Advertisement

Influence of different parameters on cured shapes and residual stresses of unsymmetric composite laminate reinforced by multi-wall carbon nanotubes

  • Ahmad Reza GhasemiEmail author
  • Mohammad Mohammadi-Fesharaki
Original Paper
  • 16 Downloads

Abstract

In this research, the curvature of three-phase unsymmetrical composite laminates was determined based on the Rayleigh–Ritz energy method. Three-phase composite laminate consists of glass fiber, epoxy resin and multi-walled carbon nanotubes (MWCNTs). Micromechanical models including Halpin–Tsai, modified Schapery, bridging and Schapery models have been employed to determine mechanical and thermal properties of nanocomposite plates. The influence of the thickness, curing temperature and weight fraction of MWCNTs were studied analytically. Then, some cross-ply composite specimens were fabricated and the analytical results were certified by experimental ones. Additionally, the results were compared with the Hyer model. It was observed that the proposed model can predict the curvature behavior better than the Hyer model. Study of the effects of mentioned parameters on the curvature of the cross-ply laminates revealed that addition of MWCNTs leads to increase in the elastic modulus and decrease in the CTE. So, the curvature of unsymmetrical cross-ply laminates decreases by addition of appropriate amount of nanoparticles.

Keywords

Curvature Curing MWCNTs Micromechanics models Three-phase Cross-ply laminates 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors are grateful for research support from University of Kashan and Iran National Science Foundation (INSF) for supporting this research with Grant No. 96001615.

