Population trends of king and common eiders from spring migration counts at Point Barrow, Alaska between 1994 and 2016

  • Rebecca McGuireEmail author
  • Robert Suydam
  • Lori Quakenbush
  • Abby N. Powell
Original Paper


Most king (Somateria spectabilis) and common eiders (S. mollissima v-nigra) breeding in the northwestern Nearctic migrate past Point Barrow, Alaska. Spring migration counts have been conducted there since 1953; during 1976–1996, both species declined > 50% for unknown reasons. To evaluate population trends, counts in 2003, 2004, 2015, and 2016 were compared to earlier counts. King eider estimates were 304,966 (95% CI ± 76,254) in 2003, 591,961 (± 172,011) in 2004, 796,419 (± 304,011) in 2015, and 322,381 (± 145,833) in 2016. Common eider estimates were 114,998 (± 28,566) in 2003, 110,561 (± 32,087) in 2004, 96,775 (± 39,913) in 2015, and 130,390 (± 34,548) in 2016. The 2016 estimate was likely biased low for king eiders due to weather (causing large pulses of king eiders to pass within 2 days) and early ice break-up (causing observers to count at greater distances from the flocks). Using all estimates, populations of both species were statistically stable during 1994–2016. Excluding the 2016 count for king eiders indicated a significant increase of 18.63%/year in that population. Photo analysis of flocks in 2016 indicated that observer counts averaged 4% lower, species detection was not different, but females’ counts were underestimated by 25%. Methods should be refined to reduce bias and variability. Ice-based spring counts are becoming more difficult due to earlier break-up, less stable ice, and new techniques or locations; or a switch to land-based summer/fall migration counts are needed. Population monitoring is needed to ensure sustainability of harvests for these valuable subsistence resources.


Beaufort sea Arctic Population estimate Somateria spectabilis Somateria mollissima Chukchi sea 



We thank the Bureau of Ocean Energy Management, Coastal Marine Institute (University of Alaska Fairbanks), Sea Duck Joint Venture, Wildlife Conservation Society, Wilburforce Foundation, Trust for Mutual Understanding, and North Slope Borough Department of Wildlife Management (NSB-DWM) for funding this study. Tim Bowman of the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service provided substantial help in raising funds and took the photos in 2016. This study would not have been possible without the substantial personnel and logistical support, and advice, of the NSB-DWM; in particular, we would like to thank Taqulik Hepa, Craig George, Leslie Peirce, Dave Ramey, Benny Akootchook, and Bobby Sarren. We thank our many observers, Mike Knoche, Sally Andersen, Michael Wald, Rosemary McGuire, Vera Kokhanova, Brittany King, Ian Fife, Rita Frantz, Peter Detwiler, Kayla Sheimreif, Mark Dodds, Laura Phillips, Garnet Raven, Craig George, Cyd Hanns, Leslie Pierce, Forrest Kagak, Brian Person, Mike Bradbury, Melinda Dorin, Lynne Dickson, Bonnie Rogers, Josh London, Rick Raymond (BOEM), and our bear guard, Perry Anashugak for their hard work in the field and apologize if we have inadvertently left someone off the list. We thank Graham Frye for statistical advice and Tasha DiMArzio for counting thousands of eiders in pictures. We thank Richard Raymond, Timothy White, Phillip Martin and David Safine for their helpful comments on drafts of this manuscript. Any use of trade, firm, or product names is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Government.


This study was funded by Sea Duck Joint Venture (Grant No. 110047), Trust for Mutual Understanding (Grant No. 110694), Coastal Marine Institute (Grant No. 110443), and Wilburforce (Grant No. 111064).

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

There are no conflicts of interest to disclose.

Ethical approval

All applicable international, national, and/or institutional guidelines for the care and use of animals were followed. As no animals were handled, approached, or interfered with, we did not conduct an official IACUC.


