Advertisement

Plant Cell Reports

, Volume 37, Issue 11, pp 1557–1569 | Cite as

Salt stress alleviation in citrus plants by plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria Pseudomonas putida and Novosphingobium sp.

  • Vicente Vives-Peris
  • Aurelio Gómez-Cadenas
  • Rosa María Pérez-Clemente
Original Article

Abstract

Key message

This work reveals the protective role of two rhizobacteria, Pseudomonas putida and Novosphingobium sp., on citrus plants subjected to salt stress conditions.

Abstract

Detrimental salt stress effects on crops are likely to increase due to climate change reducing the quality of irrigation water. Plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria (PGPRs) can mitigate stress-induced damage in plants cultivated under high salinity conditions. In this work, Citrus macrophylla (alemow) plants inoculated with the rhizobacteria Pseudomonas putida KT2440 or Novosphingobium sp. HR1a were subjected to salt stress for 30 days. Results showed that in absence of salt stress, Novosphingobium sp. HR1a induced a decrease of transpiration (E) and stomatal conductance (gs). Both rhizobacteria reduced salt stress-induced damage. Levels of abscisic acid (ABA) and salicylic acid (SA) were lower in inoculated plants under salt stress conditions. Similarly, under stress conditions maximum efficiency of photosystem II (Fv/Fm) in inoculated plants decreased to a lower extent than in non-inoculated ones. In stressed plants, Novosphingobium sp. HR1a also induced leaf accumulation of 3-indole acetic acid (IAA) and a delay in the decrease of quantum yield (ΦPSII). P. putida KT2440 inhibited root chloride and proline accumulation in response to salt stress. Although both bacterial species had beneficial effects on salt-stressed citrus plants, Novosphingobium sp. HR1a induced a better plant performance. Therefore, both strains could be candidates to be used as PGPRs in programs of inoculation for citrus protection against salt stress.

Keywords

Citrus Novosphingobium Plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria Pseudomonas Salt stress 

Abbreviations

ABA

Abscisic acid

ACC

1-Aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylate

CFU

Colony-forming units

E

Transpiration

Fv/Fm

Maximum efficiency of photosystem II

gs

Stomatal conductance

IAA

3-Indole acetic acid

NI

Non-inoculated

PGPR

Plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria

ΦPSII

Quantum efficiency of PSII photochemistry

SA

Salicylic acid

Notes

Acknowledgements

The work published in this article has been supported by the Spanish Ministerio de Economia y Competitividad (MINECO) and Universitat Jaume I through Grant nos. AGL2016-76574-R and UJI-B2016-23 respectively. V.V.-P. was recipient of a predoctoral contract from the Universitat Jaume I (PREDOC/2013/31). The authors want to acknowledge Ana Segura Carnicero and Lázaro Molina Delgado from Estación Experimental del Zaidín (Granada, Spain) for kindly providing the bacterial strains used in this work.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Supplementary material

299_2018_2328_MOESM1_ESM.docx (14 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 14 KB)

