Advertisement

Relationships between differences in the number of fiber bundles of the anterior talofibular ligament and differences in the angle of the calcaneofibular ligament and their effects on ankle-braking function

  • Mutsuaki EdamaEmail author
  • Tomoya Takabayashi
  • Takuma Inai
  • Takanori Kikumoto
  • Wataru Ito
  • Emi Nakamura
  • Ryo Hirabayashi
  • Masahiro Ikezu
  • Fumiya Kaneko
  • Ikuo Kageyama
Original Article
  • 14 Downloads

Abstract

Purpose

The aim was to clarify the relationships between differences in the number of fiber bundles of the anterior talofibular ligament (ATFL) and differences in the angle of the calcaneofibular ligament (CFL) with respect to the long axis of the fibula and their effects on ankle braking function.

Methods

The study sample included 110 Japanese cadavers. ATFLs were categorized as: Type I with one fiber bundle; Type II with two fiber bundles with incomplete separation and complete separation; and Type III with three fiber bundles. The CFLs were categorized according to the angles of the CFLs with respect to the long axis of the fibula and the number of fiber bundles. Six categories were established: CFL10° (angle of the CFL with respect to the long axis of the fibula from 10° to 19°); CFL20° (range 20°–29°); CFL30° (range 30°–39°); CFL40° (range 40°–49°); CFL50° (range 50°–59°); and CFL2 (CFLs with two crossing fiber bundles).

Results

ATFL was Type I in 34 legs (31%), Type II in 66 legs (60%), and Type III in 10 legs (9%). Five CFL categories were identified: CFL10° in 4 feet (3.7%); CFL20° in 23 feet (20.9%); CFL30° in 34 feet (30.9%); CFL40° in 33 feet (30%); CFL50° in 15 feet (13.6%); and CFL2 in one foot (0.9%). Type III contained mainly CFL40° and CFL50° (7 of 10 feet).

Conclusions

ATFL and CFL appear to cooperate in the ankle joint braking function.

Keywords

Lateral ankle ligament injury Ankle inversion restriction Lateral ankle ligament complex 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to acknowledge and thank those anonymous individuals who generously donated their bodies so that this study could be performed. This study was supported by a Research Activity Young B Grant (17K13072) from the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (JSPS) and a Grant-in-Aid program from Niigata University of Health and Welfare (H30B05).

Author contributions

ME and TT contributed to study design and data collection, and drafted the manuscript; TI and TK contributed to data analysis and made critical revisions to the manuscript; WI, EN, RH, MI, and FK made critical revisions to the manuscript; IK supervised the study, contributed to analysis and interpretation of data, and made critical revisions to the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript prior to submission.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

The methods were carried out in accordance with the 1964 Declaration of Helsinki, and the cadavers were legally donated for the research by the Nippon Dental University of Life Dentistry at Niigata in Japan.

Informed consent

Informed consent was obtained from the families of all subjects.

Availability of data and material

The data sets generated during and/or analysed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

