Advertisement

Study of hybrid alginate/gelatin hydrogel-incorporated niosomal Aloe vera capable of sustained release of Aloe vera as potential skin wound dressing

  • Arezoo Dadashzadeh
  • Rana ImaniEmail author
  • Saeid Moghassemi
  • Kobra Omidfar
  • Nabiollah AbolfathiEmail author
Original Paper
  • 16 Downloads

Abstract

Nowadays, wound dressings serve as advanced skin products, which mainly aim to accelerate the wound healing process. The wound dressings with a potential of localized and prolonged release of therapeutic agents have attracted tremendous attention. In this study, synthesis of a sustained release of niosomal Aloe vera (AV) loaded in alginate/gelatin (AG) hybrid hydrogel is aimed at improving skin regeneration as wound dressing. For this purpose, AV-loaded niosomes are synthesized and incorporated in the hybrid AG hydrogel. The size and polydispersity index (PdI) of niosomes, AV entrapment efficacy and AV in vitro release are characterized. In addition, the hydrogel characteristic, such as swelling ratio, degradation behavior and mechanical property, are studied. MTT assay is utilized to evaluate the effect of AV incorporation and release on the proliferation of fibroblast cells. Results demonstrate that size, PdI and EE% of AV-loaded niosomes are 270.080 nm, 0.108 and 42.039 ± 4.090%, respectively, and in vitro release of AV is about 20% after 7 days. AG hybrid hydrogel loaded by niosomal AV shows an extended sustained release manner, where its swelling ratio and percentage of degradation are 60 wt% after 72 h and 70 wt% after 6 days, respectively. The average Young’s modulus of the hybrid hydrogel is measured around 12.64 ± 1.3 kPa, which seems suitable as a wound dressing. Finally, MTT assay confesses an increased fibroblast proliferation in the presence of AV, particularly in the niosomal AV-loaded hydrogel. Concludingly, alginate/gelation hybrid hydrogel incorporated with niosomal AV, with sustained release potential can be suggested as a promising candidate for wound dressing applications.

Graphical abstract

Keywords

Niosome Aloe vera Sustained release Alginate Gelatin Wound dressing 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank Mostafa Rabbani and Masoud Babaei for their assistance in providing some materials for this research.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