  1. Alisauskas RT, Conn PB (2019) Detectability of arctic waterfowl using double-observer distance sampling during helicopter surveys. Ecol Evol 9:859–867CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bacon JJ, Hepa TR, Brower HK Jr, Pederson M, Olemaun TP, George JC, Corrigan BG (2009) Estimates of subsistence harvest for villages on the North Slope of Alaska, 1994–2003. North Slope Borough Department of Wildlife ManagementGoogle Scholar
  3. Barry TW (1968) Observations on natural mortality and native use of eider ducks along the Beaufort Sea coast. Can Field Nat 82:140–146Google Scholar
  4. Bentzen RL, Powell AN (2015) Dispersal, movements, and site fidelity of post fledging king eiders Somateria spectabilis and their attending females. Ibis 154:133–146CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Black AL, Gilchrist HG, Allard KA, Mallory ML (2012) Incidental observations of birds in the vicinity of Hell Gate Polynya, Nunavut: species, timing and diversity. Arctic 65:145–154CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bluhm BA, Gradinger R (2008) Regional variability in food availability for Arctic marine mammals. Ecol Appl 18:S77–S96CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Borchers DL, Zucchini W, Fewster RM (1998) Mark-recapture models for line transect surveys. Biometrics 54:1207–1220CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Borchers DL, Laake JL, Southwell C, Paxton CGM (2006) Accommodating unmodeled heterogeneity in double-observer distance-sampling surveys. Biometrics 62:372–378CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Brueggeman JJ (1980) Coastal occurrence of birds at Point Barrow, Alaska, in spring. Murrelet 61:31–34CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Buckland ST, Anderson DR, Burnham KP, Laake JL, Borchers DL, Thomas L (2001) Introduction to distance-sampling: estimating the abundance of biological populations. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  11. Buckland ST, Laake JL, Borchers DL (2010) Double-observer line transect methods: levels of independence. Biometrics 66:169–177CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Burnham KP, Anderson DR, Laake JL (1980) Estimation of density for line transect sampling of biological populations. Wildl Monogr 72:7–202Google Scholar
  13. Burnham KK, Johnson JA, Konkel B, Burnham JL (2012) Nesting common eider (Somateria mollissima) population quintuples in Northwest Greenland. Arctic 65:456–464CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Burt ML, Borchers DL, Jenkins KJ, Marques TA (2014) Using mark-recapture distance-sampling methods on line transect surveys. Methods Ecol Evol 5:1180–1191CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Caughley G, Grice D (1982) A correction factor for counting emus from the air, and its application to counts in western Australia. Aust Wildl Res 9:253–259CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Chaulk KG (2009) Suspected long-term population increases in common eiders, Somateria mollissima, on the Mid-Labrador Coast, 1980, 1994, and 2006. Can Field Nat 123:304–308CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Chaulk KG, Robertson GK, Collins BT, Montevecchi WA, Turner B (2005) Research Notes: evidence of recent population increases in common eiders breeding in Labrador. J Wildl Manag 69:805–809CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Cook RD, Jacobson JO (1979) A design for estimating visibility bias in aerial surveys. Biometrics 35:735–742CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. D’Alba L, Monahan P, Nager RG (2010) Advances in laying date and increasing population size suggest positive responses to climate change in common eiders Somateria mollissima in Iceland. Ibis 152:19–28CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Day RH, Rose JR, Pritchard AK, Blaha RJ, Cooper BA (2004) Environmental effects of the fall migration of eiders at Barrow, Alaska. Mar Ornithol 32:13–24Google Scholar
  21. Descamps S, Jenouvrier S, Gilchrist HG, Forbes MR (2012) Avian cholera, a threat to the viability of an arctic seabird colony? PLoS ONE 7(2):e29659CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Dickson DL (2012) Seasonal movement of Pacific Common Eiders breeding in arctic Canada. Technical Report Series 521, Canadian Wildlife Service, Edmonton, AlbertaGoogle Scholar
