Advertisement

European Radiology

, Volume 29, Issue 1, pp 153–160 | Cite as

Improved display of cervical intervertebral discs on water (iodine) images: incidental findings from single-source dual-energy CT angiography of head and neck arteries

  • Qingxia Wu
  • Dapeng Shi
  • Tianming Cheng
  • Hongming Liu
  • Niuniu Hu
  • Xiaowan Chang
  • Ying Guo
  • Meiyun WangEmail author
Computed Tomography
  • 129 Downloads

Abstract

Objective

To (a) assess the diagnostic performance of material decomposition (MD) water (iodine) images for the evaluation of cervical intervertebral discs (IVDs) in patients who underwent dual-energy head and neck CT angiography (HNCTA) compared with 70-keV images and (b) to explore the correlation of water concentration with the T2 relaxation time of IVDs.

Materials and methods

Twenty-four consecutive patients who underwent dual-energy HNCTA and cervical spine MRI were studied. The diagnostic performance of water (iodine), 70-keV and MR images for IVD bulge and herniation was assessed. A subjective image score for each image set was recorded. The signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) and contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) of IVDs to the cervical spinal cord were compared between water (iodine) and 70-keV images. Disc water concentration as measured on water (iodine) images was correlated with T2 relaxation time.

Results

IVD evaluations for bulge and herniation did not differ significantly among the three image sets (pairwise comparisons; all p > 0.05). SNR and CNR were significantly improved on water (iodine) images compared with those on 70-keV images (p < 0.001). Although water (iodine) images showed higher image quality scores when evaluating IVDs compared with 70-keV images, the difference is not significant (all adjusted p > 0.05). IVD water concentration exhibited no correlation with relative T2 relaxation time (all p > 0.05).

Conclusion

Water (iodine) images facilitated analysis of cervical IVDs by providing higher SNR and CNR compared with 70-keV images. The disc water concentration measured on water (iodine) images exhibited no correlation with relative T2 relaxation time.

Key Points

There was no significant difference in cervical IVD evaluations for bulge and herniation among water (iodine) images, 70-keV images and MR images.

Water (iodine) images provided higher objective and subjective image quality than 70-keV images, though the difference of subjective evaluation was not statistically significant.

The disc water concentration exhibited no correlation with relative T2 relaxation time, which reflects the inferiority of the water (iodine) images in evaluating disc water content compared with T2 maps.

Keywords

Intervertebral disc Dual-energy scanned projection radiography Computed tomography angiography Image quality enhancement Magnetic resonance imaging 

Abbreviations

ASIR-V

Adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction V

CNR

Contrast-to-noise ratio

CTA

Computed tomography angiography

DECT

Dual-energy computed tomography

DLP

Dose-length product

FSE

Fast spin echo

GSI

Gemstone spectral imaging

HAP

Hydroxyapatite

HNCTA

Head and neck computed tomography angiography

IVD

Intervertebral disc

MD

Material decomposition

ROI

Region of interest

SFOV

Scan field of view

SNR

Signal-to-noise ratio

Notes

Funding

This study has received funding by the National Key R&D Program of China (YS2017YFGH000397), National Natural Science Foundation of China (81641168, 31470047, 81720108021, 81271565), Henan Province Scientific and Technological Innovation Talents Project (164200510014), Henan Province Scientific and Technological Cooperation Project (152106000014) and Key Project of Henan Medical Science and Technology Project (201501011).

Compliance with ethical standards

Guarantor

The scientific guarantor of this publication is Meiyun Wang.

Conflict of interest

The authors of this manuscript declare no relationships with any companies, whose products or services may be related to the subject matter of the article.

Statistics and biometry

One of the authors, Xiaowan Chang, has significant statistical expertise.

Informed consent

Written informed consent was obtained from all the patients prior to study inclusion.

Ethical approval

Institutional review board approval was obtained.

Methodology

• prospective

• diagnostic study/observational

• performed at one institution

Supplementary material

330_2018_5603_MOESM1_ESM.docx (16 kb)
ESM 1 (DOCX 15 kb)