References

  1. 1.
    Mescher AL (2010) Junqueira’s basic histology: text and atlas, vol 12. McGraw-Hill Medical, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Kamel RA, Ong JF, Junker JPE (2013) Tissue engineering of skin. J Am Coll Surg 217(3):533–555Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Boateng JS, Matthews KH, Stevens HN, Eccleston GM (2008) Wound healing dressings and drug delivery systems: a review. J Pharm Sci 97(8):2892–2923Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Paul W, Sharma CP (2004) Chitosan and alginate wound dressings: a short review. Trends Biomater Artif Organs 18(1):18–23Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Murakami K, Aoki H, Nakamura S, S-i Nakamura, Takikawa M, Hanzawa M, Kishimoto S, Hattori H, Tanaka Y, Kiyosawa T (2010) Hydrogel blends of chitin/chitosan, fucoidan and alginate as healing-impaired wound dressings. Biomaterials 31(1):83–90Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Stashak TS, Farstvedt E, Othic A (2004) Update on wound dressings: indications and best use. Clin Tech Equine Pract 3(2):148–163Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Hoffman AS (2012) Hydrogels for biomedical applications. Adv Drug Deliv Rev 64:18–23Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Drury JL, Mooney DJ (2003) Hydrogels for tissue engineering: scaffold design variables and applications. Biomaterials 24(24):4337–4351Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Lee KY, Mooney DJ (2012) Alginate: properties and biomedical applications. Prog Polym Sci 37(1):106–126Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Balakrishnan B, Mohanty M, Umashankar P, Jayakrishnan A (2005) Evaluation of an in situ forming hydrogel wound dressing based on oxidized alginate and gelatin. Biomaterials 26(32):6335–6342Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Dong Z, Wang Q, Du Y (2006) Alginate/gelatin blend films and their properties for drug controlled release. J Membr Sci 280(1):37–44Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Shin H, Olsen BD, Khademhosseini A (2012) The mechanical properties and cytotoxicity of cell-laden double-network hydrogels based on photocrosslinkable gelatin and gellan gum biomacromolecules. Biomaterials 33(11):3143–3152Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Rosellini E, Cristallini C, Barbani N, Vozzi G, Giusti P (2009) Preparation and characterization of alginate/gelatin blend films for cardiac tissue engineering. J Biomed Mater Res A 91(2):447–453Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Almeida PF, Almeida A (2004) Cross-linked alginate–gelatine beads: a new matrix for controlled release of pindolol. J Control Release 97(3):431–439Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Choi YS, Hong SR, Lee YM, Song KW, Park MH, Nam YS (1999) Study on gelatin-containing artificial skin: I. Preparation and characteristics of novel gelatin–alginate sponge. Biomaterials 20(5):409–417Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Majewska I, Gendaszewska-Darmach E (2011) Proangiogenic activity of plant extracts in accelerating wound healing—a new face of old phytomedicines. Acta Biochim Pol 58(4):449–460Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Benson KF, Newman RA, Jensen GS (2015) Antioxidant, anti-inflammatory, anti-apoptotic, and skin regenerative properties of an Aloe vera-based extract of Nerium oleander leaves (NAE-8®). Clin Cosmet Investig Dermatol 8:239Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Abdullah KM, Abdullah A, Johnson ML, Bilski JJ, Petry K, Redmer DA, Reynolds LP, Grazul-Bilska AT (2003) Effects of Aloe vera on gap junctional intercellular communication and proliferation of human diabetic and nondiabetic skin fibroblasts. J Altern Complement Med 9(5):711–718Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Choi SW, Son BW, Son YS, Park YI, Lee SK, Chung MH (2001) The wound-healing effect of a glycoprotein fraction isolated from Aloe vera. Br J Dermatol 145(4):535–545Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Hashemi SA, Madani SA, Abediankenari S (2015) The review on properties of Aloe vera in healing of cutaneous wounds. Biomed Res Int 2015:714216Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Atiba A, Ueno H, Uzuka Y (2011) The effect of Aloe vera oral administration on cutaneous wound healing in type 2 diabetic rats. J Vet Med Sci 73(5):583–589Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Atiba A, Nishimura M, Kakinuma S, Hiraoka T, Goryo M, Shimada Y, Ueno H, Uzuka Y (2011) Aloe vera oral administration accelerates acute radiation-delayed wound healing by stimulating transforming growth factor-β and fibroblast growth factor production. Am J Surg 201(6):809–818Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Kalluri R, Zeisberg M (2006) Fibroblasts in cancer. Nat Rev Cancer 6(5):392Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Leask A (2007) TGFβ, cardiac fibroblasts, and the fibrotic response. Cardiovasc Res 74(2):207–212Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Varga J, Rosenbloom J, Jimenez S (1987) Transforming growth factor β (TGFβ) causes a persistent increase in steady-state amounts of type I and type III collagen and fibronectin mRNAs in normal human dermal fibroblasts. Biochem J 247(3):597–604Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Hajian M, Mahmoodi M, Imani R (2017) In vitro assessment of poly (vinyl alcohol) film incorporating Aloe vera for potential application as a wound dressing. J Macromol Sci B 56(7):435–450Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Suganya S, Venugopal J, Mary SA, Ramakrishna S, Lakshmi B, Dev VG (2014) Aloe vera incorporated biomimetic nanofibrous scaffold: a regenerative approach for skin tissue engineering. Iran Polym J 23(3):237–248Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Jithendra P, Rajam AM, Kalaivani T, Mandal AB, Rose C (2013) Preparation and characterization of Aloe vera blended collagen–chitosan composite scaffold for tissue engineering applications. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 5(15):7291–7298Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Salehi M, Farzamfar S, Bastami F, Tajerian R (2016) Fabrication and characterization of electrospun PLLA/collagen nanofibrous scaffold coated with chitosan to sustain release of Aloe vera gel for skin tissue engineering. Biomed Eng Appl Basis Commun 28(05):1650035Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Bourke SL, Al-Khalili M, Briggs T, Michniak BB, Kohn J, Poole-Warren LA (2003) A photo-crosslinked poly (vinyl alcohol) hydrogel growth factor release vehicle for wound healing applications. AAPS Pharmsci 5(4):101–111Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Buckley A, Davidson JM, Kamerath CD, Wolt TB, Woodward SC (1985) Sustained release of epidermal growth factor accelerates wound repair. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 82(21):7340–7344Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Han F, Dong Y, Song A, Yin R, Li S (2014) Alginate/chitosan based bi-layer composite membrane as potential sustained-release wound dressing containing ciprofloxacin hydrochloride. Appl Surf Sci 311:626–634Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Jannesari M, Varshosaz J, Morshed M, Zamani M (2011) Composite poly (vinyl alcohol)/poly (vinyl acetate) electrospun nanofibrous mats as a novel wound dressing matrix for controlled release of drugs. Int J Nanomed 6:993Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Kim J-H, Kim T-H, Kang MS, Kim H-W (2016) Angiogenic effects of collagen/mesoporous nanoparticle composite scaffold delivering VEGF165. Biomed Res Int 2016:9676934Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Moghassemi S, Hadjizadeh A, Hakamivala A, Omidfar K (2017) Growth factor-loaded nano-niosomal gel formulation and characterization. AAPS PharmSciTech 18(1):34–41Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Moghassemi S, Hadjizadeh A (2014) Nano-niosomes as nanoscale drug delivery systems: an illustrated review. J Control Release 185:22–36Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Yazdi Rouholamini SE, Moghassemi S, Maharat Z, Hakamivala A, Kashanian S, Omidfar K (2018) Effect of silibinin-loaded nano-niosomal coated with trimethyl chitosan on miRNAs expression in 2D and 3D models of T47D breast cancer cell line. Artif Cells Nanomed Biotechnol 46(3):524–535Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Moghassemi S, Parnian E, Hakamivala A, Darzianiazizi M, Vardanjani MM, Kashanian S, Larijani B, Omidfar K (2015) Uptake and transport of insulin across intestinal membrane model using trimethyl chitosan coated insulin niosomes. Mater Sci Eng C 46:333–340Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    Luo Y, Lode A, Akkineni AR, Gelinsky M (2015) Concentrated gelatin/alginate composites for fabrication of predesigned scaffolds with a favorable cell response by 3D plotting. RSC Adv 5(54):43480–43488Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    Saarai A, Kasparkova V, Sedlacek T, Sáha P (2011) A comparative study of crosslinked sodium alginate/gelatin hydrogels for wound dressing. In: Recent researches in geography, geology, energy, environment and biomedicine. Proceedings of the 4th WSEAS international conference on EMESEG, 14 July 2011, vol 11. pp 384–389Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    Chen YX, Cain B, Soman P (2017) Gelatin methacrylate–alginate hydrogel with tunable viscoelastic properties. AIMS Mater Sci 4(2):363–369Google Scholar
  42. 42.
    Kong QS, Yu ZS, Ji Q, Xia YZ (2009) Electrospinning of sodium alginate with poly (ethylene oxide), gelatin and nanometer silver colloid. In: Materials science forum. Trans Tech Publications, pp 1188–1191Google Scholar
  43. 43.
    Lao L, Wang Y, Zhu Y, Zhang Y, Gao C (2011) Poly (lactide-co-glycolide)/hydroxyapatite nanofibrous scaffolds fabricated by electrospinning for bone tissue engineering. J Mater Sci Mater Med 22(8):1873–1884Google Scholar
  44. 44.
    Waddad AY, Abbad S, Yu F, Munyendo WL, Wang J, Lv H, Zhou J (2013) Formulation, characterization and pharmacokinetics of Morin hydrate niosomes prepared from various non-ionic surfactants. Int J Pharm 456(2):446–458Google Scholar
  45. 45.
    Gurrapu A, Jukanti R, Bobbala SR, Kanuganti S, Jeevana JB (2012) Improved oral delivery of valsartan from maltodextrin based proniosome powders. Adv Powder Technol 23(5):583–590Google Scholar
  46. 46.
    Balakrishnan P, Shanmugam S, Lee WS, Lee WM, Kim JO, Oh DH, Kim D-D, Kim JS, Yoo BK, Choi H-G (2009) Formulation and in vitro assessment of minoxidil niosomes for enhanced skin delivery. Int J Pharm 377(1):1–8Google Scholar
  47. 47.
    Firthouse PM, Halith SM, Wahab S, Sirajudeen M, Mohideen SK (2011) Formulation and evaluation of miconazole niosomes. Int J PharmTech Res 3(2):1019–1022Google Scholar
  48. 48.
    Moghassemi S, Hadjizadeh A, Omidfar K (2016) Formulation and characterization of bovine serum albumin-loaded niosome. AAPS PharmSciTech 18:1–7Google Scholar
  49. 49.
    Bishop S, Walker M, Rogers A, Chen W (2003) Importance of moisture balance at the wound-dressing interface. J Wound Care 12(4):125–128Google Scholar
  50. 50.
    Fan L, Du Y, Huang R, Wang Q, Wang X, Zhang L (2005) Preparation and characterization of alginate/gelatin blend fibers. J Appl Polym Sci 96(5):1625–1629Google Scholar
  51. 51.
    Jachowicz J, McMullen R, Prettypaul D (2007) Indentometric analysis of in vivo skin and comparison with artificial skin models. Skin Res Technol 13(3):299–309Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Biomedical EngineeringAmirkabir University of TechnologyTehranIran
  2. 2.Biosensor Research Center, Endocrinology and Metabolism Molecular-Cellular Sciences InstituteTehran University of Medical SciencesTehranIran

Personalised recommendations