Validity and reliability of the ten-item Connor–Davidson Resilience Scale (CD-RISC10) instrument in patients with axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA) in Singapore
- 106 Downloads
We aimed to assess the validity and reliability of the ten-item Connor–Davidson Resilience Scale (CD-RISC10) in patients with axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA) in Singapore. We used cross-sectional data from 108 patients with axSpA recruited from a dedicated axSpA clinic in a Singapore tertiary referral hospital from 2017 to 2018. Analyses were guided by the COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement INstruments (COSMIN) framework. Face validity was assessed through cognitive debriefing interviews (CDIs). Internal consistency was assessed through Cronbach’s alpha. Test–retest reliability was assessed through intraclass correlation (ICC). Measurement error was assessed through smallest detectable change (SDC). Construct validity was assessed through six a priori hypotheses through correlation of the CD-RISC10 score with other patient-reported outcome measures. Structural validity was assessed using confirmatory factor analysis (CFA). Fit indices evaluated were root-mean-square error of approximation (RMSEA), comparative fit index (CFI), Tucker–Lewis index (TFI), and standardized root-mean-squared residual (SRMR). Ten patients completed the CDIs and face validity was supported. Among 108 patients (median age: 37(21–77), 81.5% males, 93.5% Chinese), the CD-RISC10 demonstrated good internal consistency (Cronbach’s alpha = 0.94), and excellent test–retest reliability [ICC = 0.964 (95% CI 0.937–0.980)]. SDC was calculated as 1.88. Construct validity was established by meeting five out of the six a priori hypotheses. Structural validity was supported as CFA confirmed a one-factor model, with adequate fit statistics after adding three covariances (RMSEA = 0.077; CFI = 0.975; TLI = 0.964; SRMR = 0.036). This study supports the CD-RISC10 as a valid and reliable measure of resilience for use in patients with axSpA.
KeywordsAxial spondyloarthritis Resilience CD-RISC Validation Singapore
YHK, TO, WF, and JT conceived and designed this study. JKP, AN, WF, NLL and YYL acquired the data for this study. AN, KKL and YHK performed the analyses and prepared the first draft of the manuscript. CST advised the statistical analyses. KKL, CST, EHC, and NLL interpreted the results. All authors read, revised critically, and approved the final manuscript.
This research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that there is no other conflict of interest to disclose.
The SingHealth Centralised Institutional Review Board approved this research. All patients provided written informed consent to participate in this research.
- 1.Zeidler H, Amor B (2011) The Assessment in Spondyloarthritis International Society (ASAS) classification criteria for peripheral spondyloarthritis and for spondyloarthritis in general: the spondyloarthritis concept in progress. Ann Rheumatic Dis 70(1):1–3. https://doi.org/10.1136/ard.2010.135889 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 8.Notario-Pacheco B, Martínez-Vizcaíno V, Trillo-Calvo E, Pérez-Yus MC, Serrano-Parra D, García-Campayo J (2014) Validity and reliability of the Spanish version of the 10-item CD-RISC in patients with fibromyalgia. Health Qual Life Outcomes 12:14. https://doi.org/10.1186/1477-7525-12-14 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 11.Rudwaleit M, Landewe R, van der Heijde D, Listing J, Brandt J, Braun J, Burgos-Vargas R, Collantes-Estevez E, Davis J, Dijkmans B, Dougados M, Emery P, van der Horst-Bruinsma IE, Inman R, Khan MA, Leirisalo-Repo M, van der Linden S, Maksymowych WP, Mielants H, Olivieri I, Sturrock R, de Vlam K, Sieper J (2009) The development of Assessment of SpondyloArthritis international Society classification criteria for axial spondyloarthritis (part I): classification of paper patients by expert opinion including uncertainty appraisal. Ann Rheumatic Dis 68(6):770–776. https://doi.org/10.1136/ard.2009.108217 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 12.Kiltz U, van der Heijde D, Boonen A, Cieza A, Stucki G, Khan MA, Maksymowych WP, Marzo-Ortega H, Reveille J, Stebbings S, Bostan C, Braun J (2015) Development of a health index in patients with ankylosing spondylitis (ASAS HI): final result of a global initiative based on the ICF guided by ASAS. Ann Rheumatic Dis 74(5):830–835. https://doi.org/10.1136/annrheumdis-2013-203967 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 14.Kwan YH, Fong WW, Lui NL, Yong ST, Cheung YB, Malhotra R, Ostbye T, Thumboo J (2016) Validity and reliability of the Short Form 36 Health Surveys (SF-36) among patients with spondyloarthritis in Singapore. Rheumatol Int 36(12):1759–1765. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00296-016-3567-3 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 16.Mokkink LB, Terwee CB, Patrick DL, Alonso J, Stratford PW, Knol DL, Bouter LM, de Vet HC (2010) The COSMIN checklist for assessing the methodological quality of studies on measurement properties of health status measurement instruments: an international Delphi study. Qual Life Res 19(4):539–549. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-010-9606-8 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 18.Jeong HS, Kang I, Namgung E, Im JJ, Jeon Y, Son J, Yu S, Kim S, Yoon S, Lyoo IK, Chung YA, Lim JH, Kim JE (2015) Validation of the Korean version of the Connor–Davidson Resilience Scale-2 in firefighters and rescue workers. Compr Psychiatry 59:123–128. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.comppsych.2015.01.006 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 20.Mukaka MM (2012) A guide to appropriate use of correlation coefficient in medical research. Malawi Med J 24(3):69–71Google Scholar
- 23.Singapore Department of Statistics (2016) General Household Survey 2015. Department of Statistics, Ministry of Trade & Industry, Republic of Singapore, SingaporeGoogle Scholar
- 24.Ng X, Low AH, Chew LC, Chong YY, Fong KY, Lui NL, Sim E, Tan YK, Yoong J, Thumboo J (2013) Disease patterns of rheumatology outpatients seen in a tertiary hospital serving a multi-ethnic, urban Asian population in Singapore. Int J Rheumatic Dis 16(3):273–278. https://doi.org/10.1111/1756-185x.12016 CrossRefGoogle Scholar