CT metal artifacts in patients with total hip replacements: for artifact reduction monoenergetic reconstructions and post-processing algorithms are both efficient but not similar
- 289 Downloads
This study compares metal artifact (MA) reduction in imaging of total hip replacements (THR) using virtual monoenergetic images (VMI), for MA-reduction-specialized reconstructions (MAR) and conventional CT images (CI) from detector-based dual-energy computed tomography (SDCT).
Twenty-seven SDCT-datasets of patients carrying THR were included. CI, MAR and VMI with different energy-levels (60–200 keV) were reconstructed from the same scans. MA width was measured. Attenuation (HU), noise (SD) and contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) were determined in: extinction artifact, adjacent bone, muscle and bladder. Two radiologists assessed MA-reduction and image quality visually.
In comparison to CI, VMI (200 keV) and MAR showed a strong artifact reduction (MA width: CI 29.9±6.8 mm, VMI 17.6±13.6 mm, p<0.001; MAR 16.5±14.9 mm, p<0.001; MA density: CI -412.1±204.5 HU, VMI -279.7±283.7 HU; p<0.01; MAR -116.74±105.6 HU, p<0.001). In strong artifacts reduction was superior by MAR. In moderate artifacts VMI was more effective. MAR showed best noise reduction and CNR in bladder and muscle (p<0.05), whereas VMI were superior for depiction of bone (p<0.05). Visual assessment confirmed that VMI and MAR improve artifact reduction and image quality (p<0.001).
MAR and VMI (200 keV) yielded significant MA reduction. Each showed distinct advantages both regarding effectiveness of artifact reduction, MAR regarding assessment of soft tissue and VMI regarding assessment of bone.
• Spectral-detector computed tomography improves assessment of total hip replacements and surrounding tissue.
• Virtual monoenergetic images and MAR reduce metal artifacts and enhance image quality.
• Evaluation of bone, muscle and pelvic organs can be improved by SDCT.
KeywordsX-ray computed tomography Artifacts Arthroplasty Hip Bone
Conventional CT imaging/images
Metal artifact reduction algorithm
Total hip replacement
Virtual monoenergetic images
The authors state that this work has not received any funding.
Compliance with ethical standards
The scientific guarantor of this publication is Jan Borggrefe.
Conflict of interest
The authors of this manuscript declare no relationships with any companies whose products or services may be related to the subject matter of the article.
Statistics and biometry
No complex statistical methods were necessary for this paper.
Written informed consent was waived by the Institutional Review Board.
Institutional Review Board approval was obtained.
• diagnostic or prognostic study
• performed at one institution
- 5.Gwam CU, Mistry JB, Mohamed NS, et al (2017) Current epidemiology of revision total hip arthroplasty in the United States: national inpatient sample 2009 to 2013. J ArthroplastGoogle Scholar
- 11.Philips CT Clinical Science PHU (2012) Metal artifact reduction for orthopedic implants (O-MAR) [Philips NetForum Community]. Available via http://clinical.netforum.healthcare.philips.com/us_en/Explore/White-Papers/CT/Metal-Artifact-Reduction-for-Orthopedic-Implants-(O-MAR). Accessed 01 July 2017
- 19.Neuhaus V, Abdullayev N, Große Hokamp N et al (2017) Improvement of image quality in unenhanced dual-layer CT of the head using virtual monoenergetic images compared with polyenergetic single-energy CT. Invest Radiol 1.Google Scholar
- 20.Likert R (1932) A technique for the measurement of attitudes. Arch Psychol 140:1–55Google Scholar
- 24.Große Hokamp N, Neuhaus V, Abdullayev N, et al (2017) Reduction of artifacts caused by orthopedic hardware in the spine in spectral detector CT examinations using virtual monoenergetic image reconstructions and metal-artifact-reduction algorithms. Skeletal Radiol 1–7.Google Scholar