Advertisement

Current Microbiology

, Volume 76, Issue 3, pp 382–391 | Cite as

Biosurfactant-Producing Capability and Prediction of Functional Genes Potentially Beneficial to Microbial Enhanced Oil Recovery in Indigenous Bacterial Communities of an Onshore Oil Reservoir

  • Thanachai Phetcharat
  • Pinan Dawkrajai
  • Thararat Chitov
  • Wuttichai Mhuantong
  • Verawat Champreda
  • Sakunnee BovonsombutEmail author
Article
  • 22 Downloads

Abstract

Microbial enhanced oil recovery (MEOR) is a bio-based technology with economic and environmental benefits. The success of MEOR depends greatly on the types and characteristics of indigenous microbes. The aim of this study was to evaluate the feasibility of applying MEOR at Mae Soon Reservoir, an onshore oil reservoir experiencing a decline in its production rate. We investigated the capability of the reservoir’s bacteria to produce biosurfactants, and evaluated the potentials of uncultured indigenous bacteria to support MEOR by means of prediction of MEOR-related functional genes, based on a set of metagenomic 16s rRNA gene data. The biosurfactant-producing bacteria isolated from the oil-bearing sandstones from the reservoir belonged to one species: Bacillus licheniformis, with one having the ability to decrease surface tension from 72 to 32 mN/m. Gene sequences responsible for biosurfactant (licA3), lipase (lipP1) and catechol 2,3-dioxygenase (C23O) were detected in these isolates. The latter two, and other genes encoding MEOR-related functional proteins such as enoyl-CoA hydratase and alkane 1-monooxygenase, were predicted in the bacterial communities residing the reservoir’s sandstones. Exposure of these sandstones to nutrients, consisting of KNO3 and NaH2PO4, resulted in an increase in the proportions of some predicted functional genes. These results indicated the potentials of MEOR application at Mae Soon site. Using the approaches demonstrated in this study would also assist evaluation of the feasibility of applying MEOR in oil reservoirs, which may be enhanced by an appropriate nutrient treatment.

Notes

Acknowledgements

This research work was facilitated and partially supported by Chiang Mai University (CMU), Northern Petroleum Development Center (NPDC), The National Center for Genetic Engineering and Biotechnology (BIOTEC), and was financially funded by the National Research Council of Thailand, NPDC, and CMU Graduate School. The authors would like to thank the staff members of the NPDC, Chiang Mai, Thailand, for their assistance in the field sampling and Dr. Denis Sweatman (CMU) for his kind assistance in proofreading the manuscript.

Supplementary material

284_2019_1641_MOESM1_ESM.xlsx (26 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (XLSX 25 KB)