References

  1. Arbona V, López-Climent MF, Mahouachi J, Pérez-Clemente RM, Abrams SR, Gómez-Cadenas A (2006) Use of persistent analogs of abscisic acid as palliatives against salt-stress induced damage in citrus plants. J Plant Growth Regul 25:1–9.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00344-005-0038-6 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Arbona V, López-Climent MF, Pérez-Clemente RM, Gómez-Cadenas A (2009) Maintenance of a high photosynthetic performance is linked to flooding tolerance in citrus. Environ Exp Bot 66:135–142.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envexpbot.2008.12.011 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Arbona V, Manzi M, Zandalinas SI, Vives-Peris V, Pérez-Clemente RM, Gómez-Cadenas A (2017) Physiological, metabolic, and molecular responses of plants to abiotic stress. In: Sarwat M, Ahmad A, Abdin M, Ibrrahim M (eds) Stress signaling in plants: genomics and proteomics perspective, vol 2, 1st edn. Springer, Cham, pp 1–35.  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-42183-4_1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Arc E, Sechet J, Corbineau F, Rajjou L, Marion-Poll A (2013) ABA crosstalk with ethylene and nitric oxide in seed dormancy and germination. Front Plant Sci 4:63.  https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2013.00063 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  5. Bao Y, Aggarwal P, Robbins Il NE, Sturrock CJ, Thompson MC, Tan HQ, Tham C, Duan L, Rodríguez PL, Vernoux T, Mooney SJ, Bennett MJ, Dinneny JR (2014) Plant roots use a patterning mechanism to position lateral root branches toward available water. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 111:9314–9324.  https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1400966111 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Barka E, Nowak J, Clément C (2006) Enhancement of chilling resistance of inoculated grapevine plantlets with a plant growth-promoting rhizobacterium, Burkholderia phytofirmans strain PsJN. Appl Environ Microbiol 72:7246–7252.  https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.01047-06 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bates LS, Waldren RP, Teare ID (1973) Rapid determination of free proline for water-stress studies. Plant Soil 39:205–207.  https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00018060 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bertani G (1951) Studies on Lysogenesis I. The mode of phageliberation by lysogenic Eschericia coli. J Bacteriol 62:293–300PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  9. Bresson J, Varoquaux F, Bontpart T, Touraine B, Vile D (2013) The PGPR strain Phyllobacterium brassicacearum STM196 induces a reproductive delay and physiological changes that result in improved drought tolerance in Arabidopsis. New Phytol 200:558–569.  https://doi.org/10.1111/nph.12383 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Cassán F, Vanderleyden J, Spaepen S (2014) Physiological and agronomical aspects of phytohormone production by model plant-growth-promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR) belonging to the genus Azospirillum. J Plant Growth Regul 33:440–459.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00344-013-9362-4 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Chiquito-Contreras RG, Osorio-Acosta F, García-Pérez E, Villanueva-Jiménez JA, Zulueta-Rodríguez R, Castillo-Rocha DG (2012) Biofertilization with rhizobacteria and a consortium of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi in citrus rootstocks. Trop Subtrop Agroecosystems 15:S72–S81Google Scholar
  12. Chojak-Koźniewska J, Linkiewicz A, Sowa S, Radzioch MA, Kuźniak E (2017) Interactive effects of salt stress and Pseudomonas syringae pv. lachrymans infection in cucumber: involvement of antioxidant enzymes, abscisic acid and salicylic acid. Environ Exp Bot 136:9–20.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envexpbot.2017.01.004 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Dimkpa C, Weinand T, Asch F (2009) Plant-rhizobacteria interactions alleviate abiotic stress conditions. Plant Cell Environ 32:1682–1694.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-3040.2009.02028.x CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Durgbanshi A, Arbona V, Pozo O, Miersch O, Sancho JV, Gómez-Cadenas A (2005) Simultaneous determination of multiple phytohormones in plant extracts by liquid chromatography-electrospray tandem mass spectrometry. J Agric Food Chem 53:8437–8442.  https://doi.org/10.1021/jf050884b CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Eghomwanre AF, Obayagbona NO, Osarenotor O, Enagbonma J (2016) Evaluation of antibiotic resistance patterns and heavy metals tolerance of some bacteria isolated from contaminated soils and sediments from Warri, Delta State, Nigeria. J Appl Sci Environ Manage 20:287–291.  https://doi.org/10.4314/jasem.v20i2.8 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Ekinci M, Yildirim E, Dursun A, Turan M (2012) Mitigation of salt stress in lettuce (Lactuca sativa L. var. Crispa) by seed and foliar 24-epibrassinolide treatments. HortScience 47:631–636Google Scholar
