Advertisement

Polymer Bulletin

, Volume 76, Issue 5, pp 2179–2196 | Cite as

Subsurface mechanical properties and subsurface creep behaviour of modified nanoclay-based wood–plastic composites studied by nanoindentation

  • Sumit Manohar YadavEmail author
  • Kamal Bin Yusoh
Original Paper
  • 37 Downloads

Abstract

Wood–plastic composites (WPCs) were prepared by polypropylene, wood flour, maleic anhydride-grafted polypropylene and pristine (Na+ montmorillonite)/TMI-modified nanoclay using extruder followed by injection moulding technique. The surface mechanical properties of the nanoclay-based WPC were investigated by means of nanoindentation technique. The results show that the hardness, elastic modulus and creep resistant of the WPC dramatically enhanced with the incorporation of nanoclay. This enhancement was dependent on the nanoclay content as well as the dispersion of nanoclay in the polymer matrix. At 1 wt% nanoclay content, the hardness, elastic modulus and creep resistant of pristine nanoclay-reinforced WPC (WPC/MMT) improved by approximately 35%, 30% and 15%, respectively, compared to WPC without nanoclay. For the TMI-modified nanoclay-based WPC (WPC/MMT Cu), the improvements in these properties were about 1.2, 1.5 and 1.5 times higher than the WPC/MMT. Viscoelastic model was applied to examine the effect of nanoclay loadings on the creep performance of the WPC. Results exhibited that the model was in good agreement with the experimental data. Incorporation of nanoclay leads to an increase in elastic deformation, especially in WPC/MMT Cu, and induces a higher initial displacement at the early stage of creep.

Keywords

Wood–plastic composites Nanoclay Nanoindentation Subsurface mechanical properties Subsurface creep behaviour 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The author is thankful to University Malaysia Pahang for providing postgraduate scholarship and funding (GRS No. 1403133) to complete this research.

References

  1. 1.
    Lee SH, Wang S (2006) Biodegradable polymers/bamboo fiber biocomposite with bio-based coupling agent. Compos Part A Appl Sci Manuf 37(1):80–91CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Hosseinaei O, Wang S, Enayati AA, Rials TG (2012) Effects of hemicellulose extraction on properties of wood flour and wood–plastic composites. Compos Part A Appl Sci Manuf 43(4):686–694CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Bakraji EH, Salman N (2003) Properties of wood–plastic composites: effect of inorganic additives. Radiat Phys Chem 66:49–53CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Mwaikambo LY, Ansell MP (1999) The effect of chemical treatment on the properties of hemp, sisal, jute and kapok fibres for composite reinforcement. Die angewandte makromolekulare Chemie 272(1):108–116CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Ashori A, Sheshmani S, Farhani F (2013) Preparation and characterization of bagasse/HDPE composites using multi-walled carbon nanotubes. Carbohydr Polym 92(1):865–871CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Faruk O, Matuana LM (2008) Nanoclay reinforced HDPE as a matrix for wood–plastic composites. Compos Sci Technol 68(9):2073–2077CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Najafi A, Kord B, Abdi A, Ranaee S (2012) The impact of the nature of nanoclay on physical and mechanical properties of polypropylene/reed flour nanocomposites. J Thermoplast Compos Mater 25(6):717–727CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Olphen HV (1977) An introduction to clay colloidal chemistry. Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Giannelis EP (1996) Polymer layered silicate nanocomposites. Adv Mater 8(1):29–35CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Dutta AK, Penumadu D, Files B (2004) Nanoindentation testing for evaluating modulus and hardness of single-walled carbon nanotube–reinforced epoxy composites. J Mater Res 19(01):158–164CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Li X, Gao H, Scrivens WA, Fei D, Xu X, Sutton MA, Reynolds AP, Myrick ML (2004) Nanomechanical characterization of single-walled carbon nanotube reinforced epoxy composites. Nanotechnology 15(11):1416CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Downing TD, Kumar R, Cross WM, Kjerengtroen L, Kellar JJ (2000) Determining the interphase thickness and properties in polymer matrix composites using phase imaging atomic force microscopy and nanoindentation. J Adhes Sci Technol 14(14):1801–1812CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Gao SL, Mader E (2002) Characterisation of interphase nanoscale property variations in glass fiber reinforced polypropylene and epoxy resin composites. Compos Part A 33:559–576CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    VanLandingham MR, Villarrubia JS, Guthrie WF, Meyers GF (2001) Nanoindentation of polymers, an overview, advances in scanning probe microscopy of polymers. Macromol Symp 167:15–43CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Munz M, Sturm H, Schulz E, Hinrichsen G (1998) The scanning force microscope as a tool for the detection of local mechanical properties within the interphase of fiber reinforced polymers. Compos Part A 29A:1251–1259CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Nawani P, Gelfer MY, Hsiao BS, Frenekl A, Gilman JW, Khalid S (2007) Surface modification of nanoclays by catalytically active transition metal ions. Langmuir 23:9808–9815CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM) (2002) ASTM D618-99:2002 Annual book of ASTM standards. American Society for Testing and Materials, West ConshohockenGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    ASTM D 792 (2004) Annual book of ASTM standards. 8.02. American Society for Testing and Materials, ConshohockenGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    International Organisation for Standarisation, ISO 14577-1.2 (2001), pp 1–27Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Oliver WC, Pharr GM (1992) An improved technique for determining hardness and elastic modulus using load and displacement sensing indentation experiments. J Mater Res 7(6):1564–1583CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Hakamy A, Shaikh FUA, Low IM (2014) Thermal and mechanical properties of hemp fabric-reinforced nanoclay–cement nanocomposites. J Mater Sci 49(4):1684–1694CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Yeh SK, Kim KJ, Gupta RK (2013) Synergistic effect of coupling agents on polypropylene-based wood–plastic composites. J Appl Polym Sci 127(2):1047–1053CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Shen L, Tjiu WC, Liu T (2005) Nanoindentation and morphological studies on injection-molded nylon-6 nanocomposites. Polymer 46:11969–11977CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Cahn RW (ed) (2005) Concise encyclopedia of materials characterization, 2nd edn. Elsevier, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Shen L, Phang IY, Chen L, Liu T, Zeng K (2004) Nanoindentation and morphological studies on nylon 66 nanocomposites. I. Effect of clay loading. Polymer 45(10):3341–3349CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Schadler LS (2003) Polymer‐based and polymer‐filled nanocomposites. Wiley‐VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim, pp 77–153Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Yang S, Zhang YW, Zeng K (2004) Analysis of nanoindentation creep for polymeric materials. J Appl Phys 95(7):3655–3666CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Wood and Paper SciencesKyungpook National UniversityDaeguRepublic of Korea
  2. 2.Faculty of Chemical Engineering and Natural Resources EngineeringUniversiti Malaysia PahangKuantanMalaysia

Personalised recommendations