Advertisement

Rheumatology International

, Volume 39, Issue 7, pp 1257–1262 | Cite as

Management of asymptomatic coccidioidomycosis in patients with rheumatic diseases

  • Jawad BilalEmail author
  • Shubha Kollampare
  • Barbara Bode
  • Jeffrey R. Lisse
  • Susan E. Hoover
  • Dominic Sudano
  • Neil M. Ampel
Pharmacovigilance
  • 24 Downloads

Abstract

Coccidioidomycosis is an endemic fungal infection common in the southwestern United States. Some rheumatology clinics periodically screen patients with coccidioidal serology, resulting in the identification of patients who are serologically positive but without clinical symptoms. The management of such patients is unclear. A retrospective study was conducted between 2007 and 2015 at two arthritis centers in Tucson, Arizona. The asymptomatic patients were identified who were receiving disease-modifying antirheumatic agents and had a positive coccidioidal serology. Serological testing including IgM and IgG was performed by enzyme immunoassay (EIA), immunodiffusion (IDTP and IDCF), or complement fixation. Out of 71 patients who were identified with positive coccidioidal serologies, 19 were asymptomatic. 18/19 patients continued antirheumatic therapy, 13 without interruption. 13/19 patients received no antifungal treatment, including 10 who remained on antirheumatic treatment. The other six were started on fluconazole, ranging from 8 to 73 months (median 30.5 months). After a median follow-up of 43 months, no patient developed clinically active coccidioidomycosis. Overall, 14 had only a positive EIA serological test. These results suggest that continued antirheumatic therapy is safe in asymptomatic patients with positive coccidioidal serological tests and that routine implementation of antifungal treatment may not always be warranted. The findings also raise concern regarding the utility of routine serological testing of asymptomatic patients residing in the coccidioidal endemic area, mainly using the EIA test.

Keywords

Biologic drugs Coccidioidomycosis Antirheumatic agents Rheumatic diseases/drug therapy Coccidioidomycosis/therapy Coccidioidomycosis/immunology 

Notes

Author contributions

Study concept and design: JB, JRL, DS, BB, and NMA; search and acquisition of data: JB, SK, and DS; analysis and interpretation of data: all the authors; drafting of the manuscript: JB, SK, DS, BB, and NMA; critical revision of the manuscript for important intellectual content: JRL, NMA, and DS; study supervision: NMA, DS, and JRL.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

Bilal J, Kollampare S, Bode B, Lisse J, Hoover SE, and Sudano D. Ampel NM declare that they have no conflict of interest related to this study.

Related abstract publications/poster presentations

Management of Asymptomatic Coccidioidomycosis in Patients with Rheumatic Disease. 2014 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting. The related abstract publication is following: Sudano, Dominick, et al. “management of Asymptomatic Coccidioidomycosis in Patients with Rheumatic Disease.: 2205.” Arthritis & Rheumatology 66 (2014): S961.

Asymptomatic Coccidioidomycosis in Patients with Rheumatic Disease: 8 Years of Experience. 2016 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting [Abstract Number: 1350]. The related abstract publication is following: Ajaz U, Lisse JR, Ampel NM, Sudano D. Asymptomatic Coccidioidomycosis in Patients with Rheumatic Disease: 8 Years of Experience [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2016; 68 (suppl 10). The Value of Routine Serological Screening for Coccidioidomycosis in Patients On Antirheumatic Therapy. 62nd Annual Cocci Study Group Meeting in Flagstaff, Arizona on April 13–14, 2018.

