Advertisement

Preparation and characterization of biogenic CaCO3-reinforced polyvinyl alcohol–alginate hydrogel as controlled-release urea formulation

  • Nisha Stanley
  • Biswanath MahantyEmail author
Original Paper
  • 19 Downloads

Abstract

A slow-release fertilizer formulation was prepared by incorporation of urea in polyvinyl alcohol–alginate hydrogel core followed by deposition of calcium carbonate coating using HCO3/CO32−-rich alkaline cell-free ureolytic culture broth. High urea encapsulation efficiencies were evident in both CaCO3-reinforced (23.48% w/w) and regular (38.71% w/w) hydrogel matrices. Deposition of carbonate over the matrix surface in the reinforced hydrogel was evident from scanning electron microscopy and typical FTIR band near 1465 cm−1 due to C–O stretch of carbonate ion. Aqueous phase release behaviour was not significantly different between the two hydrogel variants. In the soil column, two-stage urea release pattern (i.e. a slow followed by a fast) was eminent that can extend into hours. Therefore, the modified hydrogel for controlled release could be expected to have wide potential application as slow-release fertilizer in agriculture.

Keywords

Biocalcification Controlled release Fertilizer Soil column Urea 

Notes

Authors’ contribution

Nisha Stanley is the first author of this study and was responsible for collecting the data, doing experiments and sample analysis. Biswanath Mahanty, the second and corresponding author, prepared the manuscript including graphs and figures. Both the authors equally contributed to the literature review, formulating background of the study. All authors have read and approved the final manuscript.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

No potential conflict of interest is reported by the authors.

Supplementary material

289_2019_2763_MOESM1_ESM.docx (1.1 mb)
Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 1131 kb)