References

  1. 1.
    Afrapoli MS, Crescente C, Alipour S, Torsaeter O (2009) The effect of bacterial solution on the wettability index and residual oil saturation in sandstone. J Petrol Sci Eng 69:255–260.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.petrol.2009.09.002 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Agari Y, Kashihara A, Yokoyama S, Kuramitsu S, Shinkai A (2008) Global gene expression mediated by Thermus thermophilus SdrP, a CRP/FNR family transcriptional regulator. Mol Microbiol 70:60–75CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Almeida P, Moreira R, Almeida R, Guimarães AK, Carvalho AS, Quintella C, Esperidiã CMC, Taft CA (2004) Selection and application of microorganisms to improve oil recovery. Eng Life Sci 4:319–325CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Amann RI, Ludwig W, Schleifer KH (1995) Phylogenetic identification and in situ detection of individual microbial cells without cultivation. Microbiol Rev 59:143–169Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Arai H, Kodama T, Igarashi Y (1997) Cascade regulation of the two CRP/FNR-related transcriptional regulators (ANR and DNR) and the denitrification enzymes in Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Mol Microbiol 25:1141–1148CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Atlas RM (2005) Handbook of media for environmental microbiology. CRC Press, Boca RatonGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Auerbach G, Ostendorp R, Prade L, Korndörfer I, Dams T, Huber R, Jaenicke R (1998) Lactate dehydrogenase from the hyperthermophilic bacterium Thermotoga maritima: the crystal structure at 2.1 Å resolution reveals strategies for intrinsic protein stabilization. Structure 6:769–781CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Aurepatipan N, Champreda V, Kanokratana P, Chitov T, Bovonsombut S (2018) Assessment of bacterial communities and activities of thermotolerant enzymes produced by bacteria indigenous to oil-bearing sandstone cores for potential application in Enhanced Oil Recovery. J Pet Sci Eng 163:295–302CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Azubuike CC, Chikere CB, Okpokwasil GC (2016) Bioremediation techniques—classification based on site of application: principles, advantages, limitations and prospects. World J Microbiol Biotechnol 32:180.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11274-016-2137-x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Bahnson BJ, Anderson VE, Petsko GA (2002) Structural mechanism of enoyl-CoA hydratase: three atoms from a single water are added in either an E1cb stepwise or concerted fashion. Biochemetry 41:2621–2629CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Banat IM, Franzetti A, Gandolfi I, Bestetti G, Martinotti MG, Fracchia L, Smyth TJ, Marchant R (2010) Microbial biosurfactants production, applications and future potential. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 87:427–444CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Barstow DA, Clarke AR, Chia WN, Wigley D, Sharman AF, Holbrook JJ, Atkinson T, Minton NP (1986) Cloning, expression and complete nucleotide sequence of the Bacillus stearothermophilusl-lactate dehydrogenase gene. Gene 46:47–55CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Black PN, DiRusso CC (2003) Transmembrane movement of exogenous long-chain fatty acids: proteins, enzymes, and vectorial esterification. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev 67:454–472CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Bordoloi N, Konwar B (2008) Microbial surfactant-enhanced mineral oil recovery under laboratory conditions. Colloid Surf B 63:73–82CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Brown L, Vadie A (1998) The utilization of the microflora indigenous to and present in oil-bearing formations to selectively plug the more porous zones thereby increasing oil recovery during waterflooding. Department of Energy, Washington, DC.  https://doi.org/10.2172/16011 Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Brown L, Vadie A, Stephens J (2000) Slowing production decline and extending the economic life of an oil field: new MEOR technology. SPE J.  https://doi.org/10.2523/59306-MS Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Brown L (2010) Microbial enhanced oil recovery (MEOR). Curr Opin Microbiol 13:316–320CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Da Cunha CD, Rosado AS, Sebastián GV, Seldin L, von der Weid I (2006) Oil biodegradation by Bacillus strains isolated from the rock of an oil reservoir located in a deep-water production basin in Brazil. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 73:949–959CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Das P, Mukherjee S, Sen R (2008) Genetic regulations of the biosynthesis of microbial surfactants: an overview. Biotechnol Genet Eng Rev 25:165–186CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    De Clerck E, Gevers D, De Ridder K, De Vos P (2004) Screening of bacterial contamination during gelatine production by means of denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis, focussed on Bacillus and related endospore-forming genera. J Appl Microbiol 96:1333–1341CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Donaldson EC, Chilingarian GV, Yen TF (1989) Microbial enhanced oil recovery. Elsevier Science, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Duhamel M, Wehr SD, Yu L, Rizvi H, Seepersad D, Dworatzek S, Cox EE, Edwards EA (2002) Comparison of anaerobic dechlorinating enrichment cultures maintained on tetrachloroethene, trichloroethene, cis-dichloroethene and vinyl chloride. Water Res 36:4193–4202CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    El-Sheshtawy HS, Aiad I, Osman ME, Abo-Elnasr AA, Kobisy AS (2016) Production of biosurfactant from Bacillus licheniformis for microbial enhanced oil recovery and inhibition the growth of sulfate reducing bacteria. Egypt J Pet 24:155–162.