Advertisement

Using Google Trends to assess global public interest in osteoarthritis

  • Samuel S. Jellison
  • Michael Bibens
  • Jake Checketts
  • Matt Vassar
Public Health

Abstract

To evaluate global public interest in osteoarthritis by assessing changes in Internet search popularity of the disease over a 10-year period. Google Trends was used to obtain search popularity scores for the word “osteoarthritis” (OA) between January 2004 and June 2018. We also analyzed changes in search volume relative to changes in search patterns for all health topics. Search interest in OA was high relative to all other health searches over the given timeframe. Overall, searches for OA steadily decreased between May 2004 and December 2012 and then steadily rose from January 2013 to April 2018. We also found consistent annual fluctuations over the pre-specified time range, with biannual peaks typically correlating with national and global awareness days. Biannual dips occurred with changes in seasonal patterns. Google searches for OA have steadily increased in recent years. Awareness initiatives, like World Arthritis Day, may be a reason for the public to search for information on OA. It may be helpful for physicians to search the Internet themselves for websites that provide accurate and high-quality information to recommend to their patients.

Keywords

Public health Osteoarthritis Arthritis 

Notes

Author contributions

Substantial contributions to the conception or design of the work; or the acquisition, analysis, or interpretation of data for the work—SJ, MB, JC, and MV. Drafting the work or revising it critically for important intellectual content—SJ, MB, JC, and MV. Final approval of the version to be published—SJ, MB, JC, and MV. Agreement to be accountable for all aspects of the work in ensuring that questions related to the accuracy or integrity of any part of the work are appropriately investigated and resolved—SJ, MB, JC, and MV.

Funding

This investigation was not funded.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. 1.
    Cross M, Smith E, Hoy D et al (2014) The global burden of hip and knee osteoarthritis: estimates from the global burden of disease 2010 study. Ann Rheum Dis 73:1323–1330.  https://doi.org/10.1136/annrheumdis-2013-204763 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Kotlarz H, Gunnarsson CL, Fang H, Rizzo JA (2009) Insurer and out-of-pocket costs of osteoarthritis in the US: evidence from national survey data. Arthritis Rheum 60:3546–3553.  https://doi.org/10.1002/art.24984 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Khurana L, Durand EM, Gary ST et al (2017) Osteoarthritis patient preference for using technology to communicate with physicians. Osteoarthr Cartil 25:S222–S223.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joca.2017.02.385 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Fox S, Duggan M (2013) Health Online 2013. In: Pew Research Center: Internet, Science & Tech. http://www.pewinternet.org/2013/01/15/health-online-2013/. Accessed 8 June 2018
  5. 5.
    Search engine market share. https://www.netmarketshare.com/search-engine-market-share. Accessed 21 June 2018
  6. 6.
    Brigo F, Trinka E (2015) Google search behavior for status epilepticus. Epilepsy Behav 49:146–149.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.yebeh.2015.02.029 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Solano P, Ustulin M, Pizzorno E et al (2016) A Google-based approach for monitoring suicide risk. Psychiatry Res 246:581–586.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychres.2016.10.030 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Schootman M, Toor A, Cavazos-Rehg P et al (2015) The utility of Google Trends data to examine interest in cancer screening. BMJ Open 5:e006678.  https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2014-006678 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Rossignol L, Pelat C, Lambert B et al (2013) A method to assess seasonality of urinary tract infections based on medication sales and google trends. PLoS One 8:e76020.  https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0076020 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Nuti SV, Wayda B, Ranasinghe I et al (2014) The use of google trends in health care research: a systematic review. PLoS One 9:e109583.  https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0109583 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
  12. 12.
    Varady NH, Dee EC, Katz JN (2018) International assessment on quality and content of internet information on osteoarthritis. Osteoarthr Cartil.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joca.2018.04.017 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    March LM, Schwarz JM, Carfrae BH, Bagge E (1998) Clinical validation of self-reported osteoarthritis. Osteoarthr Cartil 6:87–93.  https://doi.org/10.1053/joca.1997.0098 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Wilder FV, Hall BJ, Barrett JP (2003) Osteoarthritis pain and weather. Rheumatology 42:955–958.  https://doi.org/10.1093/rheumatology/keg264 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Timmermans EJ, Schaap LA, Herbolsheimer F et al (2015) The influence of weather conditions on joint pain in older people with osteoarthritis: results from the european project on osteoarthritis. J Rheumatol 42:1885–1892.  https://doi.org/10.3899/jrheum.141594 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Baumann M, Euller-Ziegler L, Guillemin F (2007) Evaluation of the expectations osteoarthritis patients have concerning healthcare, and their implications for practitioners. Clin Exp Rheumatol 25:404–409PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Woolf AD, Pfleger B (2003) Burden of major musculoskeletal conditions. Bull World Health Org 81:646–656PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Institutional ResearchOklahoma State University Center for Health SciencesTulsaUSA

Personalised recommendations