Advertisement

The comparative investigation on synthesis, characterizations of silver ion-imprinting and non-imprinting cryogels, their impedance spectroscopies and relaxation mechanisms

  • Koray Şarkaya
  • Ahmet Demir
Original Paper
  • 9 Downloads

Abstract

In the present study, a novel ion-imprinting and non-imprinting cryogel samples have been prepared using ion-imprinting technique and the dielectric properties have been investigated using an impedance spectroscopy method. In the preparation of ion-imprinted cryogel, at the first attempt, N-methacryloly-(l)-cysteine methyl ester was used as the metal complexing monomer. Ag+-imprinted poly(hydroxyethyl methacrylate-N-methacryloly-(l)-cysteine methyl ester) cryogel was produced by bulk polymerization. Poly(2-hydroxyethyl methacrylate) was selected as the basic matrix by considering properties, high chemical and mechanical stability. After removal of template (silver ions), the ion-imprinted cryogel was used for the removal of photo-film-containing materials. The dielectric properties of cryogel samples have also been investigated by impedance spectroscopy within the frequency range of 1 Hz–10 MHz. The real part of the permittivity increases at low frequencies as electrode effects become dominant. It shows a constant value at high frequencies due to dipole polarization. On the other hand, the imaginary part does not show a relaxation peak as the relaxation time of samples is very short. The frequency dependence of electrical modulus has also been investigated. The real part of electrical modulus (M′ (f)) is an indicative of negligible electrode polarization phenomenon in the test material. The behavior of the imaginary part of frequency dependent electrical modulus (M″ (f)) exhibit that the dielectric relaxation process is usually not frequency-activated state. Dielectric relaxation process occurs spontaneously due to the hopping mechanism of charge carriers.

Keywords

Cryogel N-Methacryloly-(l)-cysteine methyl ester Ion-imprinting Molecular imprinting Polymers Dielectric properties Electrical modulus 

Notes

Acknowledgements

Authors thank Prof. Adil Denizli for his support with his facilities during experimental studies and experiences.

Supplementary material

289_2018_2657_MOESM1_ESM.docx (131 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 131 kb)

