Various Phyllosphere and Soil Bacterial Communities of Natural Grasses and the Impact Factors in a Copper Tailings Dam
Copper mining caused severe damage to the ecological environment of mining areas. The combination of microbe and plant remediation has an application potential in improving the absorption and transformation efficiency of heavy metals. The phyllosphere is the largest biointerface on the planet, and bacteria are the dominant microbial inhabitants of the phyllosphere, believed to be critical to plant growth and health. This study investigated the phyllospheric and soil bacteria communities using high-throughput sequencing, and endophyte infection statuses of four natural grasses by toluidine blue heparin assay. Results showed variation in phyllospheric bacterial community structure. Gammaproteobacteria were the most abundant bacterial population. Bacilli were found in the phyllosphere of Bothriochloa ischaemum and Imperata cylindrica, while Clostridia were only found in Calamagrostis epigejos. Alphaproteobacteria were the dominant bacteria in soil. In addition, bacterial communities were influenced by endophytic infection statuses. Oxalobacteraceae was associated with soil carbon and sulfur. Enterobacteriaceae had negative correlation with the ratio of soil carbon and nitrogen, and had positive correlation with Cd content. These results offer useful insights into phyllospheric bacterial community variance in four different natural grasses in a copper tailings dam.
This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China under Grant No. 31600308, Shanxi Scholarship Council of China under Grant No. 2016-006, and Shanxi Province Science Foundation for Youths under Grant No. 201601D021101.
- 10.Hunter PJ, Hand P, Pink D, Whipps JM, Bending GD (2010) Both leaf properties and microbe-microbe interactions influence within-species variation in bacterial population diversity and structure in the lettuce (Lactuca species) phyllosphere. Appl Environ Microbiol 76(24):8117–8125CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 12.Ikeda S, Tokida T, Nakamura H, Sakai H, Usui Y, Okubo T et al (2015) Characterization of leaf blade- and leaf sheath-associated bacterial communities and assessment of their responses to environmental changes in CO2, temperature, and nitrogen levels under field conditions. Microbes Environ 30(1):51–62CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 14.Jennifera R, Samuel O (2010) Non-native grass alters growth of native tree species via leaf and soil microbes. J Ecol 97(2):247–255Google Scholar
- 23.Osono T (2014) Diversity and ecology of endophytic and epiphytic fungi of tree leaves in Japan: a review. Springer, New Delhi, pp 3–26Google Scholar
- 33.Schulthess FM, Faeth SH (1998) Distribution, abundances, and associations of the endophytic fungal community of Arizona fescue (Festuca arizonica) 90(4):569–578Google Scholar
- 36.Wang R, Jia T, Cao M, Chai B (2018) Characteristics of soil physicochemical properties and enzyme activities over different characteristics of soil physicochemical properties and enzyme activities over different reclaimed years in a copper tailings dam. Environ Sci 39(07):3339–3348Google Scholar
- 41.Zhang W, Xu J, Zhang T (2005) Advancement on soil fungal research. J Fungal Res 3:56–62Google Scholar