Characteristics of individual thigh muscles including cross-sectional area and adipose tissue content measured by magnetic resonance imaging in knee osteoarthritis: a cross-sectional study
- 32 Downloads
This study aimed to identify the parameters related to the area and adipose tissue content of thigh muscles that are associated with radiographic knee osteoarthritis grade. Fifty patients (mean age ± standard deviation, 73.0 ± 4.5 years) were divided into early osteoarthritis (n = 23) and established osteoarthritis (n = 27) groups based on Kellgren–Lawrence classification. The femorotibial angle was measured from anteroposterior radiographs of the lower limbs. Individual thigh muscle and adipose tissue areas were analyzed using axial T1-weighted magnetic resonance imaging. After intergroup comparison, logistic regression analysis was performed to determine independent parameters associated with established osteoarthritis. Moreover, correlation coefficients were assessed between the left–right differences of osteoarthritis grade and parameters. Established osteoarthritis exhibited a significantly greater femorotibial angle and increased adipose tissue content in the subcutaneous, intermuscle, and intramuscle of the adductor, vastus lateralis, vastus intermedius, as well as a lower vastus medialis area, in comparison to early osteoarthritis. A greater femorotibial angle, increased intermuscular adipose tissue, and a lower vastus medialis area to knee extensor ratio were significantly independently associated with established osteoarthritis (odds ratio 3.2, 1.8, and 2.0, respectively). The left–right differences of femorotibial angle and vastus medialis area were significantly correlated with osteoarthritis grade, whereas adipose tissue content had no significant correlations with osteoarthritis grade. Greater femorotibial angle and lower vastus medialis area were related with higher osteoarthritis grade. Greater intermuscular adipose tissue content was associated with established osteoarthritis; however, in the left–right differences, adipose tissue content was not related with osteoarthritis grade.
KeywordsKnee osteoarthritis Magnetic resonance imaging Thigh muscles Adipose tissue Vastus medialis Left–right differences
We greatly appreciate Shigetoshi Suzuki, the staff of the radiology division for his assistance while conducting this study and the editors of American Journal Experts for correcting English language.
CK study conception and design. TK study conception and design.
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
Koun Y, Chisato K, and Takayuki K declare that they have no conflict of interest.
All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.
Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.
- 1.Zhang W, Nuki G, Moskowitz RW, Abramson S, Altman RD, Arden NK, Bierma-Zeinstra S, Brandt KD, Croft P, Doherty M, Dougados M, Hochberg M, Hunter DJ, Kwoh K, Lohmander LS, Tugwell P (2010) OARSI recommendations for the management of hip and knee osteoarthritis: part III: changes in evidence following systematic cumulative update of research published through January 2009. Osteoarthr Cartil 18:476–499. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joca.2010.01.01 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 2.Hudelmaier M, Glaser C, Hausschild A, Burgkart R, Eckstein F (2006) Effects of joint unloading and reloading on human cartilage morphology and function, muscle cross-sectional areas, and bone density—a quantitative case report. J Musculoskelet Neuronal Interact 6:284–290Google Scholar
- 8.Ruhdorfer AS, Dannhauer T, Wirth W, Cotofana S, Roemer F, Nevitt M, Eckstein F, OAI investigators (2014) Thigh muscle cross-sectional areas and strength in knees with early vs knees without radiographic knee osteoarthritis: a between-knee, within-person comparison. Osteoarthr Cartil 22:1634–1638. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joca.2014.06.002 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 9.Ruhdorfer A, Wirth W, Dannhauer T, Eckstein F (2015) Longitudinal (4 year) change of thigh muscle and adipose tissue distribution in chronically painful vs painless knees—data from the Osteoarthritis Initiative. Osteoarthr Cartil 23:1348–1356. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joca.2015.04.004 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 10.Dannhauer T, Sattler M, Wirth W, Hunter DJ, Kwoh CK, Eckstein F (2014) Longitudinal sensitivity to change of MRI-based muscle cross-sectional area versus isometric strength analysis in osteoarthritic knees with and without structural progression: pilot data from the Osteoarthritis Initiative. MAGMA 27:339–347. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10334-013-0418-z CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 12.Dannhauer T, Ruhdorfer A, Wirth W, Eckstein F (2015) Quantitative relationship of thigh adipose tissue with pain, radiographic status, and progression of knee osteoarthritis: longitudinal findings from the osteoarthritis initiative. Invest Radiol 50:268–274. https://doi.org/10.1097/RLI.0000000000000113 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 13.Raynauld JP, Pelletier JP, Roubille C, Dorais M, Abram F, Li W, Wang Y, Fairley J, Cicuttini FM, Martel-Pelletier J (2015) Magnetic resonance imaging-assessed vastus medialis muscle fat content and risk for knee osteoarthritis progression: relevance from a clinical trial. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken) 67:1406–1415. https://doi.org/10.1002/acr.22590 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 14.Wang Y, Wluka AE, Berry P, Siew T, Teichtahl AJ, Urquhart DM, Lloyd DG, Jones G, Cicuttini FM (2012) Increase in vastus medialis cross-sectional area is associated with reduced pain, cartilage loss, and joint replacement risk in knee osteoarthritis. Arthritis Rheum 64:3917–3925. https://doi.org/10.1002/art.34681 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 15.Pan J, Stehling C, Muller-Hocker C, Schwaiger BJ, Lynch J, McCulloch CE, Nevitt MC, Link TM (2011) Vastus lateralis/vastus medialis cross-sectional area ratio impacts presence and degree of knee joint abnormalities and cartilage T2 determined with 3T MRI—an analysis from the incidence cohort of the Osteoarthritis Initiative. Osteoarthr Cartil 19:65–73. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joca.2010.10.023 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 16.Canale ST, Daugherty K, Jones L, Burns B (2003) Campbell’s operative orthopaedics, 10th edn. Mosby, Philadelphia, p 265Google Scholar
- 17.Akai M, Doi T, Fujino K, Iwaya T, Kurosawa H, Nasu T (2005) An outcome measure for Japanese people with knee osteoarthritis. J Rheumatol 32:1524–1532Google Scholar
- 18.18 Yamauchi K, Yoshiko A, Suzuki S, Kato C, Akima H, Kato T, Ishida K (2017) Estimation of individual thigh muscle volumes from a single-slice muscle cross-sectional area and muscle thickness using magnetic resonance imaging in patients with knee osteoarthritis. J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong) 25:2309499017743101. https://doi.org/10.1177/2309499017743101 Google Scholar
- 21.Sattler M, Dannhauer T, Ring-Dimitriou S, Sänger AM, Wirth W, Hudelmaier M, Eckstein F (2014) Relative distribution of quadriceps head anatomical cross-sectional areas and volumes–sensitivity to pain and to training intervention. Ann Anat 196:464–470. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aanat.2014.07.005 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 24.Tetsworth K, Paley P (1994) Malalignment and degenerative arthropathy. Orthop Clin N Am 25:367–377Google Scholar
- 31.Lim BW, Hinman RS, Wrigley TV, Sharma L, Bennell KL (2008) Does knee malalignment mediate the effects of quadriceps strengthening on knee adduction moment, pain, and function in medial knee osteoarthritis? A randomized controlled trial. Arthritis Rheum 59:943–951. https://doi.org/10.1002/art.23823 CrossRefGoogle Scholar