References

  1. 1.
    Tomlinson I (2013) Doubling food production to feed the 9 billion: a critical perspective on a key discourse of food security in the UK. J Rural Stud 29:81–90.  https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JRURSTUD.2011.09.001 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Jie C, Jing-zhang C, Man-zhi T, Zi-tong G (2002) Soil degradation: a global problem endangering sustainable development. J Geogr Sci 12:243–252.  https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02837480 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Xiong ZQ, Freney JR, Mosier AR et al (2008) Impacts of population growth, changing food preferences and agricultural practices on the nitrogen cycle in East Asia. Nutr Cycl Agroecosyst 80:189–198.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10705-007-9132-4 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Xue L, Yu Y, Yang L (2014) Maintaining yields and reducing nitrogen loss in rice–wheat rotation system in Taihu Lake region with proper fertilizer management. Environ Res Lett 9:115010.  https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/9/11/115010 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Zhao X, Wang S, Xing G (2015) Maintaining rice yield and reducing N pollution by substituting winter legume for wheat in a heavily-fertilized rice-based cropping system of southeast China. Agric Ecosyst Environ 202:79–89.  https://doi.org/10.1016/J.AGEE.2015.01.002 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Tilman D, Cassman KG, Matson PA et al (2002) Agricultural sustainability and intensive production practices. Nature 418:671–677.  https://doi.org/10.1038/nature01014 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Jat RA, Wani SP, Sahrawat KL et al (2012) Recent approaches in nitrogen management for sustainable agricultural production and eco-safety. Arch Agron Soil Sci 58:1033–1060.  https://doi.org/10.1080/03650340.2011.557368 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Spiertz JHJ (2010) Nitrogen, sustainable agriculture and food security. A review. Agron Sustain Dev 30:43–55.  https://doi.org/10.1051/agro:2008064 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Dong D, Kou Y, Yang W et al (2018) Effects of urease and nitrification inhibitors on nitrous oxide emissions and nitrifying/denitrifying microbial communities in a rainfed maize soil: a 6-year field observation. Soil Tillage Res 180:82–90.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.still.2018.02.010 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Zaman M, Blennerhassett JD (2010) Effects of the different rates of urease and nitrification inhibitors on gaseous emissions of ammonia and nitrous oxide, nitrate leaching and pasture production from urine patches in an intensive grazed pasture system. Agric Ecosyst Environ 136:236–246.  https://doi.org/10.1016/J.AGEE.2009.07.010 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Zaman M, Saggar S, Blennerhassett JD, Singh J (2009) Effect of urease and nitrification inhibitors on N transformation, gaseous emissions of ammonia and nitrous oxide, pasture yield and N uptake in grazed pasture system. Soil Biol Biochem 41:1270–1280.  https://doi.org/10.1016/J.SOILBIO.2009.03.011 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Ye Y, Liang X, Chen Y et al (2013) Alternate wetting and drying irrigation and controlled-release nitrogen fertilizer in late-season rice. Effects on dry matter accumulation, yield, water and nitrogen use. F Crop Res 144:212–224.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fcr.2012.12.003 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Guo M, Liu M, Zhan F, Wu L (2005) Preparation and properties of a slow-release membrane-encapsulated urea fertilizer with superabsorbent and moisture preservation. Ind Eng Chem Res 44:4206–4211.  https://doi.org/10.1021/IE0489406 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Naz MY, Sulaiman SA (2016) Slow release coating remedy for nitrogen loss from conventional urea: a review. J Control Release 225:109–120.  https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JCONREL.2016.01.037 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Shaviv A (2001) Advances in controlled-release fertilizers. Adv Agron 71:1–49.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2113(01)71011-5 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Timilsena YP, Adhikari R, Casey P et al (2015) Enhanced efficiency fertilisers: a review of formulation and nutrient release patterns. J Sci Food Agric 95:1131–1142.  https://doi.org/10.1002/jsfa.6812 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Wang Y, Liu M, Ni B, Xie L (2012) κ-Carrageenan–sodium alginate beads and superabsorbent coated nitrogen fertilizer with slow-release, water-retention, and anticompaction properties. Ind Eng Chem Res 51:1413–1422.  https://doi.org/10.1021/ie2020526 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Jin S, Wang Y, He J et al (2013) Preparation and properties of a degradable interpenetrating polymer networks based on starch with water retention, amelioration of soil, and slow release of nitrogen and phosphorus fertilizer. J Appl Polym Sci 128:407–415.  https://doi.org/10.1002/app.38162 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Rashidzadeh A, Olad A, Salari D, Reyhanitabar A (2014) On the preparation and swelling properties of hydrogel nanocomposite based on Sodium alginate-g-Poly (acrylic acid-co-acrylamide)/Clinoptilolite and its application as slow release fertilizer. J Polym Res 21:344.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10965-013-0344-9 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Han X, Chen S, Hu X (2009) Controlled-release fertilizer encapsulated by starch/polyvinyl alcohol coating. Desalination 240:21–26.  https://doi.org/10.1016/J.DESAL.2008.01.047 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Wang Y, Liu M, Ni B, Xie L (2012) κ-Carrageenan–sodium alginate beads and superabsorbent coated nitrogen fertilizer with slow-release, water-retention, and anticompaction properties. Ind Eng Chem Res 51:1413–1422.  https://doi.org/10.1021/ie2020526 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Bortolin A, Aouada FA, Mattoso LHC, Ribeiro C (2013) Nanocomposite PAAm/methyl cellulose/montmorillonite hydrogel: evidence of synergistic effects for the slow release of fertilizers. J Agric Food Chem 61:7431–7439.  https://doi.org/10.1021/jf401273n CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    An M, Lo KV (2001) Activated sludge immobilization using the PVA-alginate-borate method. J Environ Sci Heal Part A 36:101–115.  https://doi.org/10.1081/ESE-100000475 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Naz MY, Sulaiman SA (2014) Testing of starch-based carbohydrate polymer coatings for enhanced urea performance. J Coatings Technol Res 11:747–756.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11998-014-9590-y CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Keeney D, Nelson D (1982) Nitrogen-inorganic forms. In: Miller RH, Keeney DR (eds) Methods of soil analysis part 2: chemical and microbiological properties, 2nd edn. Agronomy 9/2, American society of Agronomy, MadisonGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    González ME, Cea M, Medina J et al (2015) Evaluation of biodegradable polymers as encapsulating agents for the development of a urea controlled-release fertilizer using biochar as support material. Sci Total Environ 505:446–453.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2014.10.014 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Douglas T, Wlodarczyk M, Pamula E et al (2014) Enzymatic mineralization of gellan gum hydrogel for bone tissue-engineering applications and its enhancement by polydopamine. J Tissue Eng Regen Med 8:906–918.  https://doi.org/10.1002/term.1616 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Douglas TEL, Łapa A, Samal SK et al (2017) Enzymatic, urease-mediated mineralization of gellan gum hydrogel with calcium carbonate, magnesium-enriched calcium carbonate and magnesium carbonate for bone regeneration applications. J Tissue Eng Regen Med 11:3556–3566.  https://doi.org/10.1002/term.2273 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Suzawa Y, Funaki T, Watanabe J et al (2010) Regenerative behavior of biomineral/agarose composite gels as bone grafting materials in rat cranial defects. J Biomed Mater Res 93A:965–975.  https://doi.org/10.1002/jbm.a.32518 Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Han X, Chen S, Hu X (2009) Controlled-release fertilizer encapsulated by starch/polyvinyl alcohol coating. Desalination 240:21–26.  https://doi.org/10.1016/J.DESAL.2008.01.047 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Rahman MA, Oomori T (2009) In vitro regulation of CaCO 3 crystal growth by the highly acidic proteins of calcitic sclerites in soft coral, Sinularia Polydactyla. Connect Tissue Res 50:285–293.  https://doi.org/10.1080/03008200802714933 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Niu Y, Li H (2012) Controlled release of urea encapsulated by starch-g-poly(vinyl acetate). Ind Eng Chem Res 51:12173–12177.  https://doi.org/10.1021/ie301684p CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Shan L, Gao Y, Zhang Y et al (2016) Fabrication and use of alginate-based cryogel delivery beads loaded with urea and phosphates as potential carriers for bioremediation. Ind Eng Chem Res 55:7655–7660.  https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.iecr.6b01256 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Tao S, Liu J, Jin K et al (2011) Preparation and characterization of triple polymer-coated controlled-release urea with water-retention property and enhanced durability. J Appl Polym Sci 120:2103–2111.  https://doi.org/10.1002/app.33366 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Pereira EI, Minussi FB, da Cruz CCT et al (2012) Urea–montmorillonite-extruded nanocomposites: a novel slow-release material. J Agric Food Chem 60:5267–5272.  https://doi.org/10.1021/jf3001229 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Fidaleo M, Lavecchia R (2003) Kinetic study of enzymatic urea hydrolysis in the pH range 4–9. Chem Biochem Eng Q 17:311–318Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Chen L, Xie Z, Zhuang X et al (2008) Controlled release of urea encapsulated by starch-g-poly(l-lactide). Carbohydr Polym 72:342–348.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2007.09.003 CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of BiotechnologyKarunya Institute of Technology and SciencesCoimbatoreIndia
  2. 2.Cognizant Technology SolutionsCoimbatoreIndia

Personalised recommendations