Advertisement

Functional characterization of GI and CO homologs from Eriobotrya deflexa Nakai forma koshunensis

  • Ling Zhang
  • Yuanyuan Jiang
  • Yunmei Zhu
  • Wenbing Su
  • Ting Long
  • Tianqi Huang
  • Jiangrong Peng
  • Hao Yu
  • Shunquan LinEmail author
  • Yongshun GaoEmail author
Original Article

Abstract

Key message

The first report of the cloning and characterization of the flowering time-regulating genes GI and CO homologs from loquat.

Abstract

Flowering time is critical for successful reproduction in plants. In fruit trees, it can also influence the fruit yield and quality. In the previous work, we cloned the important florigen one EdFT and two EdFDs from wild loquat (Eriobotrya deflexa Nakai forma koshunensis); however, the upstream transcription factors are still unknown. The photoperiod pathway genes GIGANTEA (GI) and CONSTANS (CO) have been reported to mainly regulate FT expression in model plants. In this work, we first cloned photoperiod pathway orthologs EdGI and EdCO from E. deflexa Nakai f. koshunensis. Phylogenetic analysis showed they are highly conserved to those from Arabidopsis. They are mainly expressed in the leaves. The EdGI and EdCO were localized in the nucleus. Their expression showed in photoperiodic regulation, while the EdCO transcripts reached the peak at different periods from that of CO in Arabidopsis. Moreover, EdCO significantly activated the EdFT promoter activity. In the transgenic Arabidopsis, downstream-flowering genes like FT and AP1 were obviously upregulated, and consequently resulted in early-flowering phenotype compared to the wild type. These data revealed that the EdGI and EdCO may play a similar role as GI and CO in Arabidopsis, and regulate flower initiation in loquat.

Keywords

Loquat Photoperiod Flowering time EdGI EdCO 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This study was financially supported by National Natural Science Foundation (No. 31560091), Natural Science Foundation of Guangdong Province (2017A030313129), The Earmarked Fund for Guangdong Modern Agro-industry Technology Research System (2018LM1128), and Ministry of Agriculture Industry Technology Special Project (201003073).

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict interests.

Supplementary material

299_2019_2384_MOESM1_ESM.docx (6.2 mb)
Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 6315 KB)

