Advertisement

Enhanced filtration and comfort properties of nonwoven filtering facepiece respirator by the incorporation of polymeric nanoweb

  • Ahsan Nazir
  • Nabyl Khenoussi
  • Tanveer Hussain
  • Sharjeel AbidEmail author
  • Laurence Schacher
  • Dominique Adolphe
  • Abdul Zahir
  • Muhammad Bilal Qadir
  • Zubair Khaliq
  • Amir Shahzad
Original Paper
  • 12 Downloads

Abstract

Protection for the respiratory system has become a need of the day due to increased air pollution. Different nonwoven filter media have been incorporated into filtering facepiece respirators (FFRs). However, the performance of these systems could be improved further by the addition of finer nanowebs. The effect of the addition of intermediate media (nanowebs) on the comfort of FFRs also needs to be studied, as comfort can affect the performance of wearer. In this study, electrospun polymeric nanowebs were incorporated between layers of commercially available nonwoven fabrics to improve its filtration performance. The effect of the addition of polymeric webs between the layers of nonwoven filter media on the comfort properties was also studied. It was concluded that the addition of nanowebs remarkably improved the filtration capability of filter media. Also, it was found to have mixed impact on comfort properties of the resultant composite filter media; air permeability was reduced from 58 to 50 mm/s, while the filtration efficiency was improved along with thermal and water vapor permeability. Thermal conductivity was increased from 30.5 to 39 [(W/cm °C) × 104]. Water vapor permeability increased from 1.70 to 2.04 [(g/s mm2) × 108].

Keywords

Comfort Filtering facepiece respirators Nanofibers Respiratory protection 

Notes

Acknowledgments

Authors acknowledge LPMT-France for testing.

