Core stability and balance in patients with ankylosing spondylitis
The main purpose of this study was to compare core stability and balance between ankylosing spondylitis (AS) patients and healthy controls. AS patients diagnosed according to the Modified New York criteria and healthy age- and sex-matched controls were included in the study. Clinical status of AS patients was assessed using Bath AS Disease Activity Index (BASDAI), Bath AS Functional Index (BASFI), Bath AS Spinal Mobility Index (BASMI). For evaluation of core stability, static and dynamic core endurance and hip strength were assessed. Trunk flexor and extensor endurance, lateral side bridge tests for static core endurance; modified sit-up test for dynamic core endurance were used. Hip strength was measured with a hand-held dynamometer. Biodex Balance System was used to assess static and dynamic balance. Bilateral standing static and dynamic postural stability, single leg standing postural stability and limits of stability test results were recorded. 64 AS patients (40 male, 24 female) and 64 healthy controls (39 male, 25 female) were assessed. Static and dynamic core endurance test results, hip abductor strength were significantly higher in control group than AS group (p < 0.05). Static postural stability and left leg postural stability test results were significantly better in control group than AS group (p < 0.05). Overall, forward, backward, and right, limits of stability test results were significantly higher in control group (p < 0.05). The results of our study demonstrate that AS has negative effects on core stability and balance. It would be beneficial to add core stability and balance training to AS patients’ rehabilitation program.
KeywordsSpondylitis Ankylosing Postural balance Spine Abdominal muscles Back muscles
YA conducted the literature search for the background of the study, collected, analyzed and interpreted statistical data, wrote the majority of the manuscript. NI contributed to the design and implementation of the research, the analysis of the results and the writing of the manuscript. BG and GC contributed to the design of the study, the collection of data and the revision of the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
The authors declare no conflicts of interest.
All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.
Human and animal rights statement
All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki Declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.
- 2.Wanders A, Landewe R, Dougados M, Mielants H, van der Linden S, Van Der Heijde D (2005) Association between radiographic damage of the spine and spinal mobility for individual patients with ankylosing spondylitis: can assessment of spinal mobility be a proxy for radiographic evaluation? Ann Rheum Dis 64:988–994CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 6.Freeman J, Gear M, Pauli A, Cowan P, Finnigan C, Hunter H, Mobberley C, Nock A, Sims R, Thain J (2010) The effect of core stability training on balance and mobility in ambulant individuals with multiple sclerosis: a multi-centre series of single case studies. Mult Scler 16:1377–1384. https://doi.org/10.1177/1352458510378126 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 11.Garrett S, Jenkinson T, Kennedy LG, Whitelock H, Gaisford P, Calin A (1994) A new approach to defining disease status in ankylosing spondylitis: the Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index. J Rheumatol 21:2286–2291Google Scholar
- 13.Calin A, Garrett S, Whitelock H, Kennedy L, O’hea J, Mallorie P, Jenkinson T (1994) A new approach to defining functional ability in ankylosing spondylitis: the development of the Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Functional Index. J Rheumatol 21:2281–2285Google Scholar
- 14.Jenkinson TR, Mallorie PA, Whitelock H, Kennedy LG, Garrett S, Calin A (1994) Defining spinal mobility in ankylosing spondylitis (AS). The Bath AS Metrology Index. J Rheumatol 21:1694–1698Google Scholar
- 15.Zochling J (2011) Measures of symptoms and disease status in ankylosing spondylitis: ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Score (ASDAS), Ankylosing Spondylitis Quality of Life Scale (ASQoL), Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index (BASDAI), Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Functional Index (BASFI), Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Global Score (BAS-G), Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Metrology Index (BASMI), Dougados Functional Index (DFI), and Health Assessment Questionnaire for the Spondylarthropathies (HAQ-S). Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken) 63(Suppl 11):S47–S58. https://doi.org/10.1002/acr.20575 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 23.Mukaka MM (2012) A guide to appropriate use of correlation coefficient in medical research. Malawi Med J 24:69–71Google Scholar
- 29.Üşen A, Kuran B, Yılmaz F, Aksu N, Erçalık C (2017) Evaluation of the internal oblique, external oblique, and transversus abdominalis muscles in patients with ankylosing spondylitis: an ultrasonographic study. Clin Rheumatol 36:2497–2500. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10067-017-3827-y CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 34.Adam M, Leblebici B, Erkan AN, Bagis S, Akman MN (2008) Ankylosing spondylitis and postural balance. Arc Rheumatol 23:87–90Google Scholar