Glycine Betaine Effect on Dormancy in Deinococcus sp. UDEC-P1 and Psychrobacter sp. UDEC-A5 Exposed to Hyperosmotic Stress
- 23 Downloads
Bacteria under stress increase the proportion of dormant cells to ensure their survival. Cold and osmotic stress are similar, because in both the availability of water is reduced. Glycine betaine (GB) is one of the most common osmoprotectants in bacteria and possesses cryoprotectant properties. Our aim was to determine whether GB modifies the proportion of dormant Deinococcus sp. UDEC-P1 and Psychrobacter sp. UDEC-A5 cells exposed to osmotic stress. Both bacterial strains were incubated in the presence of up to 1 M NaCl with or without GB. Active and dormant cells were evaluated by both spectrophotometric and flow cytometry analysis. Without GB, Deinococcus sp. UDEC-P1 grew in the presence of 0.05 M NaCl, but with 5 mM GB grew at 0.1 M NaCl. Psychrobacter sp. UDEC-A5 grew in the presence of up to 0.25 M NaCl, but with 5 mM GB grew at 0.5 M NaCl. Under osmotic stress, the proportion of dormant cells of Deinococcus sp. UDEC-P1 and Psychrobacter sp. UDEC-A5 increased significantly (about eightfold and fivefold, respectively). The addition of GB (5 mM) exerted a different effect on the two strains, since it avoided the entrance into the dormancy of Psychrobacter sp. UDEC-A5 cells, but not of Deinococcus sp. UDEC-P1 cells. Our results suggest that the effect of GB on bacterial metabolism is strain dependent. For bacteria in which GB avoids dormancy, such as Psychrobacter sp. UDEC-A5, it could be a “double-edged sword” by reducing the “seed bank” available to recover the active population when favorable conditions return.
This study was supported by grant Enlace VRID 214.036.041-1.0. The authors would like to thank Miss Ruth Contreras for her technical support and to the “Centro de Microscopía Avanzada” (CMA BioBio, University of Concepcion, Chile) for the cytometry analyses.
Compliance with Ethical Standards
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
- 8.Darcan C, Ozkanca R, Idil O, Flint KP (2009) Viable but non-culturable state (VBNC) of Escherichia coli related to EnvZ under the effect of pH, starvation and osmotic stress in sea water. Pol J Microbiol 58:307–317Google Scholar
- 9.Guerra M, González K, González C, Parra B, Martínez M (2015) Dormancy in Deinococcus sp. UDEC-P1 as a survival strategy to escape from deleterious effects of carbon starvation and temperature. Int Microbiol 18:189–194Google Scholar
- 17.Beumer RR, TeGiffel MC, Cox LJ, Rombouts FM, Abee T (1994) Effect of exogenous proline, betaine, and carnitine on growth of Listeria monocytogenes in a minimal medium. Appl Environ Microbiol 60:1359–1363Google Scholar
- 18.Herbert RA (1990) Methods for enumerating microorganisms and determining biomass in natural environments. In: Grigorova R, Norris W (eds) Methods in microbiology. Techniques in microbial ecology. Elsevier, London, pp 1–39Google Scholar
- 25.Scholz A, Stahl J, Berardinis V, Müller V, Averhoff B (2016) Osmotic stress response in Acinetobacter baylyi: identification of a glycine-betaine biosynthesis pathway and regulation of osmoadaptive choline uptake and glycine betaine synthesis through a choline-responsive BetI repressor. Env Microbiol Rep 8:316–322CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 30.Csonka LN (1989) Physiological and genetic responses of bacteria to osmotic stress. Microbiol Rev 53:121–147Google Scholar