References

  1. Adrian J, Farrona S, Reimer JJ, Albani MC, Coupland G, Turck F (2010) cis-regulatory elements and chromatin state coordinately control temporal and spatial expression of FLOWERING LOCUS T in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell Online 22:1425–1440CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. An H, Roussot C, Suárez-López P, Corbesier L, Vincent C, Piñeiro M, Hepworth S, Mouradov A, Justin S, Turnbull C, Coupland G (2004) CONSTANS acts in the phloem to regulate a systemic signal that induces photoperiodic flowering of Arabidopsis. Development 131:3615–3626CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Andres F, Coupland G (2012) The genetic basis of flowering responses to seasonal cues. Nat Rev Genet 13:627–639CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Ballerini ES, Kramer EM (2011) In the light of evolution: a reevaluation of conservation in the CO-FT regulon and its role in photoperiodic regulation of flowering time. Front Plant Sci 2:81CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bohlenius H, Huang T, Charbonnel-Campaa L, Brunner AM, Jansson S, Strauss SH, Nilsson O (2006) CO/FT regulatory module controls timing of flowering and seasonal growth cessation in trees. Science 312:1040–1043CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Brock MT, Tiffin P, Weinig C (2007) Sequence diversity and haplotype associations with phenotypic responses to crowding: GIGANTEA affects fruit set in Arabidopsis thaliana. Mol Ecol 16:3050–3062CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Cao S, Ye M, Jiang S (2005) Involvement of GIGANTEA gene in the regulation of the cold stress response in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell Rep 24:683–690CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Corbesier L, Vincent C, Jang S, Fornara F, Fan Q, Searle I, Giakountis A, Farrona S, Gissot L, Turnbull C, Coupland G (2007) FT protein movement contributes to long-distance signaling in floral induction of Arabidopsis. Science 316:1030–1033CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Dalchau N, Baek SJ, Briggs HM, Robertson FC, Dodd AN, Gardner MJ, Stancombe MA, Haydon MJ, Stan GB, Gonçalves JM, Webb AA (2011) The circadian oscillator gene GIGANTEA mediates a long-term response of the Arabidopsis thaliana circadian clock to sucrose. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 108:5104–5109CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Datta S, Hettiarachchi GH, Deng XW, Holm M (2006) Arabidopsis CONSTANS-LIKE3 is a positive regulator of red light signaling and root growth. Plant Cell 18:70–84CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Fornara F, Panigrahi KC, Gissot L, Sauerbrunn N, Rühl M, Jarillo JA, Coupland G (2009) Arabidopsis DOF transcription factors act redundantly to reduce CONSTANS expression and are essential for a photoperiodic flowering response. Dev Cell 17:75–86CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Fowler S, Lee K, Onouchi H, Samach A, Richardson K, Morris B, Coupland G, Putterill J (1999) GIGANTEA: a circadian clock-controlled gene that regulates photoperiodic flowering in Arabidopsis and encodes a protein with several possible membrane-spanning domains. EMBO J 18:4679–4688CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Fu J, Yang L, Dai S (2015) Identification and characterization of the CONSTANS-like gene family in the short-day plant Chrysanthemum lavandulifolium. Mol Genet Genomics 290:1039–1054CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Gu C, Spongberg SA (2003) ERIOBOTRYA Lindley. In: Flora of China. Science Press, Missouri Botanical Garden PressGoogle Scholar
  15. Griffiths S, Dunford RP, Coupland G, Laurie DA (2003) The evolution of CONSTANS-like gene families in barley, rice, and Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol 131:1855–1867CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Hassidim M, Harir Y, Yakir E, Kron I, Green RM (2009) Over-expression of CONSTANS-LIKE 5 can induce flowering in short-day grown Arabidopsis. Planta 230:481–491CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Hayama R, Coupland G (2004) The molecular basis of diversity in the photoperiodic flowering responses of Arabidopsis and rice. Plant Physiol 135:677–684CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Hayama R, Yokoi S, Tamaki S, Yano M, Shimamoto K (2003) Adaptation of photoperiodic control pathways produces short-day flowering in rice. Nature 422:719–722CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Hecht V, Knowles CL, Vander Schoor JK, Liew LC, Jones SE, Lambert MJ, Weller JL (2007) Pea LATE BLOOMER1 is a GIGANTEA ortholog with roles in photoperiodic flowering, deetiolation, and transcriptional regulation of circadian clock gene homologs. Plant Physiol 144:648–661CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Hellens RP, Allan AC, Friel EN, Bolitho K, Grafton K, Templeton MD, Karunairetnam S, Gleave AP, Laing WA (2005) Transient expression vectors for functional genomics, quantification of promoter activity and RNA silencing in plants. Plant Methods 1:13CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Hong SY, Lee S, Seo PJ, Yang MS, Park CM (2010) Identification and molecular characterization of a Brachypodium distachyon GIGANTEA gene: functional conservation in monocot and dicot plants. Plant Mol Biol 72:485–497CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Hou X, Zhou J, Liu C, Liu L, Shen L, Yu H (2014) Nuclear factor Y-mediated H3K27me3 demethylation of the SOC1 locus orchestrates flowering responses of Arabidopsis. Nat Commun 5:4601CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Huq E, Tepperman JM, Quail PH (2000) GIGANTEA is a nuclear protein involved in phytochrome signaling in Arabidopsis. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 97:9789–9794CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Imaizumi T, Tran HG, Swartz TE, Briggs WR, Kay SA (2003) FKF1 is essential for photoperiodic-specific light signalling in Arabidopsis. Nature 426:302–306CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Imaizumi T, Schultz TF, Harmon FG, Ho LA, Kay SA (2005) FKF1 F-box protein mediates cyclic degradation of a repressor of CONSTANS in Arabidopsis. Science 309:293–297CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Jung JH, Seo YH, Seo PJ, Reyes JL, Yun J, Chua NH, Park CM (2007) The GIGANTEA-regulated MicroRNA172 mediates photoperiodic flowering independent of CONSTANS in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell 19:2736–2748CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Kardailsky I, Shukla VK, Ahn JH, Dagenais N, Christensen SK, Nguyen JT, Chory J, Harrison MJ, Weigel D (1999) Activation tagging of the floral inducer FT. Science 286:1962–1965CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Khanna R, Kronmiller B, Maszle DR, Coupland G, Holm M, Mizuno T, Wu SH (2009) The Arabidopsis B-Box Zinc finger family. Plant Cell 21:3416–3420CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Kim SK, Park HY, Jang YH, Lee JH, Kim JK (2013a) The sequence variation responsible for the functional difference between the CONSTANS protein, and the CONSTANS-like (COL) 1 and COL2 proteins, resides mostly in the region encoded by their first exons. Plant Sci 199–200:71–78CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Kim WY, Ali Z, Park HJ, Park SJ, Cha JY, Perez-Hormaeche J, Quintero FJ, Shin G, Kim MR, Qiang Z, Ning L, Park HC, Lee SY, Bressan RA, Pardo JM, Bohnert HJ, Yun DJ (2013b) Release of SOS2 kinase from sequestration with GIGANTEA determines salt tolerance in Arabidopsis. Nat Commun 4:1352CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Ledger S, Strayer C, Ashton F, Kay SA, Putterill J (2001) Analysis of the function of two circadian-regulated CONSTANS-LIKE genes. Plant J 26:15–22CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Lee LY, Hou X, Fang L, Fan S, Kumar PP, Yu H (2012) STUNTED mediates the control of cell proliferation by GA in Arabidopsis. Development 139:1568–1576CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Li D, Liu C, Shen L, Wu Y, Chen H, Robertson M, Helliwell CA, Ito T, Meyerowitz E, Yu H (2008) A repressor complex governs the integration of flowering signals in Arabidopsis. Dev Cell 15:110–120CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Li S, Yue W, Wang M, Qiu W, Zhou L, Shou H (2016) Mutation of OsGIGANTEA leads to enhanced tolerance to polyethylene glycol-generated osmotic stress in rice. Front Plant Sci 7:465Google Scholar
  35. Mizoguchi T, Wright L, Fujiwara S, Cremer F, Lee K, Onouchi H, Mouradov A, Fowler S, Kamada H, Putterill J, Coupland G (2005) Distinct roles of GIGANTEA in promoting flowering and regulating circadian rhythms in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell 17:2255–2270CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Park DH, Somers DE, Kim YS, Choy YH, Lim HK, Soh MS, Kim HJ, Kay SA, Nam HG (1999) Control of circadian rhythms and photoperiodic flowering by the Arabidopsis GIGANTEA gene. Science 285:1579–1582CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Park HJ, Kim WY, Yun DJ (2013) A role for GIGANTEA: keeping the balance between flowering and salinity stress tolerance. Plant Signal Behav 8:e24820CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Pennisi E (2007) Plant science—long-sought plant flowering signal unmasked, again. Science 316:350–351CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Putterill J, Robson F, Lee K, Simon R, Coupland G (1995) The CONSTANS gene of Arabidopsis promotes flowering and encodes a protein showing similarities to zinc finger transcription factors. Cell 80:847–857CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Riboni M, Galbiati M, Tonelli C, Conti L (2013) GIGANTEA enables drought escape response via Abscisic acid-dependent activation of the florigens and suppressor of overexpression of CONSTANS1. Plant Physiol 162:1706–1719CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Robson F, Costa MM, Hepworth SR, Vizir I, Piñeiro M, Reeves PH, Putterill J, Coupland G (2001) Functional importance of conserved domains in the flowering-time gene CONSTANS demonstrated by analysis of mutant alleles and transgenic plants. Plant J 28:619–631CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Samach A, Onouchi H, Gold SE, Ditta GS, Schwarz-Sommer Z, Yanofsky MF, Coupland G (2000) Distinct roles of CONSTANS target genes in reproductive development of Arabidopsis. Science 288:1613–1616CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Sawa M, Kay SA (2011) GIGANTEA directly activates flowering locus T in Arabidopsis thaliana. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 108:11698–11703CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Sawa M, Nusinow DA, Kay SA, Imaizumi T (2007) FKF1 and GIGANTEA complex formation is required for day-length measurement in Arabidopsis. Science 318:261–265CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Shim JS, Kubota A, Imaizumi T (2017) Circadian clock and photoperiodic flowering in Arabidopsis: CONSTANS is a hub for signal integration. Plant Physiol 173:5–15CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Song YH, Smith RW, To BJ, Millar AJ, Imaizumi T (2012) FKF1 conveys timing information for CONSTANS stabilization in photoperiodic flowering. Science 336:1045–1049CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Song YH, Ito S, Imaizumi T (2013) Flowering time regulation: photoperiod- and temperature-sensing in leaves. Trends Plant Sci 18:575–583CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Song YH, Shim JS, Kinmonth-Schultz HA, Imaizumi T (2015) Photoperiodic flowering: time measurement mechanisms in leaves. Annu Rev Plant Biol 66:441–464CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Sparkes IA, Runions J, Kearns A, Hawes C (2006) Rapid, transient expression of fluorescent fusion proteins in tobacco plants and generation of stably transformed plants. Nat Protoc 1:2019–2025CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Suárez-López P, Wheatley K, Robson F, Onouchi H, Valverde F, Coupland G (2001) CONSTANS mediates between the circadian clock and the control of flowering in Arabidopsis. Nature 410:1116–1120CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Tiwari SB, Shen Y, Chang HC, Hou Y, Harris A, Ma SF, McPartland M, Hymus GJ, Adam L, Marion C, Belachew A, Repetti PP, Reuber TL, Ratcliffe OJ (2010) The flowering time regulator CONSTANS is recruited to the FLOWERING LOCUS T promoter via a unique cis-element. New Phytol 187:57–66CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Tseng TS, Salomé PA, McClung CR, Olszewski NE (2004) SPINDLY and GIGANTEA interact and act in Arabidopsis thaliana pathways involved in light responses, flowering, and rhythms in cotyledon movements. Plant Cell 16:1550–1563CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Valverde F, Mouradov A, Soppe W, Ravenscroft D, Samach A, Coupland G (2004) Photoreceptor regulation of CONSTANS protein in photoperiodic flowering. Science 303:1003–1006CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Watanabe S, Xia Z, Hideshima R, Tsubokura Y, Sato S, Yamanaka N, Takahashi R, Anai T, Tabata S, Kitamura K, Harada K (2011) A map-based cloning strategy employing a residual heterozygous line reveals that the GIGANTEA gene is involved in soybean maturity and flowering. Genetics 188:395–407CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Wigge PA, Kim MC, Jaeger KE, Busch W, Schmid M, Lohmann JU, Weigel D (2005) Integration of spatial and temporal information during floral induction in Arabidopsis. Science 309:1056–1059CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Yan Y, Shen L, Chen Y, Bao S, Thong Z, Yu H (2014) A MYB-domain protein EFM mediates flowering responses to environmental cues in Arabidopsis. Dev Cell 30:437–448CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Yanovsky MJ, Kay SA (2002) Molecular basis of seasonal time measurement in Arabidopsis. Nature 419:308–312CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Zhang X, Henriques R, Lin SS, Niu QW, Chua NH (2006) Agrobacterium-mediated transformation of Arabidopsis thaliana using the floral dip method. Nat Protoc 1:641–646CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Zhang X, An L, Nguyen TH, Liang H, Wang R, Liu X, Li T, Qi Y, Yu F (2015) The cloning and functional characterization of peach CONSTANS and FLOWERING LOCUS T homologous genes PpCO and PpFT. PLoS One 10:e0124108CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Zhang L, Yu H, Lin S, Gao Y (2016) Molecular Characterization of FT and FD Homologs from Eriobotrya deflexa Nakai forma koshunensis. Front Plant Sci 7:8Google Scholar
  61. Zuo Z, Liu H, Liu B, Liu X, Lin C (2011) Blue light-dependent interaction of CRY2 with SPA1 regulates COP1 activity and floral initiation in Arabidopsis. Curr Biol 21:841–847CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.State Key Laboratory for Conservation and Utilization of Subtropical Agro-bioresources/Key Laboratory of Biology and Germplasm Enhancement of Horticultural Crops in South China, Ministry of Agriculture/College of HorticultureSouth China Agricultural UniversityGuangzhouChina
  2. 2.Department of Biological Sciences and Temasek Life Sciences LaboratoryNational University of SingaporeSingaporeSingapore

Personalised recommendations