Polymer Bulletin

, Volume 76, Issue 6, pp 2801–2817 | Cite as

Multi-walled carbon nanotubes buckypaper/epoxy composites: effect of loading and pressure on tensile and electrical properties

  • W. A. D. Wan Dalina
  • M. MariattiEmail author
  • S. H. Tan
Original Paper


Carbon nanotubes (CNT) thin sheets known as buckypaper have been used as an alternative to particulate CNT filler in the fabrication of CNT/epoxy nanocomposites. The use of CNT buckypaper is on innovative process which converts the nanomaterials into an easy-to-handle form, making them ready to be incorporated into existing fabrication lines. The properties and qualities of the buckypapers produced are affected by the varieties in the fabrication methods implemented and the quality of the CNT. Very few studies have been recorded on the properties of CNT buckypaper with respect to the vacuum filter pressure together with filler loading. Hence, this research is aimed to investigate the combination effect of vacuum pressure and MWCNT loading during the vacuum filtration process. It was found that the vacuum pressure and MWCNT loading caused a significant effect on the porosity and surface roughness of buckypapers with low MWCNT loading. This subsequently influences the tensile properties and electrical conductivities of the epoxy-filled buckypaper composites.


Buckypaper Composites Carbon nanotubes Tensile properties Electrical conductivity 



We would like to express our gratitude to the Ministry of Higher Education (MOHE) and for Universiti Sains Malaysia supporting us through MyBrain15 (myPhD) program and Fundamental Research Grant (Grant No. 6071284), respectively, which made this study possible. Funding was provided by Fundamental Research Grant (Research Universiti Grant [Grant No. 814153]).


  1. 1.
    Li Y, Krӧger M (2012) A theoretical evaluation of the effects of carbon nanotube entanglement and bundling on the structural and mechanical properties of buckypaper. Carbon 50:1793–1806. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Zhang J, Jiang D (2012) Influence of geometries of multi-walled carbon nanotubes on the pore structures of Buckypaper. Compos A 43:469–474. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Rigueur JL, Hasan SA, Mahajan SV, Dickerson JH (2010) Buckypaper fabrication by liberation of electrophoretically deposited carbon nanotubes. Carbon 48:4090–4099. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Kim S-K, Kim JT, Kim H-C, Rhee K-Y, Kathi J (2012) Thermal and mechanical properties of epoxy/carbon fiber composites reinforced with multi-walled carbon nanotubes. J Macromol Sci Part B Phys 51:358–367. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Lopes PE, Hattum FV, Pereira CMC, Nóvoa PJRO, Forero S, Hepp F, Pambaguian L (2010) High CNT content composites with CNT buckypaper and epoxy resin matrix: impregnation behaviour composite production and characterization. Compos Struct 92:1291–1298. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Saeb MR, Bakhshandeh E, Khonakdar HA, Mäder E, Scheffler C, Heinrich G (2013) Cure kinetics of epoxy nanocomposites affected by MWCNTs functionalization: a review. Sci World J. Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Zou W, Z-j Du, Y-x Liu, Yang X, H-q Li, Zhang C (2008) Functionalization of MWNTs using polyacryloyl chloride and the properties of CNT–epoxy matrix nanocomposites. Compos Sci Technol 68:3259–3264. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Ma P-C, Kim J-K (2011) Carbon nanotubes for polymer reinforcement. Taylor & Francis, Boca RatonGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Ma P-C, Siddiqui NA, Marom G, Kim J-K (2010) Dispersion and functionalization of carbon nanotubes for polymer-based nanocomposites: a review. Compos A 41:1345–1367. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Chapartegui M, Barcena J, Irastorza X, Elizetxea C, Fernandez M, Santamaria A (2012) Analysis of the conditions to manufacture a MWCNT buckypaper/benzoxazine nanocomposite. Compos Sci Technol 72:489–497. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Whitby RLD, Fukuda T, Maekawa T, James SL, Mikhalovsky SV (2008) Geometric control and tuneable pore size distribution of buckypaper and buckydiscs. Carbon 46:949–956. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Yee KF, Ong YT, Mohamed AR, Tan SH (2014) Novel MWCNT-buckypaper/polyvinyl alcohol asymmetric membrane for dehydration of etherification reaction mixture: fabrication, characterisation and application. J Membrane Sci 453:546–555. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Ashrafi B, Guan J, Mirjalili V, Hubert P, Simard B, Johnston A (2010) Correlation between Young’s modulus and impregnation quality of epoxy-impregnated SWCNT buckypaper. Compos A 41(9):1184–1191. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Komarov FF, Milchanin OV, Munoz E, Rodionova VN, Karpovich VB, Krivosheev RM (2011) Attenuation of microwave electromagnetic radiation by means of buckypaper. Tech Phys 56:1679–1684. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Young JP (2009) Continuous buckypaper manufacturing process: process investigation and improvement. Florida State University College of Engineering, TallahasseeGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Han J-H, Zhang H, Chu P-F, Imani A, Zhang Z (2015) Friction and wear of high electrical conductive carbon nanotube buckypaper/epoxy composites. Compos Sci Technol 114:1–10. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Wang Z, Liang Z, Wang B, Zhang C, Kramer L (2004) Processing and property investigation of single-walled carbon nanotube (SWNT) buckypaper/epoxy resin matrix nanocomposites. Compos A 35:1225–1232. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Ramón-Torregrosa PJ, Rodríguez-Valverde MA, Amirfazli A, Cabrerizo-Vílchez MA (2008) Factors affecting the measurement of roughness factor of surfaces and its implications for wetting studies. Colloids Surf A 323:83–93. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Ansón-Casaos A, González-Domínguez JM, Terrado E, Martínez MT (2010) Surfactant-free assembling of functionalized single-walled carbon nanotube buckypapers. Carbon 48:1480–1488. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Wan Dalina WAD (2017) Fabrication and properties of multi-walled carbon nanotubes filled woven glass fibre reinforced epoxy laminated hybrid composites. Universiti Sains MalaysiaGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Han J-H, Zhang H, Chen M-J, Wang G-R, Zhang Z (2014) CNT buckypaper/thermoplastic polyurethane composites with enhanced stiffness, strength and toughness. Compos Sci Technol 103:63–71. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Fu S-Y, Feng X-Q, Lauke B, Mai Y-W (2008) Effects of particle size, particle/matrix interface adhesion and particle loading on mechanical properties of particulate–polymer composites. Compos B 39:933–961. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Ghaleb ZA, Mariatti M, Ariff ZM (2014) Properties of graphene nanopowder and multi-walled carbon nanotube-filled epoxy thin-film nanocomposites for electronic applications: the effect of sonication time and filler loading. Compos A 58:77–83. CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Materials and Mineral Resources Engineering, Engineering CampusUniversiti Sains MalaysiaNibong Tebal, Seberang Perai SelatanMalaysia
  2. 2.School of Chemical Engineering, Engineering CampusUniversiti Sains MalaysiaNibong Tebal, Seberang Perai SelatanMalaysia

Personalised recommendations