References

  1. 1.
    Pappagianis D (1988) Epidemiology of coccidioidomycosis. Curr Top Med Mycol 2:199–238CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Galgiani JN, Ampel NM, Blair JE, Catanzaro A, Geertsma F, Hoover SE, Johnson RH, Kusne S, Lisse J, MacDonald JD, Meyerson SL, Raksin PB, Siever J, Stevens DA, Sunenshine R, Theodore N (2016) 2016 Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA) clinical practice guideline for the treatment of coccidioidomycosis. Clin Infect Dis 63(6):e112–e146.  https://doi.org/10.1093/cid/ciw360 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Increase in reported coccidioidomycosis–United States, 1998–2011 (2013). MMWR Morbidity and mortality weekly report 62 (12):217-221Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Smith CE (1940) Epidemiology of acute coccidioidomycosis with erythema nodosum (“San Joaquin” or “Valley Fever”). Am J Public Health Nations Health 30(6):600–611CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Smith CE, Beard RR (1946) Varieties of coccidioidal infection in relation to the epidemiology and control of the diseases. Amer J Public Health Nation’s Health 36(12):1394–1402CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Tsang CA, Anderson SM, Imholte SB, Erhart LM, Chen S, Park BJ, Christ C, Komatsu KK, Chiller T, Sunenshine RH (2010) Enhanced surveillance of coccidioidomycosis, Arizona, USA, 2007-2008. Emerg Infect Dis 16(11):1738–1744.  https://doi.org/10.3201/eid1611.100475 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Blair JE, Logan JL (2001) Coccidioidomycosis in solid organ transplantation. Clin Infect Dis 33(9):1536–1544.  https://doi.org/10.1086/323463 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Bergstrom L, Yocum DE, Ampel NM, Villanueva I, Lisse J, Gluck O, Tesser J, Posever J, Miller M, Araujo J, Kageyama DM, Berry M, Karl L, Yung CM (2004) Increased risk of coccidioidomycosis in patients treated with tumor necrosis factor alpha antagonists. Arthritis Rheum 50(6):1959–1966.  https://doi.org/10.1002/art.20454 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Mertz LE, Blair JE (2007) Coccidioidomycosis in rheumatology patients: incidence and potential risk factors. Ann NY Acad Sci 1111:343–357.  https://doi.org/10.1196/annals.1406.027 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Singh JA, Cameron C, Noorbaloochi S, Cullis T, Tucker M, Christensen R, Ghogomu ET, Coyle D, Clifford T, Tugwell P, Wells GA (2015) Risk of serious infection in biological treatment of patients with rheumatoid arthritis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet 386(9990):258–265.  https://doi.org/10.1016/s0140-6736(14)61704-9 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Pappagianis D, Zimmer BL (1990) Serology of coccidioidomycosis. Clin Microbiol Rev 3(3):247–268CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Taroumian S, Knowles SL, Lisse JR, Yanes J, Ampel NM, Vaz A, Galgiani JN, Hoover SE (2012) Management of coccidioidomycosis in patients receiving biologic response modifiers or disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs. Arthritis Care Res 64(12):1903–1909.  https://doi.org/10.1002/acr.21784 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Choi K, Deval N, Vyas A, Moran C, Cha SS, Mertz LE, Pasha SF, Yiannias JA, Blair JE (2019) The utility of screening for coccidioidomycosis in recipients of inhibitors of tumor necrosis factor alpha. Clin Infect Dis 68(6):1024–1030.  https://doi.org/10.1093/cid/ciy620 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Crum NF, Lederman ER, Stafford CM, Parrish JS, Wallace MR (2004) Coccidioidomycosis: a descriptive survey of a reemerging disease. Clinical characteristics and current controversies. Medicine 83(3):149–175CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Kuberski T, Herrig J, Pappagianis D (2010) False-positive IgM serology in coccidioidomycosis. J Clin Microbiol 48(6):2047–2049.  https://doi.org/10.1128/jcm.01843-09 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Drutz DJ, Catanzaro A (1978) Coccidioidomycosis. Part II. Am Rev Respir Dis 117(4):727–771.  https://doi.org/10.1164/arrd.1978.117.4.727 Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.The Arizona Arthritis CenterThe University of ArizonaTucsonUSA
  2. 2.The Section of Infectious DiseasesThe University of ArizonaTucsonUSA
  3. 3.The Southern Arizona Veterans Affairs Health Care System (SAVAHCS)TucsonUSA
  4. 4.Sanford HealthSioux FallsUSA
  5. 5.Division of Rheumatology, Department of MedicineUniversity of ArizonaTucsonUSA

Personalised recommendations