  17. Franklin FC, Bagdasarian M, Bagdasarian MM, Timmis KN (1981) Molecular and functional analysis of the TOL plasmid pWWO from Pseudomonas putida and cloning of genes for the entire regulated aromatic ring meta cleavage pathway. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 78:7458–7462CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Goldman E, Green LH (2008) Practical handbook of microbiology. CRC Press, Boca RatónGoogle Scholar
  19. Gómez-Cadenas A, Tadeo FR, Primo-Millo E, Talon M (1998) Involvement of abscisic acid and ethylene in the responses of citrus seedlings to salt shock. Physiol Plant 103:475–484.  https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1399-3054.1998.1030405.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Gupta B, Huang B (2014) Mechanism of salinity tolerance in plants: physiological, biochemical, and molecular characterization. Int J Genomics.  https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/701596 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  21. Habib SH, Kausar H, Saud HM (2016) Plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria enhance salinity stress tolerance in okra through ROS-scavenging enzymes. Biomed Res Int.  https://doi.org/10.1155/2016/6284547 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  22. Hayat S, Hayat Q, Alyemeni MN, Wani AS, Pichtel J, Ahmad A (2012) Role of proline under changing environments. Plant Signal Behav 7:1456–1466.  https://doi.org/10.4161/psb.21949 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  23. Heidari M, Golpayegani A (2012) Effects of water stress and inoculation with plant growth promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR) on antioxidant status and photosynthetic pigments in basil (Ocimum basilicum L.). J Saudi Soc Agric Sci 11:57–61.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jssas.2011.09.001 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Hussain S, Luro F, Costantino G, Ollitrault P, Morillon R (2012) Physiological analysis of salt stress behaviour of citrus species and genera: low chloride accumulation as an indicator of salt tolerance. S Afr J Bot 81:103–112.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sajb.2012.06.004 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Kang SM, Khan AL, Waqas M, You YH, Kim JH, Kim JG, Hamayun M, Lee IJ (2014) Plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria reduce adverse effects of salinity and osmotic stress by regulating phytohormones and antioxidants in Cucumis sativus. J Plant Interact 9:673–682.  https://doi.org/10.1080/17429145.2014.894587 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Kaya C, Ashraf M, Dikilitas M, Tuna AL (2013) Alleviation of salt stress-induced adverse effects on maize plants by exogenous application of indoleacetic acid (IAA) and inorganic nutrients—a field trial. Aust J Crop Sci 7:249–254Google Scholar
  27. Klassen J, Allen DM (2017) Assessing the risk of saltwater intrusion in coastal aquifers. J Hydrol 551:730–745.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2017.02.044 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Krishnan R, Menon RR, Likhitha, Busse HJ, Tanaka N, Krishnamurthi S, Rameshkumar N (2017) Novosphingobium pokkalii sp nov, a novel rhizosphere-associated bacterium with plant beneficial properties isolated from saline-tolerant pokkali rice. Res Microbiol 168:113–121.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resmic.2016.09.001 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. López-Climent MF, Arbona V, Pérez-Clemente RM, Gómez-Cadenas A (2008) Relationship between salt tolerance and photosynthetic machinery performance in citrus. Environ Exp Bot 62:176–184.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envexpbot.2007.08.002 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Mahmood S, Daur I, Al-Solaimani SG, Ahmad S, Madkour MH, Yasir M, Hirt H, Ali S, Ali Z (2016) Plant growth promoting rhizobacteria and silicon synergistically enhance salinity tolerance of mung bean. Front Plant Sci 7:876.  https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2016.00876 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  31. Mindlin SZ, Soina VS, Petrova MA, Grolenko ZhM (2008) Isolation of antibiotic resistance bacterial strains from Eastern Siberia permafrost sediments. Russ J Genet 44:27–34CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Montoliu A, López-Climent MF, Arbona V, Pérez-Clemente RM, Gómez-Cadenas A (2009) A novel in vitro tissue culture approach to study salt stress responses in citrus. Plant Growth Regul 59:179–187.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10725-009-9401-0 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Moya JL, Tadeo FR, Gómez-Cadenas A, Primo-Millo E, Talon M (2002) Transmissible salt tolerance traits identified through reciprocal grafts between sensitive Carrizo and tolerant Cleopatra citrus genotypes. J Plant Physiol 159:997–998.  