Advertisement

European Radiology

, Volume 28, Issue 11, pp 4871–4881 | Cite as

4D ASL-based MR angiography for visualization of distal arteries and leptomeningeal collateral vessels in moyamoya disease: a comparison of techniques

  • Osamu Togao
  • Akio Hiwatashi
  • Makoto Obara
  • Koji Yamashita
  • Daichi Momosaka
  • Ataru Nishimura
  • Koichi Arimura
  • Nobuhiro Hata
  • Koji Yoshimoto
  • Koji Iihara
  • Marc Van Cauteren
  • Hiroshi Honda
Neuro

Abstract

Objectives

To evaluate the performance of four-dimensional pseudo-continuous arterial spin labeling (4D-pCASL)-based angiography using CENTRA-keyhole and view sharing (4D-PACK) in the visualization of flow dynamics in distal cerebral arteries and leptomeningeal anastomosis (LMA) collaterals in moyamoya disease in comparison with contrast inherent inflow-enhanced multiphase angiography (CINEMA), with reference to digital subtraction angiography (DSA).

Methods

Thirty-two cerebral hemispheres from 19 patients with moyamoya disease (mean age, 29.7 ± 19.6 years; five males, 14 females) underwent both 4D-MR angiography and DSA. Qualitative evaluations included the visualization of anterograde middle cerebral artery (MCA) flow and retrograde flow via LMA collaterals with reference to DSA. Quantitative evaluations included assessments of the contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) on these vessels. The linear mixed-effect model was used to compare the 4D-PACK and CINEMA methods.

Results

The vessel visualization scores were significantly higher with 4D-PACK than with CINEMA in the visualization of anterograde flow for both Observer 1 (CINEMA, 3.53 ± 1.39; 4D-PACK, 4.53 ± 0.80; p < 0.0001) and Observer 2 (CINEMA, 3.50±1.39; 4D-PACK, 4.31 ± 0.86; p = 0.0009). The scores were higher with 4D-PACK than with CINEMA in the visualization of retrograde flow for both Observer 1 (CINEMA, 3.44 ± 1.05; 4D-PACK, 4.47 ± 0.88; p < 0.0001) and Observer 2 (CINEMA, 3.19 ± 1.20; 4D-PACK, 4.38 ± 0.91; p < 0.0001). The maximum CNR in the anterograde flow was higher in 4D-PACK (40.1 ± 16.1, p = 0.0001) than in CINEMA (27.0 ± 16.6). The maximum CNR in the retrograde flow was higher in 4D-PACK (36.1 ± 10.0, p < 0.0001) than in CINEMA (15.4 ± 8.0).

Conclusions

The 4D-PACK provided better visualization and higher CNRs in distal cerebral arteries and LMA collaterals compared with CINEMA in patients with this disease.

Key Points

The 4D-PACK enables good visualization of distal cerebral arteries in moyamoya disease.

The 4D-PACK enables direct visualization of leptomeningeal collateral vessels in moyamoya disease.

Vessel visualization by 4D-PACK can be useful in assessing cerebral hemodynamics.

Keywords

Magnetic resonance imaging Magnetic resonance angiography Moyamoya disease Collateral circulation Cerebrovascular disorders 

Abbreviations

4D-PACK

Four-dimensional pseudo-continuous arterial spin labeling-based angiography using CENTRA-keyhole and view sharing

4D

Four dimensional

AccASL

Acceleration-selective ASL

CBF

Cerebral blood flow

CENTRA

Contrast-enhanced timing-robust angiography

CINEMA

Contrast inherent inflow-enhanced multiphase angiography

CNR

Contrast-to-noise ratio

DSA

Digital subtraction angiography

EPI

Echo planer imaging

ICA

Internal carotid artery

LMA

Leptomeningeal anastomosis

MCA

Middle cerebral artery

MIP

Maximum intensity projection

PCA

Posterior cerebral artery

pCASL

Pseudo-continuous arterial spin labeling

RF

Radiofrequency

ROI

Region of interest

ST

Stationary tissue

TOF

Time of flight

Notes

Funding

This study has received funding by JSPS KAKENHI grant no. JP 17K10410.