  23. Dunton KH, Goodall JL, Schonberg SV, Grebmeier JM, Maidment DR (2005) Multi-decadal synthesis of benthic–pelagic coupling in the western arctic: role of crossshelf advective processes. Deep Sea Res II 52:3462–3477CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Fabijian MR, Brook R, Kuptana, D, and Hines JE (1997) The subsistence harvest of King and Common eiders in the Inuvialuit Settlement region, 1988–1994. In: Dickson DL (ed) King and common eiders of the western Canadian arctic. Occasional Paper No. 94. Canadian Wildlife Service, Ottawa, pp 21–28Google Scholar
  25. Falardeau G, Rail J-F, Gilliland S, Savard J-P (2003) Breeding survey of common eiders along the west coast of Ungava Bay, in summer 2000, and a supplement on other nesting aquatic birds. Technical Report Series No. 405, Canadian Wildlife Service, Québec Region, Sainte-Foy, Québec. ix + 67Google Scholar
  26. Fournier MA, Hines JE (1994) Effects of starvation on muscle and organ mass of King Eiders Somateria spectabilis and the ecological and management implications. Wildfowl 45:188–197Google Scholar
  27. Gilliland SG, Gilchrist HG, Rockwell RF, Robertson GJ, Savard JPL, Merkel F, Mosbech A (2009) Evaluating the sustainability of harvest among northern common eiders Somateria mollissima borealis in Greenland and Canada. Wildl Biol 15:24–36CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Grebmeier JM, Cooper LW, Feder HM, Sirenko BI (2006) Ecosystem dynamics of the Pacific-influenced Northern Bering and Chukchi Seas in the Amerasian Arctic. Prog Ocean 71:331–361CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Grier JW, Gerrard JM, Hamilton GD, Gray PA (1981) Aerial visibility bias and survey techniques for nesting bald eagles in northwestern Ontario. J Wildl Manag 45:83–92CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Guéry L, Descamps S, Pradel R, Hanssen SA, Erikstad KE, Gabrielsen GW, Gilchrist HG, Bety J (2017) Hidden survival heterogeneity of three common eider populations in response to climate fluctuations. J Anim Ecol 86:683–693CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Hipfner JM, Gilchrist HG, Gaston AJ, Cairns DK (2002) Status of common eiders, Somateria mollissima, nesting in the Digges Sound region, Nunavut. Can Field Nat 116:22–25Google Scholar
  32. Hodges JI, King JG, Conant B, Hanson HA (1996) Aerial surveys of waterbirds in Alaska 1957–94: Population trends and observer variability. National Biological Service Information and Technology Report 4.Google Scholar
  33. Iles DT, Rockwell RF, Matulonis P, Robertson GJ, Abraham KF, Davis JC, Coons DN (2013) Predators, alternative prey and climate influence annual breeding success of a long-lived sea duck. J Anim Ecol 82:683–693CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Iverson SA, Gilchrist HG, Smith PA, Gaston AJ, Forbes MR (2014) Longer ice-free seasons increase the risk of nest depredation by polar bears for colonial breeding birds in the Canadian Arctic. Proc R Soc B 281:20133128CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Johnson LL (1971) The migration, harvest and importance of waterfowl at Barrow, Alaska. M.S. thesis. Univ. Alaska, FairbanksGoogle Scholar
  36. Kerr RA (2002) A warmer Arctic means change for all. Science 297:1490–1493CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Koneff MD, Royle JA, Otto MC, Wortham JS, Bidwell JK (2008) A double-observer method to estimate detection rate during aerial waterfowl surveys. J Wildl Manag 72:1641–1649Google Scholar
  38. Laake JL, Borchers DL (2004) Methods for incomplete detection at distance zero. In: Buckland S, Anderson D, Burnham K, Laake J, Borchers D, Thomas L (eds) Advanced distance-sampling. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 108–189Google Scholar
  39. Lehikoinen A, Kiple M, Ost M (2006) Winter climate affects subsequent breeding success of common eiders. Glob Chang Biol 12:1355–1365CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Lovvorn JR, Richman SE, Grebmeier JM, Cooper LW (2003) Diet and body condition of spectacled eiders wintering in pack ice of the Bering Sea. Polar Biol 26:259–267Google Scholar
  41. Lovvorn JR, Rocha AR, Jewett SC, Dasher D, Oppel S, Powell AN (2015) Limits to benthic feeding by eiders in a vital Arctic migration corridor due to localized prey and changing sea ice. Prog Oceanogr 136:162–174CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Maftei M, Davis SE, Mallory ML (2015) Assessing regional populations of ground nesting marine birds in the Canadian High Arctic. Polar Res 34:25–55CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Merkel FR (2004) Evidence of population decline in common eiders breeding in western Greenland. Arctic 57:27–36CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Merkel, FR (2006) Common Eiders in Greenland—interactions between harvest, body condition and habitats use in winter. Ph.D. Thesis. Greenland Institute of Natural Resources and University of Copenhagen.Google Scholar
