Would it be safe to have a dog in the MRI scanner before your own examination? A multicenter study to establish hygiene facts related to dogs and men
To determine whether it would be hygienic to evaluate dogs and humans in the same MRI scanner.
We compared the bacterial load in colony-forming units (CFU) of human-pathogenic microorganisms in specimens taken from 18 men and 30 dogs. In addition, we compared the extent of bacterial contamination of an MRI scanner shared by dogs and humans with two other MRI scanners used exclusively by humans.
Our study shows a significantly higher bacterial load in specimens taken from men’s beards compared with dogs’ fur (p = 0.036). All of the men (18/18) showed high microbial counts, whereas only 23/30 dogs had high microbial counts and 7 dogs moderate microbial counts. Furthermore, human-pathogenic microorganisms were more frequently found in human beards (7/18) than in dog fur (4/30), although this difference did not reach statistical significance (p = 0.074). More microbes were found in human oral cavities than in dog oral cavities (p < 0.001). After MRI of dogs, routine scanner disinfection was undertaken and the CFU found in specimens isolated from the MRI scanning table and receiver coils showed significantly lower bacteria count compared with “human” MRI scanners (p < 0.05).
Our study shows that bearded men harbour significantly higher burden of microbes and more human-pathogenic strains than dogs. As the MRI scanner used for both dogs and humans was routinely cleaned after animal scanning, there was substantially lower bacterial load compared with scanners used exclusively for humans.
• Bearded men harbour significantly more microbes than dogs.
• Dogs are no risk to humans if they use the same MRI.
• Deficits in hospital hygiene are a relevant risk for patients.
KeywordsHygiene Cross infection Disinfection Animal experiments
We would like to thank our radiologic technologists Anke Gölz, Bea Keller and Susanne Weidmann, who try to make every day the best day possible both for our human patients and for our sick dogs. We also want to thank Nicole Graf, our professional statistician, who provided valuable support during the statistical evaluation of our results (firstname.lastname@example.org).
The authors state that this work has not received any funding.
Compliance with ethical standards
The scientific guarantor of this publication is Andreas Gutzeit.
Conflict of interest
The authors of this manuscript declare no relationships with any companies whose products or services may be related to the subject matter of the article.
Statistics and biometry
Nicole Graf kindly provided statistical advice for this manuscript.
Written informed consent was waived by the institutional review board
Institutional review board approval was obtained.
Approval from the institutional animal care committee was obtained.
• multicenter study
- 2.Eurostat (2018) Population and population change statistics. http://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/statistics-explained/index.php/Population_and_population_change_statistics. Accessed 28 Mar 2018
- 3.Statista (2018) Number of dogs in the European Union in 2017, by country (in 1000s). https://www.statista.com/statistics/414956/dog-population-european-union-eu-by-country/. Accessed 28 Mar 2018
- 4.Destatis (2017) Bevölkerung, Familien, Lebensformen. https://www.destatis.de/DE/Publikationen/StatistischesJahrbuch/Bevoelkerung.pdf?__blob=publicationFile. Accessed 28 Mar 2018
- 6.Cozzi B, Ballarin C, Mantovani R, Rota A (2017) Aging and veterinary care of cats, dogs, and horses through the records of three university veterinary hospitals. Front Vet Sci 4:14Google Scholar
- 7.AnimalScan (2013) Understanding MR imaging for your pet. http://animalscan.com/understanding-mr-imaging-for-your-pet/. Accessed 28 Mar 2018
- 10.Nyhsen CM, Humphreys H, Koerner RJ et al (2017) Infection prevention and control in ultrasound - best practice recommendations from the European Society of Radiology Ultrasound Working Group. Insights Imaging 8:523–535Google Scholar
- 15.Hôpitaux Universitaires de Genève (2017) Point prevalence survey 2017 of healthcare-associated infections and antimicrobial use in Swiss acute care hospitals. https://www.swissnoso.ch/fileadmin/swissnoso/Dokumente/5_Forschung_und_Entwicklung/2_Punktpraevalenzstudie/Report_Point_Prevalence_Survey_2017_of_HAI_and_antimicrobial_use_in_Swiss_acute_care_hospitals.pdf. Accessed 16 Feb 2018
- 17.Shen DT, Crawford TB, Gorham JR, McGuire TC (1977) Inactivation of equine infectious anemia virus by chemical disinfectants. Am J Vet Res 38:1217–1219Google Scholar
- 18.Scott FW (1980) Virucidal disinfectants and feline viruses. Am J Vet Res 41:410–414Google Scholar
- 19.Brown TT Jr (1981) Laboratory evaluation of selected disinfectants as virucidal agents against porcine parvovirus, pseudorabies virus, and transmissible gastroenteritis virus. Am J Vet Res 42:1033–1036Google Scholar