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejpe.2015.05.005 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Garvie EI (1980) Bacterial lactate dehydrogenases. Microbiol Rev 44:106Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Gudiña EJ, Pereira JF, Costa R, Coutinho JA, Teixeira JA, Rodrigues LR (2013) Biosurfactant-producing and oil-degrading Bacillus subtilis strains enhance oil recovery in laboratory sand-pack columns. J Hazard Mater 261:106–113CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Hall C, Tharakan P, Hallock J, Cleveland C, Jefferson M (2003) Hydrocarbons and the evolution of human culture. Nature 426:318–322CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Hao R, Lu A, Wang G (2004) Crude-oil-degrading thermophilic bacterium isolated from an oil field. Can J Microbiol 50:175–182CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Head IM, Jones DM, Larter SR (2003) Biological activity in the deep subsurface and the origin of heavy oil. Nature 426:344CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Kanehisa M, Goto S, Kawashima S, Okuno Y, Hattori M (2004) The KEGG resource for deciphering the genome. Nucleic Acids Res 32:277–280CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Kanwar L, Gogoi BK, Goswami P (2002) Production of a Pseudomonas lipase in n-alkane substrate and its isolation using an improved ammonium sulfate precipitation technique. Bioresour Technol 84:207–211CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Kato T, Haruki M, Imanaka T, Morikawa M, Kanaya S (2001) Isolation and characterization of long-chain-alkane degrading Bacillus thermoleovorans from deep subterranean petroleum reservoirs. J Biosci Bioeng 91:64–70CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Kaur G, Singh A, Sharma R, Sharma V, Verma S, Sharma PK (2016) Cloning, expression, purification and characterization of lipase from Bacillus licheniformis, isolated from hot spring of Himachal Pradesh, India. 3 Biotech 6:49.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s13205-016-0369-y CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Langille MG, Zaneveld J, Caporaso JG, McDonald D, Knights D, Reyes JA, Clemente JC, Burkepile DE, Thurber RLV, Knight R, Beiko RG, Huttenhower C (2013) Predictive functional profiling of microbial communities using 16S rRNA marker gene sequences. Nat Biotechnol 31:814–821CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Lin SC, Lin KG, Lo CC, Lin YM (1998) Enhanced biosurfactant production by a Bacillus licheniformis mutant. Enzym Microb Technol 23:267–273CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Lin SC, Minton MA, Sharma MM, Georgiou G (1994) Structural and immunological characterization of a biosurfactant produced by Bacillus licheniformis JF-2. Appl Environ Microbiol 60:31–38Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Maier R, Soberon-Chavez G (2000) Pseudomonas aeruginosa rhamnolipids: biosynthesis and potential applications. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 54:625–633CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Meyer M, Stenzel U, Hofreiter M (2008) Parallel tagged sequencing on the 454 platform. Nat Protoc 3:267–278.  https://doi.org/10.1038/nprot.2007.520 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Miller CE, Williams PH, Ketley JM (2009) Pumping iron: mechanisms for iron uptake by Campylobacter. Microbiol 155:3157–3165CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Mishra S, Singh S (2012) Microbial degradation of n-hexadecane in mineral salt medium as mediated by degradative enzymes. Bioresour Technol 111:148–154CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Nasiri H (2011) Enzymes for enhanced oil recovery (EOR). Dissertation, Technical University of DenmarkGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Pallant J (2013) SPSS survival manual. McGraw-Hill Education, LondonGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Pereira JF, Gudiña EJ, Costa R, Vitorino R, Teixeira JA, Coutinho JAP, Rodrigues LR (2013) Optimization and characterization of biosurfactant production by Bacillus subtilis isolates towards microbial enhanced oil recovery applications. Fuel 111:259–268CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Petersen H, Nytoft H, Ratanasthien B, Foopatthanakamol A (2007) Oils from cenozoic rift-basins in central and northern Thailand: source and thermal maturity. J Pet Geol 30:59–78CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Phetcharat T, Dawkrajai P, Chitov T, Wongpornchai P, Saenton S, Mhuantong W, Kanokratana P, Champreda V, Bovonsombut S (2018) Effect of inorganic nutrients on bacterial community composition in oil-bearing sandstones from the subsurface strata of an onshore oil reservoir and its potential use in Microbial Enhanced Oil Recovery. PLoS ONE 13:e0198050.  https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0198050 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Pornsunthorntawee O, Arttaweeporn N, Paisanjit S, Somboonthanate P, Abe M, Rujiravanit R, Chavadej S (2008) Isolation and comparison of biosurfactants produced by Bacillus subtilis PT2 and Pseudomonas aeruginosa SP4 for microbial surfactant-enhanced oil recovery. Biochem Eng J 42:172–179CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Prabhu Y, Phale P (2003) Biodegradation of phenanthrene by Pseudomonas sp. strain PP2: novel metabolic pathway, role of biosurfactant and cell surface hydrophobicity in hydrocarbon assimilation. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 61:342–351CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Racey A (2011) Chap. 13 petroleum geology. In: Ridd MF, Barber AJ, Crow MJ (eds) The geology of Thailand. Geological Society of London, LondonGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Rojo F (2009) Degradation of alkanes by bacteria. Environ Microbiol 11:2477–2490CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Ron EZ, Rosenberg E (2001) Natural roles of biosurfactants. Environ microbiol 3:229–236CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Sait M, Hugenholtz P, Janssen PH (2002) Cultivation of globally distributed soil bacteria from phylogenetic lineages previously only detected in cultivation-independent surveys. Environ Microbiol 4:654–666CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Sakai Y, Maeng JH, Tani Y, Kato N (1994) Use of long-chain n-alkanes (C13–C44) by an isolate, Acinetobacter sp. M-1. Biosci Biotechnol Biochem 58:2128–2130CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    Sen R (2008) Biotechnology in petroleum recovery: The microbial EOR. Progr Energy Combust Sci 34:714–724.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pecs.2008.05.001 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    Sepahy AA, Assadi MM, Saggadian V, Noohi A (2005) Production of biosurfactant from Iranian oil fields by isolated Bacilli. Int J Environ Sci Technol 1:287–293CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
    Simou OM, Pantazaki AA (2014) Evidence for lytic transglycosylase and β-N-acetylglucosaminidase activities located at the polyhydroxyalkanoates (PHAs) granules of Thermus thermophilus HB8. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 98:1205–1221CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. 55.
    Simpson DR, Natraj NR, McInerney MJ, Duncan KE (2011) Biosurfactant-producing Bacillus are present in produced brines from Oklahoma oil reservoirs with a wide range of salinities. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 91:1083–1093CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. 56.
    Swaathy S, Kavitha V, Pravin AS, Mandal AB, Gnanamani A (2014) Microbial surfactant mediated degradation of anthracene in aqueous phase by marine Bacillus licheniformis MTCC 5514. Biotechnol Rep 4:162–170Google Scholar
  57. 57.
    Thaniyavarn J, Roongsawang N, Kameyama T, Haruki M, Imanaka T, Morikawa M, Kanaya S (2003) Production and characterization of biosurfactants from Bacillus licheniformis F2. 2. Biosci Biotechnol Biochem 67:1239–1244CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. 58.
    Thomas S (2008) Enhanced oil recovery—an overview. Oil Gas Sci Technol Rev IFP 63:9–19.  https://doi.org/10.2516/ogst:2007060 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. 59.
    Tomita T, Kuzuyama T, Nishiyama M (2006) Alteration of coenzyme specificity of lactate dehydrogenase from Thermus thermophilus by introducing the loop region of NADP(H)-dependent malate dehydrogenase. Biosci Biotechnol Biochem 70:2230–2235CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. 60.
    Tugrul T, Cansunar E (2005) Detecting surfactant-producing microorganisms by the drop-collapse test. World J Microbiol Biotechnol 21:851–853CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. 61.
    Ueki A, Ueki K, Oguma A, Ohtsuki C (1989) Partition of electrons between methanogenesis and sulfate reduction in the anaerobic digestion of animal waste. J Gen Appl Microbiol 35:151–162CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. 62.
    Van Hamme JD, Singh A, Ward OP (2003) Recent advances in petroleum microbiology. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev 67:503–549CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. 63.
    Vos P, Garrity G, Jones D, Krieg NR, Ludwig W, Rainey FA, Schleifer KH, Whitman W (2011) Bergey’s manual of systematic bacteriology. Vol 3: The Firmicutes. Springer, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  64. 64.
    Wang J, Ma T, Zhao L, Lv J, Li G, Zhang H, Zhao B, Liang F, Liu R (2008) Monitoring exogenous and indigenous bacteria by PCR-DGGE technology during the process of microbial enhanced oil recovery. J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol 35:619–628CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. 65.
    Wang LY, Ke WJ, Sun XB, Liu JF, Gu JD, Mu BZ (2014) Comparison of bacterial community in aqueous and oil phases of water-flooded petroleum reservoirs using pyrosequencing and clone library approaches. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 98:4209–4221.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00253-013-5472-y CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. 66.
    Youssef N, Elshahed MS, McInerney MJ (2009) Microbial processes in oil fields: culprits, problems, and opportunities. In: Laskin AI, Sariaslani S, Gadd GM (eds) Advances in applied microbiology. Academic Press, Burlington, pp 141–251Google Scholar
  67. 67.
    Youssef N, Simpson DR, Duncan KE, McInerney MJ, Folmsbee M, Fincher T, Knapp RM (2007) In situ biosurfactant production by Bacillus strains injected into a limestone petroleum reservoir. Appl Environ microbiol 73:1239–1247CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. 68.
    Zhou J, Bruns MA, Tiedje JM (1996) DNA recovery from soils of diverse composition. Appl Environ Microbiol 62:316–322Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Thanachai Phetcharat
    • 1
  • Pinan Dawkrajai
    • 2
  • Thararat Chitov
    • 3
    • 5
  • Wuttichai Mhuantong
    • 4
  • Verawat Champreda
    • 4
  • Sakunnee Bovonsombut
    • 3
    • 5
    • 6
    Email author
  1. 1.Interdisciplinary Program in Biotechnology, Graduate SchoolChiang Mai UniversityChiang MaiThailand
  2. 2.Defence Energy DepartmentNorthern Petroleum Development CenterFangThailand
  3. 3.Division of Microbiology, Department of Biology, Faculty of ScienceChiang Mai UniversityChiang MaiThailand
  4. 4.Enzyme Technology LaboratoryThe National Center for Genetic Engineering and Biotechnology (BIOTEC)Pathum ThaniThailand
  5. 5.Environmental Science Research Center (ESRC)Chiang Mai UniversityChiang MaiThailand
  6. 6.Department of Biology, Faculty of ScienceChiang Mai UniversityChiang MaiThailand

Personalised recommendations