Dose-dense paclitaxel/carboplatin as neo-adjuvant chemotherapy followed by radical surgery in locally advanced cervical cancer: a prospective phase II study
The role of dose-dense schedules in the neo-adjuvant treatment (NACT) of locally advanced cervical cancer (LACC) has been reported. This phase II study investigated activity of dose-dense paclitaxel/platinum before radical surgery (RS) in LACC patients.
The primary end-point was the rate of optimal pathological response (OPR: pathological complete/microscopic response). NACT (paclitaxel: 80 mg/m2) and carboplatin (AUC 2) were administered for 6 weeks. Overall response rate (ORR) to NACT was assessed by the RECIST criteria. Patients amenable to surgery were triaged to RS. The null hypothesis was that the OPR rate would improve from 30.0 to 45.0% (α error: 0.05, β error: 0.2). The regimen would be considered active if > 25 OPRs were found.
36 patients were enrolled; 19 patients were stage IIB (52.8%) and 16 (44.4%) patients had pelvic lymph-node involvement at imaging. All patients completed neo-adjuvant chemotherapy; ORR was of 75.0%. RS was performed in 29 (93.5%) patients. Since the OPR was 16.1%, we evaluated the real chances to achieve the number of OPR required by the Simon design and decided to close the study. Grade 3/4 hematological toxicity occurred in 5 patients; surgical morbidity occurred in 14 patients. The 2-year PFS rate was 69.0%.
Dose-dense neo-adjuvant paclitaxel/carboplatin is feasible and safe in LACC patients; however, failure to achieve the primary end-point has to be recognized. Given the heterogeneity of the available studies, robust data from an adequately sized prospective study focused on more homogeneous series are required.
KeywordsLocally advanced cervical cancer Neo-adjuvant chemotherapy Dose density Radical hysterectomy Personalized medicine
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
The authors report no conflicts of interest. The authors are responsible for the content and writing of the paper.
- 2.Chemoradiotherapy for Cervical Cancer Meta-analysis Collaboration (CCCMAC) (2010) Reducing uncertainties about the effect of chemoradiotherapy for cervical cancer: individual patients data meta-analysis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 1:CD008285Google Scholar
- 6.Buda A, Fossati R, Colombo N et al (2005) Randomized trial of neoadjuvant chemotherapy comparing paclitaxel, fosfamide, and cisplatin with ifosfamide and cisplatin followed by radical surgery in patients with locally advanced squamous cell cervical carcinoma: the SNAP01 (Studio Neo-Adjuvante Portio) Italian Collaborative Study. J Clin Oncol 23(18):4137–4145CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 7.Lissoni AA, Colombo N, Pellegrino A et al (2009) A phase II, randomized trial of neo-adjuvant chemotherapy comparing a three-drug combination of paclitaxel, ifosfamide, and cisplatin (TIP) versus paclitaxel and cisplatin (TP) followed by radical surgery in patients with locally advanced squamous cell cervical carcinoma: the Snap-02 Italian Collaborative Study. Ann Oncol 20(4):660–665CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 9.Kokka F, Bryant A, Brockbank E et al (2015) Hysterectomy with radiotherapy or chemotherapy or both for women with locally advanced cervical cancer. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 4:CD010260Google Scholar
- 10.Gupta S, Maheshwari A, Parab P et al (2018) Neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by radical surgery versus concomitant chemotherapy and radiotherapy in patients with stage IB2, IIA, or IIB squamous cervical cancer: a randomized controlled trial. J Clin Oncol 36(16):1548–1555CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 14.Seidman AD, Berry D, Cirrincione C et al (2008) Randomized phase III trial of weekly compared with every-3-weeks paclitaxel for metastatic breast cancer, with trastuzumab for all HER-2 overexpressors and random assignment to trastuzumab or not in HER-2 nonoverexpressors: final results of Cancer and Leukemia Group B protocol 9840. J Clin Oncol 26:1642–1649CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 19.Vergote I, Debruyne P, Kridelka F et al (2015) Phase II study of weekly paclitaxel/carboplatin in combination with prophylactic G-CSF in the treatment of gynecologic cancers: a study in 108 patients by the Belgian Gynaecological Oncology Group. Gynecol Oncol 138(2):278–284CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 28.Therasse P, Arbuck SG, Eisenhauer EA et al (2000) New guidelines to evaluate the response to treatment in solid tumors. European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer, National Cancer Institute of the United States, National Cancer Institute of Canada. J Natl Cancer Inst 92(3):205–216CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 34.Clamp AR, McNeish I, Dean A et al (2017) ICON8: a GCIG phase III randomised trial evaluating weekly dose-dense chemotherapy integration in first-line epithelial ovarian/fallopian tube/primary peritoneal carcinoma (EOC) treatment: results of primary progression-free survival (PFS) analysis. Ann Oncol 28(suppl_5):v605–v649CrossRefGoogle Scholar