References

  1. 1.
    Yuan R, Shuman WP, Earls JP et al (2012) Reduced iodine load at CT pulmonary angiography with dual-energy monochromatic imaging: comparison with standard CT pulmonary angiography—a prospective randomised trial. Radiology 262:290–297CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Shuman WP, Chan KT, Busey JM, Mitsumori LM, Koprowicz KM (2016) Dual-energy CT aortography with 50% reduced iodine dose versus single-energy CT aortography with standard iodine dose. Acad Radiol 23:611–618CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Agrawal MD, Oliveira GR, Kalva SP, Pinho DF, Arellano RS, Sahani DV (2016) Prospective comparison of reduced-iodine-dose virtual monochromatic imaging dataset from dual-energy CT angiography with standard-iodine-dose single-energy CT angiography for abdominal aortic aneurysm. AJR Am J Roentgenol 207:W125–W132CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Machida H, Tanaka I, Fukui R et al (2016) Dual-energy spectral CT: various clinical vascular applications. Radiographics 36:1215–1232CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Chen Y, Zhang X, Xue H et al (2017) Head and neck angiography at 70 kVp with a third-generation dual-source CT system in patients: comparison with 100 kVp. Neuroradiology 59:1071–1081CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Laimi K, Salminen JJ, Metsahonkala L et al (2007) Characteristics of neck pain associated with adolescent headache. Cephalalgia 27:1244–1254CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Jull G, Amiri M, Bullock-Saxton J, Darnell R, Lander C (2007) Cervical musculoskeletal impairment in frequent intermittent headache. Part 1: subjects with single headaches. Cephalalgia 27:793–802CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Amiri M, Jull G, Bullock-Saxton J, Darnell R, Lander C (2007) Cervical musculoskeletal impairment in frequent intermittent headache. Part 2: subjects with concurrent headache types. Cephalalgia 27:891–898CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Urrutia J, Besa P, Campos M et al (2016) The Pfirrmann classification of lumbar intervertebral disc degeneration: an independent inter- and intra-observer agreement assessment. Eur Spine J 25:2728–2733CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Jones A, Clarke A, Freeman BJ, Lam KS, Grevitt MP (2005) The Modic classification: inter- and intraobserver error in clinical practice. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 30:1867–1869CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Marinelli NL, Haughton VM, Munoz A, Anderson PA (2009) T2 relaxation times of intervertebral disc tissue correlated with water content and proteoglycan content. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 34:520–524CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Thalgott JS, Albert TJ, Vaccaro AR et al (2004) A new classification system for degenerative disc disease of the lumbar spine based on magnetic resonance imaging, provocative discography, plain radiographs and anatomic considerations. Spine J 4:167S–172SCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Rizzo S, Radice D, Femia M et al (2018) Metastatic and non-metastatic lymph nodes: quantification and different distribution of iodine uptake assessed by dual-energy CT. Eur Radiol 28:760–769CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Darras KE, McLaughlin PD, Kang H et al (2016) Virtual monoenergetic reconstruction of contrast-enhanced dual energy CT at 70keV maximizes mural enhancement in acute small bowel obstruction. Eur J Radiol 85:950–956CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Yang CB, Zhang S, Jia YJ et al (2017) Dual energy spectral CT imaging for the evaluation of small hepatocellular carcinoma microvascular invasion. Eur J Radiol 95:222–227CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Milette PC (2000) Classification, diagnostic imaging, and imaging characterization of a lumbar herniated disk. Radiol Clin North Am 38:1267–1292CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Pfirrmann CW, Metzdorf A, Zanetti M, Hodler J, Boos N (2001) Magnetic resonance classification of lumbar intervertebral disc degeneration. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 26:1873–1878CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Adams A, Roche O, Mazumder A, Davagnanam I, Mankad K (2014) Imaging of degenerative lumbar intervertebral discs; linking anatomy, pathology and imaging. Postgrad Med J 90:511–519CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Schueller-Weidekamm C, Schaefer-Prokop CM, Weber M, Herold CJ, Prokop M (2006) CT angiography of pulmonary arteries to detect pulmonary embolism: improvement of vascular enhancement with low kilovoltage settings. Radiology 241:899–907CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Bonatti M, Lombardo F, Zamboni GA, Pernter P, Pozzi Mucelli R, Bonatti G (2017) Dual-energy CT of the brain: comparison between DECT angiography-derived virtual unenhanced images and true unenhanced images in the detection of intracranial haemorrhage. Eur Radiol 27:2690–2697CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Marin D, Davis D, Roy Choudhury K et al (2017) Characterization of small focal renal lesions: diagnostic accuracy with single-phase contrast-enhanced dual-energy CT with material attenuation analysis compared with conventional attenuation measurements. Radiology 284:737–747CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Vergroesen PP, Kingma I, Emanuel KS et al (2015) Mechanics and biology in intervertebral disc degeneration: a vicious circle. Osteoarthr Cartil 23:1057–1070CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Lotz JC, Haughton V, Boden SD et al (2012) New treatments and imaging strategies in degenerative disease of the intervertebral disks. Radiology 264:6–19CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Watanabe A, Benneker LM, Boesch C, Watanabe T, Obata T, Anderson SE (2007) Classification of intervertebral disk degeneration with axial T2 mapping. AJR Am J Roentgenol 189:936–942CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Marinelli NL, Haughton VM, Anderson PA (2010) T2 relaxation times correlated with stage of lumbar intervertebral disk degeneration and patient age. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 31:1278–1282CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© European Society of Radiology 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Qingxia Wu
    • 1
  • Dapeng Shi
    • 1
  • Tianming Cheng
    • 1
  • Hongming Liu
    • 1
  • Niuniu Hu
    • 1
  • Xiaowan Chang
    • 2
  • Ying Guo
    • 1
  • Meiyun Wang
    • 1
    Email author
  1. 1.Department of RadiologyHenan Provincial People’s HospitalZhengzhouChina
  2. 2.Department of Operation and ManagementHenan Provincial People’s HospitalZhengzhouChina

Personalised recommendations