary strictures: diagnostic considerations and approach. Gastroenterol Rep (Oxf) 3:22–31Google Scholar
- 11.Elyaderani MK, Gabriele OF (1980) Brush and forceps biopsy of biliary ducts via percutaneous transhepatic catheterization. Radiology 135:777–778Google Scholar
- 12.Jung GS, Huh JD, Lee SU, Han BH, Chang HK, Cho YD (2002) Bile duct: analysis of percutaneous transluminal forceps biopsy in 130 patients. Radiology 7:725–730Google Scholar
- 13.Omary RA, Bettmann MA, Cardella JF et al (2003) Quality improvement guidelines for the reporting and archiving of interventional radiology procedures. J Vasc Interv Radiol 14:S293–S295Google Scholar
- 14.Saad WE, Wallace MJ, Wojak JC, Kundu S, Cardella JF (2010) Quality improvement guidelines for percutaneous transhepatic cholangiography, biliary drainage, and percutaneous cholecystostomy. J Vasc Interv Radiol 21:789–795Google Scholar
- 15.Ierardi AM, Mangini M, Fontana F et al (2013) Usefulness and safety of biliary percutaneous transluminal forceps biopsy (PTFB): our experience. Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol 3:1–6Google Scholar
- 16.Li TF, Ren KW, Han XW (2014) Percutaneous transhepatic cholangiobiopsy to determine the pathological cause of anastomotic stenosis after cholangiojejunostomy for malignant obstructive jaundice. Clin Radiol 69:13–17Google Scholar
- 19.Kim KM, Park JW, Lee JK, Lee KH, Lee KT, Shim SG (2015) A comparison of preoperative biliary drainage methods for perihilar cholangiocarcinoma: endoscopic versus percutaneous transhepatic biliary drainage. Gut Liver 9:791–799Google Scholar
- 20.Al Mahjoub A, Menahem B, Fohlen A et al (2017) Preoperative biliary drainage in patients with resectable perihilar cholangiocarcinoma: is percutaneous transhepatic biliary drainage safer and more effective than endoscopic biliary drainage? A meta-analysis. J Vasc Interv Radiol 28:576–582CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 22.Karavasilis E, Dimitriadis A, Gonis H, Pappas P, Georgiou E, Yakoumakis E (2014) Effective dose in percutaneous transhepatic biliary drainage examination using PCXMC2.0 and MCNP5 Monte Carlo codes. Phys Med 30:432–436Google Scholar
- 26.Vander Noot MR 3rd, Eloubeidi M, Chen VK et al (2004) Diagnosis of gastrointestinal tract lesions by endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration biopsy. Cancer 102:157–163Google Scholar
- 30.Navaneethan U, Njei B, Lourdusamy V, Konjeti R, Vargo JJ, Parsi MA (2015) Comparative effectiveness of biliary brush cytology and intraductal biopsy for detection of malignant biliary strictures: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Gastrointest Endosc 81:168–176Google Scholar
- 31.Tapping CR, Byass OR, Cast JE (2012) Cytological sampling versus forceps biopsy during percutaneous transhepatic biliary drainage and analysis of factors predicting success. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 35:883–889Google Scholar