References

  1. 1.
    Ramstrom O, Mosbach K (1999) Synthesis and catalysis by molecularly imprinted materials. Curr Opin Chem Biol 3:759–764CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Rao T, Daniel TP, Gladis JM (2004) Tailored materials for preconcentration or separation of metals by ion-imprinted polymers for solid-phase extraction (IIP-SPE). Trends Anal Chem 23:28–35CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Mosbach K, Ramström O (1996) The emerging technique of molecular imprinting and its future impact on biotechnology. Nat Biotechnol 14:163–170CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Wackerling J, Lieberzeit AP (2015) Molecularly imprinted polymer nanoparticles in chemical sensing—synthesis, characterisation and application. Sens Actuators B Chem 207:144–157CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Demirel G, Ozcetin G, Turan E, Caykara T (2005) pH/temperature–sensitive imprinted ionic poly(N-tert-butylacrylamide-co-acrylamide/maleic acid) hydrogels for bovine serum albumin. Macromol Biosci 5:1032–1037CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Shiomi T, Matsui M, Mizukami F, Sakaguchi K (2005) A method for the molecular imprinting of hemoglobin on silica surfaces using silanes. Biomaterials 27:5564–5571CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Wei S, Mizaikoff B (2007) Binding site characteristics of 17β-estradiol imprinted polymers. Biosens Bioelectr 23:201–209CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Li Y, Yang HH, You QH, Zhuang ZX, Wang XR (2006) Protein recognition via surface molecularly imprinted polymer nanowires. Anal Chem 78:317–320CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Perçin I, Sener G, Demirçelik AH, Bereli N, Denizli A (2015) Comparison of two different reactive dye immobilized poly(hydroxyethyl methacrylate) cryogel discs for purification of lysozyme. Appl Biochem Biotechnol 175:2795–2805CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Haginaka J (2008) Monodispersed, molecularly imprinted polymers as affinity-based chromatography media. J Chromatogr B 866:3–13CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Say R, Birlik E, Ersöz A, Yilmaz F, Gedikbey T, Denizli A (2003) Preconcentration of copper on ion-selective imprinted polymer microbeads. Anal Chim Acta 480:251–258CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Say R, Ersoz A, Denizli A (2003) Selective separation of uranium containing glutamic acid molecular-imprinted polymeric microbeads. Sep Sci Technol 38:3431–3447CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Andac M, Say R, Denizli A (2004) Molecular recognition based cadmium removal from human plasma. J Chromatogr B 811:119–126CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Ersoz A, Say R, Denizli A (2004) Ni (II) ion-imprinted solid-phase extraction and preconcentration in aqueous solutions by packed-bed columns. Anal Chim Acta 502:91–97CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Yavuz H, Say R, Denizli A (2005) Iron removal from human plasma based on molecular recognition using imprinted beads. Mater Sci Eng C 25:521–528CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Ersoz A, Denizli A, Ozcan A, Say R (2005) Molecularly imprinted ligand-exchange recognition assay of glucose by quartz crystal microbalance. Biosens Bioelectr 20:2197–2202CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Pang X, Cheng G, Lu S, Tang E (2006) Synthesis of polyacrylamide gel beads with electrostatic functional groups for the molecular imprinting of bovine serum albumin. Anal Bioanal Chem 384:225–230CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Lozinsky VI, Plieva FM, Galaev IY, Mattiasson B (2002) The potential of polymeric cryogels in bioseparation. Bioseparation. 10:163–188CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Çavuş A, Baysal Z, Alkan H (2013) Preparation of poly(hydroxyethyl methacrylate) cryogels containing l-histidine for insulin recognition. Colloids Surf B 107:84–89CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Thompson T, Fawell J, Kunikane S, Jackson D, Appleyard S, Callan P, Bartram J, Kingston P (2007) Chemical safety of drinking-water: assessing priorities for risk management. World Health Organization Press, GenevaGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Pedroso MS, Pinho GLL, Rodrigues SC, Bianchini A (2007) Mechanism of acute silver toxicity in the euryhaline copepod Acartia tonsa. Aquat Toxicol 82:173–180CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Mack C, Wilhelmi B, Duncan JR, Burgess JE (2007) Research review paper: biosorption of precious metals. Biotechnol Adv 25:264–271CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    US Environmental Protection Agency (1999) National Recommended Water Quality Criteria-Correction, EPA-822-Z-99-001. Office of Water, WashingtonGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Arvidsson P, Plieva FM, Savina IN, Lozinsky VI, Fexby S, Bülow L, Galaev IY, Mattiasson B (2002) Chromatography of microbial cells using continuous supermacroporous affinity and ion-exchange columns. J Chromatogr A 977:27–38CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Kumar A, Plieva FM, Galaev IY, Mattiasson B (2003) Affinity