References

  1. 1.
    Bruns J, Rehder U (1993) Ligament kinematics of the ankle joint. An experimental study. Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb 131:363–369CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Burks RT, Morgan J (1994) Anatomy of the lateral ankle ligaments. Am J Sports Med 22:72–77CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Clanton TO, Campbell KJ, Wilson KJ, Michalski MP, Goldsmith MT, Wijdicks CA et al (2014) Qualitative and quantitative anatomic investigation of the lateral ankle ligaments for surgical reconstruction procedures. J Bone Jt Surg Am 96:e98CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Delfaut EM, Demondion X, Boutry N, Cotten H, Mestdagh H, Cotten A (2003) Multi-fasciculated anterior talo-fibular ligament: reassessment of normal findings. Eur Radiol 13:1836–1842CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Edama M, Kageyama I, Kikumoto T, Nakamura M, Ito W, Nakamura E et al (2017) The effects on calcaneofibular ligament function of differences in the angle of the calcaneofibular ligament with respect to the long axis of the fibula: a simulation study. J Foot Ankle Res 10:60CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Edama M, Kageyama I, Kikumoto T, Nakamura M, Ito W, Hirabayashi R et al (2018) Morphological features of the anterior talofibular ligament by the number of fiber bundles. Ann Anat 216:69–74CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Edama M, Kubo M, Onishi H, Takabayashi T, Inai T, Yokoyama E et al (2015) The twisted structure of the human Achilles tendon. Scand J Med Sci Sports 25:e497–503CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Edama M, Kubo M, Onishi H, Takabayashi T, Yokoyama E, Inai T et al (2016) Anatomical study of toe flexion by flexor hallucis longus. Ann Anat 204:80–85CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Edama M, Takabayashi T, Inai T, Kikumoto T, Ito W, Nakamura E et al (2019) The effect of differences in the number of fiber bundles of the anterior tibial ligament on ankle braking function: a simulation study. Surg Radiol Anat 41:69–73CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Fong DT, Hong Y, Chan LK, Yung PS, Chan KM (2007) A systematic review on ankle injury and ankle sprain in sports. Sports Med 37:73–94CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Grond JT (1973) The surgical treatment of injuries of the fibular collateral ligaments of the ankle. Arch Chir Neerl 25:131–136Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Kitsoulis P, Marini A, Pseftinakou A, Iliou K, Galani V, Paraskevas G (2011) Morphological study of the calcaneofibular ligament in cadavers. Folia Morphol (Warsz) 70:180–184Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Leardini A, O'Connor JJ, Catani F, Giannini S (1999) Kinematics of the human ankle complex in passive flexion; a single degree of freedom system. J Biomech 32:111–118CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Leardini A, O'Connor JJ, Catani F, Giannini S (2000) The role of the passive structures in the mobility and stability of the human ankle joint: a literature review. Foot Ankle Int 21:602–615CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Matsui K, Takao M, Tochigi Y, Ozeki S, Glazebrook M (2017) Anatomy of anterior talofibular ligament and calcaneofibular ligament for minimally invasive surgery: a systematic review. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 25:1892–1902CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Milner CE, Soames RW (1997) Anatomical variations of the anterior talofibular ligament of the human ankle joint. J Anat 191(Pt 3):457–458CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Neuschwander TB, Indresano AA, Hughes TH, Smith BW (2013) Footprint of the lateral ligament complex of the ankle. Foot Ankle Int 34:582–586CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Ozeki S, Kitaoka H, Uchiyama E, Luo ZP, Kaufman K, An KN (2006) Ankle ligament tensile forces at the end points of passive circumferential rotating motion of the ankle and subtalar joint complex. Foot Ankle Int 27:965–969CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Ozeki S, Yasuda K, Kaneda K, Yamakoshi K, Yamanoi T (2002) Simultaneous strain measurement with determination of a zero strain reference for the medial and lateral ligaments of the ankle. Foot Ankle Int 23:825–832CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Raheem OA, O'Brien M (2011) Anatomical review of the lateral collateral ligaments of the ankle: a cadaveric study. Anat Sci Int 86:189–193CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Sarrafian SK (1987) Functional characteristics of the foot and plantar aponeurosis under tibiotalar loading. Foot Ankle 8:4–18CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Sitler M, Ryan J, Wheeler B, Mcbride J, Arciero R, Anderson J et al (1994) The efficacy of a semirigid ankle stabilizer to reduce acute ankle injuries in basketball. A randomized clinical study at West Point. Am J Sports Med 22:454–461CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Taser F, Shafiq Q, Ebraheim NA (2006) Anatomy of lateral ankle ligaments and their relationship to bony landmarks. Surg Radiol Anat 28:391–397CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Ugurlu M, Bozkurt M, Demirkale I, Comert A, Acar HI, Tekdemir I (2010) Anatomy of the lateral complex of the ankle joint in relation to peroneal tendons, distal fibula and talus: a cadaveric study. Eklem Hastalik Cerrahisi 21:153–158Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Van Den Bekerom MP, Oostra RJ, Golano P, Van Dijk CN (2008) The anatomy in relation to injury of the lateral collateral ligaments of the ankle: a current concepts review. Clin Anat 21:619–626CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Wenny R, Duscher D, Meytap E, Weninger P, Hirtler L (2015) Dimensions and attachments of the ankle ligaments: evaluation for ligament reconstruction. Anat Sci Int 90:161–171CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Woods C, Hawkins R, Hulse M, Hodson A (2003) The Football Association Medical Research Programme: an audit of injuries in professional football: an analysis of ankle sprains. Br J Sports Med 37:233–238CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Yildiz S, Yalcin B (2013) The anterior talofibular and calcaneofibular ligaments: an anatomic study. Surg Radiol Anat 35:511–516CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag France SAS, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Mutsuaki Edama
    • 1
    • 2
    Email author
  • Tomoya Takabayashi
    • 1
  • Takuma Inai
    • 1
  • Takanori Kikumoto
    • 1
  • Wataru Ito
    • 1
  • Emi Nakamura
    • 1
  • Ryo Hirabayashi
    • 1
  • Masahiro Ikezu
    • 1
  • Fumiya Kaneko
    • 1
  • Ikuo Kageyama
    • 2
  1. 1.Institute for Human Movement and Medical SciencesNiigata University of Health and WelfareNiigataJapan
  2. 2.Department of Anatomy, School of Life Dentistry at NiigataNippon Dental UniversityNiigataJapan

Personalised recommendations