https://doi.org/10.1078/0176-1617-00728 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Moya JL, Gómez-Cadenas A, Primo-Millo E, Talon M (2003) Chloride absorption in salt-sensitive Carrizo citrange and salt-tolerant Cleopatra mandarin citrus rootstocks is linked to water use. J Exp Bot 54:825–833.  https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/erg064 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Nadeem SM, Ahmad M, Zahir ZA, Javaid A, Ashraf M (2014) The role of mycorrhizae and plant growth promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR) in improving crop productivity under stressful environments. Biotechnol Adv 32:429–448.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biotechadv.2013.12.005 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Nadeem SM, Ahmad M, Naveed M, Imran M, Zahir ZA, Crowley DE (2016) Relationship between in vitro characterization and comparative efficacy of plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria for improving cucumber salt tolerance. Arch Microbiol 198:379–387.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00203-016-1197-5 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Pereira SIA, Castro PML (2014) Phosphate-solubilizing rhizobacteria enhance Zea mays growth in agricultural P-deficient soils. Ecol Eng 73:526–535.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoleng.2014.09.060 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Planchamp C, Glauser G, Mauch-Mani B (2015) Root inoculation with Pseudomonas putida KT2440 induces transcriptional and metabolic changes and systemic resistance in maize plants. Front Plant Sci 5:719.  https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2014.00719 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  39. Popowska M, Rzeczycka M, Miernik A, Krawczyk-Balska A, Walsh F, Duffy B (2012) Influence of soil use on prevalence of tetracycline, streptomycin, and erythromycin resistance and associated resistance genes. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 56:1434.  https://doi.org/10.1128/AAC.05766-11 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  40. Prerostova S, Dobrev PI, Gaudinova A, Hosek P, Soudek P, Knirsch V, Vankova R (2017) Hormonal dynamics during salt stress responses of salt-sensitive Arabidopsis thaliana and salt-tolerant Thellungiella salsuginea. Plant Sci 264:188–198.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.plantsci.2017.07.020 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. Qin Y, Druzhinina IS, Pan X, Yuan Z (2016) Microbially mediated plant salt tolerance and microbiome-based solutions for saline agriculture. Biotechnol Adv 34:1245–1259.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biotechadv.2016.08.005 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. Rady M (2012) A novel organo-mineral fertilizer can mitigate salinity stress effects for tomato production on reclaimed saline soil. S Afr J Bot 81:8–14.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sajb.2012.03.013 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Rincón A, Valladares F, Gimeno TE, Pueyo JJ (2008) Water stress responses of two Mediterranean tree species influenced by native soil microorganisms and inoculation with a plant growth promoting rhizobacterium. Tree Physiol 28:1693–1701.  https://doi.org/10.1093/treephys/28.11.1693 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. Satir NY, Ortas I, Satir O (2016) The influence of mycorrhizal species on sour orange (Citrus aurantium L.) growth under saline soil conditions. Pak J Agric Sci 53:399–406.  https://doi.org/10.21162/PAKJAS/16.2425 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Sayyed RZ, Chincholkar SB, Reddy MS, Gangurde NS, Patel PR (2013) Siderophore producing PGPR for crop nutrition and phytopathogen supression. In: Maheshwari D (ed) Bacteria in agrobiology: disease management, 1st edn. Springer, Berlin, pp 449–471CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Segura A, Hernández-Sánchez V, Marqués S, Molina L (2017) Insights in the regulation of the degradation of PAHs in Novosphingobium sp. HR1a and utilization of this regulatory system as a tool for the detection of PAHs. Sci Total Environ 590–591:381–393.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.02.180 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. Sehrawat N, Yadav M, Bhat KV, Sairam RK, Jaiwal PK (2015) Effect of salinity stress on mungbean [Vigna radiata (L.) Wilczek] during consecutive summer and spring seasons. J Agr Sci 60:23–32.  https://doi.org/10.2298/JAS1501023S CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Singh RP, Shelke GM, Kumar A, Jha PN (2015) Biochemistry and genetics of ACC deaminase: a weapon to “stress ethylene” produced in plants. Front Microbiol 6:937.  https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2015.00937 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  49. Vacheron J, Desbrosses G, Bouffaud ML, Touraine B, Moënne-Loccoz Y, Muller D, Legendre L, Wisniewski-Dyé F, Prigent-Combaret C (2013) Plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria and root system functioning. Front Plant Sci 4:356.  