Can quantitative iodine parameters on DECT replace perfusion CT parameters in colorectal cancers?
- 340 Downloads
To determine the correlation between iodine concentrations derived from dual-energy CT (DECT) and perfusion CT (PCT) parameters in patients with pathologically proven colorectal cancers (CRC) and to evaluate their reproducibility and respective radiation exposures.
Institutional review board approval and written informed consents were obtained for this study. Forty-one patients with CRCs who underwent same-day DECT and PCT were prospectively enrolled. Three radiologists independently analyzed the iodine concentration of the tumors and iodine ratios [ratio of lesion to aorta (IRa) or to infrarenal IVC (IRv)] from DECT as well as blood flow (BF), blood volume (BV), permeability (PMB), and mean transit time (MTT) from PCT. Pearson R and linear correlation, paired t-test, and intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) were used.
Significant correlations were found between iodine parameters from DECT and PCT parameters: iodine concentration of tumors and BV (r = 0.32, p = 0.04), PMB (r = 0.34, p = 0.03), and MTT (r = -0.38, p = 0.02); iodine ratio (IRa) and MTT (r = -0.32, p = 0.04); iodine ratio (IRv) and BF (r = 0.32, p = 0.04) and PMB (r = 0.44, p = <0.01). DECT showed better intra- and interobserver agreements (ICC = 0.98, 0.90 in iodine concentration; 0.98, 0.91 in IRa; and 0.91, 0.93 in IRv, respectively) than PCT (ICC = 0.90, 0.78 in BF; 0.82, 0.76 in BV; 0.75, 0.75 in PMB; 0.64, 0.79 in MTT, respectively). As for radiation dosage, CTDIvol and DLP in DECT (10.48 ± 1.84 mGy and 519.7 ± 116.7 mGy·cm) were significantly lower than those of PCT (75.76 mGy and 911 mGy·cm) (p < 0.01).
Iodine parameters from DECT are significantly correlated with PCT parameters, but have higher intra- and interobserver agreements and lower radiation exposure.
• Quantitative iodine concentrations from DECT are significantly correlated with perfusion CT parameters.
• Intra- and interobserver agreements of DECT are better than those of perfusion CT.
• Effective radiation doses of DECT are significantly lower than those of perfusion CT.
• DECT can be used as an alternative to perfusion CT with lower radiation doses.
KeywordsColorectal neoplasms Perfusion Multidetector computed tomography
Computed tomography dose index volume
Dose length product
Intraclass correlation coefficient
Iodine concentration ratio of the tumor to aorta
Iodine concentration ratio of the tumor to inferior vena cava
Inferior vena cava
Mean transit time
Permeability surface area product
Region of interest
Vascular endothelial growth factor
This research was supported by the Basic Science Research Program through the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) funded by the Ministry of Science, ICT & Future Planning (2016R1A2B4007762).
Compliance with ethical standards
The scientific guarantor of this publication is Se Hyung Kim.
Conflict of interest
The authors of this manuscript declare no relationships with any companies, whose products or services may be related to the subject matter of the article.
Statistics and biometry
No complex statistical methods were necessary for this paper.
Written informed consent was obtained from all subjects (patients) in this study.
Institutional Review Board approval was obtained.
• cross-sectional study
• performed at one institution
- 15.Stiller W, Skornitzke S, Fritz F et al (2015) Correlation of quantitative dual-energy computed tomography iodine maps and abdominal computed tomography perfusion measurements: are single-acquisition dual-energy computed tomography iodine maps more than a reduced-dose surrogate of conventional computed tomography perfusion? Invest Radiol 50:703–708CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 19.Bongartz G, Golding S, Jurik A et al (2004) European guidelines for multislice computed tomography. European CommissionGoogle Scholar