Advertisement

European Radiology

, Volume 29, Issue 4, pp 1863–1873 | Cite as

Added value of diffusion-weighted imaging to conventional MRI for predicting fascial involvement of soft tissue sarcomas

  • Min A Yoon
  • Choong Guen Chee
  • Hye Won ChungEmail author
  • Joon Seon Song
  • Jong Seok Lee
  • Wanlim Kim
  • Min Hee Lee
  • Sang Hoon Lee
  • Myung Jin Shin
Musculoskeletal
  • 138 Downloads

Abstract

Objectives

This study was conducted to evaluate the added value of diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) to conventional magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for predicting fascial involvement of soft tissue sarcomas located in close proximity to fascial boundaries.

Methods

This retrospective study included 29 patients with surgically resected soft tissue sarcomas located in proximity to deep fascia and with a curvilinear tail-like hyperintensity in the adjacent fascia on T2-weighted images. All patients underwent conventional MRI and DWI at 3.0 T and had detailed histologic reports on involvement of fascia. Two musculoskeletal radiologists with 21 and 1 year of experience independently reviewed conventional MRI and conventional imaging with added DWI. Readers scored their confidence for tumor involvement of fascia using a three-point scale. Diagnostic performance (area under the curve [Az]) of the two MRI sets was assessed with receiver-operating characteristic curve analysis.

Result

Fascial involvement was present in 22/29 patients (75.9%). Both readers showed improvement in diagnostic performance with the addition of DWI (Az, from 0.545 to 0.792 and from 0.646 to 0.792 for reader 1 and reader 2, respectively). Adding DWI did not improve sensitivity or specificity for either reader (p > 0.05). Interobserver agreement for the confidence scores improved from fair to moderate with the addition of DWI (κ, from 0.390 to 0.560).

Conclusions

Adding DWI to conventional MRI improved diagnostic performance on prediction of fascial involvement of soft tissue sarcomas located in proximity to fascia, without significant improvement in sensitivity or specificity.

Key Points

• Adding DWI to conventional MRI improved readers’ confidence level for the prediction of fascial involvement of soft tissue sarcomas that are close to the deep fascia.

• Addition of DWI also improved interobserver agreement.

• Conversely, compared with conventional MRI, adding DWI did not significantly improve the sensitivity or specificity for the detection of fascial involvement.

Keywords

Soft tissue sarcoma Fascia Magnetic resonance imaging Diffusion magnetic resonance imaging 

Abbreviations

ADC

Apparent diffusion coefficient

DWI

Diffusion-weighted imaging

MPNST

Malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumor

MRI

Magnetic resonance imaging

NPV

Negative predictive value

PPV

Positive predictive value

ROC

Receiver-operating characteristic

UPS

Undifferentiated pleomorphic sarcoma

Notes

Funding

The authors state that this work has not received any funding.

Compliance with ethical standards

Guarantor

The scientific guarantor of this publication is Hye Won Chung.

Conflict of interest

The authors of this manuscript declare no relationships with any companies, whose products or services may be related to the subject matter of the article.

Statistics and biometry

No complex statistical methods were necessary for this paper.

Informed consent

Written informed consent was waived by the Institutional Review Board.

Ethical approval

Institutional Review Board approval was obtained.