Compliance with ethical standards

Guarantor

The scientific guarantor of this publication is Hiroshi Honda.

Conflict of interest

The authors of this manuscript declare relationships with the following companies: Philips Japan.

Two authors (M.O., M.V.C.) were employees of Philips Japan and provided technical support in sequence development but were not involved in the study design or interpretation of the data.

Statistics and biometry

No complex statistical methods were necessary for this paper.

Informed consent

Written informed consent was waived by the Institutional Review Board.

Ethical approval

Institutional Review Board approval was obtained.

Methodology

• retrospective

• diagnostic study

• performed at one institution

Supplementary material

330_2018_5462_MOESM1_ESM.docx (40 kb)
ESM 1 (DOCX 39 kb)
330_2018_5462_MOESM2_ESM.avi (721 kb)
ESM 2 (AVI 721 kb)
330_2018_5462_MOESM3_ESM.avi (976 kb)
ESM 3 (AVI 976 kb)
330_2018_5462_MOESM4_ESM.avi (58 kb)
ESM 4 (AVI 57 kb)
330_2018_5462_MOESM5_ESM.avi (78 kb)
ESM 5 (AVI 77 kb)
330_2018_5462_MOESM6_ESM.avi (65 kb)
ESM 6 (AVI 65 kb)
330_2018_5462_MOESM7_ESM.avi (83 kb)
ESM 7 (AVI 82 kb)

