Coronary CT angiography–derived plaque quantification with artificial intelligence CT fractional flow reserve for the identification of lesion-specific ischemia
- 236 Downloads
We sought to investigate the diagnostic performance of coronary CT angiography (cCTA)–derived plaque markers combined with deep machine learning–based fractional flow reserve (CT-FFR) to identify lesion-specific ischemia using invasive FFR as the reference standard.
Eighty-four patients (61 ± 10 years, 65% male) who had undergone cCTA followed by invasive FFR were included in this single-center retrospective, IRB-approved, HIPAA-compliant study. Various plaque markers were derived from cCTA using a semi-automatic software prototype and deep machine learning–based CT-FFR. The discriminatory value of plaque markers and CT-FFR to identify lesion-specific ischemia on a per-vessel basis was evaluated using invasive FFR as the reference standard.
One hundred three lesion-containing vessels were investigated. 32/103 lesions were hemodynamically significant by invasive FFR. In a multivariate analysis (adjusted for Framingham risk score), the following markers showed predictive value for lesion-specific ischemia (odds ratio [OR]): lesion length (OR 1.15, p = 0.037), non-calcified plaque volume (OR 1.02, p = 0.007), napkin-ring sign (OR 5.97, p = 0.014), and CT-FFR (OR 0.81, p < 0.0001). A receiver operating characteristics analysis showed the benefit of identifying plaque markers over cCTA stenosis grading alone, with AUCs increasing from 0.61 with ≥ 50% stenosis to 0.83 with addition of plaque markers to detect lesion-specific ischemia. Further incremental benefit was realized with the addition of CT-FFR (AUC 0.93).
Coronary CTA–derived plaque markers portend predictive value to identify lesion-specific ischemia when compared to cCTA stenosis grading alone. The addition of CT-FFR to plaque markers shows incremental discriminatory power.
• Coronary CT angiography (cCTA)–derived quantitative plaque markers of atherosclerosis portend high discriminatory power to identify lesion-specific ischemia.
• Coronary CT angiography–derived fractional flow reserve (CT-FFR) shows superior diagnostic performance over cCTA alone in detecting lesion-specific ischemia.
• A combination of plaque markers with CT-FFR provides incremental discriminatory value for detecting flow-limiting stenosis.
KeywordsSpiral computed tomography Coronary artery disease Angiography
Area under the curve
Coronary artery disease
Coronary CT angiography
Fractional flow reserve from coronary CT angiography
Dual-source computed tomography
Fractional flow reserve
Invasive coronary angiography
Negative predictive value
Positive predictive value
Receiver operating characteristics
The authors state that this work has not received any funding.
Compliance with ethical standards
The scientific guarantor of this publication is U. Joseph Schoepf, MD.
Conflict of interest
Dr. Schoepf receives institutional research support from Astellas, Bayer, General Electric, and Siemens Healthineers. Dr. Schoepf has received honoraria for speaking and consulting from Bayer, Guerbet, HeartFlow Inc., and Siemens Healthineers. Dr. De Cecco is a consultant for/receives institutional research support from Bayer and Siemens. Dr. Varga-Szemes receives institutional research support from Siemens Healthineers. The other authors have no conflict of interest to disclose. Workstation-based flow computations of coronary blood flow are not currently approved by the US Food and Drug Administration. A software prototype (Coronary Plaque Analysis 4.2.0 syngo.via FRONTIER, Siemens) was used for the plaque analysis. The concepts and information presented are based on research and are not commercially available.
Statistics and biometry
One of the authors has significant statistical expertise.
Written informed consent was waived by the Institutional Review Board.
Institutional Review Board approval was obtained.
• Observational study
• Performed at one institution
- 1.Smith SC Jr, Feldman TE, Hirshfeld JW Jr et al (2006) ACC/AHA/SCAI 2005 guideline update for percutaneous coronary intervention: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (ACC/AHA/SCAI writing committee to update 2001 guidelines for percutaneous coronary intervention). Circulation 113:e166–e286PubMedGoogle Scholar
- 6.Gaur S, Øvrehus KA, Dey D et al (2016) Coronary plaque quantification and fractional flow reserve by coronary computed tomography angiography identify ischaemia-causing lesions. Eur Heart J 37:1220–1227Google Scholar
- 7.Bauer RW, Thilo C, Chiaramida SA, Vogl TJ, Costello P, Schoepf UJ (2009) Noncalcified atherosclerotic plaque burden at coronary CT angiography: a better predictor of ischemia at stress myocardial perfusion imaging than calcium score and stenosis severity. AJR Am J Roentgenol 193:410–418CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 10.Tesche C, De Cecco CN, Baumann S et al (2018) Coronary CT angiography-derived fractional flow reserve: machine learning algorithm versus computational fluid dynamics modeling. Radiology. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2018171291:171291
- 14.Cury RC, Abbara S, Achenbach S et al (2016) CAD-RADSTM coronary artery disease - reporting and data system. An expert consensus document of the Society of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography (SCCT), the American College of Radiology (ACR) and the north American Society for Cardiovascular Imaging (NASCI). Endorsed by the American College of Cardiology. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr 10:269–281CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 17.Park HB, Heo R, ó Hartaigh B et al (2015) Atherosclerotic plaque characteristics by CT angiography identify coronary lesions that cause ischemia: a direct comparison to fractional flow reserve. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging 8:1–10Google Scholar
- 19.Tesche C, De Cecco CN, Caruso D et al (2016) Coronary CT angiography derived morphological and functional quantitative plaque markers correlated with invasive fractional flow reserve for detecting hemodynamically significant stenosis. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr 10:199–206CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 23.Scanlon PJ, Faxon DP, Audet AM et al (1999) ACC/AHA guidelines for coronary angiography: executive summary and recommendations. A report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (committee on coronary angiography) developed in collaboration with the Society for Cardiac Angiography and Interventions. Circulation 99:2345–2357CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 28.Dey D, Gaur S, Øvrehus KA et al (2018) Integrated prediction of lesion-specific ischaemia from quantitative coronary CT angiography using machine learning: a multicentre study. Eur Radiol 28:2655–2664Google Scholar
- 29.Benz DC, Mikulicic F, Gräni C et al (2017) Diagnostic accuracy of coronary opacification derived from coronary computed tomography angiography to detect ischemia: first validation versus single-photon emission computed tomography. EJNMMI Res 7:92Google Scholar
- 33.Nadjiri J, Hausleiter J, Jähnichen C et al (2016) Incremental prognostic value of quantitative plaque assessment in coronary CT angiography during 5 years of follow up. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr 10:97–104Google Scholar
- 34.Koo BK, Erglis A, Doh JH et al (2011) Diagnosis of ischemia-causing coronary stenoses by noninvasive fractional flow reserve computed from coronary computed tomographic angiograms. Results from the prospective multicenter DISCOVER-FLOW (diagnosis of ischemia-causing stenoses obtained via noninvasive fractional flow reserve) study. J Am Coll Cardiol 58:1989–1997CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 36.Nørgaard BL, Leipsic J, Gaur S et al (2014) Diagnostic performance of noninvasive fractional flow reserve derived from coronary computed tomography angiography in suspected coronary artery disease: the NXT trial (analysis of coronary blood flow using CT angiography: next steps). J Am Coll Cardiol 63:1145–1155Google Scholar