Methodology

• Retrospective

• Diagnostic or prognostic study

• Performed at one institution

References

  1. 1.
    Jo VY, Fletcher CD (2014) WHO classification of soft tissue tumours: an update based on the 2013 (4th) edition. Pathology 46:95–104CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Ahmad R, Jacobson A, Hornicek F et al (2016) The width of the surgical margin does not influence outcomes in extremity and truncal soft tissue sarcoma treated with radiotherapy. Oncologist 21:1269–1276CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Robinson E, Bleakney RR, Ferguson PC, O’Sullivan B (2008) Oncodiagnosis panel: 2007: multidisciplinary management of soft-tissue sarcoma. Radiographics 28:2069–2086CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    O’Donnell PW, Manivel JC, Cheng EY, Clohisy DR (2014) Chemotherapy influences the pseudocapsule composition in soft tissue sarcoma. Clin Orthop Relat Res 472:849–855CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Grabellus F, Podleska LE, Sheu SY et al (2013) Neoadjuvant treatment improves capsular integrity and the width of the fibrous capsule of high-grade soft-tissue sarcomas. Eur J Surg Oncol 39:61–67CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Chenevert TL, Brunberg JA, Pipe JG (1990) Anisotropic diffusion in human white matter: demonstration with MR techniques in vivo. Radiology 177:401–405CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Schnapauff D, Zeile M, Niederhagen MB et al (2009) Diffusion-weighted echo-planar magnetic resonance imaging for the assessment of tumor cellularity in patients with soft-tissue sarcomas. J Magn Reson Imaging 29:1355–1359CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Moore WA, Khatri G, Madhuranthakam AJ, Sims RD, Pedrosa I (2014) Added value of diffusion-weighted acquisitions in MRI of the abdomen and pelvis. AJR Am J Roentgenol 202:995–1006CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Dwyer AJ (1991) Matchmaking and McNemar in the comparison of diagnostic modalities. Radiology 178:328–330CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Cohen J (1968) Weighted kappa: nominal scale agreement with provision for scaled disagreement or partial credit. Psychol Bull 70:213–220CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Amin MB, Edge S, Greene F et al (2017) AJCC cancer staging manual, 8th edn. Springer, BerlinCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Noebauer-Huhmann IM, Weber MA, Lalam RK et al (2015) Soft tissue tumors in adults: ESSR-approved guidelines for diagnostic imaging. Semin Musculoskelet Radiol 19:475–482CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Enneking WF, Spanier SS, Malawer MM (1981) The effect of the anatomic setting on the results of surgical procedures for soft parts sarcoma of the thigh. Cancer 47:1005–1022CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Tanabe KK, Pollock RE, Ellis LM, Murphy A, Sherman N, Romsdahl MM (1994) Influence of surgical margins on outcome in patients with preoperatively irradiated extremity soft tissue sarcomas. Cancer 73:1652–1659CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Lee SY, Jee WH, Jung JY et al (2016) Differentiation of malignant from benign soft tissue tumours: use of additive qualitative and quantitative diffusion-weighted MR imaging to standard MR imaging at 3.0 T. Eur Radiol 26:743–754CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    van Rijswijk CS, Kunz P, Hogendoorn PC, Taminiau AH, Doornbos J, Bloem JL (2002) Diffusion-weighted MRI in the characterization of soft-tissue tumors. J Magn Reson Imaging 15:302–307CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Koh DM, Collins DJ (2007) Diffusion-weighted MRI in the body: applications and challenges in oncology. AJR Am J Roentgenol 188:1622–1635CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Fernebro J (2007) Soft tissue sarcoma patterns multiplicity, heterogeneity and growth characteristics. Department of Clinical Sciences, Lund University, LundGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Weiss SW, Enzinger FM (1978) Malignant fibrous histiocytoma: an analysis of 200 cases. Cancer 41:2250–2266CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Yoo HJ, Hong SH, Kang Y et al (2014) MR imaging of myxofibrosarcoma and undifferentiated sarcoma with emphasis on tail sign; diagnostic and prognostic value. Eur Radiol 24:1749–1757CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Kaya M, Wada T, Nagoya S et al (2008) MRI and histological evaluation of the infiltrative growth pattern of myxofibrosarcoma. Skeletal Radiol 37:1085–1090CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Lefkowitz RA, Landa J, Hwang S et al (2013) Myxofibrosarcoma: prevalence and diagnostic value of the “tail sign” on magnetic resonance imaging. Skeletal Radiol 42:809–818CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© European Society of Radiology 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Min A Yoon
    • 1
  • Choong Guen Chee
    • 1
  • Hye Won Chung
    • 1
    Email author
  • Joon Seon Song
    • 2
  • Jong Seok Lee
    • 3
  • Wanlim Kim
    • 3
  • Min Hee Lee
    • 1
  • Sang Hoon Lee
    • 1
  • Myung Jin Shin
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Radiology and Research Institute of RadiologyUniversity of Ulsan College of Medicine, Asan Medical CenterSeoulSouth Korea
  2. 2.Department of PathologyUniversity of Ulsan College of Medicine, Asan Medical CenterSeoulSouth Korea
  3. 3.Department of Orthopedic SurgeryUniversity of Ulsan College of Medicine, Asan Medical CenterSeoulSouth Korea

Personalised recommendations