Funding

The project was not funded.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

References

  1. 1.
    Kjellstrom T, Lodh M, McMichael T, Ranmuthugala G, Shrestha R, Kingsland S (2006) Air and water pollution: burden and strategies for control. The International Bank for Reconstruction and Development/The World Bank, Washington DCGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Zarocostas J (2006) Air pollution is a major threat to health says WHO. BMJ 333(7571):722CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Dickenson TC (1997) Filters and filtration handbook. Elsevier, AmsterdamGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Hutten IM (2007) Handbook of non-woven filter media. Elsevier, AmsterdamGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Spurný K (1998) Advances in aerosol filtration. Lewis Publishers, Boca RatonGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Qin X-H, Wang S-Y (2006) Filtration properties of electrospinning nanofibers. J Appl Polym Sci 102(2):1285–1290CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Ryu YJ, Kim HY, Lee KH, Park HC, Lee DR (2003) Transport properties of electrospun nylon 6 nonwoven mats. Eur Polym J 39(9):1883–1889CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Podgórski A, Bałazy A, Gradoń L (2006) Application of nanofibers to improve the filtration efficiency of the most penetrating aerosol particles in fibrous filters. Chem Eng Sci 61(20):6804–6815CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Min K, Kim S, Kim S (2018) Silk protein nanofibers for highly efficient, eco-friendly, optically translucent, and multifunctional air filters. Sci Rep 8(1):9598CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Zhang R et al (2016) Nanofiber air filters with high-temperature stability for efficient PM 2.5 removal from the pollution sources. Nano Lett 16(6):3642–3649CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Gopal R et al (2007) Electrospun nanofibrous polysulfone membranes as pre-filters: particulate removal. J Memb Sci 289(1–2):210–219CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Abid S, Hussain T, Raza ZA, Nazir A (2019) Current applications of electrospun polymeric nanofibers in cancer therapy. Mater Sci Eng, C 97:966–977CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Abid S et al (2019) Enhanced antibacterial activity of PEO-chitosan nanofibers with potential application in burn infection management. Int J Biol Macromol 135:1222–1236CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Abid S, Hussain T, Nazir A, Zahir A, Khenoussi N (2018) Acetaminophen loaded nanofibers as a potential contact layer for pain management in Burn wounds. Mater. Res. Express 5(8):085017CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Abid S, Hussain T, Nazir A, Khenoussi N, Zahir A, Riaz S (2018) Development of nanofibers based neuropathic patch loaded with lidocaine to deal with nerve pain in burn patients. IOP Conf Ser Mater Sci Eng 414(1):012019CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Abid S, Hussain T, Nazir A, Zahir A, Khenoussi N (2019) A novel double-layered polymeric nanofiber-based dressing with controlled drug delivery for pain management in burn wounds. Polym Bull 76(12):6387–6411CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Wang Y, Li W, Xia Y, Jiao X, Chen D (2014) Electrospun flexible self-standing γ-alumina fibrous membranes and their potential as high-efficiency fine particulate filtration media. J Mater Chem A 2(36):15124–15131CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Dotti F, Varesano A, Montarsolo A, Aluigi A, Tonin C, Mazzuchetti G (2007) Electrospun porous mats for high efficiency filtration. J Ind Text 37(2):151–162CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Li L, Frey MW, Green TB (2006) Modification of air filter media with nylon-6 nanofibers. J Eng Fibers Fabr. 1:155892500600100101Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Barhate RS, Loong CK, Ramakrishna S (2006) Preparation and characterization of nanofibrous filtering media. J Memb Sci 283(1–2):209–218CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Heikkilä P, Taipale A, Lehtimäki M, Harlin A (2008) Electrospinning of polyamides with different chain compositions for filtration application. Polym Eng Sci 48(6):1168–1176CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Faccini M, Amantia D, Vázquez-Campos S, Vaquero C, de Ipiña JML, Aubouy L (2011) Nanofiber-based filters as novel barrier systems for nanomaterial exposure scenarios. J Phys: Conf Ser 304(1):012067Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Kuo Y-Y, Bruno FC, Wang J (2014) Filtration performance against nanoparticles by electrospun nylon-6 media containing ultrathin nanofibers. Aerosol Sci Technol 48(12):1332–1344CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Kuo C-N, Chen H-F, Lin J-N, Wan B-Z (2007) Nano-gold supported on TiO2 coated glass-fiber for removing toxic CO gas from air. Catal Today 122(3–4):270–276CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Marsano E, Francis L, Giunco F (2010) Polyamide 6 nanofibrous nonwovens via electrospinning. J Appl Polym Sci 117(3):1754–1765Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Demir B, Cerkez I, Worley SD, Broughton RM, Huang T-S (2015) N-Halamine-modified antimicrobial polypropylene nonwoven fabrics for use against airborne bacteria. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 7(3):1752–1757CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Laird IS, Goldsmith R, Pack RJ, Vitalis A (2002) The effect on heart rate and facial skin temperature of wearing respiratory protection at work. Ann Occup Hyg 46(2):143–148PubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Smith JD, MacDougall CC, Johnstone J, Copes RA, Schwartz B, Garber GE (2016) Effectiveness of N95 respirators versus surgical masks in protecting health care workers from acute respiratory infection: a systematic review and meta-analysis. CMAJ 188(8):567–574CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Shen H et al (2019) Analysis of heat transfer characteristics in textiles and factors affecting thermal properties by modeling. Text Res J 89(21–22):4681–4690CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Chen J, Yu W (2011) Structure designing and property investigation of flexible multilayer thermal insulation materials. Res J Text Appar 15:21–27CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Han HR, Park Y, Yun C, Park CH (2018) Heat transfer characteristics of aluminum sputtered fabrics. J Eng Fiber Fabr 13(3):155892501801300Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Wei J, Xu S, Liu H, Zheng L, Qian Y (2015) Simplified model for predicting fabric thermal resistance according to its microstructural parameters. Fibers Text East Eur 23(112):57–60Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Akshat TM, Misra S, Gudiyawar MY, Salacova J, Petru M (2019) Effect of electrospun nanofiber deposition on thermo-physiology of functional clothing. Fibers Polym 20(5):991–1002CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Zhou SS, Lukula S, Chiossone C, Nims RW, Suchmann DB, Ijaz MK (2018) Assessment of a respiratory face mask for capturing air pollutants and pathogens including human influenza and rhinoviruses. J Thorac Dis 10(3):2059–2069CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Liu YP, Deng Y, Jiang ZX (2012) Effect of nanofiber diameter on filtration efficiency. Adv Mater Res 560–561:737–741CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Koch M, Krammer G (2008) The permeability distribution (PD) method for filter media characterization. Aerosol Sci Technol 42(6):433–444CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Akduman C, Kumbasar EPA (2017) Electrospun polyurethane nanofibers. In: Aspects of polyurethanes. IntechOpen.  https://doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.69937 Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Kizildag N, Ucar N (2016) Electrospinning functional polyacrylonitrile nanofibers with polyaniline, carbon nanotubes, and silver nitrate as additives. In: Electrospinning—material, techniques, and biomedical applications. InTech.  https://doi.org/10.5772/65472 Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    Sinha MK, Das BR (2018) Chitosan nanofibrous materials for chemical and biological protection. J Text Fibrous Mater 1:251522111878837CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ahsan Nazir
    • 1
    • 2
  • Nabyl Khenoussi
    • 2
  • Tanveer Hussain
    • 1
  • Sharjeel Abid
    • 1
    Email author
  • Laurence Schacher
    • 2
  • Dominique Adolphe
    • 2
  • Abdul Zahir
    • 1
  • Muhammad Bilal Qadir
    • 1
  • Zubair Khaliq
    • 1
  • Amir Shahzad
    • 1
  1. 1.Electrospun Materials and Polymeric Membranes Research Group (EMPMRG)National Textile UniversityFaisalabadPakistan
  2. 2.Laboratoire de Physique et Mécanique Textiles (LPMT)Université de Haute-Alsace | UHAMulhouseFrance

Personalised recommendations