Advertisement

European Radiology

, Volume 28, Issue 11, pp 4792–4799 | Cite as

Percutaneous intentional intra-luminal-assisted recanalization (PILAR technique) of challenging chronic total occlusions using a high-frequency vibration device

  • Stephanie Volpi
  • Amine Chouiter
  • Francois Saucy
  • Steven Hajdu
  • Anne-Marie Jouannic
  • Salah D. Qanadli
Vascular-Interventional
  • 104 Downloads

Abstract

Objectives

Recanalization of peripheral chronic total occlusions (CTO) is technically challenging especially in cases of in-stent and/or pre-stent and heavily calcified lesions. A high-frequency vibrational device (HFVD) was first used as a secondary-intention device in CTO recanalizations when they were refractory to a guidewire. The aim of this study was to assess the safety and efficacy of the HFVD as a first-line treatment for challenging CTOs and thus to define the percutaneous intentional intraluminal-assisted recanalization (PILAR) technique.

Methods

Fifty-two patients were treated with the HFVD. Only challenging CTOs were included: 7 pre-stent, 7 in-stent, and 38 highly calcified CTOs. Technical success was defined as the ability to cross the CTO using the HFVD. Secondary outcome was defined as successful intraluminal crossing. Safety endpoints were procedure-related thromboembolism or perforation. Patients were followed up at 3 months and 1 year.

Results

The technical success rate for recanalization was 90%, of which 83% were intraluminal. The mean recanalized length was 91 ± 44 mm. One thromboembolic complication occurred, which was subsequently treated with thromboaspiration. Three-month and 1-year primary patency rates were 92% and 79%, respectively.

Conclusions

HFVD-based PILAR is a safe and effective technique for in-stent or pre-stent CTO recanalization of long and calcified lesions.

Key Points

Intraluminal recanalization is the preferred procedure in heavily calcified or pre-/in-stent CTO.

First-line use of assisted intraluminal recanalization for CTO defines the PILAR technique.

HFVD-based PILAR is safe and provides a high success rate for challenging CTO recanalization.

Keywords

Peripheral artery disease Endovascular techniques Medical device Angioplasty Lower limb 

Abbreviations

BTK

Below the knee

CTA

Computed tomography angiography

CTO

Chronic total occlusion

HFVD

High-frequency vibrational device

PILAR

Percutaneous intentional intraluminal-assisted recanalization

Notes

Funding

The authors state that this work has not received any funding.

Compliance with ethical standards

Guarantor

The scientific guarantor of this publication is Prof. S.D. Qanadli.

Conflict of interest

The authors of this manuscript declare no relationships with any companies, whose products or services may be related to the subject matter of the article.

Statistics and biometry

No complex statistical methods were necessary for this paper.

Informed consent

Written informed consent was obtained from all subjects (patients) in this study.

Ethical approval

Institutional Review Board approval was obtained.

