Springer Nature is making SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 research free. View research | View latest news | Sign up for updates

Blockchain and society


In this text, the origin of blockchain technology is explained and put into the context of three waves of digitalization: digitalization of information represented by the internet, digitalization of communities and community building tools represented by social media and digitalization of value represented by blockchain. The text will show that blockchain can bring back promised features of digitalization of the first two waves, features that were lost with centralization tendencies created by business models that are independent of the underlying technology. After a short introduction to the terminology, a map of the potential blockchain has for society is sketched. The text also debates the decentralization aspects of the technology and the challenges it poses for individuals and organizations. Later, the storytelling aspects, as well as some religious aspects within and around the blockchain community are analyzed. Finally, some thoughts about adoption scenarios are laid out, and some ideas why blockchains have become very important in Switzerland are formulated. The focus of this text is on the opportunities and strengths of the technology. It deliberately oversimplifies the technological aspects in order to focus on the implication of the technology on society.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.


  1. 1.

  2. 2.

  3. 3.

  4. 4.

  5. 5.

  6. 6.


  1. 1.

    Kaplan A (1964) The conduct of inquiry: methodology for behavioral science. Chandler Publishing Co, San Francisco

  2. 2.

    Goodman P (1968) People or personnel: decentralising and the mixed systems. Vintage Books, New York

  3. 3.

    Xu X, Weber I, Staples M, Zhu L, Bosch J, Bass L, Pautasso C, Rimba P (2017) A taxonomy of Blockchain-based systems for architecture design. Accessed 10 Jan 2019 (Conference: ICSA’17: IEEE International Conference on Software Architecture 0.1109/ICSA.2017.33)

  4. 4.

    Ballandies MC, Dapp MM, Pournaras E (2018) Decrypting distributed ledger design—taxonomy, classification and blockchain community evaluation. Accessed 10 Jan 2019

  5. 5.

    Nickerson RC, Varshney U, Muntermann J (2013) A method for taxonomy development and its application in information systems. Eur J Inf Syst 22(3):336–359

  6. 6.

    Szabo N (1997) Formalizing and Securing Relationships on Public Networks, First Monday Volume 2, Number 9—1 September 1997. Accessed 10 Jan 2019

  7. 7.

    Gilbert S, Lynch N (2002) Brewer’s conjecture and the feasibility ofconsistent, available, partition-tolerant web services. ACM Sigact News 33(2):51–59

  8. 8.

    The Economist (2015) The trust machine. Economist 31st:p10ff

  9. 9.

    Tasca P (2015) Digital currencies: principles, trends, opportunities, and risks, ECUREX research working paper. (Created 7 Sept 2015). Accessed 10 Jan 2019

  10. 10.

    Shiller RJ (2019) Narrative Economics, January 2017 Cowles Foundation Discussion paper No. 2069. Accessed 10 Jan 2019

  11. 11.

    Agre PE (2003) Peer-to-peer and the promise of Internet equality, communications of the ACM, 46(2), 39–42. Accessed 10 Jan 2019

  12. 12.

    Reijers W, Coeckelbergh M (2019) The blockchain as a narrative technology: investigating the social ontology and normative configurations of cryptocurrencies. Philos Technol 31(8):103.

  13. 13.

    DuPont Q (2014) The politics of cryptography: Bitcoin and the ordering machines. J Peer Prod 1:1–10

  14. 14.

    Yinger JM (1970) The scientific study of religion. Macmillan, London

  15. 15.

    Bruce S (1995) Religion in modern britain. Oxford University Press, Oxford

  16. 16.

    Liberman V, Samuels SM, Ross L (2004) The name of the game: predictive power of reputations versus situational labels in determining prisoner’s dilemma game moves. Pers Soc Psychol Bull.

  17. 17.

    Tavneet Suri WJ (2016) The long-run poverty and gender impacts of mobile money. Science 354(6317):1288–1292.

  18. 18.

    DuPont Q A history and ethnography of “The DAO,” a failed decentralized autonomous organization, Cryptocurrencies, Blockchains, and Global Governancem, Edited ByMalcolm Campbell-Verduyn, Chapter 8, Experiments in algorithmic governance. Accessed 10 Jan 2019

  19. 19.

    Tumasjan A, Beutel T (2018) Blockchain-based decentralized business models in the sharing economy: a technology adoption perspective, business transformation through blockchain, publisher: Palgrave Macmillan. Accessed 10 Jan 2019

Download references

Author information

Correspondence to Toni Caradonna.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Caradonna, T. Blockchain and society. Informatik Spektrum (2020).

Download citation