Dose reference levels and clinical determinants in stroke neuroradiology interventions
- 164 Downloads
To establish dose reference levels (RLs) for stroke interventions while carefully analysing the impact of clinical and technical parameters on patient exposure.
The study retrospectively analysed data from 377 stroke patients prospectively collected between 15 October 2015 and 30 March 2017 at a single, level-3 stroke centre equipped with Philips Allura Clarity systems. Local dose RLs were first derived as the 75th percentile of the dose area product (DAP), cumulative air kerma (Ka,r), fluoroscopy time (FT) and the number of images (NI). Univariate and multivariate negative binomial regressions were considered for the statistical analysis to investigate the dose variability with clinical and technical parameters such as patient’s age and sex, occlusion removal technique, number of passages, single-plane or biplane equipment, etc.
Local stroke dose RLs were derived in terms of total DAP (162 Gy cm2), Ka,r (854 mGy), FT (42 min) and NI (559). Gender (relative dose multiplier (RDM) 1.31; 95% CI 1.12–1.45), number of passages (RDM 1.22 per passage; 95% CI 1.10–1.22) and procedure success (RDM 0.52, 95% CI 0.55–0.80) proved to be key parameters affecting patient dose. Meanwhile the statistical analysis did not find any difference in relative dose received by patients owing to age, baseline NIHSS score, occlusion removal technique, posterior circulation, support of an anaesthesiologist or use of biplane equipment.
Stroke dose RLs introduced in this work promote the optimisation of patient doses. Male gender, number of passages and success of recanalisation are independent key parameters affecting patient dose.
• Stroke dose RLs derived in terms of total DAP (162 Gy cm 2 ), K a,r (854 mGy), FT (42 min) and NI (559) will help optimise the radiation safety of patients treated with mechanical thrombectomy.
• Male gender (relative dose multiplier 1.31; 95% CI 1.12–1.45), number of passages (RDM 1.22 per passage; 95% CI 1.10–1.22) and success of recanalisation TICI score > 2b (RDM 0.52, 95% CI 0.55–0.80) are independent key parameters affecting patient dose.
• Stent retriever or aspiration technique showed no significant difference in terms of the dose delivered to the patient; neither technique should be favoured for dosimetric reasons provided that there is no difference regarding clinical outcomes.
KeywordsStroke Thrombectomy Radiation protection Patients Statistics
As low as reasonably achievable
Cumulative air kerma at interventional reference point
Dose area product
Diagnostic reference levels
International Commission on Radiological Protection
Number of images
National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale
Picture Archiving and Communication System
Relative dose multiplier
Stroke Interventional Laboratory Consensus
Thrombolysis in cerebral infarction
The authors state that this work has not received any funding.
Compliance with ethical standards
The scientific guarantor of this publication is Pr Laurent Spelle.
Conflict of interest
The authors of this manuscript declare relationships with the following companies: Philips, Medtronic, Stryker, MicroVention, Balt.
Statistics and biometry
One of the authors has significant statistical expertise.
As a follow-up evaluation on stroke patients, informed consent was not required.
As a follow-up evaluation, the study did not involve any change in the standard procedure and did not require the identification of individuals.
• performed at one institution
- 14.Haussen DC, Lima FO, Bouslama M et al (2017) Thrombectomy versus medical management for large vessel occlusion strokes with minimal symptoms: an analysis from STOPStroke and GESTOR cohorts. J Neurointerv Surg. https://doi.org/10.1136/neurintsurg-2017-013243
- 15.Konstas AA, Minaeian A, Ross IB (2017) Mechanical thrombectomy in wake-up strokes: a case series using Alberta stroke program early CT score (ASPECTS) for patient selection. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis 26:1609-1614Google Scholar
- 17.Shams T, Zaidat O, Yavagal D, Xavier A, Jovin T, Janardhan V (2016) Society of Vascular and Interventional Neurology (SVIN) Stroke Interventional Laboratory Consensus (SILC) criteria: a 7M management approach to developing a stroke interventional laboratory in the era of stroke thrombectomy for large vessel occlusions. Interv Neurol 5:1–28Google Scholar
- 18.ICRP (1996) Radiological protection and safety in medicine: a report of the International Commission on Radiological Protection. Ann ICRP 26:1–47Google Scholar
- 19.Balter S, Hopewell JW, Miller DL, Wagner LK, Zelefsky MJ (2010) Fluoroscopically guided interventional procedures: a review of radiation effects on patients' skin and hair. Radiology 254:326–341Google Scholar
- 23.Kien N, Rehel JL, Etard C, Aubert B (2011) Patient dose during interventional neuroradiology procedures: Results from a multi-center study. J Radiol 92:1101–1112Google Scholar
- 24.Vañó E, Miller DL, Martin CJ et al (2017) ICRP Publication 135: Diagnostic Reference Levels in Medical Imaging. Ann ICRP 46:1–144Google Scholar
- 26.Brown P, Cobb M, Smith T, A Zomorodi, L Gonzalez (2016) Fluoroscopy time and radiation dose in mechanical thrombectomy: a comparison of techniques. J Neurointerv Surg 8:A78–A79Google Scholar
- 28.Powers WJ, Derdeyn CP, Biller J et al (2015) 2015 American Heart Association/American Stroke Association focused update of the 2013 guidelines for the early management of patients with acute ischaemic stroke regarding endovascular treatment: a guideline for healthcare professionals from the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association. Stroke 46:3020–3035CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 30.Rouchaud A, Pistocchi S, Blanc R, Engrand N, Bartolini B, Piotin M (2014) Predictive value of flat-panel CT for haemorrhagic transformations in patients with acute stroke treated with thrombectomy. J Neurointerv Surg 6:139–143Google Scholar
- 31.The R Foundation (2014) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. https://www.R-project.org
- 33.Iwanaga J, Watanabe K, Tsuyoshi S, Tabira Y, Yamaki K (2016) Tortuous common carotid artery: a report of four cases observed in cadaveric dissections. Case Rep Otolaryngol 2016:2028402Google Scholar