References

  1. 1.
    Teimouri R, Amini S, Bagheri-Bami A (2018) Evaluation of optimized surface properties and residual stress in ultrasonic assisted ball burnishing of AA6061-T6. Measurement 116:129–139Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Jeronimidis G, Parkyn AT (1988) Residual stresses in carbon fibre-thermoplastic matrix laminates. J Compos Mater 22(5):401–415Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Aghdam MM, Khojeh A (2003) More on the effects of thermal residual and hydrostatic stresses on the yielding behavior of unidirectional composites. Compos Struct 62:285–290Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Ghasemi AR, Mohammadi MM (2016) Residual stress measurement of fiber metal laminates using incremental hole-drilling technique in consideration of the integral method. Int J Mech Sci 114:246–256Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Shokrieh MM, Akbari S (2012) Application of pulse method to incremental slitting measurement of residual stresses in laminated composites. J Mech Res Appl 4(1):9–15Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Prime MB, Sebring RJ, Edwards JM, Hughes DJ, Webster PJ (2004) Laser surface-contouring and spline data-smoothing for residual stress measurement. J Exp Mech 44(2):176–184Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Poon CY, Kujawinska M, Ruiz C (1993) Strain measurements of composites using an automated moiré interferometry method. Measurement 12(1):45–57Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Lesiak P, Szeląg M, Budaszewski D, Plaga R, Mileńko K, Rajan G, Semenova Y et al (2012) Influence of lamination process on optical fiber sensors embedded in composite material. Measurement 45(9):2275–2280Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Sante RD, Donati L, Troiani E, Proli P (2014) Evaluation of bending strain measurements in a composite sailboat bowsprit with embedded fibre Bragg gratings. Measurement 54:106–117Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Geng X, Jiang M, Gao L, Wang Q, Jia Y, Sui Q, Jia L, Li D (2017) Sensing characteristics of FBG sensor embedded in CFRP laminate. Measurement 98:199–204Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Bacon DH, Edwards L, Moffatt JE, Fitzpatrick ME (2011) Synchrotron X-ray diffraction measurements of internal stresses during loading of steel-based metal matrix composites reinforced with TiB2 particles. Acta Mater 59(9):3373–3383Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Hyer MW (1982) The room-temperature shapes of four-layer unsymmetric cross-ply laminates. J Compos Mater 16:296–310Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Hahn HT (1981) Warping of unsymmetric cross-ply graphite/epoxy laminates. Compos Technol Rev 3(3):114–117Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Ren L, Parvizi-Majid A, Li Z (2003) Cured shape of cross-ply composite thin shells. J Compos Mater 20:1801–1820Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Zarrelli M, Skordos AA, Partridge IK (2008) Thermomechanical analysis of a toughened thermosetting system. Mech Compos Mater 44(2):181–190Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Zarrelli M, Skordos AA, Partridge IK (2010) Toward a constitutive model for cure-dependent modulus of a high temperature epoxy during the cure. Eur Polym J 46(8):1705–1712Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Giddings PF, Bowen CR, Salo AIT, Kim HA (2010) Bi-stable composite laminates: effects of laminate composition on cured-shape and response to thermal load. Compos Struct 92:2220–2225Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Betts DN, Salo AIT, Bowen CR, Kim HA (2010) Characterization and modelling of the cured shapes of arbitrary layup bi-stable composite laminates. Compos Struct 92:1694–1700Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Dai F, Li H, Du S (2013) Cured shapes of Bi-stable CFRP composite laminates with the side length exceeding a critical value. Appl Compos Mater 20:505–516Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Yuan Z, Wang Y, Wang J, Wei S, Liu T, Cai T, He J, Wang W (2018) A model on the curved shapes of unsymmetric laminates including tool-part interaction. Sci Eng Compos Mater 25(1):1–8Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Lee H, Lee JG, Ryu J, Cho M (2017) Twisted shape Bi-stable structure of asymmetrically laminated CFRP composites. Compos Part B 108:345–353Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Shokrieh M, Daneshvar A, Akbari S (2014) Reduction of thermal residual stresses of laminated polymer composites by addition of carbon nanotubes. Mater Des 53:209–216Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Ghasemi AR, Mohammadi MM, Moradi M (2014) Investigation of mechanical and thermal properties of polymer composites reinforced by multi-walled carbon nanotube for reduction of residual stresses. Iran J Polym Sci Technol 27:213–230Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Ghasemi AR, Mohammadi MM, Mohandes M (2015) The role of carbon nanofibers on thermo-mechanical properties of polymer matrix composites and their effect on reduction of residual stresses. Compos Part B 77:519–527Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Ghasemi AR, Mohammadi M (2016) Three-dimensional residual stresses analysis of nanocomposite polymeric matrix based on fiber reinforced carbon nanotubes. J Sci Technol Compos 4(2):23–30Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Ghasemi AR, Mohammadi-Fesharaki M, Mohandes M (2017) Three-phase micromechanical analysis of residual stresses in reinforced fiber by carbon nanotubes. J Compos Mater 51(12):1783–1794Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Fung YC (1965) Foundation of solid mechanics. Prentice-Hall Inc., New JerseyGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Timenshenko SP (1981) Woinovsky-Krieger. Theory of plates and shells, McGraw-HillGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Rana S, Alagirusamy R, Joshi M (2011) Development of carbon nanofibre incorporated three phase carbon/epoxy composites with enhanced mechanical. Electr Therm Prop Compos Part A 42:439–445Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Cox HL (1952) The elasticity and strength of paper and other fibrous materials. J Appl Phys 3:72–79Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Hirsch T (1992) Modulus of elasticity of concrete affected by elastic moduli of cement paste matrix and aggregate. J Am Concr Inst 59:427–451Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Srivastava VK, Singh S (2012) A micro-mechanical model for elastic modulus of multi-walled carbon nanotube/epoxy resin composites. Int J Compos Mater 2(2):1–6Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Alamusi N, Qiu J, Li Y, Chang C, Atobe S, Fukunaga H, Liu Y, Ning H, Wu L, Li J, Yuan W, Watanabe T, Yan C, Zhang Y (2013) Multi-scale numerical simulations of thermal expansion properties of CNT-reinforced nanocomposites. Nanoscale Res Lett 8(1):15Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Kaw AK (2006) Mechanics of composite materials, 2nd edn. CRC, Boca RatonGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Halpin JC, Kardos JL (1976) The Halpin–Tsai equations: a review. Polym Eng Sci 16:344–352Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Huang ZM (2001) Simulation of the mechanical properties of fibrous composites by the bridging micromechanics model. Compos Part A 32:143–172Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Huang ZM (2001) Micromechanical prediction of ultimate strength of transversely isotropic fibrous composites. Int J Solid Struct 38:4147–4172Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Karadeniz ZH, Kumlutas D (2007) A numerical study on the coefficients of thermal expansion of fiber reinforced composite materials. Compos Struct 78:1–10Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    Ismail SO, Ojo SO, Dhakal HN (2017) Thermo-mechanical Modelling of FRP cross-ply composite laminates drilling: delamination damage analysis. Compos Part B 108:45–52Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    Dong K, Zhang J, Cao M, Wang M, Gu B, Sun B (2016) A mesoscale study of thermal expansion behaviors of epoxy resin and carbon fiber/epoxy unidirectional composites based on periodic temperature and displacement boundary conditions. Polym Test 55:44–60Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    Ghasemi AR, Tabatabaeianand A, Moradi M (2018) Residual stress and failure analyses of polymer matrix composites considering thermal cycling and temperature effects based on classical laminate plate theory. J Compos Mater.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0021998318812127 Google Scholar
  42. 42.
    Hu N, Jia B, Arai M, Yan C, Li J, Liu Y, Atobe S, Fukunaga H (2012) Prediction of thermal expansion properties of carbon nanotubes using molecular dynamics simulations. Comput Mater Sci 54:249–254Google Scholar
  43. 43.
    Ghasemi AR, Moradi M (2016) Low thermal cycling effects on mechanical properties of laminated composite materials. Mech Mater 96:126–137Google Scholar
  44. 44.
    Ghasemi AR, Fesharaki MM (2018) Effect of carbon nanotube on cured shape of cross-ply polymer matrix nanocomposite laminates: analytical and experimental study. Iran Polym J 27(12):965–977Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Composite and Nanocomposite Research Laboratory, Department of Solid Mechanics, Faculty of Mechanical EngineeringUniversity of KashanKashanIran

Personalised recommendations