  45. Merkel FR (2010) Evidence of recent population recovery in common eiders breeding in western Greenland. J Wildl Manag 74:1869–1874CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Murdoch J (1885) Birds. In: Ray PH (ed) Report of the international polar expedition to Point Barrow, Alaska. Part 4. Government Printing Office, Washington, DC, pp 104–128.Google Scholar
  47. Naves LC and Otis D (2017) Alaska Subsistence Harvest of Birds and Eggs, 2016, Alaska Migratory Bird Co-management Council. Alaska Department of Fish and Game Subsistence Division, Technical Paper No. 434, Anchorage.Google Scholar
  48. Oppel S, Dickson DL, Powell AN (2009) International importance of the Chukchi Sea as a staging area for migrating king eiders. Polar Biol 32:775–782CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Phillips LM (2005) Migration ecology and distribution of King Eiders. University of Alaska Fairbanks, ThesisGoogle Scholar
  50. Platte RM, Stehn RA (2013) Abundance and trend of waterbirds on Alaska’s Yukon/Kuskokwim Delta coast based on 1988 to 2012 aerial surveys. Unpublished report. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Anchorage, Alaska, USAGoogle Scholar
  51. Pratte I, Davis SE, Maftei M, Mallory ML (2016) Aggressive neighbors and dense nesting: nest site choice and success in high-Arctic common eiders. Polar Biol 39:1597–1604CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Prop J, Aars J, Bårdsen B-J, Hanssen SA, Bech C, Bourgeon S, de Fouw J, Gabrielsen GW, Lang J, Noreen E, Oudman T, Sittler B, Stempniewicz L, Tombre I, Wolters E, Moe B, (2015) Climate change and the increasing impact of polar bears on bird populations. Front Ecol Evol 3:33CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Quakenbush LT, Suydam RS, Acker R, Knoche M, Citta J (2009) Migration of king and common eiders Past Point Barrow, Alaska, during summer/fall 2002 through spring 2004: population trends and effects of wind. Final Report to the Coastal Marine Institute, Fairbanks, Alaska, USAGoogle Scholar
  54. Stehn RA, Dau CP, Conant B, Butler WI Jr (1993) Decline of spectacled eiders nesting in western Alaska. Arctic 46:264–277CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Suydam RL, Quakenbush L, Johnson M, George JC, Young J (1997) Migration of king and common eiders past Point Barrow, Alaska, in spring 1987, spring 1994 and fall 1994. In: Dickson DL (ed) King and common eiders of the western Canadian arctic. Occasional Paper No. 94. Canadian Wildlife Service, Ottawa, pp 21–28Google Scholar
  56. Suydam RS, Dickson DL, Fadely JB, Quakenbush LT (2000a) Population declines of king and common eiders of the Beaufort Sea. Condor 102:219–222CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Suydam RS, Quakenbush LT, Dickson DL, Obritschkewitsch T (2000b) Migration of king, Somateria spectabilis, and common, S. mollissima v-nigra, eiders past Point Barrow, Alaska, during spring and summer/fall 1996. Can Field-Nat 114:444–452Google Scholar
  58. Thompson SK (2002) Sampling. Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  59. Thompson DQ, Person RA (1963) The eider pass at Point Barrow, Alaska. J Wildl Manag 27:348–356CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Udevitz MS, Jay CV, Cody MB (2005) Observer variability in pinniped counts: Ground-based enumeration of walruses at haul-out site. Mar Mammal Sci 21(1):108–120CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Wilson HM, Larned WW, Swaim MA (2018) Abundance and trends of waterbird breeding populations on the Arctic Coastal Plain, Alaska, 1986-2017. Unpublished report, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Anchorage, Alaska, USAGoogle Scholar
  62. Woodby DA, Divoky GJ (1982) Spring migration of eiders and other waterbirds at Point Barrow, Alaska. Arctic 35:403–410CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Rebecca McGuire
    • 1
    • 2
    Email author
  • Robert Suydam
    • 3
  • Lori Quakenbush
    • 4
  • Abby N. Powell
    • 2
    • 5
  1. 1.Wildlife Conservation SocietyFairbanksUSA
  2. 2.Institute of Arctic BiologyUniversity of AlaskaFairbanksUSA
  3. 3.North Slope Borough, Department of Wildlife ManagementUtqiaġvikUSA
  4. 4.Alaska Department of Fish and GameFairbanksUSA
  5. 5.U. S. Geological Survey, Florida Cooperative Fish and Wildlife Research UnitUniversity of FloridaGainesvilleUSA

Personalised recommendations