fractionation of lymphocytes using a monolithic cryogel. J Immunol Methods 283:185–194CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Yao KJ, Yun JX, Shen SC, Wang LH, He XJ, Yu XM (2006) Characterization of a novel continuous supermacroporous monolithic cryogel embedded with nanoparticles for protein chromatography. J Chromatogr A 1109:103–110CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Mafu LD, Msagati TA, Mamba BB (2013) Ion-imprinted polymers for environmental monitoring of inorganic pollutants: synthesis, characterization, and applications. Environ Sci Pollut Res Int 20(2):790–802CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Yoshikawa M (2008) Surface plasmon resonance studies on molecularly imprinted films. J Polym Appl Sci 110:2826–2832CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Haginaka J (2001) HPLC-based bioseparations using molecularly imprinted polymers. Bioseparation 10:337–351CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Ye L, Mosbach K (2001) Polymers recognizing biomolecules based on a combination of molecular imprinting and proximity scintillation: a new sensor concept. J Am Chem Soc 123:2901–2902CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Zhang L, Cheng G, Fu C (2003) Synthesis and characteristics of tyrosine imprinted beads via suspension polymerization. React Funct Polym 56:167–173CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Nicholl IA, Rosengren JP (2001) Molecular imprinting of surfaces. Bioseparation 10:301–305CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Cormak PAG, Mosbach K (1999) Molecular imprinting: recent developments and the road ahead. React Funct Polym 41:115–124CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Kyritsis A, Pissis P, Grammatikakis J (1995) Dielectric relaxation spectroscopy in poly(hydroxyethyl acrylates)/water hydrogels. J Polym Sci Part B Polym Phys 33(12):1737–1750CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Aziz SB, Abidin ZHZ, Arof AK (2010) Influence of silver ion reduction on electrical modulus parameters of solid polymer electrolyte based on chitosansilver triflate electrolyte membrane. Express Polym Lett.  https://doi.org/10.3144/expresspolymlett.2010.38 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Aziz SB (2017) Investigation of metallic silver nanoparticles through UV–Vis and optical micrograph techniques. Int J Electrochem Sci 10:363–373CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Aziz SB, Abidin ZHZ, Arof AK (2010) Effect of silver nanoparticles on the DC conductivity in chitosan-silver triflate polymer electrolyte. Phys B Phys Condens Matter 405:4429–4433.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physb.2010.08.008 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Aziz SB, Abidin ZHZ (2014) Electrical and morphological analysis of chitosan: AgTf solid electrolyte. Mater Chem Phys 144:280–286.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matchemphys.2013.12.029 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Aziz SB, Abidin ZHZ, Kadir MFZ (2015) Innovative method to avoid the reduction of silver ions to silver nanoparticles (Ag+ → Ag°) in silver ion conducting based polymer electrolytes. Phys Scr 90:035808.  https://doi.org/10.1088/0031-8949/90/3/035808 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Aziz SB, Abdullah OG, Rasheed MA (2017) A novel polymer composite with a small optical band gap: new approaches for photonics and optoelectronics. J Appl Polym Sci 134:10.  https://doi.org/10.1002/app.44847 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Aziz S, Abdullah R, Rasheed M et al (2017) Role of ion dissociation on DC conductivity and silver nanoparticle formation in PVA: AgNt based polymer electrolytes: deep insights to ion transport mechanism. Polymers (Basel) 9:338.  https://doi.org/10.3390/polym9080338 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Aziz SB, Rasheed MA, Abidin ZHZ (2017) Optical and electrical characteristics of silver ion conducting nanocomposite solid polymer electrolytes based on chitosan. J Electron Mater 46:6119–6130.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11664-017-5515-8 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Aziz SB (2017) Morphological and optical characteristics of chitosan(1−x): Cuxo (4 ≤ x ≤ 12) based polymer nano-composites: optical dielectric loss as an alternative method for Tauc’s model. Nanomaterials 7:444.  https://doi.org/10.3390/nano7120444 CrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Aziz S, Abdulwahid R, Rasheed M et al (2017) Polymer blending as a novel approach for tuning the SPR peaks of silver nanoparticles. Polymers (Basel) 9:486.  https://doi.org/10.3390/polym9100486 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Utku S, Yılmaz E, Türkmen D et al (2008) Ion-imprinted thermosensitive polymers for Fe3+ removal from human plasma. Hacettepe J Biol Chem 36:291–304Google Scholar
  46. 46.