Methodology

• retrospective

• observational study

• performed at one institution

References

  1. 1.
    Zaitoun R, Iyer SS, Lewin RF, Dorros G (1990) Percutaneous popliteal approach for angioplasty of superficial femoral artery occlusions. Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn 21(3):154–158CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Vraux H, Hammer F, Verhelst R, Goffette P, Vandeleene B (2000) Subintimal angioplasty of tibial vessel occlusions in the treatment of critical limb ischaemia: mid-term results. Eur J Vasc Surg 20(5):441–446CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Met R, Van Lienden KP, Koelemay MJ et al (2008) Subintimal angioplasty for peripheral arterial occlusive disease: a systematic review. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 31(4):687–697CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Zander T, Rabellino M, Baldi S, Blasco O, Maynar M (2010) Infrainguinal revascularization using the Crosser vibrational system. Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol 19(4):231–236CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Al-Ameri H, Mayeda GS, Shavelle DM (2009) Use of high-frequency vibrational energy in the treatment of peripheral chronic total occlusions. Catheter Cardiovasc interv 74(7):1110–1115CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Capek P, McLean GK, Berkowitz HD (1991) Femoropopliteal angioplasty. Factors influencing long-term success. Circulation 83(2):I70–I80PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Tan KH, Sulke N, Taub NA, Watts E, Sowton E (1993) Determinants of success of coronary angioplasty in patients with a chronic total occlusion: A multiple logistic regression model to improve selection of patients. Br Heart J 70(2):126–131CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Wei LM, Zhu YQ, Zhang PL, Liu F, Lu HT, Zhao JG (2017) Morphological characteristics of chronic total occlusion: predictors of different strategies for long-segment femoral arterial occlusions. Eur Radiol.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-017-5003-9 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Nadal Luis L, Cynamon J, Lipsitz E et al (2004) Subintimal Angioplasty for Chronic Arterial Occlusions. In: Steinberg JD (ed) Techniques in vascular and interventional radiology. Elsevier, New York, pp 16–22Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    London NJ, Srinivasan R, Naylor A et al (2011) Subintimal angioplasty of femoropopliteal artery occlusions: the long term results. Eur J Vasc Surg. 8(2):148–155CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Tiroch K, Cannon L, Reisman M et al (2008) High-frequency vibration for the recanalization of guidewire refractory chronic total coronary occlusions. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 72(6):771–780CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Galassi AR, Tomasello SD, Costanzo L, Campisano MB, Marza F, Tamburino C (2010) Recanalization of complex coronary chronic total occlusions using high-frequency vibrational energy CROSSER catheter as first-line therapy: a single center experience. J Interv Cardiol 23(2):130–138CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Staniloae CS, Mody KP, Yadav SS, Han SY, Korabathina R (2011) Endoluminal treatment of peripheral chronic total occlusions using the Crosser® recanalization catheter. J Invasive Cardiol 23(9):359–362PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Gandini R, Volpi T, Pipitone V, Simonetti G (2009) Intraluminal recanalization of long infrainguinal chronic total occlusions using the Crosser system. J Endovasc Ther 16(1):23–27CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Beschorner U, Rastan A, Zeller T (2009) Recanalization of femoropopliteal occlusions using the crosser system. J Endovasc Ther 16(4):526–527CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Khalid MR, Khalid FR, Farooqui FA, Devireddy CM, Robertson GC, Niazi K (2010) A novel catheter in patients with peripheral chronic total occlusions: a single center experience. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 76(5):735–739CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Laswed T, Rizzo E, Guntern D et al (2008) Assessment of occlusive arterial disease of abodminal aorta and lower extremities arteries: value of multidetector CT angiography using an adaptative acquisition method. Eur Radiol 18(2):263–272CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Wolf YG, Tillich M, Lee WA, Rubin GD, Fogarty TJ, Zarins CK (2001) Impact of aortoiliac tortuosity on endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms: evaluation of 3D computer-based assessment. J Vasc Surg 34:594–599CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Ito T, Tsuchikane E, Nasu K et al (2015) Impact of lesion morphology on angiographic and clinical out- comes in patients with chronic total occlusion after recanalization with drug-eluting stents: a multislice computed tomography study. Eur Radiol 25:3084–3092CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Fanelli F, Cannavale A, Gazzetti M et al (2014) Calcium burden assessment and impact on drug-eluting balloons in peripheral arterial disease. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 37(4):898–907CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Filipiadis DK, Binkert C, Pellerin O, Hoffmann RT, Krajina A, Pereira PL (2017) Cirse Quality Assurance Document and Standards for Classification of Complications: The Cirse Classification System. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 40(8):1141–1146CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Van der Heijden FH, Eikelboom BC, Banga JD, Mali WP (1993) Management of superficial femoral artery occlusive disease. Br J Surg. 80(8):959–963CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Adam DJ, Bradbury AW (2007) TASC II document on the management of peripheral arterial disease. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 33(1):1–2CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Ferraresi R, Hamade M, Gallicchio V, Troisi N, Mauri G (2016) Hydrodynamic boost: a novel re-entry technique in subintimal angioplasty of below-the-knee vessels. Eur Radiol 26(8):2419–2425CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Ko YG, Kim JS, Choi DH, Jang Y, Shim WH (2007) Improved technical success and midterm patency with subintimal angioplasty compared to intraluminal angioplasty in long femoropopliteal occlusions. J Endovasc Ther 14(3):374–381CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Shin SH, Baril D, Chaer R, Rhee R, Makaroun M, Marone L (2011) Limitations of the Outback LTD re-entry device in femoro-popliteal chronic total occlusions. J Vasc Surg 53(5):1260–1264CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Melzi G, Cosgrave J, Biondi-Zoccai GL et al (2006) A novel approach to chronic total occlusion: the crosser system. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 68(1):29–35CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Laird J, Joye J, Sachdev N et al (2014) Recanalization of infrainguinal chronic total occlusions with the crosser system: results of the PATRIOT trial. J Invasive Cardiol 26(10):497–504PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© European Society of Radiology 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Stephanie Volpi
    • 1
  • Amine Chouiter
    • 2
  • Francois Saucy
    • 3
  • Steven Hajdu
    • 1
  • Anne-Marie Jouannic
    • 1
  • Salah D. Qanadli
    • 1
  1. 1.Cardio-Thoracic and Vascular Unit, Department of radiologyCentre Hospitalo-Universitaire VaudoisLausanneSwitzerland
  2. 2.Department of RadiologyHôpital de la ProvidenceNeuchâtelSwitzerland
  3. 3.Department of Vascular SurgeryCentre Hospitalo-Universitaire VaudoisLausanneSwitzerland

Personalised recommendations