Intravoxel incoherent motion diffusion-weighted imaging for assessment of histologic grade of hepatocellular carcinoma: comparison of three methods for positioning region of interest
- 256 Downloads
To prospectively compare the diagnostic performances of three methods of region of interest (ROI) placement for the measurements of intravoxel incoherent motion (IVIM) diffusion-weighted MR imaging in differentiating the histologic grade of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC).
Eighty-seven patients with 91 newly diagnosed HCCs were studied using IVIM imaging. Two attending radiologists separately identified the selection of tumour tissue for ROI positioning. Three different ROI positioning methods, namely the whole tumour volume (WTV) method, three-ROI method and one-section method, were used for the measurement. Kruskal–Wallis rank test or one-way ANOVA was used to compare the difference in IVIM parameters and ADC across the three different ROI positioning methods. Spearman correlation analysis was used to determine the correlation between each parameter and Edmondson–Steiner (E–S) grade. Receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curve analyses were performed to evaluate the diagnostic performance.
For the ADC and ADCslow, the mean value measured by using the WTV method was significant higher than the one-section and three-ROI methods (all p < 0.01). For the ADCslow, the highest area under curve (AUC) with a value of 0.969 was obtained by using the WTV method, followed by the one-section method (AUC = 0.938) and three-ROI method (AUC = 0.873). Additionally, for the ADC, AUC values were 0.861 for WTV method, 0.840 for one-section method and 0.806 for three-ROI method.
Different ROI positioning methods used significantly affect the IVIM parameters and ADC measurements. Measurements of ADCslow value derived from WTV method entailed the highest diagnostic performance in grading HCC.
• Diffusion MRI is useful for non-invasively differentiating the histologic grade of hepatocellular carcinoma.
• Different ROI positioning methods used significantly affect the IVIM parameters and ADC measurements.
• IVIM model is advantageous over mono-exponential model for assessing the histologic grade of hepatocellular carcinoma.
KeywordsMagnetic resonance imaging Hepatocellular carcinoma Diagnostic imaging
Apparent diffusion coefficient
Area under curve
Intravoxel incoherent motion
Receiver operating characteristics
Region of interest
Whole tumour volume
This study received funding by Research Grant of National Nature Science Foundation of China and Science (Grant number 81471658) and Technology Support Program of Sichuan Province (Grant number 2017SZ0003)
Compliance with ethical standards
The scientific guarantor of this publication is Bin Song.
Conflict of interest
The authors of this manuscript declare no relationships with any companies whose products or services may be related to the subject matter of the article.
Statistics and biometry
One of the authors (Yi Wei) has significant statistical expertise.
Written informed consent was obtained from all subjects (patients) in this study.
Institutional review board approval was obtained.
• diagnostic study
• performed at one institution
- 3.Recio-Boiles A, Babiker HM. Cancer, Liver. [Updated 2017 Aug 29]. StatPearls, Treasure Island FL. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK448337/. Accessed 12 Nov 2017
- 15.Nasu K, Kuroki Y, Tsukamoto T, Nakajima H, Mori K, Minami M (2009) Diffusion-weighted imaging of surgically resected hepatocellular carcinoma: imaging characteristics and relationship among signal intensity, apparent diffusion coefficient, and histopathologic grade. AJR Am J Roentgenol 193:438–444CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 17.Amin MB, Edge SB, Greene FL et al (eds) (2017) AJCC cancer staging manual, 8th edn. Springer, New YorkGoogle Scholar
- 18.Blazic IM, Lilic GB, Gajic MM (2017) Quantitative assessment of rectal cancer response to neoadjuvant combined chemotherapy and radiation therapy: comparison of three methods of positioning region of interest for ADC measurements at diffusion-weighted MR imaging. Radiology 282:615CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 20.Nougaret S, Vargas HA, Lakhman Y et al (2016) Intravoxel incoherent motion-derived histogram metrics for assessment of response after combined chemotherapy and radiation therapy in rectal cancer: initial experience and comparison between single-section and volumetric analyses. Radiology 280:446–454CrossRefGoogle Scholar