    Aziz SB, Woo TJ, Kadir MFZ, Ahmed HM (2018) A conceptual review on polymer electrolytes and ion transport models. J Sci Adv Mater Devices 3:1–17.  https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JSAMD.2018.01.002 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Aziz SB (2013) Li+ ion conduction mechanism in poly(ε-caprolactone)-based polymer electrolyte. Iran Polym J 22:877–883.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s13726-013-0186-7 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Aziz SB, Abdullah O, Hussein S et al (2017) Effect of PVA blending on structural and ion transport properties of CS: AgNt-based polymer electrolyte membrane. Polymers (Basel) 9:622.  https://doi.org/10.3390/polym9110622 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Aziz SB (2016) Erratum to: Occurrence of electrical percolation threshold and observation of phase transition in chitosan(1−x): AgIx (0.05 ≤ x ≤ 0.2)-based ion-conducting solid polymer composites. Appl Phys A 122:785.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00339-016-0272-8 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Szu SP, Lin CY (2003) AC impedance studies of copper doped silica glass. Mater Chem Phys 282:295–300CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Kwok HL, Siu WC (1979) Carrier concentration and mobility in chemically sprayed cadmium sulphide thin films. Thin Solid Films 61:249–257CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    Buchner R, Stauber J, Barthel J (1999) The dielectric relaxation of water between 0 °C and 35 °C. Chem Phys Lett 306:57–63CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    Angulo-Sherman A, Mercado-Uribe H (2014) Water under inner pressure: a dielectric spectroscopy study. Phys Rev E 89:022406(1–5)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
    Aziz SB, Abdullah RM (2018) Crystalline and amorphous phase identification from the tanδ relaxation peaks and impedance plots in polymer blend electrolytes based on [CS:AgNt]x:PEO(x−1) (10 ≤ x ≤ 50). Electrochim Acta 285:30–46.  https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ELECTACTA.2018.07.233 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. 55.
    Kaatze U (1989) Complex permittivity of water as a function of frequency and temperature. J Chem Eng Data 34:371–374CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. 56.
    Prabakar K, Narayandass SK, Mangalaraj D (2003) Dielectric properties of Cd0.6Zn0.4Te thin films. Phys Status Solidi A 199:507–514CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. 57.
    Abdel Kader MM, Elzayat MY, Hammad TR, Aboud AI, Abdelmonem H (2011) Dielectric permittivity, AC conductivity and phase transition in hydroxyl ammonium sulfate. Phys Scr 83:1–7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. 58.
    Satter AA, Samy AR (2003) Dielectric properties of rare earth substituted Cu–Zn ferrites. Phys Status Solidi(a) 200:415–422CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. 59.
    Maurya D, Kumar J (2005) Dielectric-spectroscopic and a.c. conductivity studies on layered Na2-XKXTi3O7 (X = 0.2, 0.3, 0.4) ceramics. J Phys Chem Solids 66:1614–1620CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. 60.
    Maity S, Bhattacharya D, Ray SK (2011) Structural and impedance spectroscopy of pseudo-co-ablated (SrBi2Ta2O9)(1−x)–(La0.67Sr0.33MnO3)x composites. J Phys D Appl Phys 44:1–10CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. 61.
    Matheswaran P, Saravanakumar R, Velumani S (2010) AC and dielectric properties of vacuum evaporated InTe bilayer thin films. Mater Sci Eng B 174:269–272CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. 62.
    Moynihan CT (1994) Analysis of electrical relaxation in glasses and melts with large concentrations of mobile ions. J Non-Cryst Solids 172–174:1395–1407CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. 63.
    Moynihan CT, Boesch LP, Laberge NL (1973) Decay function for the electric field relaxation in vitreous ionic conductors. Phys Chem Glasses 14:122–125Google Scholar
  64. 64.
    Sural M, Ghosh A (1998) Electrical conductivity and conductivity relaxation in glasses. J Phys Condens Matter 10:10577–10586CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. 65.
    Sinclair DC, West AR (1989) Impedance and modulus spectroscopy of semiconducting BaTiO3 showing positive temperature coefficient of resistance. J Appl Phys 66:3850–3856CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. 66.
    Sinclair DC, West AR (1994) Effect of atmosphere on the PTCR properties of BaTiO3 ceramics. J Mater Sci 29:6061–6068CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. 67.
    Aziz SB, Karim WO, Qadir K, Zafar Q (2018) Proton ion conducting solid polymer electrolytes based on chitosan incorporated with various amounts of barium titanate (BaTiO3). Int J Electrochem Sci 13:6112–6125.  https://doi.org/10.20964/2018.06.38 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. 68.
    Aziz SB (2018) The Mixed contribution of ionic and electronic carriers to conductivity in chitosan based solid electrolytes mediated by CuNt salt. J Inorg Organomet Polym Mater 28:1942–1952.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10904-018-0862-3 CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Chemistry, Faculty of Science and LettersDuzce UniversityDüzceTurkey
  2. 2.Department of Physics, Faculty of Arts and SciencesDüzce UniversityDüzceTurkey
  3. 3.Department of ChemistryHacettepe UniversityAnkaraTurkey

Personalised recommendations