References

  1. 1.
    Suzuki J, Takaku A (1969) Cerebrovascular "moyamoya" disease. Disease showing abnormal net-like vessels in base of brain. Arch Neurol 20:288–299CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Suzuki J, Kodama N (1983) Moyamoya disease—a review. Stroke 14:104–109CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Nishimoto A, Takeuchi S (1968) Abnormal cerebrovascular network related to the internal cartoid arteries. J Neurosurg 29:255–260CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Yamada I, Murata Y, Umehara I, Suzuki S, Matsushima Y (1996) SPECT and MRI evaluations of the posterior circulation in moyamoya disease. J Nucl Med 37:1613–1617PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Mugikura S, Takahashi S, Higano S et al (1999) The relationship between cerebral infarction and angiographic characteristics in childhood moyamoya disease. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 20:336–343PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Togao O, Mihara F, Yoshiura T et al (2006) Cerebral hemodynamics in Moyamoya disease: correlation between perfusion-weighted MR imaging and cerebral angiography. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 27:391–397PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Miyamoto S, Kikuchi H, Karasawa J, Nagata I, Ikota T, Takeuchi S (1984) Study of the posterior circulation in moyamoya disease. Clinical and neuroradiological evaluation. J Neurosurg 61:1032–1037CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Funaki T, Takahashi JC, Takagi Y et al (2013) Impact of posterior cerebral artery involvement on long-term clinical and social outcome of pediatric moyamoya disease. J Neurosurg Pediatr 12:626–632CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Hishikawa T, Tokunaga K, Sugiu K, Date I (2014) Long-term outcomes in adult patients with ischemic-type moyamoya disease involving posterior circulation. Acta Neurochir 156:1745–1751CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Williams DS, Detre JA, Leigh JS, Koretsky AP (1992) Magnetic resonance imaging of perfusion using spin inversion of arterial water. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 89:212–216CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Zaharchuk G, Do HM, Marks MP, Rosenberg J, Moseley ME, Steinberg GK (2011) Arterial spin-labeling MRI can identify the presence and intensity of collateral perfusion in patients with moyamoya disease. Stroke 42:2485–2491CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Hara S, Tanaka Y, Ueda Y et al (2017) Noninvasive evaluation of CBF and perfusion delay of moyamoya disease using arterial spin-labeling MRI with multiple postlabeling delays: comparison with (15)O-Gas PET and DSC-MRI. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 38:696–702CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Gunther M, Bock M, Schad LR (2001) Arterial spin labeling in combination with a look-locker sampling strategy: inflow turbo-sampling EPI-FAIR (ITS-FAIR). Magn Reson Med 46:974–984CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Iryo Y, Hirai T, Kai Y et al (2014) Intracranial dural arteriovenous fistulas: evaluation with 3-T four-dimensional MR angiography using arterial spin labeling. Radiology 271:193–199CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Iryo Y, Hirai T, Nakamura M et al (2015) Collateral circulation via the circle of Willis in patients with carotid artery steno-occlusive disease: evaluation on 3-T 4D MRA using arterial spin labelling. Clin Radiol 70:960–965CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Iryo Y, Hirai T, Nakamura M et al (2016) Evaluation of intracranial arteriovenous malformations with four-dimensional arterial-spin labeling-based 3-T magnetic resonance angiography. J Comput Assist Tomogr 40:290–296CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Fujima N, Osanai T, Shimizu Y et al (2016) Utility of noncontrast-enhanced time-resolved four-dimensional MR angiography with a vessel-selective technique for intracranial arteriovenous malformations. J Magn Reson Imaging 44:834–845CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Uchino H, Ito M, Fujima N et al (2015) A novel application of four-dimensional magnetic resonance angiography using an arterial spin labeling technique for noninvasive diagnosis of Moyamoya disease. Clin Neurol Neurosurg 137:105–111CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Obara M, Togao O, Beck GM et al (2018) Non-contrast enhanced 4D intracranial MR angiography based on pseudo-continuous arterial spin labeling with the keyhole and view-sharing technique. Magn Reson Med.  https://doi.org/10.1002/mrm.27074 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    van Vaals JJ, Brummer ME, Dixon WT et al (1993) "Keyhole" method for accelerating imaging of contrast agent uptake. J Magn Reson Imaging 3:671–675CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Jones RA, Haraldseth O, Muller TB, Rinck PA, Oksendal AN (1993) K-space substitution: a novel dynamic imaging technique. Magn Reson Med 29:830–834CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Willinek WA, Hadizadeh DR, von Falkenhausen M et al (2008) 4D time-resolved MR angiography with keyhole (4D-TRAK): more than 60 times accelerated MRA using a combination of CENTRA, keyhole, and SENSE at 3.0T. J Magn Reson Imaging 27:1455–1460CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Zhang X, Petersen ET, Ghariq E et al (2013) In vivo blood T(1) measurements at 1.5 T, 3 T, and 7 T. Magn Reson Med 70:1082–1086CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Yamada I, Himeno Y, Nagaoka T et al (1999) Moyamoya disease: evaluation with diffusion-weighted and perfusion echo-planar MR imaging. Radiology 212:340–347CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Obara M, Togao O, Yoneyama M et al (2017) Acceleration-selective arterial spin labeling for intracranial MR angiography with improved visualization of cortical arteries and suppression of cortical veins. Magn Reson Med 77:1996–2004CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Togao O, Hiwatashi A, Obara M et al (2018) Acceleration-selective arterial spin-labeling MR angiography used to visualize distal cerebral arteries and collateral vessels in moyamoya disease. Radiology 286:611–621CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Uemura A, O'Uchi T, Kikuchi Y, Yashiro N, Ihara N, Shoji K (2004) Prominent laterality of the posterior cerebral artery at three-dimensional time-of-flight MR angiography in M1-segment middle cerebral artery occlusion. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 25:88–91PubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Lima FO, Furie KL, Silva GS et al (2010) The pattern of leptomeningeal collaterals on CT angiography is a strong predictor of long-term functional outcome in stroke patients with large vessel intracranial occlusion. Stroke 41:2316–2322CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© European Society of Radiology 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Osamu Togao
    • 1
  • Akio Hiwatashi
    • 1
  • Makoto Obara
    • 2
  • Koji Yamashita
    • 1
  • Daichi Momosaka
    • 1
  • Ataru Nishimura
    • 3
  • Koichi Arimura
    • 3
  • Nobuhiro Hata
    • 3
  • Koji Yoshimoto
    • 3
  • Koji Iihara
    • 3
  • Marc Van Cauteren
    • 2
  • Hiroshi Honda
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Clinical Radiology, Graduate School of Medical SciencesKyushu UniversityFukuokaJapan
  2. 2.Philips JapanTokyoJapan
  3. 3.Department of Neurosurgery, Graduate School of Medical SciencesKyushu UniversityFukuokaJapan

Personalised recommendations