https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2013.00356 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  50. Vejan P, Abdullah R, Khadiran T, Ismail S, Boyce AN (2016) Role of plant growth promoting rhizobacteria in agricultural sustainability—a review. Molecules 21:1–17.  https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules21050573 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Vives-Peris V, Gómez-Cadenas A, Pérez-Clemente RM (2017) Citrus plants exude proline and phytohormones under abiotic stress conditions. Plant Cell Rep 36:1971–1984.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00299-017-2214-0 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  52. Vives-Peris V, Marmaneu D, Gómez-Cadenas A, Pérez-Clemente RM (2018a) Characterization of Citrus WRKY transcription factors and their responses to phytohormones and abiotic stresses. Biol Plant 62:33–44.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10535-017-0737-4 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Vives-Peris V, Molina L, Segura A, Gómez-Cadenas A, Pérez-Clemente RM (2018b) Root exudates from citrus plants subjected to abiotic stress conditions have a positive effect on rhizobacteria. J Plant Phys 228:208–217.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jplph.2018.06.003 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Vurukonda SSKP, Vardharajula S, Shrivastava M, SkZ A (2016) Enhancement of drought stress tolerance in crops by plant growth promoting rhizobacteria. Microbiol Res 184:13–24.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.micres.2015.12.003 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  55. Wang D, Xu A, Elmerich C, Ma LZ (2017) Biofilm formation enables free-living nitrogen-fixing rhizobacteria to fix nitrogen under aerobic conditions. ISME J 11:1602–1613.  https://doi.org/10.1038/ismej.2017.30 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  56. Watanarojanaporn N, Boonkerd N, Wongkaew S, Prommanop P, Teaumroong N (2011) Selection of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi for citrus growth promotion and Phytophthora suppression. Sci Hortic (Amsterdam) 128:423–433.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scienta.2011.02.007 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Wu QS, Zou YN (2009) Mycorrhizal influence on nutrient uptake of citrus exposed to drought stress. Philipp Agric Sci 92:33–38Google Scholar
  58. Wu QS, Zou YN (2010) Beneficial roles of arbuscular mycorrhizas in citrus seedlings at temperature stress. Sci Hortic (Amsterdam) 125:289–293.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scienta.2010.04.001 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Yasmin H, Bano A, Samiullah (2013) Screening of PGPR isolates from semi-arid region and their implication to alleviate drought stress. Pakistan J Bot 45:51–58Google Scholar
  60. Zandalinas SI, Rivero RM, Martínez V, Gómez-Cadenas A, Arbona V (2016) Tolerance of citrus plants to the combination of high temperatures and drought is associated to the increase in transpiration modulated by a reduction in abscisic acid levels. BMC Plant Biol 16:105.  https://doi.org/10.1186/s12870-016-0791-7 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  61. Zandalinas SI, Mittler R, Balfagón D, Arbona V, Gómez-Cadenas A (2018) Plant adaptations to the combination of drought and high temperatures. Physiol Plant 162:2–12.  https://doi.org/10.1111/ppl.12540 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  62. Zhang L, Gao JS, Kim SG, Zhang CW, Jiang JQ, Ma XT, Zhang J, Zhang XX (2016) Novosphingobium oryzae sp. nov., a potential plant-promoting endophytic bacterium isolated from rice roots. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 66:302–307.  https://doi.org/10.1099/ijsem.0.000718 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  63. Zhang YC, Wang P, Wu QH, Zou YN, Bao Q, Wu QS (2017) Arbuscular mycorrhizas improve plant growth and soil structure in trifoliate orange under salt stress. Arch Agron Soil Sci 63:491–500.  https://doi.org/10.1080/03650340.2016.1222609 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Zhao WT, Feng SJ, Li H, Faust F, Kleine T, Li LN, Yang ZM (2017) Salt stress-induced FERROCHELATASE 1 improves resistance to salt stress by limiting sodium accumulation in Arabidopsis thaliana. Sci Rep 7:14737.  https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-13593-9 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  65. Zhu Y, Wang Z, Wang J, Wang Z, Zhou J (2014) Plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria improve shoot morphology and photosynthesis in dryland spring wheat. WIT Trans Built Environ 145:343–350.  https://doi.org/10.2495/ICBEEE20130431 CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Departament de Ciències Agràries i del Medi NaturalUniversitat Jaume ICastellón de la PlanaSpain

Personalised recommendations